Just a suggestion. Why not put up such projects on Meta/
Keeping them on the English wikipedia brings about a misconception that it
is restricted to English.
P.S: I've been told that the words 'Indic' and 'Vernacular' are derogatory.
Let's say Indian languages shall we?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12
2012/11/13 Srikanth Ramakrishnan :
> P.S: I've been told that the words 'Indic' and 'Vernacular' are derogatory.
Citation needed. I hope not to derail this thread, but AFAIK there's
nothing derogatory in these words. I don't even know why do you
mention "vernacular", which didn't appear in the ema
Amir,
I was merely told by someone. I was told that both words were derogatory
[at the same time, hence I mentioned both].
If you wish to discuss this further, we can take it offlist.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> 2012/11/13 Srikanth Ra
2012/11/13 Srikanth Ramakrishnan :
> Amir,
> I was merely told by someone. I was told that both words were derogatory [at
> the same time, hence I mentioned both].
> If you wish to discuss this further, we can take it offlist.
If he didn't explain it, then you can presume that it's wrong. There's
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> If he didn't explain it, then you can presume that it's wrong. There's
> nothing to discuss, and there's nothing wrong with saying "Indic
> languages".
>
The word "Indic" refers generally to the Indo-Aryan f
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 09:31 AM, Anirudh Bhati wrote:
The word "Indic" refers generally to the Indo-Aryan family of
languages, which does not include Dravidian languages prevalent in
Southern India.
[citation needed]
Then Why don't they just called Indic language, other than Indo-Arya
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2012/11/14 Anirudh Bhati :
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Amir E. Aharoni
> wrote:
>>
>> If he didn't explain it, then you can presume that it's w
> The word "Indic" refers generally to the Indo-Aryan family of languages,
> which does not include Dravidian languages prevalent in Southern India.
> Hence, bunching the entire system of Dravidian languages together with the
> Indo-Aryan languages in India may seem derogatory to some, and reasona
I don't know which dictionary this is. Merriam-Webster says that it can be
both:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indic
"Indic" is very common in discussion of computing in the languages of India
and its neighboring countries, all of which face similar challenges.
There's nothing derogato
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Anirudh Bhati wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Amir E. Aharoni
> wrote:
>>
>> If he didn't explain it, then you can presume that it's wrong. There's
>> nothing to discuss, and there's nothing wrong with saying "Indic
>> languages".
>
>
> The word "Indic"
My email was not directed at anyone personally. It was simply a response
to the observation Srikanth made and from what I glanced from Wikipedia
articles.[1] In the context of linguistics, you will be hard-pressed to
find reliable sources that refer to Indic languages as a generic term for
all of
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Anivar Aravind wrote:
> factually incorrect .
> Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmic_scripts
>
The article you refer to lacks proper citations.
___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
2012/11/14 Anirudh Bhati :
> The word 'Indic' itself is a derivative of the word "Hindus" or "Indus"
> referring to the Indus Valley Civilization, which did not stretch as far as
> Deccan India where the Dravidian family of languages have been prevalent.
> The distinction between the Indic language
13 matches
Mail list logo