Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] India map and indian laws

2011-02-15 Thread Arun Ganesh
As someone who created many of the Indian maps on wikipedia, this is a
serious issue which needs a decision as it has been in the gray for quite a
while. I have stopped my contribution of Indian maps ever since i realized
that my work could have legal repercussions. For now, all the maps come with
an explanation of the depiction of the borders and a disclaimer that it may
not conform to local laws.

Specimen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:India_map_blank.svg

This is an issue which requires someone with sound legal knowledge to solve,
something for the chapter to take up. Let us not forget that we are creating
a repository of knowledge, if wikipedia ever hid the truth for the sake of
being politically correct, the whole project is pointless.

-- 
j.mp/ArunGanesh
___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l


Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] India map and indian laws

2011-02-15 Thread Nikhil Sheth
The root of this problem is very similar to the Section 377 case (refer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_377_of_the_Indian_Penal_Code)

The laws and attitudes in place regarding this case are ancient and in
present circumstances, wrong. They do the country more harm than good. Going
by these laws, even something as beneficial as a GPS locator that can save
lives of lost travelers and disaster victims, can be deemed illegal. Hence,
if we use common sense, we can conclude that these laws are in fact illegal
and detrimental to India and its citizens. Maybe a more precise and updated
form would be correct, but presently it's in the wrong.

Just my opinion: falsified representation of areas as belonging to India
when they're not really in Indian control, can be interpreted as lying to
the people and grand treason. I would see it as equivalent to lying about
the country's GDP or poverty figures just to pretend being in the clear. If
we cannot accept one then why accept the other? If Indians were shown the
reality, we might just empower the coming generation to do something about
it and they might actually live to see these areas return back to Indian
control one day. By consistently being ignorant of it for decades, the
previous generation has lost that opportunity.

So I think the answer is easy and simple - it will be implementation that I
guess can be a little humbling. I think the best message that Indian
wikipedians can give right now is passive non-co-operation : remove all the
maps of our country from Wikipedia that come under question and make it
known to all that we will rather go map-less than lie to our fellow citizens
or to the world.


Cheers,
Nikhil Sheth
+91-966-583-1250
Pune, India
Teach For India http://www.teachforindia.org/ Fellow, 2011-13
www.nikhilsheth.tk
Find me on: Twitter http://twitter.com/nikhiljs |
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/nikjs|
LinkedIn http://in.linkedin.com/in/nikhiljs | Google
http://www.google.com/profiles/nikhil.js|
RangDehttp://www.rangde.org/investor/nikhilsheth
Join me on: Pune Documentary
Clubhttp://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=138497769525636| Let's
Do it Pune http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lets-do-it-Pune/103857326346659 |
Toastmasters in
Punehttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Toastmasters-in-Pune/148767611833746|
Wikipedia
For Schools 
projecthttp://education.wikia.com/wiki/Wikipedia_For_Schools_Offline_Edition

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Gautam John gau...@prathambooks.orgwrote:

 This isn't an easy question to answer:

 There is the National Map Policy and the Guidelines:

 http://www.surveyofindia.gov.in/tenders/National Map Policy.htm

 Which states:

 Export of all maps/digital data in 1: 250K and larger scales through
 any means is prohibited vide Ministry of Finance (Department of
 Revenue) Notification No. 118-Cus./F.No.21/ 5/62-Cus. I/VIII dt. 4th
 May 1963. Digital Topograhical data will be licensed to only Indian
 individuals, organisations, firms or companies.

 However, I do not know if this means maps/digital data built upon SoI
 maps or *any* maps so created or what the definition of export it. My
 reading, OSM/Google Map Creator et. al. might violate this where the
 resolution is 1: 250K and larger. If I understand correctly, most
 maps on Wikipedia about India should be okay. Or where the map is
 created outside of India.

 And this is problem number 1.

 Then there is this:

 In addition, the SOI is currently preparing City Maps. These City
 Maps will be on large scales in WGS-84 datum and in public domain. The
 contents of such maps will be decided by the SOI in consultation with
 Ministry of Defence.

 No idea what they mean by public domain and this is problem 2.

 http://www.surveyofindia.gov.in/instructions.html#LEGAL

 Which is just rather difficult to parse. AFAIK, it is illegal to
 *show* a map, in India, that does not conform to the SoI principles.

 One option - show more than one map, which is purely a risk mitigation
 exercise. Or, show one map to those coming from Indian IPs - I don't
 even know if this is possible. Third, lobby for a change of rules
 which is unlikely in the short term.

 More when I learn something new.

 Thank you.

 Best,

 Gautam
 
 http://social.prathambooks.org/

 ___
 Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
 Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l


Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] India map and indian laws

2011-02-15 Thread BalaSundaraRaman
Hi Arun,

I agree that this is a very serious issue. We should contact the foundation's 
legal counsel for suitable action as the foundation typically handles 
content-issues, particularly ones that involve a question of legality. Chapters 
shouldn't be mistaken as being responsible for the content on wikipedia (you'd 
know this already, but writing this in general).

- Sundar
 That language is an instrument of human reason, and not merely a medium for 
the expression of thought, is a truth generally admitted.
- George Boole, quoted in Iverson's Turing Award Lecture



From: Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia India list wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tue, February 15, 2011 2:57:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] India map and indian laws


As someone who created many of the Indian maps on wikipedia, this is a serious 
issue which needs a decision as it has been in the gray for quite a while. I 
have stopped my contribution of Indian maps ever since i realized that my work 
could have legal repercussions. For now, all the maps come with an explanation 
of the depiction of the borders and a disclaimer that it may not conform to 
local laws. 


Specimen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:India_map_blank.svg



This is an issue which requires someone with sound legal knowledge to solve, 
something for the chapter to take up. Let us not forget that we are creating a 
repository of knowledge, if wikipedia ever hid the truth for the sake of being 
politically correct, the whole project is pointless.

-- 
j.mp/ArunGanesh
___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l


Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] India map and indian laws

2011-02-15 Thread Ragib Hasan
I believe there are two separate issues here:

1. Should Wikipedia have maps or any content that is not liked by
Govt. of X country or the people of Y country?

2. Should individual Indian Wikipedians or the WM India chapter be
held responsible for any content on Wikipedia?

The first one is straightforward ... to preserve WP:N, wikipedia
should NOT cater to the viewpoints of any particular govt. (Note that,
the maps in question actually are WP:N in the sense that they show the
status quo as well as the territorial claims of different nations.)

The second question is complex, and perhaps WM India officials should
clarify this in media as well as with govt ... the chapter and
Wikipedia are separate, and the chapter does not dictate nor is
responsible for any wikipedia content. I believe that German wikipedia
has a similar issue regarding the display of some nazi symbols (which
is illegal in Germany). It may be useful to see what they did to
handle this.

Finally, forcing Wikipedia to conform to a particular Govt. or
national viewpoint just because the foundation has an office in that
country, is an affront to Wikipedia's core principle: WP:N.


Ragib


On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:56 AM, BalaSundaraRaman
sundarbe...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi Arun,
 I agree that this is a very serious issue. We should contact the
 foundation's legal counsel for suitable action as the foundation typically
 handles content-issues, particularly ones that involve a question of
 legality. Chapters shouldn't be mistaken as being responsible for the
 content on wikipedia (you'd know this already, but writing this in general).
 - Sundar

 That language is an instrument of human reason, and not merely a medium for
 the expression of thought, is a truth generally admitted.
 - George Boole, quoted in Iverson's Turing Award Lecture

 From: Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.com
 To: Wikimedia India list wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Sent: Tue, February 15, 2011 2:57:13 PM
 Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] India map and indian laws

 As someone who created many of the Indian maps on wikipedia, this is a
 serious issue which needs a decision as it has been in the gray for quite a
 while. I have stopped my contribution of Indian maps ever since i realized
 that my work could have legal repercussions. For now, all the maps come with
 an explanation of the depiction of the borders and a disclaimer that it may
 not conform to local laws.
 Specimen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:India_map_blank.svg

 This is an issue which requires someone with sound legal knowledge to solve,
 something for the chapter to take up. Let us not forget that we are creating
 a repository of knowledge, if wikipedia ever hid the truth for the sake of
 being politically correct, the whole project is pointless.
 --
 j.mp/ArunGanesh

 ___
 Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
 Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l



___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l


Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] India map and indian laws

2011-02-15 Thread Ragib Hasan
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Gautam John gau...@prathambooks.org wrote:
 On 15 February 2011 23:57, Ragib Hasan ragibha...@gmail.com wrote:

 responsible for any wikipedia content. I believe that German wikipedia
 has a similar issue regarding the display of some nazi symbols (which
 is illegal in Germany). It may be useful to see what they did to
 handle this.

 Indeed. Thanks for this pointer, Ragib. Would you know of other such
 instances please?

 Thank you.

 Best,

 Gautam


I'm not sure, but I assume the Turkish wiki should have similar issues
related to the Armenian genocide?

Note though that the two examples are slightly different from this
thread's issue. Each of these were regional language wikipedias
catering to the specific country.

--

Ragib

___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l


Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] India map and indian laws

2011-02-14 Thread Sudhanwa Jogalekar
Hi,

A simpler technical solution will be to show the map that is correct
in the India context for all the IP addresses originating from India
and for all other IPs, the current one ( I think that is the one
recognised by UN)

This should give a right solution to all the users.
Additionally, on all the pages where India map is presented, entries
for both the maps should be given mentioning the context and the
disputes.

-Sudhanwa


On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Bala Jeyaraman sodabot...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 There is a discussion going on at
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:India#Map

 about compliance to indian laws about representation of India in maps.
 According to Indian law it is illegal to show a map that differs from the
 official map (which includes, Pakistan controlled Kashmir and the Aksai
 Chin).  An editor has raised the concern that using the current map (which
 shows only areas administered and not areas claimed) is exposing Indian
 editors to legal liabilities and prosecution.

 Since the Indian govt has successfully forced organisations like Google and
 National geographic to show the official map previously and now the
 foundation has plans for an India office, shouldn't this issue be considered
 seriously? Should we contacting the foundation legal office about this?

 regards
 Bala

 ___
 Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
 Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l





-- 

~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!
www.projects4students.com

___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l


Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] India map and indian laws

2011-02-14 Thread Swaroop Rao
I think that such a measure would only complicate matters, and would present
the wrong information to the Indian user.

Swaroop G Rao


On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 19:02, Sudhanwa Jogalekar sudhanwa@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 A simpler technical solution will be to show the map that is correct
 in the India context for all the IP addresses originating from India
 and for all other IPs, the current one ( I think that is the one
 recognised by UN)

 This should give a right solution to all the users.
 Additionally, on all the pages where India map is presented, entries
 for both the maps should be given mentioning the context and the
 disputes.

 -Sudhanwa


 On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Bala Jeyaraman sodabot...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  There is a discussion going on at
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:India#Map
 
  about compliance to indian laws about representation of India in maps.
  According to Indian law it is illegal to show a map that differs from the
  official map (which includes, Pakistan controlled Kashmir and the Aksai
  Chin).  An editor has raised the concern that using the current map
 (which
  shows only areas administered and not areas claimed) is exposing Indian
  editors to legal liabilities and prosecution.
 
  Since the Indian govt has successfully forced organisations like Google
 and
  National geographic to show the official map previously and now the
  foundation has plans for an India office, shouldn't this issue be
 considered
  seriously? Should we contacting the foundation legal office about this?
 
  regards
  Bala
 
  ___
  Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
  Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
 
 



 --

 ~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!
 www.projects4students.com

 ___
 Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
 Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

___
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l