I don't think wordsmithing a boilerplate email footer to solve a
hypothetical problem is really a worthwhile use of staff and trustee time.
Dan
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 11:35, Fæ wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 15:26, Michael Maggs wrote:
> >
> > The disclaimer has been carefully worded and is
If you'd like someone who's involved in the product and strategy side of
tech to help out in a working group, committee, or whatever else, let me
know. I'd be happy to help.
Dan
On 5 June 2015 at 06:38, Michael Maggs mich...@maggs.name wrote:
Wikimedia UK needs your help. We want to transform
Although note that I live on the west coast of the US, so travelling to
anywhere in the UK or doing anything before 5pm UK time might not be my
strength. ;-)
Dan
On 6 June 2015 at 05:46, Dan Garry (Deskana) djgw...@gmail.com wrote:
If you'd like someone who's involved in the product
On 23 November 2014 at 10:21, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
On 18 November 2014 at 19:13, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
In fairness copyright is a pretty blameless error for new editors
And so is CoI/ autobiography - many good editors, including some on
this list (not least
Jon,
I'm saddened to see you go. Thank you for everything you've done for
Wikimedia UK. Best of luck in your future ventures!
Dan
On 11 November 2014 00:48, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
With some sadness I have to tell you that I will be leaving Wikimedia UK,
as an employee,
Creating a set of moderation guidelines to cover the few people on
moderation on this list is not really an efficient use of my time. I would
imagine most people feel the same way.
Dan
On 24 July 2014 10:57, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
You're on moderation because you have (a)
If someone makes a mistake when putting content into the new website, then
that mistake will remain for longer as volunteers won't be able to fix it.
On the other hand, a wiki isn't a great primary website for an
organisation, and WMUK should gain a lot from having a website that's
easier to
