comment seems to have been deleted? doesnt show at the bottom and this _was_
the link:
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/talkback/0,101161,39616171-39001105c-20100584o,00.htm
regards
mark
2009/2/20 Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.com
2009/2/20 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
2009/2/20 Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.com:
2009/2/20 Mark (Markie) newsmar...@googlemail.com
comment seems to have been deleted? doesnt show at the bottom and this
_was_ the link:
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/talkback/0,101161,39616171-39001105c-20100584o,00.htm
Strange. David did you
2009/2/20 Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.com:
Oh dear. Well, mind posting what you wrote here? I read it, but closed the
tab...
I didn't save it myself! I've left another comment asking WTF happened
to the first one and asking if they want to phone me for verification.
- d.
2009/2/20 geni geni...@gmail.com:
They probably do it's just there are rather a lot of ways out there of
organising your website and they didn't immediately pick up on which
one wikipedia uses.
You mean they didn't right click on the image and click properties?
That seems pretty incompetent to
2009/2/20 geni geni...@gmail.com:
2009/2/20 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
2009/2/20 geni geni...@gmail.com:
They probably do it's just there are rather a lot of ways out there of
organising your website and they didn't immediately pick up on which
one wikipedia uses.
You mean they
2009/2/20 geni geni...@gmail.com:
2009/2/20 Brian McNeil brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org:
I have not, and would not, actively seek out child pornography. However, I
have a clue about how the modern Internet works. Any semi-intelligent
publisher of child pornography is going to use things like
2009/2/20 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/2/20 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
Many of the problems are with that list. The list contains html pages,
not images (at least, not exclusively), and not even the right html
pages (they never blocked the [[Image:...]] page). If the
