2009/2/20 geni <geni...@gmail.com>: > 2009/2/20 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>: >> 2009/2/20 geni <geni...@gmail.com>: >>> They probably do it's just there are rather a lot of ways out there of >>> organising your website and they didn't immediately pick up on which >>> one wikipedia uses. >> >> You mean they didn't right click on the image and click "properties"? >> That seems pretty incompetent to me... > > Wouldn't work. That for example would block > http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/33/Virgin_Killer.jpg/200px-Virgin_Killer.jpg > but not http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/33/Virgin_Killer.jpg. > > Given that this is wikipedia there is also no particular reason to > expect the image to stay in the same place.
True, but they didn't even do that, as I understand it. They should at least be blocking the image that is actually used on the page. I can't see any reason for them to be blocking non-image files at all, why block the html file when the only infringement is the image? _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org