2009/2/20 geni <geni...@gmail.com>:
> 2009/2/20 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>:
>> 2009/2/20 geni <geni...@gmail.com>:
>>> They probably do it's just there are rather a lot of ways out there of
>>> organising your website and they didn't immediately pick up on which
>>> one wikipedia uses.
>> You mean they didn't right click on the image and click "properties"?
>> That seems pretty incompetent to me...
> Wouldn't work. That for example would block
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/33/Virgin_Killer.jpg/200px-Virgin_Killer.jpg
> but not http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/33/Virgin_Killer.jpg.
> Given that this is wikipedia there is also no particular reason to
> expect the image to stay in the same place.

True, but they didn't even do that, as I understand it. They should at
least be blocking the image that is actually used on the page. I can't
see any reason for them to be blocking non-image files at all, why
block the html file when the only infringement is the image?

Wikimedia UK mailing list
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to