Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Wlm2013-l] Lists of UK listed buildings

2013-06-20 Thread WereSpielChequers
Nice work, but as the WLM images will be going onto Coommons you also need
a column for the relevant commons category,  otherwise how are you going to
correctly categorise the uploaded images?

Jonathan

On 19 June 2013 19:41, Katie Chan katie.c...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:

 No, splitting it into multiple lists as it exist now are perfectly fine.


 On 19 June 2013 17:42, Rod Ward r...@rodspace.co.uk wrote:

 Hi Katie,

 ** **

 Thanks – I guess I will be going through the Somerset ones when I get
 some time.

 ** **

 Does it matter that a county (ie Somerset) has too many entries to fit on
 one list?

 ** **

 Rod

 ** **

 *From:* Katie Chan [mailto:katie.c...@wikimedia.org.uk]
 *Sent:* 19 June 2013 17:21
 *To:* Rod Ward
 *Cc:* WLM 2013 UK mailing list; Wikimediauk-l
 *Subject:* Re: [Wlm2013-l] Lists of UK listed buildings

 ** **

 Unless as a research project, someone go through every entries to see
 what each particular listing covers and count manually, no one have the
 answer to how many independent buildings or structures are listed. That's
 why the heritage organisations talks about listed building entries instead,
 which is also how I counted Scotland, Wales  Northern Ireland.

 ** **

 The template for England is particular crude and in need of improvement.
 The headers are chosen based on what headers are on the various existing
 lists so that changing to templates don't lose us any existing information.
 Some of the headers, such as architect and date listed could probably do
 with being made optional. I'll see about doing that unless someone beat me
 to it. The UID (or HB number) field is essential for WLM as tagging an
 upload with that is how we know an upload on Commons is eligible for the
 competition so yes, that would need to be added. With the number, we can
 also link directly to each individual entries page on English Heritage
 (likewise for Scotland  Northern Ireland), instead of say Images of
 England or some other website. The templates don't actually currently have
 a separate column for references as I was having a little problem with
 making template variables work inside a ref tag. I guess the solution
 will be having to do it manually. Again, unless someone beat me to it, I'll
 add that sometime.

 ** **

 Katie

 ** **

 On 19 June 2013 16:12, Rod Ward r...@rodspace.co.uk wrote:

 Hi Katie,

  

 This looks as if you have done a tremendous amount of work.

  

 However I have some questions..

 When I created
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grade_I_listed_buildings_in_Somerset and
 its 7 sub lists I was asked “How many listed buildings are there” as part
 of various review processes -  even having studied all the source I can
 find for year I can mot answer that. In Bath whole streets (of 30-50
 buildings) can be under one listing and yet in other examples the house may
 be one listing, the walls several more and the fountain a listing on its
 own. Therefore what figure should be put in the first “number” column on
 the tracking table?

  

  

 If a list created some years ago (eg
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grade_I_listed_buildings_in_South_Somerset)
 has references for each one which use Images of England, and was completed
 before the National heritage list was available are you asking for an extra
 column to be added with the NHLE Unique ID number?

  

 Do we need to include columns for architect and date list?

  

 Rod

  

  

 *From:* wlm2013-l-boun...@wikimedia.org.uk [mailto:
 wlm2013-l-boun...@wikimedia.org.uk] *On Behalf Of *Katie Chan
 *Sent:* 19 June 2013 15:11
 *To:* WLM 2013 UK mailing list
 *Cc:* Wikimediauk-l
 *Subject:* [Wlm2013-l] Lists of UK listed buildings

  

 Hi all,

  

 One of the task that needs to be completed for WLM to happen is to have
 exhaustive lists of all eligible listed buildings on Wikipedia, using
 appropriately formed templates instead of wiki tables directly. To get
 everyone going, I have created the templates[1], which everyone is of
 course encouraged to improve.

  

 In terms of the actual lists themselves, I have created a tracking
 table[2] so that everyone can see where we are and where work needs to be
 done. All the columns should be fairly self explanatory, aside from the one
 on images which is intended to track when someone has searched through
 Commons  Wikipedia for existing images and added them to the respective
 list.

 Except for Wales, where lists didn't exist before, you can navigate to
 the existing lists from [3]. As you can see, I have made a start on at
 least one counties per countries so that everyone can see what I envisage
 them looking like[4]. You can find a copy of the source data for
 England[5], Wales[6], Scotland[7] and Northern Ireland[8] at the respective
 links provided. There's also PHP scripts for manipulation of
 geo-coordinates (latitude/longitude) to[9] and from[10] OS 

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Wlm2013-l] Lists of UK listed buildings

2013-06-20 Thread Roger Bamkin
Solid work Katie and this should establish a base. The data isnt perfect
but as least you have probably got the best available. Without that you
could have just been recreating what was already in a database somewhere.

Nice to see that English Heritage are revising their access rules. I guess
some wag would say that if they gave us permission we might be able to
improve the data and write it back for the common benefit (one day?). I
guess if the stuff gets geotagged then it might reveal where 3 walls of a
building, the entrance gates and a statue all have individual entries
whilst the mansion next door has only one. However the value of these
datasets are not in their precision but in the breadth.

Well done
R


On 20 June 2013 00:22, WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.comwrote:

 Nice work, but as the WLM images will be going onto Coommons you also need
 a column for the relevant commons category,  otherwise how are you going to
 correctly categorise the uploaded images?

 Jonathan

 On 19 June 2013 19:41, Katie Chan katie.c...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:

 No, splitting it into multiple lists as it exist now are perfectly fine.


 On 19 June 2013 17:42, Rod Ward r...@rodspace.co.uk wrote:

 Hi Katie,

 ** **

 Thanks – I guess I will be going through the Somerset ones when I get
 some time.

 ** **

 Does it matter that a county (ie Somerset) has too many entries to fit
 on one list?

 ** **

 Rod

 ** **

 *From:* Katie Chan [mailto:katie.c...@wikimedia.org.uk]
 *Sent:* 19 June 2013 17:21
 *To:* Rod Ward
 *Cc:* WLM 2013 UK mailing list; Wikimediauk-l
 *Subject:* Re: [Wlm2013-l] Lists of UK listed buildings

 ** **

 Unless as a research project, someone go through every entries to see
 what each particular listing covers and count manually, no one have the
 answer to how many independent buildings or structures are listed. That's
 why the heritage organisations talks about listed building entries instead,
 which is also how I counted Scotland, Wales  Northern Ireland.

 ** **

 The template for England is particular crude and in need of improvement.
 The headers are chosen based on what headers are on the various existing
 lists so that changing to templates don't lose us any existing information.
 Some of the headers, such as architect and date listed could probably do
 with being made optional. I'll see about doing that unless someone beat me
 to it. The UID (or HB number) field is essential for WLM as tagging an
 upload with that is how we know an upload on Commons is eligible for the
 competition so yes, that would need to be added. With the number, we can
 also link directly to each individual entries page on English Heritage
 (likewise for Scotland  Northern Ireland), instead of say Images of
 England or some other website. The templates don't actually currently have
 a separate column for references as I was having a little problem with
 making template variables work inside a ref tag. I guess the solution
 will be having to do it manually. Again, unless someone beat me to it, I'll
 add that sometime.

 ** **

 Katie

 ** **

 On 19 June 2013 16:12, Rod Ward r...@rodspace.co.uk wrote:

 Hi Katie,

  

 This looks as if you have done a tremendous amount of work.

  

 However I have some questions..

 When I created
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grade_I_listed_buildings_in_Somerset and
 its 7 sub lists I was asked “How many listed buildings are there” as part
 of various review processes -  even having studied all the source I can
 find for year I can mot answer that. In Bath whole streets (of 30-50
 buildings) can be under one listing and yet in other examples the house may
 be one listing, the walls several more and the fountain a listing on its
 own. Therefore what figure should be put in the first “number” column on
 the tracking table?

  

  

 If a list created some years ago (eg
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grade_I_listed_buildings_in_South_Somerset)
 has references for each one which use Images of England, and was completed
 before the National heritage list was available are you asking for an extra
 column to be added with the NHLE Unique ID number?

  

 Do we need to include columns for architect and date list?

  

 Rod

  

  

 *From:* wlm2013-l-boun...@wikimedia.org.uk [mailto:
 wlm2013-l-boun...@wikimedia.org.uk] *On Behalf Of *Katie Chan
 *Sent:* 19 June 2013 15:11
 *To:* WLM 2013 UK mailing list
 *Cc:* Wikimediauk-l
 *Subject:* [Wlm2013-l] Lists of UK listed buildings

  

 Hi all,

  

 One of the task that needs to be completed for WLM to happen is to have
 exhaustive lists of all eligible listed buildings on Wikipedia, using
 appropriately formed templates instead of wiki tables directly. To get
 everyone going, I have created the templates[1], which everyone is of
 course encouraged to improve.

  

 In terms of the actual lists themselves, I have