http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7921985.stm
A decent article, all told. One mistake (it's not just admins that
revert vandalism) and one misleading statement (the group of editors
that will flag revisions will be extremely large, which isn't made
clear). There is a comments form at the bott
In-Reply-To:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7921985.stm
>
> A decent article, all told. One mistake (it's not just admins that
> revert vandalism) and one misleading statement (the group of editors
> that will flag revisions will be extremely large, which isn't made
> clear). There is a
2009/3/6 Peter Cohen :
> In-Reply-To:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7921985.stm
>>
>> A decent article, all told. One mistake (it's not just admins that
>> revert vandalism) and one misleading statement (the group of editors
>> that will flag revisions will be extremely large, which is
All,
Thanks to all that filled in the poll. The conclusion poll was that
either saturday or sunday was fine (based on Andrew's and Tango's
comments that they're happy with either day). We'll make the final
decision between the two based on the availability of the location
for the AGM.
Mik
Can I disagree with Andrew's email? This sort of thing's best done
collaboratively, rather than coming from a single person, and that's
what a wiki's best at.
I've just set up a proposals page at:
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Projects/Proposals
Please could people go there to submit ideas, fle
Thanks for setting up the page, Mike. Perhaps I should reword:
> > Unfortunately, the Board is pretty busy at the moment organising the
> > AGM and related matters, so we don't really have the time to organise
> > anything on this by the deadline. However, if any--- _group of people_ in
> > the c
