Hi all,
At the last meeting, Tango made the good suggestion that I start
sending out summaries of the board meetings, including the
interesting points and questions that we would like your views on.
This email is the first of those - I'll endeavour to send these out
closer to the board mee
2009/6/6 Michael Peel :
> How widely available should the Register of Members be amongst the
> Board? We now have an internal board wiki which we currently have the
> Register of Members on, such that it is available to all of the
> Board. Does anyone have any objections to this?
I see no problem
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/6/6 Michael Peel :
>> How widely available should the Register of Members be amongst the
>> Board? We now have an internal board wiki which we currently have the
>> Register of Members on, such that it is available to all of the
>> Board.
On 06/06/2009, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/6/6 Michael Peel :
>
> > How widely available should the Register of Members be amongst the
> > Board? We now have an internal board wiki which we currently have the
> > Register of Members on, such that it is available to all of the
> > Board. Does an
Accounts can now be closed on private wikis, and there isnt really anything
else that can be done apart from making directors sign a privacy agreement,
which may or may not already be in place.
Alternatively we could just brain wash them...
Regards
mark
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Martin Pee
On 06/06/2009, Mark (Markie) wrote:
> Accounts can now be closed on private wikis, and there isnt really anything
> else that can be done apart from making directors sign a privacy agreement,
> which may or may not already be in place.
Mmm a privacy agreement, signed and kept on record, would be
2009/6/6 Andrew Walker :
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> 2009/6/6 Michael Peel :
>>> How widely available should the Register of Members be amongst the
>>> Board? We now have an internal board wiki which we currently have the
>>> Register of Members on, such that it is ava
2009/6/6 Martin Peeks :
> On 06/06/2009, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> 2009/6/6 Michael Peel :
>>
>> > How widely available should the Register of Members be amongst the
>> > Board? We now have an internal board wiki which we currently have the
>> > Register of Members on, such that it is available to
2009/6/6 Martin Peeks :
> On 06/06/2009, Mark (Markie) wrote:
>> Accounts can now be closed on private wikis, and there isnt really anything
>> else that can be done apart from making directors sign a privacy agreement,
>> which may or may not already be in place.
>
> Mmm a privacy agreement, sign
On 6 Jun 2009, at 16:02, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> This does mean that you should separate out the information you need
>> to include in the register and the other information (e.g. email
>> addresses) you may hold on members. Especially anything that could be
>> subject to the data protection act.
Also covered by ThirdSector:
http://thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/911135/Wikimedias-UK-charity-
application-re-examined/
Thanks,
Mike
On 1 Jun 2009, at 13:41, Michael Peel wrote:
> See http://www.charityfinance.co.uk/home/content.php?
> id=2876&pg=15&cat=30
>
> Mike
>
> __
2009/6/6 Michael Peel :
> Also covered by ThirdSector:
>
> http://thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/911135/Wikimedias-UK-charity-
> application-re-examined/
"Organisation responsible for Wikipedia" - that's about as bad as it
gets! I haven't read the full article (free registration required - I
never
Full article copied below. As you can see the distinction between the Wikimedia
Foundation and Wikimedia UK is explained further down:
Organisation responsible for Wikipedia already turned down by HM
Revenue & Customs
Wikimedia UK is to have its application for charitable status
reconsidere
13 matches
Mail list logo
