Is it possible to run other MediaWiki courses on codeacademy? The
Extension Development and the Core Development for example?
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Yuri Astrakhan yuriastrak...@gmail.com wrote:
I will be happy to part-take in this, as I do have some
Hi Dan,
thanks a lot for the insights to the vistaprint MediaWiki ecosystem.
Did you give Semantic MediaWiki a try?
/Alexander
Am 07.02.2013 22:31, schrieb Daniel Barrett:
Vistaprint (www.vistaprint.com) has a hugely successful MediaWiki system
internally. 150,000+ topics, 1000+ active
Dear List(s),
Currently I'm inactive for Wikimedia after a lot of things changed. The
latest change is that I'm now working for a big datacentre and I do not
feel that I have enough time for other things.
I already got a few mails that I was collecting hats, so hereby I stop as:
LangCom member
Thank you very much for your work, Huib. I sincerely hope to work with
you again!
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2013/2/8 Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com:
Dear List(s),
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After much delay, Gerrit 2.6 will be coming to our servers. This release
brings a *lot* of really cool features and fixes, but I'd like to outline a
couple of the major ones:
I realized a little bit ago that I was a
1. A desire for a department to have their own space on the wiki.
In our organisation (CUSTIS, Russia) we easily solve it by creating one
primary wiki + separate ones for different departments.
It's just a normal wiki family with shared code.
Very simple solution without any extensions.
The
Hello,
We have historically generated MediaWiki documentation on the Subversion
server known as formey:
https://svn.wikimedia.org/doc/
That the result of running doxygen once per day against the master
branch of mediawiki/core.git.
We would like to move the documentation to another host and I
On 02/08/2013 12:25 AM, Yury Katkov wrote:
Is it possible to run other MediaWiki courses on codeacademy? The
Extension Development and the Core Development for example?
We can ask, but it is probably better do it after having started
effectively with the API task.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at
Whichever way we chose, could we have http redirects from the old
svn.wikimedia.org? There's a lot of urls that link there.
I prefer doc.mediawiki.org/project/version/master (aka
doc.mediawiki.org/core/master/php ) as in my mind, the hierarchy makes
more sense like that, as the type of code is
Hello,
Due to some mistake I made during the Jenkins job overhaul last year,
the PHPUnit jobs were no more using $wgDevelopmentWarnings. That is now
fixed.
I have also enabled $wgShowExceptionDetails per bug 43059.
If that cause any serious trouble, shell users could change the setting
file on
Yes a654a6e79adc8f4730bb69f79e0b6a960d7d3cbe should be fixed. It should add
the nullLockManager back.
--
View this message in context:
http://wikimedia.7.n6.nabble.com/NullLockManager-and-the-math-extension-tp4995536p4995767.html
Sent from the Wikipedia Developers mailing list archive at
vita...@yourcmc.ru writes:
In our organisation (CUSTIS, Russia) we easily solve it by creating one
primary wiki + separate ones for different departments.
In practice, we have found this doesn't work well for us (with thousands of
employees).
Each department winds up writing its own wiki page
On 02/08/2013 12:55 PM, Aaron Schulz wrote:
Yes a654a6e79adc8f4730bb69f79e0b6a960d7d3cbe should be fixed. It should add
the nullLockManager back.
Done, please review.
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/48144/
Thanks,
Matt Flaschen
___
Wikitech-l
On 02/08/2013 01:23 PM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
also we have SemanticMediaWiki.
We started looking into Semantic MediaWiki - it has impressive features.
But we got scared off by stories that it slows down the
wiki too much. Maybe we should give it another look.
DanB
A recent improvement in
On 2013-02-08 2:28 PM, Sumana Harihareswara suma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 02/08/2013 01:23 PM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
also we have SemanticMediaWiki.
We started looking into Semantic MediaWiki - it has impressive features.
But we got scared off by stories that it slows down the
wiki
Hi, in the past we have been discussing the need to update
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developer_hub
Here is a basic proposal to get started. If we agree on the main idea
the implementation will be easier. Perhaps we can do it edit by edit
during some weeks, instead of an ambitious full
Hey,
We started looking into Semantic MediaWiki - it has impressive features.
But we got scared off by stories that it slows down the
wiki too much. Maybe we should give it another look.
You _can_ abuse SMW in a way that it will kill performance on your wiki. If
you use it in a sane fashion,
Are you going to reference software that has nothing to do with mediawiki
on mediawiki.org as well? if not, then keep the hub we have on meta...
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi, in the past we have been discussing the need to update
Do you want help?
I don't know much about the API at the moment, but it is my Level-Up
assignment this quarter. Documenting things is a good way to learn them.
I have written a lot of courseware in the past.
Luke Welling
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
On 02/08/2013 10:23 AM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
O_O $1 excel-to-html? O_OOO
Why not just copy-paste into for example wikEd (google://wikEd)? :-))) Not
that beautiful, but it works.
Now, I will demonstrate what I mean by Corporate needs are different. :-)
With our extension, the
In practice, we have found this doesn't work well for us (with
thousands of employees).
Yeah, our company doesn't have thousands of employees :-)
Each department winds up writing its own wiki page about the same
topic (say, Topic X), and they're all different.
So it means most of your
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Luke Welling WMF lwell...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Do you want help?
I don't know much about the API at the moment, but it is my Level-Up
assignment this quarter. Documenting things is a good way to learn them.
I have written a lot of courseware in the past.
Great! How do you feel about taking the lead? I can help making sure we
are in sync with WMF in terms of authorization, trademarks, etc.
Sure, although it seems everything legal takes forever with WMF... (its
been over a week since I asked to get an NDA to see the api logs, no
response :) )
On 02/08/2013 04:12 PM, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Luke Welling WMF
lwell...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Do you want help?
I don't know much about the API at the moment, but it is my Level-Up
assignment this quarter. Documenting things is a good way to learn them.
I
https://github.com/OSAS/strapping-mediawiki looks pretty awesome! (Example
at http://www.ovirt.org/Home). This also makes bootstrap's classes /
layouting helpers available to content inside the wiki itself, which is
pretty cool.
(thanks to Patrick Reilly on IRC)
--
Yuvi Panda T
Le 08/02/13 22:37, Yuvi Panda a écrit :
https://github.com/OSAS/strapping-mediawiki looks pretty awesome! (Example
at http://www.ovirt.org/Home). This also makes bootstrap's classes /
layouting helpers available to content inside the wiki itself, which is
pretty cool.
(thanks to Patrick
All,
Do we have an existing method for extensions to
autogenerate documentation (via a commit hook or something) and then to
upload that to a documentation server? (Something akin to what we do with
MediaWiki core.)
We should have this for Doxygen, and make something similar for JSDuck --
the JS
On 02/08/2013 01:15 PM, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
Great! How do you feel about taking the lead? I can help making sure we
are in sync with WMF in terms of authorization, trademarks, etc.
Sure,
fyi I have put Yuri in touch with our Codecademy contact. Anybody
willing to get involved: please
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
Arent you contracting for the WMF? ...
Nope, all my work so far has been volunteering. Sponsors are welcome :)
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
fyi I have put Yuri in touch with our
On 02/08/2013 04:32 PM, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
Arent you contracting for the WMF? ...
Nope, all my work so far has been volunteering. Sponsors are welcome :)
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG
Give it a try?
Hello.
I wrote an extension[1] for Wikinews and Wiktionary to replace the
JS-driven custom tabs (Opinions in Wikinews, Citations/Template
documentation in Wiktionary).
According to the manual, as there were no pros heard from Design-l, now
the extension must undergo a technical design review,
I would love to test the course once it comes out! I don't know how
MediaWiki API works so I should be able to give feedback as a newbie.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 02/08/2013 04:32 PM, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Antoine
On 02/08/2013 08:35 PM, Paul Selitskas wrote:
According to the manual, as there were no pros heard from Design-l, now
the extension must undergo a technical design review, before it is decided
whether the extension is able to fly on production sites - deployment
review.
Out of curiosity,
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 02/08/2013 08:35 PM, Paul Selitskas wrote:
According to the manual, as there were no pros heard from Design-l, now
the extension must undergo a technical design review, before it is
decided
whether the
I suppose that means there should be a review to see if the extension
design is OK to be deployed live.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Paul Selitskas
Well, those tabs are already used in Wikinews and Wiktionary, so I
personally find no reason for design review.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose that means there should be a review to see if the extension
design is OK to be deployed live.
To be honest, I doubt that many extensions go through a ui review prior to
their main review. Given that the ui components have already existed, I
would reccomend you just skip to the next step of that guide If you can't
find anyone. Trust me as a volunteer contributed extension it will probably
I agree, I'm just saying I think the guide is implying that the extension
should be reviewed for security and whatnot before being deployed.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 8,
On Feb 8, 2013, at 7:18 AM, Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
A) http://doc.wikimedia.org/mediawiki-core/branch|tag/php
Would bring:
doc.wikimedia.org/mediawiki-core/master/php
doc.wikimedia.org/mediawiki-core/master/js
doc.wikimedia.org/mediawiki-core/1.20.2/php
Before we get too entrenched in the address layout, can we have a
better url than doc, it doesn't really scream out what it does,
Something along the lines documentation or development (probably
not so much) suggest better about what the address will contain.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:37 PM,
On Feb 8, 2013 7:42 PM, Teresa Cho tcho...@gmail.com wrote:
I would love to test the course once it comes out! I don't know how
MediaWiki API works so I should be able to give feedback as a newbie.
+1
I would love to test it out as well.
___
Hi All
I have worked lot on MediaWiki API. If someone needs help then I can definitely
help. I have one suggestion that we have to improve some portion of
documentation so that new bee can easily understand.
Thanks
Harsh
---
Harsh Kothari
Research Fellow,
Physical Research Laboratory(PRL).
Yes, extensions need to be reviewed (esp. In terms of security and
performance) before anyone will deploy them.
-bawolff
On 2013-02-08 10:35 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, I'm just saying I think the guide is implying that the extension
should be reviewed for security and
43 matches
Mail list logo
