Hi,
I am very keen to help the Code-ins.
I have posted a quite general task on
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Google_Code-In#Code. Shall I split the
task to smaller ones (similar to the size as annoying_little_bugs) and
define them before 28 October?
I was GSoC 2013 participant and work on [bug
Quim Gil wrote:
See Top closers and Top openers of all-time, last year and last
month at http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/top.html
PS: yes, this information should appear at
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/its.html - I will file a report.
Thanks for these links. I clicked around a bit. Please
I came across Gerrit change 79948[1] today, which makes VectorBeta
use a pile of non-free fonts (with one free font thrown in at the end
as a sop). Is this really the direction we want to go, considering
that in many other areas we prefer to use free software whenever we
can?
Looking around a
Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
I came across Gerrit change 79948 today, which makes VectorBeta use a
pile of non-free fonts (with one free font thrown in at the end as a
sop). Is this really the direction we want to go, considering that in
many other areas we prefer to use free software whenever we
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:52 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
While this is a technical mailing list, this is a
topic dealing with legal issues.
This doesn't have any legal issues as far as I know, since we're not
distributing any fonts in this context. It's just a matter of whether
we
Thanks for making us aware of this, Brad. I've immediately removed an
unneeded use in Translate and removed that entry from the list.
One instance remains in the header monospace hack, could probably be
changed to monospace, monospace. Can you please elaborate?
Cheers!
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at
Le 26/10/13 20:00, Siebrand Mazeland (WMF) a écrit :
One instance remains in the header monospace hack, could probably be
changed to monospace, monospace. Can you please elaborate?
Have a look at docs/uidesign/monospace.html which exposes the monospace
issue.
If you add another font after
So I'll just make a few brief, general points:
* It might be nice for the design folks to weigh in here with their
thoughts on font selection.
* We traditionally didn't specify a lot of fonts at all, meaning you got
whatever default fonts were configured on your system: thus, non-free fonts
like
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Erwin Dokter er...@darcoury.nl wrote:
This is completly a non-issue. CSS Font stacks merely *refer* to a font
already installed (and paid for) on a reader's computer. There are no legal
issues arising form this whatsoever.
You missed the point. The issue is
On Oct 26, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
That said,
my personal preference would be for us to keep our font neutrality and not
declare anything other than 'serif' and 'sans-serif', but I'm open to
listening to other people's arguments.
rgree++
Hi folks,
Here's the RFCs that have the most interest expressed on the
Architecture Summit invite page[1]:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/TitleValue
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Configuration_database
On Oct 27, 2013 4:19 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:52 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
There's an open question in my mind as to what constitutes a non-free
font,
In this context, I mean non-free in the context of
12 matches
Mail list logo
