Hi,
There are so many extensions useful to the enterprise but probably also so
many which are not useful at all or not maintained and if I wanted to start
a corporate wiki right now I would probably be very lost what to look at
and how people do things, so it seemed like a good idea to list the
There are so many extensions useful to the enterprise but probably
also so
many which are not useful at all or not maintained and if I wanted to
start
a corporate wiki right now I would probably be very lost what to look
at
and how people do things, so it seemed like a good idea to list the
Hi everyone,
I guess this would not directly solve any of the problems listed, but would
it be helpful to bring back to life
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Enterprise_hub ? It was started by somebody
an year or two ago but seems to have been abandoned at a draft stage. I am
thinking if everybody
I guess this would not directly solve any of the problems listed, but
would
it be helpful to bring back to life
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Enterprise_hub ? It was started by
somebody
an year or two ago but seems to have been abandoned at a draft stage.
I am
thinking if everybody adds some
On 14.02.2013 21:14, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
I guess this would not directly solve any of the problems listed, but
would
it be helpful to bring back to life
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Enterprise_hub ? It was started by
somebody
an year or two ago but seems to have been abandoned at a
On 02/12/2013 05:30 PM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
On 02/11/2013 11:25 AM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
Imagine if Wikipedia had a separate wiki for every city in the world. The same
problem would result.
I find it is easier to imagine what would happen if each language had a
separate Wikipedia.
On 2013-02-13 11:27 AM, Marco Fleckinger marco.fleckin...@wikipedia.at
wrote:
On 02/12/2013 05:30 PM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
On 02/11/2013 11:25 AM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
Imagine if Wikipedia had a separate wiki for every city in the world.
The same problem would result.
I find it
On 12/02/13 06:26, Brian Wolff wrote:
For subpages to really fill this use case I think the page title would have
to show only (or primarily emphasize) the subpage name instead of the full
page name.
I think it has been brought up in the past, there may be an extension
doing that.
Also it
I wished for:
1. A desire for a department to have their own space on the wiki.
S Page asked:
I assume you looked at enabling subpages in the main namespace?[1]
That way Human Resources/Payroll/Show_me_the_money gets a nice breadcrumb up
to Payroll
and Human Resources landing pages.
On 02/11/2013 11:25 AM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
Imagine if Wikipedia had a separate wiki for every city in the world. The
same problem would result.
I find it is easier to imagine what would happen if each language had a
separate Wikipedia. We would end up with slightly different facts
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Daniel Barrett d...@vistaprint.com wrote:
...
1. A desire for a department to have their own space on the wiki.
I assume you looked at enabling subpages in the main namespace?[1]
That way Human Resources/Payroll/Show_me_the_money gets a nice
breadcrumb up to
On 2013-02-12 12:55 AM, S Page sp...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Daniel Barrett d...@vistaprint.com
wrote:
...
1. A desire for a department to have their own space on the wiki.
I assume you looked at enabling subpages in the main namespace?[1]
That way Human
Le 08/02/13 21:51, Lee Worden a écrit :
As an aside, you could almost certainly do this cheaper with
WorkingWiki. If you can write a make rule to retrieve the Excel file
from the network drive and make it into html and image files (and maybe
a little wikitext to format the page), you're
On 08/02/13 21:51, Lee Worden wrote:
As an aside, you could almost certainly do this cheaper with
WorkingWiki. If you can write a make rule to retrieve the Excel file
from the network drive and make it into html and image files (and maybe
a little wikitext to format the page), you're done.
On 9 February 2013 23:00, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
You could do it with openoffice.org/libreoffice, although I agree that
getting all the dependencies right for running in the server is a bit
tedious. You can also use Excel itself for that (eg. COM automation), as
suggested by
On 02/09/2013 03:00 PM, Platonides wrote:
On 08/02/13 21:51, Lee Worden wrote:
As an aside, you could almost certainly do this cheaper with
WorkingWiki. If you can write a make rule to retrieve the Excel file
from the network drive and make it into html and image files (and maybe
a little
Hi Dan,
thanks a lot for the insights to the vistaprint MediaWiki ecosystem.
Did you give Semantic MediaWiki a try?
/Alexander
Am 07.02.2013 22:31, schrieb Daniel Barrett:
Vistaprint (www.vistaprint.com) has a hugely successful MediaWiki system
internally. 150,000+ topics, 1000+ active
1. A desire for a department to have their own space on the wiki.
In our organisation (CUSTIS, Russia) we easily solve it by creating one
primary wiki + separate ones for different departments.
It's just a normal wiki family with shared code.
Very simple solution without any extensions.
The
vita...@yourcmc.ru writes:
In our organisation (CUSTIS, Russia) we easily solve it by creating one
primary wiki + separate ones for different departments.
In practice, we have found this doesn't work well for us (with thousands of
employees).
Each department winds up writing its own wiki page
On 02/08/2013 01:23 PM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
also we have SemanticMediaWiki.
We started looking into Semantic MediaWiki - it has impressive features.
But we got scared off by stories that it slows down the
wiki too much. Maybe we should give it another look.
DanB
A recent improvement in
On 2013-02-08 2:28 PM, Sumana Harihareswara suma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 02/08/2013 01:23 PM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
also we have SemanticMediaWiki.
We started looking into Semantic MediaWiki - it has impressive features.
But we got scared off by stories that it slows down the
wiki
Hey,
We started looking into Semantic MediaWiki - it has impressive features.
But we got scared off by stories that it slows down the
wiki too much. Maybe we should give it another look.
You _can_ abuse SMW in a way that it will kill performance on your wiki. If
you use it in a sane fashion,
On 02/08/2013 10:23 AM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
O_O $1 excel-to-html? O_OOO
Why not just copy-paste into for example wikEd (google://wikEd)? :-))) Not
that beautiful, but it works.
Now, I will demonstrate what I mean by Corporate needs are different. :-)
With our extension, the
In practice, we have found this doesn't work well for us (with
thousands of employees).
Yeah, our company doesn't have thousands of employees :-)
Each department winds up writing its own wiki page about the same
topic (say, Topic X), and they're all different.
So it means most of your
Vistaprint (www.vistaprint.com) has a hugely successful MediaWiki system
internally. 150,000+ topics, 1000+ active users across several continents, five
years of history, and a fully supported team of developers to create
extensions. (We are looking into open-sourcing some of them.)
The main
I don't mind these discussions, but can we please stop changing the
subject, because it's changed three times and it makes it difficult to keep
track of.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Barrett d...@vistaprint.com
1. A desire for a department to have their own space on the wiki.
I'm not talking about access control, but (1) customized look feel,
and (2) ability to narrow searches to find articles only within that
space. The closest
27 matches
Mail list logo
