Anyone against this?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Adam Baso ab...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Is this good to go?
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Adam Baso ab...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I posted the query results at
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T104942#1458981. I _believe_ there
wasn't
On 24 July 2015 at 16:18, Adam Baso ab...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Anyone against this?
Do it.
J.
--
James D. Forrester
Lead Product Manager, Editing
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
jforres...@wikimedia.org | @jdforrester
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Is this good to go?
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Adam Baso ab...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I posted the query results at
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T104942#1458981. I _believe_ there
wasn't significant skew on particular days that would taint the initially
reported number, although
... Have we done any analysis on usage of those subdomains?
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Adam Baso ab...@wikimedia.org wrote:
There's a ticket for removing mobile.wikipedia.org and wap.wikipedia.org
domains/subdomains, which are legacy domain names superceded by
m.wikipedia.org and its
Can we look at a wider sample? using a single day as judgement factor is a
bad idea. However if the data supports your position I dont see any serious
problems. You might want to take a look at either the UA's or refering
sources to see if there is a primary source for the traffic and mitigate
Hi John --
What do you think would be a better sample? My feeling is that a 24 hour
period captures global usage and we're currently at about .01% of page
views come to these domains is a pretty good indicator. Keep in mind we're
doing this for a legitimate technical reason and not arbitrarily.
There's a ticket for removing mobile.wikipedia.org and wap.wikipedia.org
domains/subdomains, which are legacy domain names superceded by
m.wikipedia.org and its subdomains.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T104942
The rationale for the removal of these legacy domain names is to help
support
Looks like the user pageviews for wap.wikipedia.org and mobile.wikipedia.org
subdomains are approximately 0.02% of the size of pageviews for
m.wikipedia.org subdomains based on a recent one day check.
hive select count(*) from
wmf.webrequest where
year = 2015 and month = 7 and day = 14
and
No problem, I'll run some extra queries.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:04 AM, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
1 day isnt much to base a decision on, especially on a global level.
Normally I would use a sample set of at least a week, to a month of values.
Sorry if I seem like im being a
1 day isnt much to base a decision on, especially on a global level.
Normally I would use a sample set of at least a week, to a month of values.
Sorry if I seem like im being a pain, I have just seen a lot of bad choices
made based off limited data sets. With a wider data set we might find that
Hi,
If you look at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T104942#1436332 (linked
from this thread, before Adam posted his own data) an analysis was done
on a file called per-domain-count which we previously extracted from
sampled 1:1000 logs for approximately 25 days for all kinds of
I posted the query results at
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T104942#1458981. I _believe_ there wasn't
significant skew on particular days that would taint the initially reported
number, although there were small variations as expected.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Adam Baso
12 matches
Mail list logo
