2012/9/1 bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com:
Slightly hijacking this thread but is related.
I tried my hand at creating some gerrit related statistics:
https://toolserver.org/~bawolff/gerrit-stats.htm
The Wall of Shame links don't work for me – neither View gerrit
query or number-links. (Using
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
In my response to Steven at the time [1], I indicated that we have a
modest contractor budget for this work. The RFP is now posted here:
http://hire.jobvite.com/Jobvite/Job.aspx?j=o4gIWfwIc=qSa9VfwQ
Please let me know if
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
1. We could generate and keep only certain sizes, tossing the rest.
Heck yes. Generate some standard sizes at upload time and let the browser
scale if a funny size is demanded. Modern browsers scale photos nicely,
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com wrote:
2012/9/1 bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com:
Slightly hijacking this thread but is related.
I tried my hand at creating some gerrit related statistics:
https://toolserver.org/~bawolff/gerrit-stats.htm
The Wall of Shame
Le 01/09/12 01:39, bawolff a écrit :
I tried my hand at creating some gerrit related statistics:
https://toolserver.org/~bawolff/gerrit-stats.htm
Kudos on bringing back the wall of shame!
--
Antoine hashar Musso
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Le 31/08/12 22:43, Mark A. Hershberger a écrit :
But in an organization like the Foundation, you'll come across
volunteers, etc., who would prefer to use Google as little as possible.
I make my own attempts at this (which is why I run my own email server
for my friends and family).
Note that
On 09/01/2012 04:01 PM, Antoine Musso wrote:
Le 31/08/12 22:43, Mark A. Hershberger a écrit :
But in an organization like the Foundation, you'll come across
volunteers, etc., who would prefer to use Google as little as possible.
I make my own attempts at this (which is why I run my own email
As true as all this is, some of us would prefer to keep an advertising
giant like Google out of our business as much as possible.
Or alternatively, a non-free software giant like Google. But it comes to
roughly the same conclusion.
--
Mark Holmquist
Contractor, Wikimedia Foundation
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mark Holmquist mtrac...@member.fsf.org wrote:
As true as all this is, some of us would prefer to keep an advertising
giant like Google out of our business as much as possible.
Or alternatively, a non-free software giant like Google. But it comes to
roughly the
That's nice, but as a business decision the wikimedia foundation has
decided to host our corporate email with Google. For personal mail we
all have the choice of whatever system we would like, but this
business decision has been made for us, and if someone wants a
wikimedia.org address, I don't
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Mark Holmquist mtrac...@member.fsf.org wrote:
That's nice, but as a business decision the wikimedia foundation has
decided to host our corporate email with Google. For personal mail we
all have the choice of whatever system we would like, but this
business
George Herbert wrote:
But defaulting to thumb seems like a good idea to
me (but we ought to make some usage stats first :) ).
Yeah... changing existing behavior gets scary. :)
Usage stats win. So - how can we get those?
How much consideration is (or should be) given to people who hotlink
Mark Holmquist wrote:
(I'm leaving out arguments about the decision to host with Google, but
it seems like a relevant thing, perhaps there are archived discussions
that I could read?)
The Wikimedia Foundation's decision to switch to Google Apps came up on
foundation-l in October 2010. The
Daniel Friesen wrote:
Done in true developer style [RFC] MediaWiki Foundation:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/MediaWiki_Foundation
Thank you for this! This is exactly what I had in mind.
It's interesting, with a lot of (proposed) non-profits, the biggest concerns
are
14 matches
Mail list logo
