-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
MediaWiki core patches will now need to pass tests on postgres and
sqlite (in addition to mysql of course) to be merged. For speed, CI
won't run postgres/sqlite tests until after the patch has been +2'd
(gate-and-submit queue). If you want to ru
OK, it sounds like the fuzziness with prioritization, perhaps with the
exception of "unbreak now", isn't worth the effort to harmonize globally
because doing so would require nontrivial effort for questionable gain.
Thanks for clarifying.
Pine
( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
___
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Pine W wrote:
> Hi Gergo,
>
> I understand that it might take 2 hours to complete a priority X task that
> has been open for 2 years, but depending on the definition of "high"
> priority, it seems to me that the median high priority task should be open
> for fewer t
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 10:42 PM Stas Malyshev
wrote:
> Yes, it looks more the case of "we thought it's a high priority task but
> turned out it's not" rather than "we take a long time to do high
> priority tasks". I.e. maybe we need to have some rules around removing
> tasks from "High" if it's c
Hi!
>> and "high"? The reason that I ask is that a median age of 738 days for
>> "high" priority tasks seems very long. I would hope that we would not take
>> two years to complete "high" priority tasks.
>>
>
> The median age of open priority X tasks is not the same as the median time
> it takes
Hi Gergo,
I understand that it might take 2 hours to complete a priority X task that
has been open for 2 years, but depending on the definition of "high"
priority, it seems to me that the median high priority task should be open
for fewer than 2 years.
Maybe this is a complex enough topic that it
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:14 PM Pine W wrote:
> Thanks for the updated statistics. I wonder, was there ever an agreement on
> how to standardize the definitions for priorities, such as "unbreak now"
> and "high"? The reason that I ask is that a median age of 738 days for
> "high" priority tasks se
Thanks for the updated statistics. I wonder, was there ever an agreement on
how to standardize the definitions for priorities, such as "unbreak now"
and "high"? The reason that I ask is that a median age of 738 days for
"high" priority tasks seems very long. I would hope that we would not take
two
Hi Community Metrics team,
This is your automatic monthly Phabricator statistics mail.
Accounts created in (2018-07): 293
Active Maniphest users (any activity) in (2018-07): 912
Task authors in (2018-07): 473
Users who have closed tasks in (2018-07): 325
Projects which had at least one task mov
