I know we just added some new maintenance scripts for checking things with
composer. I’m sure it wouldn’t be that bad having update.php check first and
tell the user to run “composer install” before doing update.php.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On January 13, 2015 at 08:07:34, Marcin
The relevant link: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgUpgradeKey
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On January 13, 2015 at 13:36:10, Chad (innocentkil...@gmail.com) wrote:
The installer can be run on an existing install and
updates will be run.
-Chad
On Tue Jan 13 2015 at 10:30:00 AM
.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On January 16, 2015 at 11:59:14, Chad (innocentkil...@gmail.com) wrote:
It's hard to have a community when we keep hiring everyone out of it.
We should use this as an advertising point. “Come contribute to MediaWiki,
there’s a pretty high percentage we’ll hire you.” :P
--
Tyler
ing old revisions' validation status.
Exactly what information is being stored? Is it just a flag that says valid
or not valid? Is it a list of errors and warnings? If so what format is it
all in?
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
__
Somebody can correct me, but:
$title = Title::makeTitle( NS_FILE, $filename );
$file = wfLocalFile( $title );
$file->getUrl();
// $file->getFullUrl();
// ...
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Jer
WMF employees is
just about the stupidest thing you could do for an open source software
project. It defeats the entire purpose of MediaWiki being open-source.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On January 22, 2015 at 06:31:29, Brian Wolff (bawo...@gmail.com) wrote:
I dont know if this is
Ah, I see. Yeah then it was just a misunderstanding. I completely agree with
you on that point. I would be fine with an entirely-WMF ArchCom as long as
being in the WMF was not one of the criteria they were selected because of.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On January 22, 2015 at 17:51:59
authentication.
Thanks,
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
I have to say: I think the presentations this year were better than ever, and
we definitely got a lot of important discussion done concerning the future of
SOA and MediaWiki.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On January 28, 2015 at 09:16:00, Brion Vibber (bvib...@wikimedia.org) wrote:
Agreed
code can be “provided” in the form of a simple link to another website
on which to download the code.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On February 7, 2015 at 16:08:16, Bartosz Dziewoński (matma@gmail.com) wrote:
MediaWiki is already available under GPL 2 *or any later version*. Why
would
Romeo
On Feb 7, 2015 6:00 PM, "David Gerard" wrote:
> On 7 February 2015 at 22:20, Tyler Romeo wrote:
>
> > **However**, I’d like to take this opportunity and jump a step further.
> What would everybody think of switching to the AGPLv3 instead? The
> advantage that this p
does not have to
be provided or published to the general public.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On February 7, 2015 at 18:49:29, David Gerard (dger...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 7 February 2015 at 23:39, wctaiwan wrote:
> IANAL, but if there is some flexibility here, I would argue that extensi
cense like MIT that does not
actually support the free software movement. (Also, we actually can’t switch to
the MIT license without express permissions from every developer who ever
contributed to core anyway.)
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
signature.asc
Description: Message signed
://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78212.)
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On February 8, 2015 at 10:40:03, Thomas Mulhall (thomasmulhall...@yahoo.com)
wrote:
GPLv3 is not a simple upgrade, it is merely a switch to a more
restrictive license. It is quite unlikely to happen.
Each time the subject has been raised, we
ons for the projects.
That is quite depressing to hear. MediaWiki is supposed to be an open
source software movement, so I would think one of the goals of our
community would be to preserve that and keep MediaWiki open source, but if
the WMF has some future goals to make its software pro
fact that is the
entire reason the GPL was written in the first place: in response to
companies acting in bad faith.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
software under the
terms of the v2 *or* the v3. And, as I mentioned, since Apache is only
compatible with v3, as long as using the software under the v2 is an option,
you cannot combine code that is under Apache.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On February 9, 2015 at 04:06:54, David Gerard (dger
work on
software that's truly free, rather than virally free.
I hope you don’t seriously think GPL software is not “truly free”.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg
___
Wikitech-l mai
software. But at that point it’s really just a difference in
opinion. What is more important: allowing as many people to use our libraries
as possible, or protecting against our libraries from being used in proprietary
software.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On February 10, 2015 at 18:23
On February 11, 2015 at 11:49:15, Bryan Davis (bd...@wikimedia.org) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
> What is more important: allowing as many people to use our libraries as
> possible, or protecting against our libraries from being used in proprietary
>
On February 11, 2015 at 12:53:54, C. Scott Ananian (canan...@wikimedia.org)
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
> I’m still not entirely convinced that the GPLv2 allows more licenses than
> the v3.
GPL v2+ is a superset of GPL v3. I don't know why you find t
es are not required to give back, but one could argue that they are
almost forced to since they must offer source code to all end-users anyway.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg
___
I've said this previously, but I believe the only controversial part of
this change is ensuring the security and privacy of email addresses.
All this involves is constructing a process where every login,
regardless of the identifier and regardless of the database state,
always performs one and exa
r password hashing as
simple as possible.
--
Tyler Romeo
On 2/19/15 08:36, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> I described an alternate idea on how to avoid timing attacks without
> limiting it to one account per address.
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Talk:Requests_for_comment/Login
This sounds like a pretty cool idea to work on. I'll leave some comments on
the Phabricator task.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
> The day Extension:Newsletter is deployed, e
a provider that can authenticate the external user's
credentials and give the users' groups from the authorization provider.
The reason behind this separation is to allow a bit more abstraction
between the local authentication layer and the actual verification of
credentials.
Regards,
-
think relying on SMS verification is going to provide much faith
for users competing against governments to hide their identity.)
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg
___
Wikitech-l mailing
Will do some time this week. My semester has been a little crazy so I had to
put it on the side.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
On April 21, 2015 at 07:44:07, John Erling Blad (jeb...@gmail.com) wrote:
Can you do a followup on replies on the patches?
Is there an open issue on OATH on
This is a functionality of PHPUnit, not of MediaWiki. The idea is that each
test case (or function) is considered the most basic unit of testing. So
setUp() and tearDown() have to be called before and after each function to
ensure the testing environment is clean for the test.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo
This looks pretty interesting. Is there a reason we don't just put this in
the core?
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
I see no problem with this. SHA-1 has such a strong avalanche effect that
even the chance of having two similar hashes is pretty low.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at
It would be better, but I believe MediaWiki already uses this type of
storage. Changing to binary would require a schema change.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:20
I think it would be nice to have a changeset in Gerrit showing the actual
merge. I'm not sure how this would be possible with Gerrit, but it would
definitely be useful as a final review (and for QA purposes).
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Com
figure out why it's
failing, because the actual code hasn't really changed at all (in fact some
of wfUrlencode is even copied/pasted). Maybe somebody can offer some
insight?
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.c
>
> So unless other existing core functionality would need it, it doesn't make
> sense
> to include it.
>
This makes sense.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Wed, Sep
Sounds somewhat viable. I know a number of other projects who use composer.
It would be interesting to try it out.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Mark A
e core, but if we're
going truly modular some will argue otherwise.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep
Well in that case maybe we can get some sort of official design document
going so that we're planning rather than plinning. :P
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at
You should also add an SPF record in addition to a TXT record, as
recommended by RFC 4408. The format is the same.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Daniel
The login form should be properly implemented as a FormSpecialPage. I have
some initial code drafted for that if you want. The only big problem is
supporting the various hooks in the current form.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
Thanks Denny. This is pretty helpful for looking at the exact changes being
made.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Denny Vrandečić <
denny.vra
Theoretically I guess it's capable with the API and whatnot, but I don't
think it's been attempted (or at least not to the extent you're implying).
It'd be interesting.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.w
That moment of suspense before a big branch merge...
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We now at around the
Indeed. The script eliminated some tens of thousands of spam pages among
only ~400 actual content pages. It was not perfect (there were still a few
pages that had spam on them), but it definitely worked amazingly and did
not have any false positives that I am aware of.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens
For some cases I find ORMTable and our framework pretty useful, but on the
other hand our current database solution (with DatabaseBase::select and the
like) is perfectly fine and works efficiently and securely for most
purposes.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
This is not a good idea. We should wait until the ContentHandler branch is
fully QAd and we are sure it will not be reverted before converting
extensions over to using it.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro
The problem is that both AuthPlugin and ExternalAuth are pretty hacked
together authentication system and both should be tossed in the garbage and
replaced with a legitimately designed authnz system.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
both too separate from the local authentication process, not to mention
both require users have passwords, which is something that is not
necessarily true for certain external authentication methods.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
Wouldn't it be simpler to just compare the Wikimedia version? if version <
1.21 { Don't use ContentHandler }
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Vi
I'll work on that over the next week and see if I can come up with a good
design to work off of.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Ryan Lane wrote:
&g
I do not think, design-wise, this is a good idea. In addition to what Tim
said, extensions would become needlessly complex if we started accounting
for every possible MediaWiki feature that's added in a given release.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Maj
uld be used in combination with the FormSpecialPage-based
Special:Userlogin and Special:ChangePassword that are currently in Gerrit
to allow more comprehensive authnz frameworks.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
ication data",
which is raw data captured from the authentication point. This is one
advantage over AuthPlugin, which requires a username/password scheme. And I
believe, if we were to do this, we could have an AuthPluginProvider, which
would wrap around $wgAuth for backwards compatibility.
*
made. Maybe this already happens and I just don't know where this
resource is.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> I said I w
I am aware of the RELEASE-NOTES file. However, it is only updated once a
feature has been merged into the codebase, There should be some general
idea of at least what is planned for a release before the code is actually
written.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
You guys should totally
do OAuth." or something along those lines.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 11:
Keep in mind this is not a problem with git, but a problem with gerrit. Git
will work perfectly fine with summary lines over 62 characters (try git
shortlog).
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
It seems like people have some pretty good reasons for parsing JS/CSS pages
(categorization, backlinks, speedy deletion templates, etc.), so unless
there is some significant disadvantage to MW for enabling parsing, I'm
going to have to agree with the bug filer.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Inst
Agreed on what Daniel said. I'd much prefer to keep my extensions on
Gerrit, but it becomes slightly frustrating when you have to wait two weeks
for the repository to be created.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztec
m a patient
man ;) ).
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Ori Livneh wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, October 22, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Ori Livneh wrote:
>
> >
>
I think it's a cool idea, especially considering I'm still kicking myself
for not getting involved in open-source earlier. The real problem is
deciding what to have them work on.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizki
So recently https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/15746 was merged. It implements
a pretty timestamp function. Yet it was somehow completely ignored that we
actually have an MWTimestamp class made specifically for timestamp objects
in MediaWiki.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class
anguage is
used to generate it properly.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Siebrand Mazeland wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Antoine Musso
> wr
Well I think we agreed before somewhere that we should not use Composer for
installation of MW extensions, and that MW is in dire need of its own
extension management code.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro
uggestion, and then myself and a few others agreed
with him.
Here's the original thread:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-September/063503.html
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmai
et it to 2.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
process the timestamp and then pass the data onto
Language to do the formatting. That way it happens transparently.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Terry Chay
would call in order to get the proper timestamps.
I can work on a patch for this now.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Chad wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at
Since Apache tends to be the main web server people use, in order to make
MediaWiki use SPDY, we'd have to work with mod_spdy. Does anybody know how
stable this is?
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | ty
ver a
socket, or maybe having an improved edit form that tells your browser when
another user edits the page.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov
>
> Of course this is pretty much impossible with PHP. Of course this is
> pretty much impossible with PHP.
No it's not. You use PHP's sockets functions, albeit PHP is probably not
the most optimal language for setting up a websocket server.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Inst
Is this video about OAuth 2.0 only, or the original 1.0 as well?
--Tyler Romeo
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Daniel Friesen
wrote:
> The latest in
I'm working on this.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Harsh Kothari wrote:
> Hi Chad
>
> Thanks for sharing this info.
> Harsh
>
wgSecureLogin works. I patched the broken version of it not too long ago.
Now I'm just waiting on my patch in Gerrit to turn on wgSecureLogin on WMF
wikis.
On Nov 17, 2012 1:03 PM, "Antoine Musso" wrote:
> Le 16/11/12 22:04, Brion Vibber a écrit :
>
> > Do we have a timetable for migrating all l
Which bug is that? If there's not a patch I'll work on it ASAP. ;)
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Chris Steipp wrote:
> There is one more bu
If this plan is implemented, I'd recommend still testing with older
browsers rather than just saying it may happen to work or not.
--Tyler Romeo
On Nov 20, 2012 8:20 PM, "James Forrester" wrote:
> All,
>
> *TL;DR: We're proposing a more formal, but more limited, st
y the same person,
and each is a fix for errors in the commit before it. It kind of defeats
the point of having code review in the first place.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com
| tylerro...@gmai
132 days? It was uploaded onto Gerrit just recently. Many of the people
here (including myself) only get notice of changes if it's discussed on the
mailing list or if a change is uploaded to Gerrit.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Sc
Ah OK. That's my fault, then. I must have missed the initial upload of the
change. By the way, what exactly is the purpose of the RDBStore and
UIDGenerator classes? It looks interesting, but I'm just wondering what the
core or extensions will use it for.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens In
n page that your username is already
filled in for you. AFAIK, it isn't used in any way by MediaWiki to identify
the user.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:57 PM
e uneasy about this tracking, but I can understand the
reasoning behind it.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:50 PM, bawolff wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at
Maybe I'm missing something, but where is the 180 days number coming from.
When User::setCookies() sets the cookies, it gives it no expiry, so in
reality the cookie persists until the browser removes it.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Sc
Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation. It's a bit misleading, because in
PHP's actual setcookie function, using 0 as the expiry makes it expire at
the end of the session.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com
I've had patchsets that I submitted in August and they still haven't been
merged. For example, the account creation API, which has actually been
approved, but never merged.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com
Sounds good to me. IMHO, if you're submitting a patch and haven't already
run unit tests on that patch, you're probably doing something wrong. I've
done that a few times myself, and could have avoided unnecessary patchset
submissions if I had done so.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
have to wait
it out. ;)
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Matma Rex wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:55:24 +0100, Matthew Flaschen <
> mflasc...@wikimed
Lol yes. Parent5446 is my actual username, although it is not my name in
real life. :P
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Matthew Flaschen
wrote:
> On 12
I might join in. I'm guessing the Hangout link will be sent via the mailing
list?
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Rob Moen wrote:
> This is gre
inion of the repository maintainer.
What we should do is get a list going on mediawiki.org with people listing
what they're open to reviewing and how free they are to do so.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tyler
code
repositories, code is only ever submitted when the maintainer approves it,
thus only the maintainer can actually approve or deny a change. However,
since open source development involves many users, the +1/-1 functionality
allows others to get their opinion in.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institu
Agreed. I know that for my extensions, while I'm open to taking in
co-maintainers who want to approve commits, I'd definitely not be
comfortable just opening it to the public.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizki
You can count me in as interested. I can't add my name on my own, though,
since I'm IP blocked from editing on WMF wikis.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com
| tylerro...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 a
Hey,
Just a brief response to people who requested that I view/work on some
bugs: currently I am traveling and have limited Internet, but when I get
back on the 7th of January I'll look into stuff and give responses.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Maj
ready; there are just a few functionality
problems with the JavaScript crypto library.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Platonides wrote:
> On 28/12/12 18
authentication/authorization system, but I don't think it'll be ready for
this release (hopefully it can get in the next release alongside the
password hashing rewrite).
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tyle
>
> Do you have the relevant changes tagged in Gerrit so that I can link to
> them?
Not sure what you mean by tagged, but here's the change:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/18127
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.wh
sure they fit in the
database, although it shouldn't really be an issue. :P
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Matma Rex wrote:
> Yesterday, per the
e relevant than typos, yet people don't seem to be
> too
> keen to enforce that.
I'm not so sure about *every* commit, but I definitely agree that this
needs to be enforced more. If you're fixing something or adding a new
feature, there should be a bug to go with it.
*--
I think the best thing to do would be to just avoid getting the article ID
in the first place. If you have a Title object, you can just pass that
object directly to either Article::newFromTitle or to WikiPage::factory.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in
101 - 200 of 715 matches
Mail list logo
