- Original Message -
From: Mark A. Hershberger m...@nichework.com
Can we get a simple English version of the poetry there?
As others have pointed out poetry doesn't translate well, but I've
managed to come up with an interpretation that I hope is easy for a
non-native speaker to
- Original Message -
From: Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr
Le 23/01/2015 09:11, littlewmfb...@yandex.com a écrit :
Oh what a day! Which began when perforce
a visitor from afar began to exhort
snip
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-January/080300.html
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Friesen dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com
On 2015-01-18 5:29 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org
Three quick examples of things on the horizon (I'm not
particularly saying
we'd actually
- Original Message -
From: Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com
I've been saying for over a year now we should just drop the 1. from
the 1.x.y release versions. So the next release would be 25.0, 26.0,
etc etc.
Oh dear ghod, no. I already want to massacre the entire release management
- Original Message -
From: James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org
Three quick examples of things on the horizon (I'm not particularly saying
we'd actually do these for Wikimedia's use, but if you're going to ask
for straw man arguments… :-)):
- Get rid of wikitext on the
- Original Message -
From: Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org
On the leadership front, let me throw out a hypothetical: should we
have MediaWiki 2.0, where we start with an empty repository and build
up? If so, who makes that decision? If not, what is our alternative
vision? Who is
- Original Message -
From: Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org
*contradicting the serious tone
In my experiance, some wikipedians (esp. On enwiki) feel the wiki
should
have a very formal tone, and that share this links are out of place.
Ive
always wondered if thats partially
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org
spambots. We just have to jump out of the existing captcha design
band-wagon. Here are some ideas:
Surely we can come up with a creative idea that is:
* Easy for humans to solve
* Can't be solved by out-of-the-box
- Original Message -
From: Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
I like api.php too, given that we refer to the old one as
query.php.
You are in a keynote session at OSCON introducing... which API?
Please
- Original Message -
From: Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com
It is a matter of stability in PHP. Bcrypt has built-in support in PHP, as
does PBKDF2, whereas scrypt requires an extension. It should be noted,
however, that the patch that was merged implements an extensible password
API,
- Original Message -
From: Emmanuel Engelhart kel...@kiwix.org
PS: We really want to make a post @blog.wikimedia.org (so in English).
If someone is volunteer to write this, I would really appreciate his
help.
If you write such a blog post in what English you have handy, I'd be happy
- Original Message -
From: Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com
Have any of you ever heard of Non-Violent Communication (NVC).
No, but I don't think it's an optimal choice of name. In my view, it's
accusing of a malevolent motivation people who are not you, who may not
*hold*
- Original Message -
From: MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com
I've used '!ask' a lot before but I'm going to stop. I hope others do
the same.
So really you're going for !!ask.
!ask used to be more direct (some would say meaner) and I'm a little
sad to see it go away, but I suppose
- Original Message -
From: Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org
Currently Flow is the only project using HTML storage. We are working on
preparing this for MediaWiki proper though, so in the longer term the
interwiki conflict issue should disappear.
Where, by HTML storage I hope you
That's where we are, right?
Some people on outages are reporting no-light on on-campus fibers*; if we
see an uptick in problem reports this morning, that might be why.
Cheers,
-- jra
* specifically DC2 to DC5
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
The Paley Center for Media notes on Twitter that Wikipedia is 13 years old
today.
Thanks to Jimmy and He Who Shall Not Be Named, and to Brion, Tim, Mark and
all the hundreds of other dev, ops, admin and outreach people who brought us
to this point; each of you has made it possible for the tens of
- Original Message -
From: Ken Snider ksni...@wikimedia.org
After working through the specifics internally, we now have a public
RFP posted[1] and ready for proposals. We invite any organization
meeting the requirements outlined to submit a proposal for review.
My snap reaction, Ken,
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 10:52:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] 2013 Datacenter RFP - open for submissions
I'm curious which details you would like to see?
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, C. Scott Ananian
canan...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
One intermediate position might be for WMF to distribute virtual
machine images
I'd rather provide cloud-init scripts with instructions on how
- Original Message -
From: MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com
Much of the content on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia wikis comes from
non-vested contributors. That is, many, many helpful additions and
corrections come from people who will make only a few edits in their
lifetime. While I
How many printers would it take to keep up with updates to Wikipedia?
http://what-if.xkcd.com/59/
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth
- Original Message -
From: MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com
The RFC currently seems to gloss over what problem is attempting to be
solved here and what benefits a new URL structure might bring. I'd like to
see a clearer statement of a problem and benefits to a switch, taking
into
- Original Message -
From: Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.com
How about the following?
Our current URL structure is extremely obtuse for non-technical users,
and generally defies their expectations. To most people,
en.wikipedia.org/Dogor even
wikipedia.org/Dog should work
- Original Message -
From: Lee Worden worden@gmail.com
I ask because I've been producing editsection-like links for a long time
in our extension project, with commas in between - for example a LaTeX
document will come with a list of links like [log, pdf, dvi]. Maybe
I should
- Original Message -
From: David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
http://www.rightscale.com/blog/cloud-cost-analysis/cloud-cost-analysis-how-much-could-wikipedia-save-cloud
How many machines do we have right now? Couple hundred?
What's a Win2008 server license going for?
What percentage of
- Original Message -
From: Zack Weinberg za...@cmu.edu
The first step really must be to enable HTTPS unconditionally for
everyone (whether or not logged in). I see on the roadmap that there
is concern that this will lock out large groups of users, e.g. from
China; a workaround simply
- Original Message -
From: Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com
Thanks for taking the time to write these two emails. You raise an
interesting point about having everything on one domain. I really
don't think that's practical for political reasons (not to mention
technical disruption), but
- Original Message -
From: Mark Bergsma m...@wikimedia.org
We had the same result in the Level3 looking glass, but while we were
debugging it and trying to gather more info or hosts/networks
affected, it started working again in the L3 LG as well. So it appears
that the problem was
I will pass your approbation on to ESR :_)
Cheers,
-- jra
- Original Message -
From: Yuvi Panda yuvipa...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 2:55:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] python vs php
Can we all just agree that
- Original Message -
From: Leslie Carr lc...@wikimedia.org
The Ops team has been working on a document about best practices with
regards to production machines. If you have access to a production
machine, please read this document
In case y'all missed this:
- Forwarded Message -
From: PRIVACY Forum mailing list priv...@vortex.com
To: privacy-l...@vortex.com
Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2013 3:10:01 PM
Subject: [ PRIVACY Forum ] French homeland intelligence threatens a volunteer
sysop to delete a Wikipedia Article
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
Hey, Ryan; did you see, perhaps on outages-discussion, the after
action
report
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
We just finished deploying a new SSL certificate to the sites. Now all
*.m and *. certificates are included in a single certificate, except
mediawiki.org. Unfortunately we somehow forgot mediawiki.org when we
ordered the updated
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
Hey, Ryan; did you see, perhaps on outages-discussion, the after action
report from Microsoft about how their Azure SSL cert expiration screwup
happened?
What's the relevance here?
Does ops have a procedure for avoiding
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com
Can you just link to the discussion archive?
Was a posting:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazure/archive/2013/03/01/details-of-the-february-22nd-2013-windows-azure-storage-disruption.aspx
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
- Original Message -
From: Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com
Minification is a WMF cluster issue, not a MW software issue, is it
not?
Mediawiki minifies things regardless of if its being run by the WMF or
somebody else.
Ah; thanks. Have not looked at internals lately. Since
- Original Message -
From: David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
People will say any spurious bollocks
What's the license on that observation, David? :-)
Cheers,
-- jr 'I wanna steal that' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer
- Original Message -
From: MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com
The Open Source Initiative doesn't seem to really like the idea:
http://opensource.org/faq#cc-zero.
A number of former and current contributors (notably Lee Daniel Crocker)
have released their creative works and inventions
- Original Message -
From: Chris Grant chrisgrantm...@gmail.com
This is based on a flawed reading of the GPL. The GPL covers the
distribution of program code. The license specifically states that “The act
of running the Program is not restricted”. (Furthermore: “Activities other
than
- Original Message -
From: Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
Regarding GPL requisites, it seems clear that minified javascript is
“object code” [1], which we can convey per section 6d [2], which is
already possible if you know how the RL works, although we should
probably provide those
- Original Message -
From: Jack Phoenix j...@countervandalism.net
Let me just state this for the record: I find copyright paranoia and
associated acts, such as this very thread with 59 (and counting!)
messages absurd, ridiculous and a complete waste of time.
We note that you have
- Original Message -
From: Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com
Jack is not alone. The amount of bikeshedding on this list has reached
truly epic proportions in the last couple of weeks...to the point where I've
started ignoring the vast majority of the list (and I've always been
an
- Original Message -
From: Mark Holmquist mtrac...@member.fsf.org
The minification process, however, does *not* cause a problem. We can
simply add the comments to the file(s) after the minification. It does
mean we'll need to include, potentially, multiple license headers in
one HTTP
- Original Message -
From: Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com
Yes, it will cause an issue. If that extra data is going in every
reply,
multiply its size by our replies per day count, won't you? I don't
know
what that number is, but I'm quite certain it's substantial.
*Every
- Original Message -
From: Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com
But WMF getting a license doesn't help everybody else who uses MW.
Minification is a WMF cluster issue, not a MW software issue, is it not?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
I wrote up some quick documentation on OpenID as a provider. Feel free to
modify it, especially for inaccurately used terminology. It's also likely a
good time to start bikeshed discussions on the urls, as I think it'll
end up
- Original Message -
From: Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com
I think a very light weight proxy that only passes subscribe
commands to
redis would work. A read only redis slave could be provided but I
don't
think it includes a way to limit what commands clients can run,
- Original Message -
From: Leslie Carr lc...@wikimedia.org
Can you try with https now ? I had forgotten to reload apache when
pushing out a change to the https config (to allow https without
login). You can also use http.
https://icinga.wikimedia.com is now confirmed accessible, yes.
- Original Message -
From: Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
What is exact procedure of properly removing page from database so
that it doesn't break anything? What needs to be deleted and in
which order?
maintenance/deleteArchivedRevisions.php permanently removes the
content of
- Original Message -
From: Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com
You meant innodb_file_per_table
Yes; I forgot the exact name, and tried (apparently unsuccessfully) to
make that look as little like an exact parameter as possible.
Happily, the OP runs that way anyway.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay
- Original Message -
From: Juliusz Gonera jgon...@wikimedia.org
On 02/20/2013 12:04 PM, Luke Welling WMF wrote:
I am strongly of the opinion that within broad ranges deployment
frequency
does not matter. It really does not matter if you deploy twice an
hour or
every second
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Leslie Carr lc...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
As some may have noticed, we are phasing out nagios in favor of
icinga ( https://www.icinga.org/ )
nagios.wikimedia.org now redirects to
- Original Message -
From: Liangent liang...@gmail.com
nagios.wikimedia.org now redirects to icinga.wikimedia.org ! Please
let us know if you notice anything that has broken or is
inconsistent.
So now there's no public view of server monitoring info?
- Original Message -
From: Leslie Carr lc...@wikimedia.org
Icinga is public.
It may be, but that URL goes to an HTTPS Auth dialog, with nothing
behind it if one cancels. Perhaps something was missed?
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com
On Feb 26, 2013 11:25 PM, Matthew Bowker
matthewrbowker.w...@me.com
wrote:
I hate to be that guy, but is it supposed to be password
protected? Is
there somewhere non-ops people can look for server status, or is
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
I believe the OpenID extension is matured to the point where it's usable on
the Wikimedia projects, acting as an OpenID provider. The extension still
needs review and such, but I think it's a good time to discuss how we'd
like to
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
Any OpenID consumer, whether WMF or not, would be able to use us as an
authentication provider.
So, then, all OpenID guarantees is this provider says it's the same person
it was last time?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
I see no reason in doing so. If third parties want to allow Wikimedia
as a provider, I don't see why we'd object.
There is no potential liability there?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
- Original Message -
From: Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org
On 02/22/2013 10:44 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
There is no potential liability there?
IANAL, but I can't think of a scenario where allowing a user to prove I
am user X on Wikimedia projects can create liability
Original Message -
From: Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org
On 02/22/2013 10:43 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
So, then, all OpenID guarantees is this provider says it's the same
person it was last time?
The exact semantics is, IIRC, that person has presented credential to
us we
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Barrett d...@vistaprint.com
1. A desire for a department to have their own space on the wiki.
I'm not talking about access control, but (1) customized look feel,
and (2) ability to narrow searches to find articles only within that
space. The closest
- Original Message -
From: Dan Andreescu dandree...@wikimedia.org
The following manual seems to be the most actively maintained guide
for getting MediaWiki installed on Windows:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Running_MediaWiki_on_Windows
If you run into any problems, I'd
Is that stuff supposed to go after one chooses no, ask me more questions?
Cause I was not asked *any* more questions.
On a related story: if I give the installer a table prefix for which the
tables already exist, what will it do? I have 3 wikis in the same DB, and
I therefore cannot simply drop
- Original Message -
From: . oscar.vi...@gmail.com
It could be interesting (but I have no idea if is feasible), if git
recognize automatically elements in a commit text, and colorize it on
the terminal screen (or maybe bold it if the screen renders using
truetype fonts). This way, if
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Paumier gpaum...@wikimedia.org
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
wrote:
I have forwarded this to the Outages mailing list, so that people who
want to know/get complaints about such things have advance warning
I have forwarded this to the Outages mailing list, so that people who
want to know/get complaints about such things have advance warning.
Cheers,
-- jra
- Original Message -
From: Ct Woo ct...@wikimedia.org
To: Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org, Development and
It's the new year, and in light of the recent poll about which devs are
working on what, let me make another, albeit vaguely macabre, suggestion:
If you're a developer, or other staffer, can the people around you pick
up the pieces if you get hit by a bus? How badly will it impact delivery
and
- Original Message -
From: Asher Feldman afeld...@wikimedia.org
If lock timeout throws an exception that closes the connection to mysql, at
least that will result in a rollback. If the connection is pooled and
reused, it can likely result in a commit.
I would assert that if that's
- Original Message -
From: Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com
That doesn't allow you to type wi.ki/en/Donut in order to open
article, shortened url is also hard to remember
Well, there's nothing for that. wi.ki/en/Donut is not a shortened URL...
cause what if the article you were
- Original Message -
From: nischay nahata nischay...@gmail.com
When using wikipedia and clicking on an image it opens up on a new
page.
Wouldn't it be nice if it just scaled-up on the same page using JS. Is
there an extension there for this? and if yes why not implemented on
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Schmidt schm...@netaction.de
As you said, the preferred implementation would be something that's close
to the
parser and puts extra annotations (like span tags) in the
parser-generated HTML
You talk about up to several megabytes per page.
It
Original Message -
From: Strainu strain...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 3:32:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Email notification sender
2012/1/3 Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:09 AM,
- Original Message -
From: Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org
On 30/12/11 08:30, Dan Collins wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com
wrote:
It doesn't need to be compatible or open-source right?
GPL 2.0 section 2 b:
b) You must cause any
- Original Message -
From: Dan Collins en.wp.s...@gmail.com
On Bugzilla, bugs which are minor enhancements should not be tagged
highest priority unless the priority is truly highest. This should
certainly not be done en masse without personally reviewing the bug
itself. Technological
- Original Message -
From: Victor Vasiliev vasi...@gmail.com
Lua is great, however, it's a bit strange to use two interpreters
(PHP+Lua) together. That limits hosting possibilities and it's
something
like using two similar screwdrivers for the same screw.
Not really. Lua was
- Original Message -
From: Peter Kaminski kamin...@istori.com
I don't have anything particular against Lua and no particular love for
JavaScript, but JS seems more web-native; plus code and skills developed
can accrue to both client- and server-side of the web.
Just so I'm clear:
- Original Message -
From: Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org
It's the exact same yellow as before, guys. The *exact* shade.
This is the exact definition of a bikeshed argument. Feel free to
move along.
I don't see, Brandon, that Erwin suggested that it is not.
But no,
- Original Message -
From: Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com
As they say on enwiki, [citation needed].
Well, we probably say {{citation-needed}}, but... :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer The
- Original Message -
From: Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org
The yellow is *unchanged*
Is this not what Erwin's on about?
So. What was *supposed* to be a 15 minute task has now turned into a
drama - over something I don't really care that much about anyways.
Well, that's a sort
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com
Green has a meaning of Go or of this is ok in many cultures.
Making either side green gives a bias to the diff. Similarly with red.
Red means Stop or this is not ok. Many people associate red with
blood, and green with nature.
- Original Message -
From: Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
* the only important thing about the colors is that the text is
legible
We could save this debate by just making them the same color. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org
So we've decided to defer our HipHop deployment until hhvm is at a
suitable level of maturity. We don't know exactly when that will be,
but Jason Evans says in the note linked above that the first 90% is
done; now we're
I nominate this posting for should be posted on meta.
- Original Message -
From: Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 1:57:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Deployment process clarification?
On 15/12/11 12:05, Ian
- Original Message -
From: Philip Neustrom phi...@localwiki.org
http://localwiki.org
We just did our first general-public software release.
* Everything is stored as HTML5. We threw out wiki markup.
I hope that works out well for you.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
- Original Message -
From: Neil Harris n...@tonal.clara.co.uk
On 13/12/11 21:27, Neil Kandalgaonkar wrote:
That is really cool; at long last, the WYSIWYG editor is not just on
its way, but looking really good!
Once the wikitext parser (which is, of course, the hard part) is ready
Is this custom code? Or does BZ4 include it, and I simply haven't found it yet?
Cheers,
-- jra
- Original Message -
From: reporter repor...@kaulen.wikimedia.org
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 10:00:01 PM
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Bugzilla Weekly
- Original Message -
From: Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org
I think MediaWiki 2.0 should just be a renumbering, like Linux 2.6 -
3.0, rather than any kind of backwards compatibility break.
I disagree. (You knew that was coming, right? :-)
A major version number change
- Original Message -
From: Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org
IMO a switch to a visual editor as the default editing environment
would be sufficient to merit the 2.0 moniker. Heck, it'd be sufficient
to get rid of the double square brackets in the logo. ;-)
And either of those would be
- Original Message -
From: Diederik van Liere dvanli...@gmail.com
The question is, when is LATER? Technically, these bugs are not open and so
nobody will ever see them again and that's how they will be forgotten.
I would assume that LATER is, in a release after this one... and that
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Paumier gpaum...@wikimedia.org
I'm wondering if there are actually people reading all the stuff
that's pushed through these channels.
Now that I know it's there, I'll certainly be reading it; thanks for the
headsup. ;-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R.
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Paumier gpaum...@wikimedia.org
Meanwhile, we don't really have social media channels dedicated to
Wikimedia tech stuff, i.e. channels where we can actually post stuff,
links, blog posts, outage info, etc and engage with a larger community
of
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Paumier gpaum...@wikimedia.org
Not silly at all. As a matter of fact, while you were writing that, I
was registering @wikitechlog on both services, which I think is a
better alternative for automated notifications.
What you said. :-)
Cheers,
--
- Original Message -
From: Dan Collins en.wp.s...@gmail.com
Do we want that second category to be resolved later? If so, we're
going to be waiting a long time for people to come back with more
details. Should bugs that are resolved later because the original
requester or someone else
- Original Message -
From: Mark A. Hershberger mhershber...@wikimedia.org
Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com writes:
Do we have a Target release in our BZ?
We've begun using Milestones in Bugzilla for this. One of the
milestones is Mysterious Future. I think you should feel free to use
torrus.wikimedia.org/torrus is 500 tonight; is that expected?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
- Original Message -
From: Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com
Allow me to extend my personal thanks to everybody who helped out on
development, testing, review, testing, deployment, testing, breaking,
fixing, and releasing of MediaWiki 1.18. It's a big process but by
golly we're still
- Original Message -
From: Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
On 23/11/11 06:46, trouble daemon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
wrote:
After fixing one bug, going to close another as a duplicate less
than a
minute after the previous save,
- Original Message -
From: Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org
Reverting hundreds of bug property changes was labour intensive. It
points to the need for better tools to deal with malicious behaviour
in Bugzilla. I looked into the possibility of writing an automated
revert tool as a
- Original Message -
From: Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
Might there be some relatively easy way to hack rate limiting into
the code?
In general, except for triage WONTFIX runs, I shouldn't think any given user
would need to comment on or status-change a bug more than about
- Original Message -
From: jida...@jidanni.org
S == Strainu strain...@gmail.com writes:
S Otherwise they will just go on the AdBlockPlus list.
No wonder Wikipedia ads are so irritating (besides making babies cry),
they are the only ads on the net one still sees these days,
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
