On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Matthew Flaschen
mflasc...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 02/22/2013 09:38 PM, Chad wrote:
So, I've seen this site tossed around quite a bit recently, and I'm
curious:
is there any plan to start integrating this jenkins and our other
jenkins?
Depends on what you
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I've seen this site tossed around quite a bit recently, and I'm
curious:
is there any plan to start integrating this jenkins and our other jenkins?
Plans exist, but I am pretty sure there are no deadlines.
More
(anonymous) wrote:
But right now, I don't sense a huge amount of friction between the WMF's
needs and the non-WMF MediaWiki-using community. The most that can be
said is that the WMF is focused on its sites and doesn't make third
party use a priority. This doesn't stop support for other
On 02/22/2013 03:42 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
I am a bit unhappy that instead
of a database, MySQL is used/preferred, but (after the last
few bugfixes), PostgreSQL works, so I’m set.
Please do not hesitate to file any bugs for things that don't work for
you in PG. And if they aren't getting
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
- Where is QA? I mean, I know somewhere somebody is probably doing some
sort of testing, but having worked as a QA engineer I haven't seen
anything
in MW that would resemble proper and traditional testing
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Željko Filipin zfili...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Feel free to add features/scenarios to the backlog[2] in the meantime. Let
me know if you need help with that. (Test results for our browser
automation project are available[3] to everybody, by the way).
[snip]
On 02/22/2013 09:38 PM, Chad wrote:
So, I've seen this site tossed around quite a bit recently, and I'm curious:
is there any plan to start integrating this jenkins and our other jenkins?
More importantly: is there any chance to get the results of these sorts of
tests in Gerrit? I think it's
(Adding a couple of mailing lists so others can weigh in. Changing
subject so those added aren't completely lost.)
On 02/21/2013 11:55 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
Ok, just a question as humble 3rd party MediaWiki user and technical
volunteer coordinator at the WMF: is there a possibility to consider
On 2013-02-21 1:40 PM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org wrote:
(Adding a couple of mailing lists so others can weigh in. Changing
subject so those added aren't completely lost.)
On 02/21/2013 11:55 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
Ok, just a question as humble 3rd party MediaWiki user and
On 02/21/2013 12:50 PM, Brian Wolff wrote:
Thus the use of unstablish releases on wikimedia allows for much more
stable core releases.
Thanks for pointing this out. I meant to say this, too.
I guess the question I want other MediaWiki users to answer is: Are
there any concerns that mitigate
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org
wrote:
But right now, I don't sense a huge amount of friction between the WMF's
needs and the non-WMF MediaWiki-using community. The most that can be
said is that the WMF is focused on its sites and doesn't make third
I'd like to see MediaWiki gain a more stable release process as well. I
think some of the primary things that we're lacking are:
- Where is QA? I mean, I know somewhere somebody is probably doing some
sort of testing, but having worked as a QA engineer I haven't seen anything
in MW that
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see MediaWiki gain a more stable release process as well. I
think some of the primary things that we're lacking are:
- Where is QA? I mean, I know somewhere somebody is probably doing some
sort of
13 matches
Mail list logo
