In this case I am talking about sw related to wmf projects, so it needs
hack in order to make it work on other wikis, however I support one wiki,
so doesn't matter where it should be, but we should have all tools on one
place, splitting wmf to meta and general to other wikis would not help much.
Hi folks,
we have had some discussion with other devs of huggle and I have a
question, what is the best location to host wikimedia related projects?
Documentation / web pages (preferably a wiki), I guess most suitable is mww
but that one should be for mediawiki only or not? I am talking about
Pywikibot has a problem with that, and there was an open discuss.
See
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/pywikipedia-l/2011-February/thread.html#6676
with the topic pywikipediabot.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/pywikipedia-l/2011-February/006676.html
--
Bináris
În data de 20 februarie 2012, 12:55, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com a scris:
Hi folks,
we have had some discussion with other devs of huggle and I have a
question, what is the best location to host wikimedia related projects?
Documentation / web pages (preferably a wiki), I guess most suitable
Wmf ops probably don't, but thanks to labs we could probably create a new
infrastructure managed by community developers, where we could host the
sites / documentation and repository for code all under one wmf domain like
development.wikimedia.org/wiki etc. I think we could host the source code
Petr,
Thanks for bringing this up.
I have some opinions on this, but I -- like many WMF engineering staff
-- have today as a holiday (Presidents' Day). Can this decision wait
until tomorrow?
best,
--
Sumana Harihareswara
Volunteer Development Coordinator
Wikimedia Foundation
On 02/20/2012
Hi Petr,
Op 20-2-2012 11:55, Petr Bena schreef:
we have had some discussion with other devs of huggle and I have a
question, what is the best location to host wikimedia related projects?
www.mediawiki.org . Creating another wiki will just be a lot of extra work.
Maarten
I think the debate is more Meta wiki or MediaWiki.org.
Petr - my understanding is that Huggle can be utilized by non-WMF wikis. As
such, I'd recommend (or advocate for) MediaWiki.org to house it. Probably in
the main namespace - which (again - as I understand it) houses things specific
to
Remember that for bots we have also http://botwiki.sno.cc
2012/2/20 Gregory Varnum gregory.var...@gmail.com:
I think the debate is more Meta wiki or MediaWiki.org.
Petr - my understanding is that Huggle can be utilized by non-WMF wikis. As
such, I'd recommend (or advocate for) MediaWiki.org
On 21.02.2012, 0:35 Gregory wrote:
I think the debate is more Meta wiki or MediaWiki.org.
Petr - my understanding is that Huggle can be utilized by non-WMF
wikis. As such, I'd recommend (or advocate for) MediaWiki.org to
house it. Probably in the main namespace - which (again - as I
I like the idea of a namespace for Tool: (or similar).
While we're adding namespaces - what about Book: (s?): for the growing number
of planned additions to the new MediaWiki Virtual Library that Wikinaut and
others are working on? Already been decide housing them on MW.org is most
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Gregory Varnum
gregory.var...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the idea of a namespace for Tool: (or similar).
While we're adding namespaces - what about Book: (s?): for the growing
number of planned additions to the new MediaWiki Virtual Library that
Wikinaut and
MediaWiki Wiki if they work on any mediawiki install by default(ish).
If they needs hacks to work, ideally elsewhere
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Hacks to MW core or to their software? If just their software (which I think
is the case) - doesn't seem any different from extensions which need some
additional configuring.
Although - either way - housing it elsewhere only seems to add to the
complexity for SysAdmins. Where else within WMF
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Gregory Varnum
gregory.var...@gmail.com wrote:
Hacks to MW core or to their software?
Either
If just their software (which I think is the case) - doesn't seem any
different from extensions which need some additional configuring.
Config Settings != Hacking to
15 matches
Mail list logo
