Hello,
- Did you try to make some games work with a patch to avoid some
checks, since you have the game license ?
The only protected game what was able to install is Railroad tycoon II,
and it worked correctly using a patch. (it is a official patch what
disable the protection because they had
Hello,
Two of the titles on the list are reported to work now (atleast by Raphael and
the other d3d8 guys). It are GTA3 and MaxPayne. The installers can be tricky
to get working sometimes...
I did the tests with no tricks ;) The only thing what modified was
Managed in config file.
Hi Carlos,
Great work.
- Did you try to make some games work with a patch to avoid some
checks,
since you have the game license ?
- Did you try to copy the installed directory (+registrry entries),
since before that it would be an installer compatibility list ?
--- Lozano, Carlos A. [EMAIL
Hi,
Two of the titles on the list are reported to work now (atleast by Raphael and
the other d3d8 guys). It are GTA3 and MaxPayne. The installers can be tricky
to get working sometimes...
Regards,
Roderick
On Saturday 07 June 2003 15:29, Lozano, Carlos A. wrote:
Hello,
It is a little games
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 22 Janvier 2003 23:39, Greg Turner a écrit :
can you report the current working state of the game under wine Dx
after ? As d3d8 not support multi-texturing yet, i think you should
have some graphics problems
OK, I gave this a
Presumably, added to the list of programs that work ;)
Well, as the funds / time of the D3D developpers is limited, we do not have
all the existing D3D game ever done :-)
This is where open source should work (ie a lot of applications testers /
bug reporters) but for the moment, we do not have
I am wondering if Swat3d will be added to the list anytime soon
for use with wine ??
what do you mean by added to the list ?
Presumably, added to the list of programs that work ;)
It's what i have thought first,
but will be added ... for use ... sound like will be added to the
priority
On Monday 20 January 2003 11:05 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message d'origine
De: Ronald James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sujet: Games Swat 3d
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:39:52 +0200
I am wondering if Swat3d will be added to the list anytime soon for
use with wine ??
De: Greg Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sujet: Re: Games Swat 3d
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:48:35 -0600
Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 20 January 2003 11:05 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message d'origine
De: Ronald James [EMAIL PROTECTED
Laurent's copy protection patch, while impressive, does have a pretty
serious
copyright-related issue, which has nothing to do with the DMCA. The problem
is that his SafeDisc driver is - at least in parts - a direct translation
of a
dissassembly. Such translation means that technically
On Saturday 02 November 2002 11:46, Mark Hannessen wrote:
Can we post *how* to break the copy protection? I don't think so.
we can. we could include the cracks needed to run the game on the site.
it is legal use a crack if you own the game.
as long as we don't forget the disclamer: don't
On Sunday 03 November 2002 10:50 pm, Gavriel State wrote:
Mark Hannessen wrote:
When the patch was published, there was a discussion, and the
conclusion was that the code is very probably legal, and is not
against DMCA
Are you sure about the above statements? Have you checked that, or
greg turner wrote:
hmm that's too bad. couldn't this problem be eliminated by creating
a safedisc spec from this patch, and doing a dirty-room/clean-room
number on it, by implementing that spec from scratch? Dunno if it's
worth the effort... are a lot of people really in need of
On Monday 04 November 2002 09:36 am, Mark Hannessen wrote:
greg turner wrote:
hmm that's too bad. couldn't this problem be eliminated by creating
a safedisc spec from this patch, and doing a dirty-room/clean-room
number on it, by implementing that spec from scratch? Dunno if it's
greg turner wrote:
hmm that's too bad. couldn't this problem be eliminated by creating
a safedisc spec from this patch, and doing a dirty-room/clean-room
number on it, by implementing that spec from scratch? Dunno if it's
worth the effort... are a lot of people really in need of
Stupid question that will probably be ripped to shreds but what about if we
release the binaries with copy protection support but not put it in CVS
(kinda like transgaming, except that users dont have to pay for the binaries)?
It's illegal according to the LGPL as far as I know (except, of
--- Lionel Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stupid question that will probably be ripped to shreds but what about if
we
release the binaries with copy protection support but not put it in CVS
(kinda like transgaming, except that users dont have to pay for the
binaries)?
It's illegal
On Monday 04 November 2002 04:31 pm, Dustin Navea wrote:
--- Lionel Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stupid question that will probably be ripped to shreds but what about
if
we
release the binaries with copy protection support but not put it in CVS
(kinda like transgaming, except
Surely there is no reason that wine actually has to do these checks
anyway - would it not be simply possible to say that the checks passed
regardless?
And even if we do decide to implement them, (I don't know the legal
position on this - I'm not a lawyer or anything), I don't see why
implementing
here we are.
Zsolt about Safedisc 1.x
When the patch was published, there was a discussion, and the conclusion was
that the code is very probably legal, and is not against DMCA
Are you sure about the above statements? Have you checked that, or it is
just your opinion?
Carlos words
On Sunday 03 November 2002 15:53, Mark Hannessen wrote:
here we are.
Zsolt about Safedisc 1.x
When the patch was published, there was a discussion, and the conclusion
was that the code is very probably legal, and is not against DMCA
Are you sure about the above statements? Have you
Mark Hannessen wrote:
When the patch was published, there was a discussion, and the conclusion was
that the code is very probably legal, and is not against DMCA
Are you sure about the above statements? Have you checked that, or it is
just your opinion?
Carlos words regarding copy protection:
Gavriel State wrote:
Mark Hannessen wrote:
When the patch was published, there was a discussion, and the
conclusion was that the code is very probably legal, and is not
against DMCA
Are you sure about the above statements? Have you checked that, or
it is just your opinion?
Carlos words
Can we post *how* to break the copy protection? I don't think so.
we can. we could include the cracks needed to run the game on the site.
it is legal use a crack if you own the game.
as long as we don't forget the disclamer: don't download this crack unless
you own this game legal
if we can not
On Saturday 02 November 2002 03:46 am, Mark Hannessen wrote:
Can we post *how* to break the copy protection? I don't think so.
we can. we could include the cracks needed to run the game on the
site. it is legal use a crack if you own the game.
as long as we don't forget the disclamer: don't
Op vrijdag 1 november 2002 22:48, schreef Dimitrie O. Paun:
On November 1, 2002 05:36 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
copy protection, nothing more
the problem is that there are license issues with copy protection that
prevent us from inplenting it at all.
but the game itself runs perfect.
Z_God wrote:
Op vrijdag 1 november 2002 22:48, schreef Dimitrie O. Paun:
On November 1, 2002 05:36 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
copy protection, nothing more
the problem is that there are license issues with copy protection that
prevent us from inplenting it at all.
but the game itself runs
Mark Hannessen wrote:
On Friday 01 November 2002 21:29, you wrote:
On November 1, 2002 01:07 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
most games i own install and run ferfectly, but will not give you
out the box experience because wine lacks good copy protection code.
Diablo II is a good example
Can't
Mark Hannessen wrote:
Game-wise:
Jazz Jackrabbit 2
Fallout
Neverwinter Nights
Grand Prix Legends
Discworld II
Did you???
Displays three logos, shows the copyright screen (with death on a
horse), starts playing the music and goes into a loop. What did you do
to get it
I beg to differ. We do NOT need to crack these games, nor should we
aspire to it. What we need is a method for the original game's code to
verify that a legally CD is indeed in the drive.
totaly agree.
but in order to do that, we need copyprotection ( like wineX or
windows ) but doing that
On Saturday 02 November 2002 03:49 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
I beg to differ. We do NOT need to crack these games, nor should we
aspire to it. What we need is a method for the original game's code to
verify that a legally CD is indeed in the drive.
totaly agree.
but in order to do that,
Op zaterdag 2 november 2002 22:56, schreef Sam:
On Saturday 02 November 2002 03:49 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
I beg to differ. We do NOT need to crack these games, nor should we
aspire to it. What we need is a method for the original game's code to
verify that a legally CD is indeed in
On Saturday 02 November 2002 21:49, Mark Hannessen wrote:
I beg to differ. We do NOT need to crack these games, nor should we
aspire to it. What we need is a method for the original game's code to
verify that a legally CD is indeed in the drive.
totaly agree.
but in order to do that, we
El sáb, 02 de nov de 2002, a las 21:49, Mark Hannessen escribio:
I beg to differ. We do NOT need to crack these games, nor should we
aspire to it. What we need is a method for the original game's code to
verify that a legally CD is indeed in the drive.
totaly agree.
but in order to do
--- Mark Hannessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Game-wise:
Jazz Jackrabbit 2
Fallout
Neverwinter Nights
Grand Prix Legends
Discworld II
Wing Command 4 ( use the win95 exe instead of the dos exe )
most games i own install and run ferfectly, but will not give you
out the box
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Dustin Navea wrote:
[...]
Just a thought, why not create a bug in bugzilla where people can post which
apps/games/utils work nearly (if not) perfect instead of having ten million
emails. 1 bug for apps, 1 for games, and 1 for utils.
Because the Applications Database is the
On November 1, 2002 01:07 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
most games i own install and run ferfectly, but will not give you
out the box experience because wine lacks good copy protection code.
Diablo II is a good example
Can't we be a little bit more flexible and add these games to the
list as
On Friday 01 November 2002 21:29, you wrote:
On November 1, 2002 01:07 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
most games i own install and run ferfectly, but will not give you
out the box experience because wine lacks good copy protection code.
Diablo II is a good example
Can't we be a little bit
On November 1, 2002 05:36 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
copy protection, nothing more
the problem is that there are license issues with copy protection that
prevent us from inplenting it at all.
but the game itself runs perfect.
every function in Diablo II is inplented and working very very
Op vrijdag 1 november 2002 21:29, schreef Dimitrie O. Paun:
On November 1, 2002 01:07 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
most games i own install and run ferfectly, but will not give you
out the box experience because wine lacks good copy protection code.
Diablo II is a good example
Can't we be
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Dustin Navea wrote:
[...]
Just a thought, why not create a bug in bugzilla where people can
post which
apps/games/utils work nearly (if not) perfect instead of having ten
million
emails. 1 bug for apps, 1 for games, and 1 for utils.
Because the
41 matches
Mail list logo
