On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Thomas Wickline wrote:
[...]
Since were talking about this *great* winehq site
update. What do you people think about a small ...
LUG resources page for people who are interested
in doing presentations ?
We might find a place to put it but I am not sure we should: the web
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On October 31, 2002 07:00 pm, Francois Gouget wrote:
This is a good start. Here are my comments, based on
the following principles:
[...]
1. About
1.1. Intro
1.2. Why Wine
1.3. Wine myths debunked
1.4. Technical details
1.5.
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On October 31, 2002 03:35 am, Johan Gill wrote:
Even with perfectly working builtin dlls, one needs overrides for the
native dlls that are proprietary, or the loading will fail. Or is this a
bug?
This doesn't sound right. Can you give some
Hallo,
what is the status of winelib compilation of MFC and msvcrt?
Thanks
--
Uwe Bonnes[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
- Tel. 06151 162516 Fax. 06151 164321 --
El jue, 31 de oct de 2002, a las 23:56, Dimitrie O. Paun escribio:
On October 31, 2002 06:02 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-- Users can start using Wine
-- works well for a fair number of apps
-- no MS DLLs required (from real Windows)
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Hallo,
what is the status of winelib compilation of MFC and msvcrt?
I don't think compiling msvcrt with Winelib has ever been attempted.
Concerning compiling the MFC it has been a long time (6 months?) since
I tried. Shouldn't be must worse than before g.
Hello everybody :),
Could you send me a list of the popular apps what you have been able to
install+run more or less flawless (using only builtin dlls)???
o Name of the app.
o Version.
o URL, if it can be free downloaded.
* popular apps: Applications used by a large number of people in
*
Oh, one other thing that would be nice, while I think of it... is there
any reason (now we are GPL'ed) that we cannot incorperate cabextract
(http://www.kyz.uklinux.net/cabextract.php3) into Wine?
Currently we shell out to it as an external program, in order to run
Microsoft's setup APIs ecetra.
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 09:12, György 'Nog' Jeney wrote:
György, could you check which other includes can be used if
winternl.h is absent? Else youll probably have to wait for
somebody which has it to compile your test.
This is included in the latest platform SDK but it should
Oh, one other thing that would be nice, while I think of
it... is there
any reason (now we are GPL'ed) that we cannot incorperate cabextract
(http://www.kyz.uklinux.net/cabextract.php3) into Wine?
Because we are not GPL:ed. We are LGPL:ed.
Application that go under programs/ might as an
Yes, to my eye it looks like a linking problem but I'm not sure how to tell.
Maybe if I whittle it down to a single .c file which I can post to the list
it'll make it easier to diagnose.
Well, the easier would be that, yes. Basically, just create the DDraw
interface (as done in
On 31 Oct 2002, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IDL-generated files would also eventually obsolete all the current
wine/obj_*.h files, but those obj_* files seem to be somewhat more
logically structured than MS's own IDL files, should we craft Wine's IDL
On November 1, 2002 05:40 am, Carlos Lozano wrote:
Oki doki :)
Very cool. Things like FTP Commander, WinZip, etc.
Even if they are not perfect (like FTP Commnader with
it's ComboEx problem), but they look like can be esily
fixed. We can then start going through them, and getting
them to work.
--- Carlos Lozano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody :),
Could you send me a list of the popular apps what you have been able to
install+run more or less flawless (using only builtin dlls)???
o Name of the app.
o Version.
o URL, if it can be free downloaded.
* popular apps:
I installed a program called Mind Manager, and tried to run it. It
installed OK, but when I came to run it the initial dialog came up and it
was totally unresponsive to either keyboard or mouse. So I looked around
the system for any errors and found that the title of the window in the KDE
window
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Greg Turner wrote:
On Thursday 31 October 2002 06:08 pm, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Note that I will work on ReWind, not directly on Wine, so I probably
won't be able to submit massive change all files to include this
instead of that patches (that apply to Wine) with any new
On November 1, 2002 03:04 am, Francois Gouget wrote:
Anyway, I'm not sure 'Status' should be top-level and if you look on
GNUStep's site it is in fact level 2 (it's a submenu of 'Information').
It is definitely a 'one-click' item. I get a instant surge of sympathy
for projects (there are quite
On November 1, 2002 07:37 am, Dustin Navea wrote:
Does this include games too?
I would say yes, most def.
--
Dimi.
Andi and I have talked about the FAQ a lot on
and off through the years, going back to when
he was in St. Paul and first set up the
FAQ-o-matic.
When I go visit a project the very first
thing I look at (before screenshots,
about, or *anything* else) is the FAQ.
Therefore, I think it's extremely
My vision for the FAQ is a hand edited main
FAQ with the current FAQ-o-matic being
pushed to a secondary role.
I request that the new FAQ be done in the same was as the Docs, with SGML
tools. This way it can be published in several formats.
--
_ _WebGeek/NetAdmin CodeWeavers -=
Hello,
It is today top 100 tucows list. I think that it shouldn't
be the better wine top 100 list, some entries should be
removed, and some new added. (For example some cdrecord
program).
Regards,
Carlos.
--
___ _ \ | / Infraestructuras
| . |._ _ _| | ___ ___ ___
Here are a few programs I've used in the last few days that are near
enough to flawless with only builtins:
App-wise:
mIRC 6.2 - www.mirc.co.uk
IDA Pro 4.2.1 Demo - ftp://ftp.po.cs.msu.su/pub/ida/demo421.zip
E-Tax (Australian Electronic Tax software, needs Desktop mode :/)
Game-wise:
Jazz
On Friday 01 November 2002 01:42 am, Thomas Wickline wrote:
The way it is now I Search around for who is working on what .. And
then PESTER
the info out of them ;) I don't like doing it this way. But it is the
only way I have at this time.
Actually, this sounds like the only universally
On Friday 01 November 2002 12:19, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
Yes, to my eye it looks like a linking problem but I'm not sure how to
tell. Maybe if I whittle it down to a single .c file which I can post to
the list it'll make it easier to diagnose.
Well, the easier would be that, yes. Basically,
On Friday 01 November 2002 06:47 am, Ove Kaaven wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Greg Turner wrote:
On Thursday 31 October 2002 06:08 pm, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Note that I will work on ReWind, not directly on Wine, so I
probably won't be able to submit massive change all files to
include this
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Ender wrote:
Game-wise:
Jazz Jackrabbit 2
Fallout
Neverwinter Nights
Grand Prix Legends
Okay, if it'll help you although my knowledge of x86 calling conventions and
post-286 instructions etc. (last x86 I wrote was in a BIOS five years ago) is
pretty hopeless :-)
Well, I am not very good at X86 ASM either, but well, the problem lies here :
2fe0: 8b 57 08
On Friday 01 November 2002 12:19, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
Yes, to my eye it looks like a linking problem but I'm not sure how to
tell. Maybe if I whittle it down to a single .c file which I can post to
the list it'll make it easier to diagnose.
Well, the easier would be that, yes. Basically,
As the topic suggests this thread focusses on the layout of our existing
wine header code. Maybe it sounds a bit pedantic but it's essential to
have unified guidelines all developers should follow:
Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] already did a great job [1]:
He just added additional comments
Hi to all !
This sounds familiar. ;-)
I've been lost in the development world, but, i still have some quite
interesting results from what i commented from WineConf.
Will get back when those will be ready to publish.
Cheers !
---Reply to mail from Carlos Lozano about Tucows top-100
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:16:58PM +0200, Jaco Greeff wrote:
+/* FIXME: Don't know what this value should be, 10 seems enough as
+ * the maximum number of simultaneous _popen'ed processes
+ */
#define POPEN_MAX_FILES 10
...
+INT POPEN_getOpenFileSlotPos(VOID)
+{
+INT i = 0;
+
Is this even close? As before, I didn't include diffs to configure
because of an autoconf version mismatch between myself and wine.
diff -ur -x CVS -x 'bigdif*' ../wine.test/configure.ac ./configure.ac
--- ../wine.test/configure.ac 2002-10-31 03:10:18.0 -0600
+++ ./configure.ac
Greg Turner wrote:
--- /dev/null 1969-12-31 18:00:00.0 -0600
+++ ./programs/wrpcss/main.h 2002-11-01 08:45:47.0 -0600
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2002 Greg Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ *
+ * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the
Joerg Mayer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:16:58PM +0200, Jaco Greeff wrote:
Please output an ERR here to ask people to report that POPEN_MAX_FILES
needs to be increased.
Will do that, thanks.
Greetings,
Jaco
Hi there,
On Friday 01 Nov 2002 8:23 am, Ove Kaaven wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
However, that still *requires* that the wineserver is actually doing
all the work and the wine processes that load and link PE images are
doing very little except marshalling the win32 API
Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then we wouldn't have to
change all those COM-using .c file to stop including wine/obj_*.h (and I
could more easily convert the files). Or would you really prefer getting
rid of wine/obj_*.h?
Yes, I want to get rid of them. They are a real pain to deal
Greg Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This guy needs a name if I'm ever going to start coding it. How about:
Wine Remote Procedure Call System Server aka wrpcss.exe.so? A little
misleading with the ss thing, but this name will look familiar to
windows users, and is more accurate than my
Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't decided yet. But I probably won't send to rewind-patches, since
I don't usually use that list (if it's something useful to Wine, I'd just
send a patch to wine-patches and have the rewind patch tracker pick it up
from there. But if it's not useful
Le ven 01/11/2002 à 11:27, Geoff Thorpe a écrit :
Hi there,
[snip]
What do you mean? No PE apps can link straight to glibc. Only
Unix-implemented DLLs (like the Wine ones) can link to it. The problem
Ah, this had been my question. It seemed otherwise from the earlier post
I had seen.
Jaco Greeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Calling the popen function returns a FILE* which needs to be
converted to a MSVCRT_FILE*. The apprach taken here is potentially not
the best route but the only one I could think of. Is it suffiecient?
No, it's wrong. You should be using the Windows API
On Friday 01 November 2002 09:59 am, Jaco Greeff wrote:
Greg Turner wrote:
GNU + * Lesser General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a cop
Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]y of the GNU Lesser General
Public
^^^
My app calls DirectSoundCreate, which fails, returning
DSERR_ALLOCATED. I have no idea what the problem is.
Any ideas what might be wrong, or any traces, etc I could
provide to give more info?
-Steve
On Friday 01 November 2002 10:21 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Greg Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This guy needs a name if I'm ever going to start coding it. How
about: Wine Remote Procedure Call System Server aka wrpcss.exe.so?
A little misleading with the ss thing, but this name will
Game-wise:
Jazz Jackrabbit 2
Fallout
Neverwinter Nights
Grand Prix Legends
Discworld II
Wing Command 4 ( use the win95 exe instead of the dos exe )
most games i own install and run ferfectly, but will not give you
out the box experience because wine lacks good copy protection code.
Diablo
--- Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On November 1, 2002 02:00 am, you wrote:
after banging my head on my keyboard for a few minutes
because i couldnt find treeview_notifyformat i went and looked at cvsweb
and found out...there is no treeview_notifyformat before guy's patch so
In responding to Dimi's call for better binary packaging,
and the whole issue of getting a base line config ready,
it felt clear to me that WineSetupTk is a tool that
is underutilized.
I have been trying to persuade Alexandre to include
WineSetupTk in the main Wine distribution for some
time now,
On 01 Nov 2002 08:40:20 -0800, Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Jaco Greeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Calling the popen function returns a FILE* which needs to be
converted to a MSVCRT_FILE*. The apprach taken here is potentially not
the best route but the only one I could
Well, the problem seems to come from an incompatibility between g++ and the
way Wine defines COM objects. From my experiences, the g++ vtable starts at
offset 8 whereas Wine defines COM object vtables as starting at offset 0 (ie
vtable[0] == first method whereas for g++ vtable[2] == first method).
Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't care what the app installs. I care what you do _before_ the app
installs. That is, you should have no native DLLs in your fake windows.
Oh, if you allow using native dlls that the app installs then things
are easier; I thought you wanted to
Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, the init directive stuff is not really mandatory for
the goals of 0.8. I just put it here since you said you're
working on some linker hacks to get this working before
we have proper DLL separation.
Actually the linker hacks have to be on top
On 01 Nov 2002 08:40:20 -0800, Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
No, it's wrong. You should be using the Windows API (CreateProcess
etc.) not the Unix popen(). Then you can build a proper MSVCRT_FILE.
Sorry, I had a few beers tonight ;) Ok, I just remembered what my concerns
were
--- Mark Hannessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Game-wise:
Jazz Jackrabbit 2
Fallout
Neverwinter Nights
Grand Prix Legends
Discworld II
Wing Command 4 ( use the win95 exe instead of the dos exe )
most games i own install and run ferfectly, but will not give you
out the box
On 1 Nov 2002, Jaco Greeff wrote:
[...]
Now wera are faced with a problem in that wcmd is not a pure Windows
application and it doesn't reside in your Windows filesystem, rather it is
in your *nix path.
Try c:\Windows\System\wcmd.exe and I think you will find that it works.
--
Francois
On Friday 01 Nov 2002 11:51 am, Vincent Béron wrote:
Le ven 01/11/2002 à 11:27, Geoff Thorpe a écrit :
Hi there,
[snip]
What do you mean? No PE apps can link straight to glibc. Only
Unix-implemented DLLs (like the Wine ones) can link to it. The
problem
Ah, this had been my
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:21:26 -0800 (PST), Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote :
Try c:\Windows\System\wcmd.exe and I think you will find that it works.
*lol* Like I've said, expect me to be slow tonight :)
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Dustin Navea wrote:
[...]
Just a thought, why not create a bug in bugzilla where people can post which
apps/games/utils work nearly (if not) perfect instead of having ten million
emails. 1 bug for apps, 1 for games, and 1 for utils.
Because the Applications Database is the
Francois == Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Francois On 1 Nov 2002, Jaco Greeff wrote: [...]
Now wera are faced with a problem in that wcmd is not a pure Windows
application and it doesn't reside in your Windows filesystem, rather
it is in your *nix path.
On November 1, 2002 08:15 am, Jeremy White wrote:
My vision for the FAQ is a hand edited main
FAQ with the current FAQ-o-matic being
pushed to a secondary role.
Please get rid of the FAQ-O-matic. The interface
is atrocious. A hand written one would do just
fine, is not like we add 100
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Greg Turner wrote:
On Friday 01 November 2002 10:21 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Greg Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This guy needs a name if I'm ever going to start coding it. How
about: Wine Remote Procedure Call System Server aka wrpcss.exe.so?
A little
On Friday 01 November 2002 11:35 am, Jeremy White wrote:
In responding to Dimi's call for better binary packaging,
and the whole issue of getting a base line config ready,
it felt clear to me that WineSetupTk is a tool that
is underutilized.
probably. any tool that can read in a config file,
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
[...]
Giving a fully qualified patch is probably bad advice here. Try wcmd.exe
only and have cmd.exe.so in wine's program directory.
Actually, using COMSPEC or something like that might be even better.
The exact behavior has to be checked on Windows though.
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 20:50:07 +0100, Uwe Bonnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Giving a fully qualified patch is probably bad advice here. Try wcmd.exe
only and have cmd.exe.so in wine's program directory. Wine sets on startup
WINEDLLPATH to $topdir/dlls:$topdir/programs and wineapploader there
On November 1, 2002 01:07 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
most games i own install and run ferfectly, but will not give you
out the box experience because wine lacks good copy protection code.
Diablo II is a good example
Can't we be a little bit more flexible and add these games to the
list as
On November 1, 2002 11:57 am, Greg Turner wrote:
argh! cut-and-paste is the culprit. this is (another reason) why I
hate inlining patches... just too freakin' sloppy...
Dude, you don't *need* to copy paste to inline patches!!!
Just use the Insert File... menu present in most (all?) mail
On November 1, 2002 01:38 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Oh, if you allow using native dlls that the app installs then things
are easier; I thought you wanted to make things work with builtins
only. But then you cannot ignore the dll overrides problem, you need
to tweak the overrides just right
On November 1, 2002 01:39 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Actually the linker hacks have to be on top of the dll separation. But
it could be possible to do them for already separated dlls so that we
can get rid of init everywhere except in kernel/ntdll. I'll try that.
Well, maybe the dll
On November 1, 2002 02:50 pm, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Probably Alexandre knows more.
Well, yeah, he always does! :)
--
Dimi.
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:06:55PM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On November 1, 2002 08:15 am, Jeremy White wrote:
My vision for the FAQ is a hand edited main
FAQ with the current FAQ-o-matic being
pushed to a secondary role.
Please get rid of the FAQ-O-matic. The interface
is
Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think I'd say dunno/maybe/yes. There's no terribly good reason to make
it compatible, but I know of no terribly good reason not to either (except
for the fact that we don't know exactly how much stuff it does - I think
it does RPC/DCOM registrations,
On Friday 01 November 2002 21:29, you wrote:
On November 1, 2002 01:07 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
most games i own install and run ferfectly, but will not give you
out the box experience because wine lacks good copy protection code.
Diablo II is a good example
Can't we be a little bit
On November 1, 2002 04:02 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
Excuse me, what is sooo terrible about the FOM ???
Having to maintain hundreds of different web pages by hand
(in order to gain the required interdependencies for some complicated
issues) is a *lot* more difficult than simply
On November 1, 2002 04:02 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
I agree that using a static web page for the FAQ part instead could
probably be better - but for the troubleshooting content ??
The troubleshooting content is meant to be a step-by-step problem solver
area (and it is, to some extent). Now tell
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:21:54PM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On November 1, 2002 04:02 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
Excuse me, what is sooo terrible about the FOM ???
Having to maintain hundreds of different web pages by hand
(in order to gain the required interdependencies for some
I expect to be living close to it for the next few months and may
well get some questions that don't appear on the mailing list. I also
don't see myself being able to find the time to do much coding, however
much I'd like to.
On the other hand I'm not sure I can do things in a timely
On November 1, 2002 05:36 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
copy protection, nothing more
the problem is that there are license issues with copy protection that
prevent us from inplenting it at all.
but the game itself runs perfect.
every function in Diablo II is inplented and working very very
On November 1, 2002 04:36 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
My (hidden) point was that the FOM is two *SEPARATE* units,
the FAQ and everything else.
(as always, nobody seems to grasp this)
Good point, but you see, I wasn't grasping it :) But that's a
problem in itself, there's some confusion there, no?
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:29:20PM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On November 1, 2002 04:02 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
I agree that using a static web page for the FAQ part instead could
probably be better - but for the troubleshooting content ??
The troubleshooting content is meant to be a
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:44:53PM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On November 1, 2002 04:36 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
My (hidden) point was that the FOM is two *SEPARATE* units,
the FAQ and everything else.
(as always, nobody seems to grasp this)
Good point, but you see, I wasn't grasping
On November 1, 2002 04:49 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
Sometimes I've got the impression that I'm partly fighting the KISS
dumb-it-down-until-there-is-plain-nothing-left-to-annoy-the-helpless-user-
with-its-bewildering-size-and-information-overload syndrome.
Well, that's true. At least from my
Quoting John K. Hohm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, it's wrong. You should be using the Windows API (CreateProcess
etc.) not the Unix popen(). Then you can build a proper MSVCRT_FILE.
Sorry, I had a few beers tonight ;) Ok, I just remembered what my
concerns
were about using CreateProcess
Op vrijdag 1 november 2002 21:29, schreef Dimitrie O. Paun:
On November 1, 2002 01:07 pm, Mark Hannessen wrote:
most games i own install and run ferfectly, but will not give you
out the box experience because wine lacks good copy protection code.
Diablo II is a good example
Can't we be
Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, maybe the dll separation term is overloaded. One way to understand
it is that DLLs export all their external functions through the .spec file.
And yes, we are not that far away from doing that. What I was referring to
is the elimination of the
On Friday 01 November 2002 02:35 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
[DllOverrides]
; some dlls you may want to change
oleaut32 = builtin, native
ole32= builtin, native
commdlg = builtin, native
comdlg32 = builtin, native
shell= builtin, native
shell32 = builtin,
On Friday 01 November 2002 02:27 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On November 1, 2002 11:57 am, Greg Turner wrote:
argh! cut-and-paste is the culprit. this is (another reason) why
I hate inlining patches... just too freakin' sloppy...
Dude, you don't *need* to copy paste to inline patches!!!
On Friday 01 November 2002 02:55 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think I'd say dunno/maybe/yes. There's no terribly good reason to
make it compatible, but I know of no terribly good reason not to
either (except for the fact that we don't know exactly how
On November 1, 2002 03:04 am, Francois Gouget wrote:
My thinking is that only the top-level items would be visible on the
home page and then you can click on an item to expand it and go to its
first page.
Agreed.
Actually, if we want to reduce the number of top-level menus in my
proposal we
- Original Message -
From: Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jeremy White [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: Wine FAQ - call for a volunteer
On November 1, 2002 04:02 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
I agree
Hi,
When I run the EarthViewer 3d setup (www.keyhole.com), wine tells me
this:
ERROR: You need to merge the 'winedefault.reg' file into your
Wine registry by running: `regedit winedefault.reg'
fixme:ole:_LocalServerThread CoMarshalInterface failed, 80070057!
Can someone help me with the
This will probably get renamed to Wine 0.9 TODO,
after Alexandre's clarification, but I haven't
changed the name just yet, to avoid confusion.
Once again, what I mean by 0.8:
-- Users can start using Wine
-- works well for a fair number of apps
-- no MS DLLs required (from real
Hi guys,
I don't know if this is the right place, but I actually trying to run
some commercial applications on Wine. We have sucess in all aplications,
but VB. These applications need to use MDAC, and this Microsoft package
need to be licensed for commercial use.
Anybody know any MDAC
In the reactos rosapps source tree we have started on a front-end for regedit.exe that
uses the
regedit from wine/programs. Would you guys like this for 0.9/1.0? If so, I am sure
RobD would
relicense as his work is based on the LGPL work.
Thanks
Steven
--- Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dlls/user/resources/user32_hu.rc
Please use either CVS or release 20021031 as the source for
user32 resources. Specifically there is no such an identifier
MDI_IDS_MOREWINDOWS but IDS_MDI_MOREWINDOWS instead and one
more string in the user32 string table has been added.
On November 1, 2002 01:38 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Oh, if you allow using native dlls that the app installs then things
are easier; I thought you wanted to make things work with builtins
only. But then you cannot ignore the dll overrides problem, you need
to tweak the overrides just
On November 1, 2002 09:17 pm, Steven Edwards wrote:
In the reactos rosapps source tree we have started on a front-end for
regedit.exe that uses the regedit from wine/programs. Would you guys like
this for 0.9/1.0? If so, I am sure RobD would relicense as his work is
based on the LGPL work.
I
On November 2, 2002 12:02 am, Ender wrote:
If you expect internet explorer to work, you are GOING to have to have at
least shdocvw,shlwapi set native,builtin. That way they are not required,
but if IE is installed and those DLLs exist, you will need to use the
native versions. I really can't
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Dustin Navea wrote:
[...]
Just a thought, why not create a bug in bugzilla where people can
post which
apps/games/utils work nearly (if not) perfect instead of having ten
million
emails. 1 bug for apps, 1 for games, and 1 for utils.
Because the
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On November 2, 2002 12:02 am, Ender wrote:
If you expect internet explorer to work, you are GOING to have to have at
least shdocvw,shlwapi set native,builtin. That way they are not required,
but if IE is installed and those DLLs exist, you will
97 matches
Mail list logo
