It seems to me a long time ago (back in the dial up days), we restricted people
from 8 AM to midnight but let them go full out and abuse the heck out of their
connection if they so desired from midnight to 8 AM. We didn't *bill*
differently.
Or maybe we just wanted to. I know we *told*
On Nov 15, 2009, at 11:47 PM, jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
Oh my that is insane kw/h pricing. Happen to know what there buy back rates
are?
Here I pay .07 kw/h with a buy back of .02 kw/h.
New York State requires buyback at the same rate as the sell rate. So it'd be
.07 kw/h both ways. The
Motorola Canopy 5.4GHz radios updated with the latest firmware cannot
transmit in the 5600-5650 part of the band.
I don't understand what is iffy about the band... Canopy operators have
been using it for two years or so now legally, and while DFS still has
issues in its current implementation,
I switched a farmer to us from Agristar the other night. Satellite
internet His number one gripe was that they metered him and once they
went over a certain limit they were blocked for 24 hours as punishment.
Man, that's severe! Imagine turning a customer totally off for 24 hours!!!
Is he completely cut off or restricted to only certain sites/email? Hughes
meters during business hours and if one goes over budget then they throttle you
to a crawl during the following business hours period. The meter is off during
the wee hours.
Greg
On Nov 21, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Robert
Ran into the same roadblock and gave up. The problem is that the
dependencies are there but have the wrong version. You'll need to
roll back to the older version the new packages rely on.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:34 AM, ccrum cc...@dot11net.com wrote:
Well, I'm pretty competent with Linux,
He told me he gets Blacked out and the internet doesn't work but he may
have had email access but honestly most people in this area use yahoo or
gmail so even if they allowed email protocol, they wouldn't use it.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
It's "iffy" because the FCC allowed the specific band, and now they are
trying to take it back away... two years later. If I never upgrade my
radios, does that mean I'm legal to run in that specific band forever?
I just don't understand how they can allow it for 2 years, and then try
and take
IMO, it is "iffy" for the reason you mentioned. The FCC (at the request
of the FAA and the NTIA) appears ready to deny use of the 5.6 spectrum
in areas where interference with airport weather radar takes place. I
doubt that any WISP would ague that their use of that spectrum is more
important
Ubiquiti just released the 5.1 Beta firmware today. Supposed to clear up
issues with the new AiMax gear.
Description from the forums is as follows:
* Full legacy product support
* WEP and WPA-TKIP support
* Added: Advanced Ethernet Settings
* WEB server change
* Auto ACK improvement
*
I imagine at some point your going to have to upgrade.
I could see the requirement being that all new radios will be hard coded
with the United States region code, and then they will force that you will
have to have that same region code set at the AP. Once that occurs. either
you accept the
Has anyone had any experience with the Mushroom Truffle BBNA Router?
http://www.mushroomnetworks.com/product.aspx?product_id=1000
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 13:52 -0800, Gary Garrett wrote:
Yes, this is the answer I am looking for.
Let me know when this is available / stable,
It looks (so far) as though the system is performing VERY WELL. Of the
ones that I have tested with, I have had very positive results. One
thing
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 10:40 -0800, Joe Miller wrote:
Make it a plug-n-play for us non Mikrotik people and I would say sold.
DONE! LOL. I don't sell a script. I sell the installation of a
system, which will include installation, configuration, customization
(to an extent) and basic
Butch,
You think that it could run on a PC with 2 NICS without an issue? That way the
CPU usage can be a lot lower.
- Original Message
From: Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sat, November 21, 2009 8:01:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Understand that what they do is have a co-lo where they have lots and lots of BW
(one hopes). Then, tunnel out across the links at your end into the colo, and
bond the tunnels. You then look like their IP's to the world.
http://mushroomnetworks.com/product.aspx?product_id=1009
NGL wrote:
Has
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 07:45 -0600, Mike wrote:
If it would run on say a MT 450G, and
the price was right, you'd sell a bunch! I'd buy several for my network.
After installing this on an RB600 moving about 4k pps I saw it move CPU
from an average of about 60% up to about 80-100% (more often
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:15 -0800, Joe Miller wrote:
You think that it could run on a PC with 2 NICS without
an issue? That way the CPU usage can be a lot lower.
Yes. My development platform is an x86 box at 1GHz with 1G RAM. My
opinion is that your suggested platform is the ideal scenario.
My father in law lives off the grid so he turns off the everything in the
house when he is gone... The power is OFF.
He got home one day and was throttled by Hughes. W. T. F. and there was no
arguing the point with the rep.
Man was he ticked. Former AF Colonel.. NEVER swears. He swore a lot that
Good, bad, ugly?
Looking at their extra heavy duty 40'. It has an 18 sq. ft. wind load @ 70
mph. Though not as strong, it seems to be about half the price of a Super
Titan S100 of equivalent height. Looking for it to hold 2 up to 3' dishes, 2x
5 GHz sectors, and 4x 900 MHz sectors (whenever
Is 18 sq. ft. enough wind loading?
The dishes would be 14 sq. ft. or so off the bat... add in the sectors,
radio, and cable... and your past 100% loaded. Better to spend the money on
a lot more wind loading then you will need than to see your tower come
crashing to the ground.
Daniel White
3-dB
21 matches
Mail list logo
