I need to move 155MB internet traffic over 90miles. Fiber will take too long
and cost too much. Anybody have a solution that will work. Power is an issue
where repeaters are used. Solar would be the preferred option. I also need
to manage and distribute bandwidth. Any ideas?
--
Akinlolu
Ship hard drives?
On a serious note. To move that kind of bandwidth, Your looking at licensed
links running the whole way, Multiple Hops. But that will also be quite
expensive. And the number of hops would depend on how high your sites are.
Also, You said fiber would take to long. Was this
At 11/15/2010 04:06 AM, Akinlolu Ajay-Obe wrote:
I need to move 155MB internet traffic over 90miles. Fiber will take
too long and cost too much. Anybody have a solution that will work.
Power is an issue where repeaters are used. Solar would be the
preferred option. I also need to manage and
I'd like to hear from people who have switched from one of these free
products to the other.
I'm considering a switch from Nagios to The Dude myself, but I'd like to
hear pros cons of either.
What did you switch from/to, and why?
Thanks !
Mark
What are you using it for? If it's for monitoring servers (disk/cpu usage
and such) Dude is a joke. If it's for an easy GUI to position things
relative to one another, Nagios is going to be difficult.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Nagios, IMHO, is more scalable. If you are monitoring hundreds to 1000+
units Nagios is a better fit. There are some Nagios front ends to help with
configuration but they are still clunky compared the The Dude. If I you
have a few hundred devices go with the Dude.
Justin
--
Justin
We have Nagios for monitoring/alerting on:
- wireless network components : up/down, flapping, signal levels, is ssh
interface responding?
- routers: up/down, flapping, utilization, is ssh interface responding?
- UPS: up/down, battery capacity, battery status, internal temperature, line
power
I would personally drop those two and use Xymon. Tack on Devmon for router
SNMP queries. Though there could be a script to do it, too.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Mark Nash markl...@uwol.net
One quick thing, and I don't have experience with Nagios, but I know trying
to get Dude to run on Linux for me was a nightmare. We scrapped that pretty
quickly and put it back on an XP Pro system.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
I hated it on both - RouterOS works for me.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Jason Hensley ja...@jaggartech.com wrote:
One quick thing, and I don't have experience with Nagios, but I know trying
to
Had trouble with it locking up on RouterOS, but that was a couple of
versions ago.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 12:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nagios vs. The Dude
I
Hi All,
I need a 5 gig omni. 8 or 9 dB.
I've got one from Winncomm but I don't like it much. The mount seems to
place the raydome below the mounting bracket etc.
What are folks using and where do you get them?
Got a new 5 gig tower that's running about 12dB or so below calculated
signal
Someone please help this guy.
_
From: John A Sterling [mailto:john.a.sterl...@jpmchase.com]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 1:33 PM
To: k...@wavelinc.com
Cc: johnasterling...@gmail.com
Subject: wavelinc
I saw your web page about your service in Bucyrus. My mom lives on the
I have also been looking for a wide band omni, 5.x like 5.1 to 5.9 apx,
where did they go?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 10:42 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject:
What about pnp4nagios for graphing and nagvis for map of network?
Have you looked at NINJA for nagios?
On 11/15/2010 09:45 AM, Mark Nash wrote:
We have Nagios for monitoring/alerting on:
- wireless network components : up/down, flapping, signal levels, is ssh interface
No income no jobs no assets?
Couldn't resist...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Matt Jenkins m...@smarterbroadband.netwrote:
What about pnp4nagios for graphing and nagvis for map of network?
According to the WISPA member's map, Avolve, Country Connections, NexGen
Access and Jenco have Grove City surrounded.
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=enie=UTF8source=embedmsa=0msid=107401
Dude makes it much easier for support staff to properly support the
network and provides all sorts of stats to prove issue to customers. We
do however have issues with Dude locking up on both WinXP and RouterOS
when the back-end database gets to 2GB.
_
From: Jason Hensley
If you are looking for work in the WISP industry or have a job posting,
please place an ad on the WISPA Classifieds Ads page
http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=2297 . I will send out the notification via
email as well.
Thanks,
Rick Harnish
Executive Director
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
First Job Posting:
Hiring an Inside Sales Account Executive
Contact Information
http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=2305i=76 Contact Elizabeth Olszta
Phone: 847-353-1381
Location : Chicago, IL, USA
http://www.tbicom.com/insidesales Visit Website
More Information
Inside Sales Account
The issue will be height. Remember, the longer the link, the taller the
freznel zone height requirement will be at the middle of the link.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com
To: WISPA
Larsen RO5810NF 10dbi Omni with N-Female connector.
On 11/15/2010 10:42 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Hi All,
I need a 5 gig omni. 8 or 9 dB.
I've got one from Winncomm but I don't like it much. The mount seems to
place the raydome below the mounting bracket etc.
What are folks using and
I have 6 virtual wlan interfaces. I want to prevent traffic form any
wlan interface to reach any other wlan interface. This includes the IP
address of the wlan interface. Besides creating 42 (I think) filters to
do this is there any way to group interfaces into a filter template or
something?
A while back I had asked a similar question .. Butch was kind enough to
provide a great answer.. see below:-
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
-
On 9/17/2010 10:50 AM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 00:11
Ok simplification of what I need to do. I need to get more than 1 DHCP
address on the same physical ethernet port I can assign more than 1
static address, so why not more than 1 dynamic address?
On 11/02/2010 01:15 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
How do I create a subinterface on an ethernet port
You can only have 1 dhcp server port per interface. You'll need to do
vlans.
On Nov 15, 2010 6:12 PM, Matt Jenkins m...@smarterbroadband.net wrote:
Ok simplification of what I need to do. I need to get more than 1 DHCP
address on the same physical ethernet port I can assign more than 1
In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik
On 11/15/2010 03:16 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
You can only have 1 dhcp server port per interface. You'll need
to do vlans.
On Nov 15, 2010 6:12 PM, "Matt Jenkins" m...@smarterbroadband.net
wrote:
Ok simplification of
A bit more detail…Matt also needs both DHCP clients to operate from the same
source MAC address.
I sent him a solution that uses two MAC addresses on the same physical port and
does not involve VLANs, although its obviously of no use because it does not
meet his requirements.
What MikroTik
You can have multiple pools to dish to people. I do this in my shop, my
computers that are being worked on get an ip out of the default pool, but I
set static computers to be dished an ip out of a different pool. For what
it's worth...
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Blake Covarrubias
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 17:51 -0500, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
A while back I had asked a similar question .. Butch was kind enough to
provide a great answer.. see below:-
Awww, shucks! :-)
--
* Butch Evans *
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:23 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote:
In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik
You cannot do multiple dhcp-clients, either (which is what you'd need).
--
* Butch Evans
Thanks for the reply. None of these wlan interfaces are in a bridge.
Each is NATed separately
On 11/15/2010 02:51 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
A while back I had asked a similar question .. Butch was kind enough to
provide a great answer.. see below:-
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 14:46 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote:
I have 6 virtual wlan interfaces. I want to prevent traffic form any
wlan interface to reach any other wlan interface. This includes the IP
address of the wlan interface. Besides creating 42 (I think) filters to
do this is there any
In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one dhcpc
on each bridge?
On Nov 15, 2010 7:00 PM, Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:23 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote:
In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik
You cannot
I think Chupaka has posted on the MikroTik forms about having luck doing
by turning RADIUS on for DHCP requests, and then setting up a freeradius
server to handle the assignments. You can set up freeradius to match
just about anything. Not the easiest thing in the world, but...
-Kristian
On
You cannot add a single interface to multiple bridge's.
My failed solution I provided to Matt did involve adding ether1 to a bridge,
then setting auto-mac=no and admin-mac on the bridge to something other than
ether1.
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Nov 15, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
In
I think you guys are overlooking his statement that he does not control the
DHCP server, and was looking to add multiple DHCP *clients* on a single
interface using the same MAC in the DHCP requests.
A few of us have stated multiple times is not currently possible with MikroTik.
The solution
awesome thanks! I didn't realize you could specify a != that simplifies
a bunch of other filters I have setup before.
On 11/15/2010 04:06 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 14:46 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote:
I have 6 virtual wlan interfaces. I want to prevent traffic form any
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:13 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote:
In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one
dhcpc on each bridge?
Unless this has changed, an interface cannot be on more than one bridge.
--
Not sure, was a guess.
On Nov 15, 2010 7:42 PM, Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:13 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote:
In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one
dhcpc on each bridge?
Unless this has changed, an interface cannot be on more
Nick,
I'm an idiot. That last one doesn't work. Try this.
/ip route print where 208.65.55.1 in dst-address
Works for me. :-)
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Nov 11, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Blake Covarrubias wrote:
Nick,
Use regex search.
/ip route print where dst-address~208.65.55.1
--
Blake
'Just a bit outside' - Bob Euchre
-- Original Message --
From: Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:20:44 -0500
According to the WISPA member's map, Avolve, Country Connections, NexGen
Neither example worked for me on v3.30. What version are you running this
command on?
Thanks,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 8:50 PM
To: WISPA General List
Cc:
Brad,
I've tested this on 4.9, 4.11, 4.12 and 5.0rc1.
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Brad Belton wrote:
Neither example worked for me on v3.30. What version are you running this
command on?
Thanks,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Contact Country Connections - they might be able to help.
www.CountryConnections.net
On Nov 15, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
3836 georgesville Wrightsville Rd., Grove City, OH 43123
_
Glenn Kelley
Ok, I'll give it a try on a v4.11 box.
Thanks!
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 9:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT Console route lookup
Brad,
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 20:10 -0700, Blake Covarrubias wrote:
I've tested this on 4.9, 4.11, 4.12 and 5.0rc1.
This was added in 4.x, IIRC.
--
* Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation*
*
WOW! I remember the days when everyone used to ask you these
questions..
On 11/15/2010 1:42 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Hi All,
I need a 5 gig omni. 8 or 9 dB.
I've got one from Winncomm but I don't like it much. The mount seems to
place the raydome below the mounting bracket
These kind of questions get my curiosity up. Is there any advantage to
splitting out multiple backhauls from my main tower to separate interfaces
on my router? Or perhaps even separate routers?
-RickG
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
A while back I had
Never, and I mean never, has Dude locked on my Win 2003 server.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Paul Hendry
paul.hen...@skyline-networks.com wrote:
Dude makes it much easier for support staff to properly support the
network and provides all sorts of stats to prove issue to customers. We do
You are lucky.
Regards,
Chuck
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:03 AM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Never, and I mean never, has Dude locked on my Win 2003 server.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Paul Hendry
paul.hen...@skyline-networks.com wrote:
Dude makes it much easier for support
Never locked up for me, I just hate wasting time on Windows servers.
On Nov 16, 2010 12:05 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
You are lucky.
Regards,
Chuck
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:03 AM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Never, and I mean never, has Dude locked on my Win 2003
PNP4Nagios works pretty well. The only thing that I didn't like is that it was
a steep (very steep) learning curve for that interface vs. Cacti. I didn't
really want to go through and re-create all of my graph templates again so I
stuck with Cacti.
NINJA is ok, but I found it to be a bit
Not that I have any preferences of OS but to be fair I set up the WIndows
2003 server once (last year) and have never done anything else to it.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
Never locked up for me, I just hate wasting time on Windows servers.
I'll go ahead and plug the Opsview front end to nagios. More than a front end
really. I've been using nagios since the netsaint days and didn't want to give
up years of hands on experience, but we needed a bit slicker configuration
methods. It also *almost* replaces cacti, but not quite.
Worked fine here. Thanks
I noticed the last command didn't work and hadn't had a chance to reply
back and say it didn't work right.
That does the trick however. (5.0rc3)
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(855) FLSPEED x106
From: Blake Covarrubias
56 matches
Mail list logo
