we use and are very happy with Billmax.
On Jan 17, 2018 1:07 PM, "Brian Rohrbacher" wrote:
> What do we got out there for billing solutions? My current one is not
> working out. I've been using Freeside for a number of years now and I
> liked it but they don't have
I am in need of hardware kits (18db dish, mounting brackets, ubolts
etc.) for Nanobridge M2s. I know I have seen posts where some of you are
accumulating these things. I am short. Need about 50 or so...
Hit me off-list with pricing if you can help.
Thanks!
--
John Vogel - President
JMZ
/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
John Vogel - President
KwiKom Communications
(620) 365-7782
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http
Registration Number available to
representatives of the Commission, the FAA, and the general public upon
reasonable demand.
Read more:
http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/17-4-antenna-structure-19844476#ixzz1EDhuqS9Q
John Vogel
On 2/17/2011 12:08 AM, John Scrivner wrote:
I own a registered tower site that I
Make sure the client radio is getting enough voltage? I have seen
similar things happen that were fixed with a higher voltage/amperage
power supply. Does this install have a long cable run or anything
different than the others that might affect the input power?
--John
On 12/18/2010 7:46 PM,
We just recently switched to Freeside from Platypus. One of the reasons
was to give more control over integration. Although the biggest
complaint I had with Plat was that it took 10 clicks to get to the
information I wanted...
With Freeside, we have it set up to add entries into FreeRadius,
Can the UBNT co-exist with MT APs in the same environment or will the
UBNT wipe out all other 802.11x based APs on nearby channels within
hearing distance?
On 9/13/2010 1:10 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
From personal experience I can tell you that you will be very happy
when you make the switch. I
Could it be related to this?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/928233
John
richard sterne wrote:
Older versions of Windows work fine.
Richard
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I was told that I needed to be in the $30k/month range before the
long-haul provider I was talking to would consider giving me a port
here So close, but yet so far.
John
Kevin Neal wrote:
I was recently quoted $300,000 to break into a long-haul fiber route
(not Verizon), that was to cover
John Vogel wrote:
I was told that I needed to be in the $30k/month range before the
long-haul provider I was talking to would consider giving me a port
here So close, but yet so far.
John
Note: I didn't ask, but I kind of assumed that meant a commit to 1GE @
$30/mbps... Do you suppose
I found this interesting.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/28/fcc_mulls_tv_spectrum_auction_for_broadband/
The US Federal Communications Commission is considering a plan that
would reclaim some precious airwaves from the country's television
broadcasters and reinvent them as wireless
interference from the tree.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:01 PM, John Vogel jvo...@vogent.net wrote:
So... I have a customer, been on for a couple of years now. The CPE on
their home quit working. I go to check it out, log into the CPE from
their computer, everything looks good, except
I just use an old chain saw file. Lots of those around here. About a
foot long, pointed on one end. Going through a wall, I drill the hole
about the same size as the cat5, jam the pointed end of the file in the
end of the cat5, then push through the hole. Works great! I did have to
learn to keep a
I think most of the items you are proposing to pay less than $30 dollars
for are too cheap. I wouldn't want to do those things for those amounts.
Especially if I have to drive to the customer's home to do them.
John
RickG wrote:
OK, back to my original question: Does anyone have a fee schedule
I have no idea how the Alvarion equipment handles bridging, but when I
have needed to bridge the CPE and also give the client an address via
DHCP, I have done it with a Mikrotik DHCP server, inputting the MAC of
the radio, but specifying use src mac address. That lets the client
plug whatever they
Free speech itself is not so much the issue, as presented by most who
would argue for net neutrality, but rather application/traffic type. If
it were not for the change in the way network traffic has evolved,
moving from a bursty/intermittent type of traffic to a constant, high
bit rate streaming,
can or can not send it to or
receive it from.
I think I stated that very clearly. Do you agree?
Respectfully,
jack
John Vogel wrote:
Free speech itself is not so much the issue, as presented by most who
would argue for net neutrality, but rather application/traffic type. If
it were
17 matches
Mail list logo