Re: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2

2006-03-29 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2 A typical BTA for a MMDS or ITFS build may only be 24 Mhz. Half of what you're saying isn't enough (50 Mhz). Some projects I'm working on have a whopping total of 10 mhz. I

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2

2006-03-29 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 1:24 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2 Mark, Well said. I agree with about everything you said. You're on the mark. Keep in mind the telco's don't have 6 month ROI's either. Some are better than others

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2

2006-03-28 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
- From: Brad Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2 A typical BTA for a MMDS or ITFS build may only be 24 Mhz. Half of what you're saying

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2

2006-03-28 Thread Blair Davis
I have little need of more microwave spectrum. I need spectrum in the low UHF or high VHF bands to get thru these trees. I think many, if not most, rural WISP's would agree with me. -- Blair Davis AOL IM Screen Name -- Theory240 West Michigan Wireless ISP 269-686-8648 A division of: Camp

[WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2

2006-03-28 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Hi All, Barring something that you guys see that we've missed this will be sent to the commerce committee folks. For those that don't know there are a couple of bills in Congress at this time that deal with this issue. As I can't send an attachment to the isp list I'll put the text here:

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2

2006-03-28 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:06 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2 I would strike the only 50 MHz of spectrum statement about 3650. The industry has paid billions for way less. The answer is using spectrally efficient systems with what we get for free

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper -Version 2

2006-03-28 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
! - - Original Message - From: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:46 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper -Version 2 Understood. But it is only 50 mhz. How

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2

2006-03-28 Thread Steve Stroh
MMDS/ITFS/BRS is approximately 190 MHz (I don't remember what the FCC's fiddling at the lower end to create BRS out of ITFS/MMDS added or subtracted. 5.4 GHz band is 255 MHz. Original 800 MHz cellular spectrum was 50 MHz and sparked cellular telephone industry in the US using analog

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces Position Paper - Version 2

2006-03-28 Thread Ron Wallace
Yes, Yes i would like to have groups of 3, 6 MHz channels right about 518-580 MHz, boy would that smoke.-Original Message-From: Steve Stroh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 02:59 PMTo: 'WISPA General List'Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [Board] Television Whitespaces