Whitespaces devices should not need to rely on circles on a map as these
never quite reflect the reality of coverage. Hills, buildings, noise
levels
etc. never show up. I know, we use that method for some of our marketing.
It's a good estimate, but signal checks are still the only really
: Brian Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 11:52 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Whitespaces filing
Marlon,
This is probably one of your best filings to date. Nicely done and well
written. I have a few comments and/or suggestions in line
today, yeah. But give it a couple of years.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Whitespaces filing
On the multiple TV channels
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
These data points would include geographic coordinates, antenna beam
width, transmitter power, antenna height, antenna polarization and
antenna azimuth, which in turn could be used to calculate D/U
(desired/undesired) protection ratios, geographic separation or any
- Original Message -
From: Forrest W Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Whitespaces filing
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
These data points would include geographic coordinates, antenna beam
Hi All,
Here is my first draft of an FCC filing on the 04-186 white spaces issue.
To file your own comments go here:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi
Enter 04-186 into the blue box. Follow the instructions.
The main location for filing docs is:
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/
