Depends on how far apart your backhauls are going to be. I went to the
Ubiquiti Bullets and a pacific wireless grid at 5GHz for up to 15 miles.
Some of the Nanos and Airgrids can be used for closer range. As far as
Mimo, if you are looking to push more than 70+ mbps through a backhaul, you
may
Sorry, saw you were talking clients. What I see as the plus on the client
side is using dual polarity sectors then even if I am using a single
polarity cpe, such as an airgrid, I can rotate it and possibly catch a
better signal. For the dual polarity Nanos, I've seen a cleaner signal and
more
On the subject of strictly MT backhauls what kind of throughput are you
looking for?
I always use this enclosure
http://quicklinkwireless.com/Itemdesc.asp?ic=DCE-H-LG-2eq=Tp=
For a backhaul with 1 card a 411ah is fine. 433ah for two cards.
Ubnt for xr2/xr5 cards.
I've used Arc
MIMO/802.11N on MT sucks. Use UBNT.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Mark Dueck m...@netking.bz wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a small WISP and I've been using only Tranzeo till now. I
would like to start using something that support MIMO. What should I
consider? Been reading a lot on this
On 04/19/2010 01:41 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
On the subject of strictly MT backhauls what kind of throughput are you
looking for?
My throughput requirements are minimal at this point. I'm in Belize,
and clients here generally get 128 to 512kbps connections. If I get a
36Mbit backhaul link,
Wireless cards?
OH MY GOD YES. For a backhaul or AP there is no doubt about it.
Every day I find something else to complain about the r5*/r2* cards. The
overall quality is on par with the price, but it's the little things. Like
removing 5/10mhz channel support on the card but allowing it in
If you have to use MT as the AP, yes go with the UBNT cards.
MT cards are ok for CPE stuff. Certainly not tower stuff.
But I was moreso saying don't use MT as the AP.
Use the UBNT Rockets or Nano's as APs.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Mark Dueck m...@netking.bz wrote:
On 04/19/2010 01:41
I found that out as well. Even with the CPE use, I saw the signal
fluctuating way too much. I had 2 subs connecting to the same AP and close
to the same distance out. The UBNT 2.4 card outperformed the MT card hands
down. Not at first, on the initial install it all looked good but in a few
I have lots of MT AP's, in fact most of them are, I do use a couple of
UBNT AP (and I'm talking about 2.4, almost all of my 5GHZ AP's are
UBNT). The thing I hate is the ACL list which I can't put in the
customer name and IP so I can easily diagnosis it. I guess it's forcing
me to put up a
That brings me to another question. So far I've just been putting
manaul IP, no DHCP. I've been looking at putting up a radius server,
but don't quite see how I can setup the clients. How is this done? the
Tranzeo clients have no radius client configuration. Or is there not a
need to
I really prefer MT APs to Ubnt APs.
On 4/19/10, Mark Dueck m...@netking.bz wrote:
That brings me to another question. So far I've just been putting
manaul IP, no DHCP. I've been looking at putting up a radius server,
but don't quite see how I can setup the clients. How is this done? the
If you are going to use a Tik box as the AP or the backend, set up a hotspot
service.
-- Original Message --
From: Mark Dueck m...@netking.bz
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:27:15 -0600
That brings me to another
In hindsight, I think we would have tried to do PPPoE on our network
instead of routing. The primary reason is Management and Billing, and
then we'd also not have to setup special firewall rules on our routed
clients for their public ip address. Then for our in-town hotspots
our customers could
So are you saying that if I do PPPoE, and have routing at the CPE
device, I don't really need to do routing between towers?
Is there any point in having IP ranges per location if using PPPoE, or
is it not even possible then?
On 04/19/2010 04:29 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
In hindsight, I think we
I've tried hotspot and it's pretty painful to manage and keep working
some times.
On 4/19/10, Stuart Pierce spie...@avolve.net wrote:
If you are going to use a Tik box as the AP or the backend, set up a hotspot
service.
-- Original Message --
From:
Correct. Depends on your situation, you can still do IP ranges...setup
a PPPoE concentrator per tower, and assign an IP range for that
concentrator. Really it is up to you. You could PPPoE tunnel all the
way back to your core (I don't think I'd advise that, if you have
multiple wireless
I swapped out my last MT as backhaul and am now all UBNT witth that. UBNT
is a cheap and simple plug and play system so it has worked more than well
for us for backhaul duty. MT is now used for the odd stuff where we need to
config a special use.
- Original Message -
From: Jayson
HA! That was a head scratcher for me too. A nice email to the company over
that. No response, as anticipated.
AND I WANT MY SERIAL PORT SENSING BACK1
:)
B0b-
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
18 matches
Mail list logo
