To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] yet another WiMAX vs LTE article
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Chuck Profito cprof...@cv-access.com
wrote:
Actually we have found Ruckus to do very well with multipath! i.e. boat
docks, moving water, moving boats, moving rolled tin structure
: [WISPA] yet another WiMAX vs LTE article
Since their beam forming is dynamic, I would expect it to work very well
in that environment.
As Ruckus beamforming is based on selecting a receiver instead of
combining the signals, it should indeed deal with ducting but not too
well with multi-path
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Chuck Profito cprof...@cv-access.com wrote:
Actually we have found Ruckus to do very well with multipath! i.e. boat
docks, moving water, moving boats, moving rolled tin structure, generating
killer multipath, kills EVERY OTHER ROUTER/AP EXCEPT RUCKUS. try it ,
I'm still getting my feet wet with the whole 4G thing and found this
interesting
http://www.maravedis-bwa.com/Issues/5.29/Readmore3.html
(Sorry if it's old news to many...)
Almost everyone I know is betting (and betting big!) on LTE. The only
ones I know holding out on WiMAX 2 are niche
it as a mobile
concept.
Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rogelio
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 6:18 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] yet another WiMAX vs LTE
At 7/1/2010 09:17 AM, Rogello wrote:
I'm still getting my feet wet with the whole 4G thing and found this
interesting
http://www.maravedis-bwa.com/Issues/5.29/Readmore3.html
(Sorry if it's old news to many...)
Almost everyone I know is betting (and betting big!) on LTE. The only
ones I know
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 6:18 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] yet another WiMAX vs LTE article
I'm still getting my feet wet with the whole 4G thing and found this
interesting
http://www.maravedis-bwa.com/Issues/5.29/Readmore3.html
(Sorry if it's old news to many...)
Almost
It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
available) in the 802.11n have been the Ruckus Wireless Folks. They had
been sticking to indoor units because of their business relationships
with the Outdoor
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
It's not a fair comparison. Some people (is this especially an American
disease?) treat everything as a one-on-one death match, and in this case act
as if there were a WiMAX Corp. duking it out with LTE Corp. for
At 7/1/2010 10:20 AM, awrote:
It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
available) in the 802.11n have been the Ruckus Wireless Folks. They had
been sticking to indoor units because of their business
At 7/1/2010 12:45 PM, Rogello wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
It's not a fair comparison. Some people (is this especially an American
disease?) treat everything as a one-on-one death match, and in
this case act
as if there were a WiMAX
wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] yet another WiMAX vs LTE article
At 7/1/2010 10:20 AM, awrote:
It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
available) in the 802.11n have been the Ruckus Wireless Folks
Anybody with a screwdriver and a Motorola PMP320 AP will find a DesignArt 2400
chipset under the hood of a $3500 BaseStation that is 802.16e mobile WiMAX
which does 2x2 MIMO. The same chipset also powers a 6x6 MIMO PureWave BTS @
3.65 GHz.
Faisal Imtiaz
At 7/1/2010 10:20 AM, awrote:
It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
available) in the 802.11n have been the Ruckus Wireless Folks. They had
been sticking to indoor units
Since their beam forming is dynamic, I would expect it to work very well
in that environment.
As Ruckus beamforming is based on selecting a receiver instead of
combining the signals, it should indeed deal with ducting but not too
well with multi-path.
No Beam forming is expected from
15 matches
Mail list logo
