Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 6:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
I do. I will drop it to you offlist.
D. Ryan Spott wrote:
Do you have any ethreal data you can share?
ryan
Steve Smith wrote:
In our case we are using staros APs. We
: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
So we now have WISPs with both StarOS and Mtik AP's that are having issues
'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Well, this definetly has something to do with having P2P installed on any
machine behind the CPQ router because I can trigger this 100% of the time by
launching limewire.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
Wireless Internet Service
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
While I am not certain
, 2009 10:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
While I am not certain that it is a Tranzeo issue, I do know that it is
something we are able to cause 100% of the time only on Tranzeo units.
It is possible that it is something in our
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:19 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Well, this definetly has something to do with having P2P
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
We have been seeing a couple issues with old Linksys WRT54Gs passing
private IP addresses down the PPPoE tunnel. It is almost like the NAT
table gets full, or there isn't enough memory to keep it all, then gets
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
While I am not certain that it is a Tranzeo issue, I do know
: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
While I am not certain that it is a Tranzeo issue, I do know that it is
something we are able to cause 100% of the time only on Tranzeo units.
It is possible that it is something
List
Cc: Brent Thrift
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Kurt, do yourself a favor and just drop the Tranzeo ap's. The 6000 and 6600
units that I use absolutely suck. The 4.0.2 firmware helped quite a bit
with the lock up issues, but now the speeds suck.
I've
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
I thought I mentioned that all AP's are Mikrotik v3.15. I gave up on the
Tranzeo AP's a LONG time ago Best decision I ever made.
Kurt Fankhauser
Dropping you an off-list response with much more detail. But also
posting here to report that we are seeing a very similar problem. We
are seeing the Tranzeo units fail to sustain downloads after two to five
minutes when they are in router mode performing NAT. Tranzeo is blaming
Mikrotik.
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Dropping you an off-list response with much more detail. But also
posting here
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
H, I've not upgraded many of the CPQ's to 4.0.2. I've not noticed what
you're talking about. I tend to only update firmware when something's not
working though, so I may not have noticed for a while.
laters,
marlon
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Wasn't Tranzeo that diagnosed the disconnect problem?
On 6/9/09, Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com wrote:
Marlon,
I
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Wasn't Tranzeo
Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: Brent Thrift
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Kurt, do yourself a favor and just drop the Tranzeo ap's. The 6000 and 6600
units that I use absolutely suck. The 4.0.2 firmware helped
I've got about 50 or 60 CPQ's and SL2's out there, as well as a dozen or
so 6000's, some for up to 4 or 5 years.
I've never had a single problem with any of them failing to pass traffic
as mentioned in the thread. I just upgraded one small town to 4.0.2, a
couple 6000's and a couple dozen
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Dropping you an off-list response with much more
Why you would route AT the AP boggles my mind... Routing Before the AP
is the way to go.
Why add additional load on an AP when it should be working on sending
and receiving wireless data.
ryan
Rick Kunze wrote:
I've got about 50 or 60 CPQ's and SL2's out there, as well as a dozen or
so
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
I've got about 50 or 60 CPQ's and SL2's out there, as well as a dozen or
so 6000's, some for up to 4 or 5 years.
I've never had a single problem with any of them failing to pass traffic
as mentioned
; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Why you would route AT the AP boggles my mind... Routing Before the AP
is the way to go.
Why add additional load on an AP when it should be working on sending
and receiving wireless data.
ryan
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: D. Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:38 PM
To: rku...@colusanet.com; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Why
In our case we are using staros APs. We like to have the CPE set to
router mode so we don't have to deal with any of the client equipment
on their side of our unit at their place. That way we don't care if
they change out a piece of equipment.
We are having no problem with any Tranzeo
Do you have any ethreal data you can share?
ryan
Steve Smith wrote:
In our case we are using staros APs. We like to have the CPE set to
router mode so we don't have to deal with any of the client equipment
on their side of our unit at their place. That way we don't care if
they change
I do. I will drop it to you offlist.
D. Ryan Spott wrote:
Do you have any ethreal data you can share?
ryan
Steve Smith wrote:
In our case we are using staros APs. We like to have the CPE set to
router mode so we don't have to deal with any of the client equipment
on their
Kurt, do yourself a favor and just drop the Tranzeo ap's. The 6000 and 6600
units that I use absolutely suck. The 4.0.2 firmware helped quite a bit
with the lock up issues, but now the speeds suck.
I've gotten rid of almost all of them in favor of MT APs. Life is soo
good now!
It
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: Brent Thrift
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Kurt, do yourself a favor and just drop the Tranzeo ap's. The 6000 and 6600
units that I use absolutely
28 matches
Mail list logo
