Broadband Use To Reach 100 Million
Submitted by Mike Sachoff on Fri, 03/23/2007 - 09:01.
The United States has 54.6 million broadband households, while China has
46.6 million; the two countries comprise the largest broadband markets
in the world.
On a global scale there were 250 broadband hou
FCC To Study Broadband Practices
The issue is one of four 'principles' deemed important enough to be
studied by the FCC.
By W. David Gardner
InformationWeek
March 22, 2007 05:32 PM
The issue of whether broadband providers should charge different prices
for different speeds or capacities will
Monday, March 26, 2007 - 9:34 (GMT+99)
Ericsson deals blow to WiMAX
Filed under: Mobile Phones | by :luk |
Red Herring: Ericsson on Friday confirmed reports that it has quietly
closed down development and manufacturing of WiMAX products, making it
the first major telecommunications equipment m
Saturday, March 24, 2007
Wireless broadband grants announced by N.H.
The New Hampshire Division of Economic Development's Telecommunications
Advisory Board has unveiled a $100,000 matching grant initiative to
stimulate and support wireless broadband public/private projects
throughout the state
Butch Evans wrote:
This is not acceptable. ALL facilities based service providers are
required to be compliant.
How is using a 3rd party not compliant? I seem to recall the FCC
specifically allows for 3rd parties to provide your compliance.
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
A ttp is compliant. But it's entirely possible (probably likely) that the
ttp's hardware will have to be at the wisp's local. Not at the upstream.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operato
MOUNTAIN VIEW, California (Reuters) - A little under one-third of U.S.
households have no Internet access and do not plan to get it, with most
of the holdouts seeing little use for it in their lives, according to a
survey released on Friday.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070326/od_nm
Anything related to 11Ghz, should be WISPs concern. It is my belief that
all serious unlicensed ISPs will at some point start to migrate to Licensed
spectrums for backhauls. 11Ghz is one of the few upgrade options available
for WISP's that designed their existing backhaul to 5.8Ghz functionalit
Agreed. Just getting caught up on some of my email readings and strongly
believe Jack and John are off the mark here.
6GHz, 11GHz, 18GHz, 23GHz, 24GHz, 60GHz and 80-90GHz should all be important
to us as a group. Any frequency that can be used by fixed wireless
operators should be important to
I wanted to share with my excellent experience with Don Annas from Triad
Telecom.
I contacted him about VoIP deployment since I need to provide a solution
to an MTU. I had the small blurb he submitted about his business.
I've never gotten into VoIP and needed (still need) some pretty
extensive
Hi,
As a new member of WISPA I am reading with interest all of the postings
about CALEA from the past few weeks.
Thankfully, we have designed our network in such a way that all customer IP
traffic passes through at least one Cisco switch before it can be bridged to
any other customer or rout
>What patents did Vonage infringe upon. What does Verizon have a patter on
>concerning voip ...
Many thanks to Peter, who supplied all the specifics of the patents in
question. Interesting reading.
> ... and how does that effect the future?
I read the public announcement from Vonage issued t
All,
Below is Ken's latest Blog post, still a work in progress, since George
brought it up he felt it was appropriate.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
According to the A.C. Nielsen Co., the average American watches more than
4 hours of TV each day.
http://www.csun.edu/science/health/docs/tv&health.ht
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Matt Liotta wrote:
Butch Evans wrote:
This is not acceptable. ALL facilities based service providers are required
to be compliant.
How is using a 3rd party not compliant? I seem to recall the FCC
specifically allows for 3rd parties to provide your compliance.
Detail
Thanks, Marlon. I'm going to give it a try. I'll figure out if I want to
charge my customers for it or not.
Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Sc
sigh
having no viable options vs. having one's head buried in the sand are two
totally different things.
Boy I'm getting tired of being insulted for having a successful business!
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Mo
I hope it works out for you.
Work with Frank on it. He can get you a 30 day free trial. We did that and
it turned out to be a powerful sales tool for us as well.
laters,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, March
I can say that I have always been a gadget freak. I almost always have
the newest toys (cell phones, laptops, two-way radios, etc.) and I
usually play with them for a few months, and then put them on ebay. I am
a technology freak. I love new things (like our newest toy, an 18ghz
Dragonwave AirP
Nice easy reading here.
http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1264
Looks like the trend is towards video on demand.
Here's a link:
http://www.tv-links.co.uk/index.do/4
We have a long way to go before this stuff is mainstream for sure. But
there is a convergence happening.
I myself
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:49:43 -0400, Adam Greene wrote
> Hi,
>
> As a new member of WISPA I am reading with interest all of the
> postings about CALEA from the past few weeks.
>
> Thankfully, we have designed our network in such a way that all
> customer IP traffic passes through at least one Ci
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:08:56 -0400, Dawn DiPietro wrote
> All,
>
> And which of society's groups of will be eager to take advantage of free
> Video On Demand? Why the people who can't afford to pay for these
> high dollar services or would prefer not to.
>
> The next question is, what kind of ba
I think the technical details are covered here pretty well.
In general, the service is rock solid and works quite well. At a
former company, we deployed it and used it for several years and never
had any complaints on a technical level that I can recall. It really
did help retain our customers;
I agree with Travis for similar reasons. I doubt anyone other than the
fiber to the home people are going to be able to compete with IPTV
unless something drastic happens for wireless delivery of bandwidth.
With the proliferation of 720p HDTV and up I can't see someone hooking
that up to the
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:49:43 -0400, Adam Greene wrote
>
>
> A: No. The petition proposes CALEA coverage of only broadband Internet access
> service and broadband telephony service. Other Internet-based services,
> including those classified as "information services" such as email and visit
Well with AT&T's HomeZone there is a lot of bandwidth use coming up. We are
testing it up here in Alaska and it works quite slick. It downloads via the
WiMax network and caches it for you. So the bandwidth usage it the deal, not
IPTV streaming. Anyone else on the list using it?
-Dee
Alaska W
Mark, your info is 3 years old
We have to be ready to "tap our lines". Even IMs.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "wispa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA compliance methods
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:49:
>I myself don't want to watch a movie on my pc monitor. I like the
>comfort of a big picture in my easy chair. When I can do that with
>internet tv, it will be a lot more popular.
Yeah, but ...
My living room big picture that I watch from my easy chair happens to be my PC
video server, not a T
Marlon,
With all due respect... We need solid engineering arguements if we're
going to present an official WISPA position to the FCC. If we submit
comments based on faulty engineering then it will be obvious to the FCC
(the FCC has real engineers on staff) that we don't know what we're
talkin
All due respect right back at ya! grin
Anyhow, to think that manufacturers all have our best interests at heart is
a bit naive I think. What's better for them? A 4' dish sale or a cheap and
easy 2' or 1' dish?
I'm not willing to get into technical arguments about this issue. The fact
is,
Brad,
I think you may be misquoting or misunderstanding me. No good can come
from that. Real questions need to be asked and need to be correctly
answered before we risk our reputation by filing comments with the FCC
that are technically incomplete or technically incorrect.
Here's a repost of
Marlon,
Just for info... see inline...
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
All due respect right back at ya! grin
Anyhow, to think that manufacturers all have our best interests at heart
is a bit naive I think. What's better for them? A 4' dish sale or a
cheap and easy 2' or 1' dish?
DISH SIZE -
Rich Comroe wrote:
< SNIP >
Yeah, but ...
Location Free, Slingbox, etc., do quite nicely on much much less BW. Is IPTV
really that much of a hog that it needs 1.25Mbps? How could it possibly
compete against products out there already that use only a tenth of this BW?
The items that use 1/
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:09:23 -0700, Marlon K. Schafer wrote
> Mark, your info is 3 years old
>
> We have to be ready to "tap our lines". Even IMs.
> marlon
>
I think you missed my point, Marlon... That being that not even the
government is a reliable source of information about what the go
33 matches
Mail list logo