Thanks John
So the 5700 to 5500 is part of the 5400 that we are all waiting for?
George
John Scrivner wrote:
The Military only for now. We will be able to under certain conditions
if the NTIA would ever release the reference standard for developing
testing of DFS and TPC for 5.4 to 5.7 GHz eq
The Military only for now. We will be able to under certain conditions
if the NTIA would ever release the reference standard for developing
testing of DFS and TPC for 5.4 to 5.7 GHz equipment certification. Many
hardware manufacturers have equipment ready once a testing standard is
released.
S
Who is allowed to use 5700 to 5500 in the US?
Thanks
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Those are very good features and have been around a while now but we
still ended up ebaying all of our 900 gear. I think the fact that they
still use csma/cd and don't include GPS support w/ every product line is
what has stopped them from having that killer product...
Jon Langeler
Michwave Te
When it comes to my customer's information and what they do, I use DKDC
protocol. If a spook comes by asking for logs, they get the NOYB
protocol. If they have a court order, they get FIOY protocol.
Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DKDC=Dont Know, Dont Care
NOYB=None Of Your Business
FIOY=Figur
...imagine if some entry were mistakenly interpreted and an innocent
subscriber were to take the brunt of the terror-squad's wrath...
especially if that subscriber was a fierce lawyer.
. . . j o n a t h a n
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Sam
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
I do not want the legal liability of being responsible for having such logs,
keeping such logs, and having to prove such logs are absolutely accurate.
That's just that part.
Amen to that brother!
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless
I don't know that I can even do that much, but I agree, it is not for me to fund data collection for the government. If they want data collected, I can make a switch port available and charge them co-location fees to house a system they provide. As long as there is a law or court order, I have
Title: Re: [WISPA] WHY?
Right, start trying to charge BB for that! Next, they will require you to ‘buy’ an ISP license to operate to ‘pay you’ your co-lo fees. :-)
On 8/24/06 3:23 PM, "Scott Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know that I can even do that much, but I agree, it is not for
; A division of:
> Camp Communication Services, INC
>
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--- End of Original
I'm going to save my 4.0 Firmware evaluation results for later, after I'm
finished testing.
But while working with ED Wyatt this past week, (ps. thanks Ed for the
time), It reminded of some of the cool features that had existed in the
Firmware (supported on V3 also)
One that sticks out is the
IMHO, this is real simple..
If you give me an IP, in near real-time or for a few months after, I can
give you a user name and address, unless it was a free, public access
use at one of our hotspots, in which case you are SOL. If it is 6
months ago or longer, if the user is still a custome
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WHY? - ooops
> I still think we need to keep this discussion going for a bit. I have a
> question for you guys. Which do you thi
I've always told my customers that whatever they do on the net is not
annonamous. And that they should assume someone is watching and is
listening.
I've kinda described privacy on the net is like being blindfolded at the
local football stadium and thinking nobody is there, but then to find
ou
You want me to hang a $500 PC in a box on a non-penetrating roof mount?
Current location has no power, only POE - at 100feet.
Next location up is precisely the same... buildingtop with only POE power
from inside.
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WIS
I still think we need to keep this discussion going for a bit. I have a
question for you guys. Which do you think is better for all concerned.
Do you think we should portray a false sense of security and anonymity?
Do you think we should tell our customers, "Hey do whatever you want
online, nob
Are you actually carrying your traffic, with your own approved public
IP assignment to several carriers and they accept and route that
traffic to and from the Internet? Any time I requested that it was a
very expensive proposition to have and they also only did large blocks
of publics. I guess t
Flip Flop Flip Flop
Guess they are not sure if they are sorry the lawyer got it wrong or
maybe they are sorry that they were uncovered...
You decide.
http://news.com.com/5208-1028-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=20499&messageID=177273&start=-1
Tim Kerns wrote:
*Qwest on data retention laws: Oops
Qwest on data retention laws:
Oops
http://news.com.com/Qwest+on+data+retention+laws+Oops/2100-1028-6108926.html?part=dht&tag=nl.e703
Looks like someone may be updating their
resume.
- Original Message -
From:
Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursd
Hi,
You have to connect to the internet backbone somewhere (even if in
multiple locations, etc.). You would simply need a $500 PC at each
connection. Pretty simple.
Travis
Microserv
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
Travis, my network has no such "central" point. There is no point where my
traffic
In my case, all "servers" are in boxes in the air, on the roof, or
otherwise. BGP needs to be in the regular AP version.
- Original Message -
From: "Lonnie Nunweiler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Managing C
21 matches
Mail list logo
