Re: [WISPA] Akamai

George Rogato wrote: Thats my thoughts. But, if NBC isn't paying Akamai, it won't be on their servers. Once you are on a peering exchange it is as easy as asking with Akamai since they have an open peering policy. Although, some networks with open peering policies will not peer with you if

[WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service And Provide the Atlanta Metro Market with New Wireless Offerings ATLANTA (January 9, 2008) - One Ring Networks announced today that it will be launching WiMAX service in the Atlanta Metro area using licensed spectrum it

Re: [WISPA] Akamai

Matt, Everyone is asking about peering with Google... and I would like to ask you because you already are peered with them... do you actually see that much traffic going to and from Google? I would think peering with Microsoft or NBC or places like that would be much more beneficial?

[WISPA] Advice for Ad supported wireless and dialup

Anyone have any suggestions on how to implement a free service that is supported by advertisers... Specifically; I'm interested in turning our small dialup pool into a free service sponsored by ads the same principal would apply for wireless connectivity at specific places. -- Regards, Ty

Re: [WISPA] Akamai

Travis Johnson wrote: Matt, Everyone is asking about peering with Google... and I would like to ask you because you already are peered with them... do you actually see that much traffic going to and from Google? I would think peering with Microsoft or NBC or places like that would be much

[WISPA] For those using IPTrack

I am trying a new install of IPTrack. I have my router all set up and sending NetFlow data (verified by tcpdump and NTOP) however when I try to start IPTrack I get these errors: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/src/iptrack/iptrack_capture.pl line 198. Use of uninitialized

RE: [SPAM] [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

Hmmm. I didn't know their was a profile for 3650.. Mike Bushard, Jr Wireless Network Engineer 320-256-WISP (9477) 320-256-9478 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:08 AM To: WISPA

[WISPA] Test, Ignore

I'm in the middle of moving the WISPA mailing lists to a new (and bigger!) server, and want to be sure I haven't broken anything too horribly. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, et cetera. David Smith MVN.net

[WISPA] ***Your message was blocked***

WHAT HAPPENED ? === Your message [WISPA] Test, Ignore was not delivered. WHO WAS AFFECTED ? == [EMAIL PROTECTED] WHY DID THIS HAPPEN ? = 550 INVALID RECIPIENT WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN ? == ? 10 ? 2008

Re: [WISPA] Akamai

sorry if it was already mentioned, but what many universities use for caching is (open src) squid: http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/ ftp://ftp.squid-cache.org (software development originally funded by NSF (i.e., US taxpayers) to support research into performance and scalability

[WISPA] Mailing List Status

Welcome to the new mailing list, same as the old mailing list. I think I've successfully moved all the WISPA mailing lists to their new server, where they'll have plenty more room to grow over the next few years. I apologize to everyone who got spurious emails from the Mailman list software; the

Re: [WISPA] Test, Ignore

I was just setting up some mailing lists of my own! lol. I'm sure all will go well! Dennis Burgess Mikrotik Certified Consultant www.linktechs.net David E. Smith wrote: I'm in the middle of moving the WISPA mailing lists to a new (and bigger!) server, and want to be sure I haven't broken

[WISPA] ***Your message was blocked***

WHAT HAPPENED ? === Your message Re: [WISPA] Test, Ignore was not delivered. WHO WAS AFFECTED ? == [EMAIL PROTECTED] WHY DID THIS HAPPEN ? = 550 INVALID RECIPIENT WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN ? == ? 10 ? 2008

[WISPA] ***Your message was blocked***

WHAT HAPPENED ? === Your message [WISPA] Mailing List Status was not delivered. WHO WAS AFFECTED ? == [EMAIL PROTECTED] WHY DID THIS HAPPEN ? = 550 INVALID RECIPIENT WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN ? == ? 10 ?