I used to live in Anytown. It sucked.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 8:38 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Speaking of cool amps
"This reminds me of the old CB amplifier business, wh
I cannot imagine how someone can charge what this guy does for a basic front
end to pf in bsd.
You could hire someone to write something for much less ...
amazing
vyatta does bandwidth shaping in their paid product - but in my humble opinion
- it is lacking big time.
pfsense does it - as
We had an ETINC box as well, I second what Travis says. Except it was
actually worse than Travis describes.
Avoid at all costs.
- Dan
On 10/15/2010 8:47 AM, Travis Johnson wrote:
>Run... run far far away...
>
> We ran an ETINC box for many years, until we couldn't take his support
> an
"This reminds me of the old CB amplifier business, which the FCC eventually
cracked down upon."
You mean they tried cracking down upon. CB's are still land of the "wild
west". When is the last time you heard someone getting a penalty for an
over-amp'ed CB? Reminds me of handgun laws cracking down
Hi Fred,
Nusrat of Shireeninc does a lot of business over-seas and for folks in
the Marine industries
.. I could be wrong, but you can get away with a heck of lot on an
oil-rig or a tanker !
:)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, Fl 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 2
They've been cracking down on our business too. And that's a good thing as
far as I'm concerned. Hi powered systems cause a lot of trouble in nearly
any case.
I had to laugh at the earlier example turning out to be hyperlink amps! We
hear that name so seldom anymore I thought they'd finally
At 10/15/2010 03:54 PM, MarlonS wrote:
>http://www.shireeninc.com/amplifiers-24-2watt-outdoor.html
>
>hehehehe
Hey, watt's a 4-watt amp [pun intended] among friends?
Oddly enough, I probably could use these legally, since they all hit
amateur frequencies as well as ISM frequencies. They might b
http://www.shireeninc.com/amplifiers-24-2watt-outdoor.html
hehehehe
marlon
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WI
"No Bandwidth Management for you.2 weeks!"
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 12:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for Bandwidth Manager
Run... run far far away.
I agree, when I first came to work for my current employer he had etinc
bandwidth managers..
We ended up calling him the bandwidth nazi.. he was horrible to deal with
and
thought that everyone was stupid and treated you that way..
Ryan
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Travis Johnson wrote:
>
Yeah, his attitude has cost him a LOT of business over the years.
He and I had a number of long talks about that quite some time back and it
seemed like he was getting better.
How long has it been since you've worked with him?
BTW, according to his site, a license for his software is only $500
I can respect your frustration, Forbes. Some may remember a thread that I
brought up "Is RIP Stable" because our network engineer swore up & down that
RIP was flaky between two sites and the upstream router was dropping all the
routes to this site every few minutes etc etc etc yada yada yada bl
I am in 100% agreement with Travis on this. We had the EXACT
same experience.
* Larry A. Weidig (lwei...@excel.net)
* Excel.Net,Inc. - http://www.excel.net/
* (920) 452-0455 - Sheboygan/Plymouth area
* (888) 489-9995 - Other areas, toll-free
-Original Message-
From: wireless-bou
Yeah, that was my first thought.
The only reason to do this is to cause problems for someone.
Do NOT go that route Scott. It's always the second one in a fight that gets
into the most trouble.
Get a hold of a spectrum analyzer, document what's being done and then sue
their tails off. The FCC
The response to my request has been overwhelming, this morning it was
amazing, response after great response. Because of the strong
insistence that Mikrotik is so great we are trying to make it work.
Dennis helped a lot by setting up remote sys log using software we
already have. We are se
Matt,
What do you have your availability percentages set at in
your network properties of Radio Mobile? For any tree class going above 180
or 200% tells me you have something set wrong in the RF tool somewhere else.
The examples I posted are actually in fairly dense forested areas
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:36, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> Dennis has been around for a very long time.
> http://www.etinc.com/
I remember owning one of these, a long time ago. We had to pull it not
because of any issues with the software, but because of (indirect) hardware
problems. We used to n
Brian,
I really like your idea for a full duplex system. Your example does not
appear to have much foliage and has rather high density. I feel that
TVWS should be used primarily for the low density with lots of foliage.
High density areas like that could very easily be serviced with higher
fre
Run... run far far away...
We ran an ETINC box for many years, until we couldn't take his support
and attitude any longer... or his nazi licensing system.
Travis
Microserv
On 10/15/2010 10:36 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> Dennis has been around for a very long time.
> http://www.etinc.com/
Dennis has been around for a very long time.
http://www.etinc.com/
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Forbes Mercy"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 3:15 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Looking for Bandwidth Manager
> In my mission to rid our network of Mikrotik I need
NETEQ or PFSense
On 10/15/2010 10:34 AM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
> Well I really don't feel good saying TrafficXpress or whatever their latest
> incarnation is from Logisense, but see if that is something that you can use.
>
> -- Original Message --
> From:
Well I really don't feel good saying TrafficXpress or whatever their latest
incarnation is from Logisense, but see if that is something that you can use.
-- Original Message --
From: Forbes Mercy
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:40:
At 10/15/2010 07:45 AM, MikeH wrote:
> I think it feels like you're walking into the wolves' den because
>everyone else has such excellent experiences with Mikrotik routing. I
>can assure you that it's not the load alone that's making Mikrotik flake
>out.
>
>I'm not going to pretend I know your
Seems like an overly pompous response to an overtly obvious
statement. No site we'll do is transmit only or receive only. All will
do 2 way communications, though Brian's suggestions would have transmit
only and receive only radios.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://
I think it feels like you're walking into the wolves' den because
everyone else has such excellent experiences with Mikrotik routing. I
can assure you that it's not the load alone that's making Mikrotik flake
out.
I'm not going to pretend I know your network size or capacity
requirements, b
You're leaving Mikrotik, but...
All of my bandwidth management is done at the tower and is performed by
Mikrotik. The non-customer facing routers don't do anything but route,
though will eventually adopt Butch's QoS I'm sure.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-
Forbes, just be careful, here. ALL equipment exhibits some sort of
goofiness when it hits its limit. If the processor can not handle the
load, bad things happen. If it runs out of memory, it does goofy
things. Whether it is an MT or Cisco, it will fail at some level of
loading. The Ubiqui
27 matches
Mail list logo