I remember seeing that there was a vendor other than Exalt that had a 1
gig real throughput single radio setup. It was even mentioned in one of
these Exalt threads. However, my searching magic simply can't find it.
Ideas?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Bridgewave does as well.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
That's what I thought, but they only had their 60 and 80 GHz products on
their site.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 4/13/2011 6:17 AM, can...@believewireless.net wrote:
Bridgewave does as well.
We are mounting close to a 50kW FM antenna and want to use heavy,
double shielded cable
for the runs to the APs since we've seen issues in the past. Fiber up
the tower but will need
3-4 ft jumpers to the APs.
Any recommendations?
http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/cat5e-shielded.htm
---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training
On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:15 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I remember seeing that there was a vendor other than Exalt that had a 1 gig
real throughput single radio setup. It was even mentioned in one of these
Exalt threads. However, my searching magic simply can't find it.
Trango can apparently
I remember hearing that was only on the high freq side.
And that at 11ghz with payload compression they were seeing about 2:1 (so
like ~500Mb/s@11ghz).
Also heard that the radio will compress, Then compare it to the
uncompressed packet. And that if it didn't gain anything, It would just
drop
I'm assuming that's single shielded and not double shielded.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote:
http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/cat5e-shielded.htm
---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 08:35, can...@believewireless.net
p...@believewireless.net wrote:
We are mounting close to a 50kW FM antenna and want to use heavy,
double shielded cable
for the runs to the APs since we've seen issues in the past. Fiber up
the tower but will need
3-4 ft jumpers to
Thanks everyone for your responses re: serving clients' credit card readers;
they were very helpful.
A related question I asked on another listserv: does anyone use lightweight
VPN solutions in their CPE to create tunnels from the client's location,
thru your backhaul, back to your wired/fibered
network aware CC terminals do not encrypt their own traffic?
On 4/13/11 1:30 PM, Ben West wrote:
Thanks everyone for your responses re: serving clients' credit card
readers; they were very helpful.
A related question I asked on another listserv: does anyone use
lightweight VPN solutions in
MikroTik RB750's at the client and maybe a RB493 at the head end? Instant VPN
tunnel.
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Ben West
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:31 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting
Hi Ben,
You can slice this in as many ways as you like... However if you want to
keep it simple and effective...
Here is the rundown
If they are using the correct processor, who is able to do these
transactions over IP / via the Internet, then you don't have to worry
about any of
Get with someone who can tell you exactly how long to make the cables. You
don't want them any whole fraction of the FM wavelength freq or it will
compound your problem. Make them as de-tuned length as possible.
I've had a coax in my hand not hooked to anything in the vacinity of a
This is correct, but we have this cable installed on 100k FM transmitter towers
without issues.
---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website:
I've been asked by the powers that be in a nearby small municipality to remote
control their generators as I have done on our own, so they can quickly shut it
down when lightning approaches. They just lost one of their 500KVA generators
to lightning. I'd be volunteering my time and expertise in
We use Tranzeo TR-902's in hills all the time, and have good luck.
I use this unit to reboot my Ap's on the towers, it is controlled with a
pager.
http://www.wesellpagers.com/wireless_switch.htm
Bob Rothstein
Prime Access
(877) 333-1003
Works flawless
NGL
Thanks for the info about 900MHz. It sounds like it would work.
The only thing I can find in country is 2.4GHz and 5.8GHz gear. So I'll have to
import the 900MHz if I want it or just go with 2.4GHz. I might try the 2.4GHz
NanoBridges since I can buy them locally. With the 18dbi antennas it
Faisal,
Thank you especially for the response that the network-aware CC readers
(should) encrypt their traffic. I was having difficulty finding
non-ambiguous information about that.
I'm still looking at options for possible lightweight VPN solutions, whether
to add another layer of security to
Wavelength (m) = speed of light (m/s) / frequency (Hz)
Avoid ΒΌ wavelength multiples.
--
Patrick Shoemaker
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Scott Carullo
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 14:54
To: can...@believewireless.net; WISPA General List
And speed of light (c) = 300,000,000 m/s
--
Patrick Shoemaker
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Patrick Shoemaker
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 21:10
To: sc...@brevardwireless.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ethernet Cable for FM
In space (vacuum). Cables have a velocity factor.
On Apr 13, 2011, at 8:42 PM, Patrick Shoemaker wrote:
And speed of light (c) = 300,000,000 m/s
--
Patrick Shoemaker
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Patrick Shoemaker
Sent: Wednesday,
Except in this case, assuming the shield is intact and good quality, we are
dealing with undesired currents flowing on the surface of the cable shield
only. At 100 MHz and assuming an aluminum foil shield in the cat5, the shield
metal is thicker than a few skin depths (about 8 um skin depth).
If the dielectric of coax cables causes them to have a velocity factor of .6,
why would the jacket insulation be different?
Greg
On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:28 PM, Patrick Shoemaker wrote:
Except in this case, assuming the shield is intact and good quality, we are
dealing with undesired currents
Because usually when we're analyzing a coax cable the current we care
about is flowing within the cable, on the outer surface of the inner
conductor and the inner surface of the outer conductor. The physical
dimensions and materials of the cable components and the dielectric
constant (relative
25 matches
Mail list logo
