Thanks for the information. Much obliged.
At 12/12/2011 04:12 PM, you wrote:
>SES Americom can be done. It's just not a easy process.
>
>
>
>Our first agreement with them took more than a year of legal wrangling.
>
>
>Since then we have successfully negotiated agreements with SES for
>another 5
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wi
You have to contact who manages the Satellite Earth Station and they
usually have an application and various forms to fill out. If you're
dealing with SES Americom, have fun. I don't know of one that they have
approved.
Pat
On 12/12/2011 11:20 AM, Fred R. Goldstein wrote:
> Does anyone
Does anyone have a standard letter to use to ask permission from
satellite earth stations to use the 3650 MHz band within the 150 mile
exclusion zone? Thanks.
--
Fred Goldsteink1io fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/
+1 617 795 2701
"It found that 69 of 92, or 75 percent, of receivers tested “experienced
harmful interference” at the equivalent of 100 meters (109 yards) from a
LightSquared base station."
Really? . So what happens to every cell site that they build on that
relies on GPS for sync and timing?
I like where the
Yea. Light speed is crashing before it even gets started.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:58 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
> http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-09/falcone-s-lightsquared-said-to-disrupt-75-of-gps-in-tests.html
>
> They have to fix this tiny issue of interference b
At 12/12/2011 01:58 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
>http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-09/falcone-s-lightsquared-said-to-disrupt-75-of-gps-in-tests.html
>
>They have to fix this tiny issue of interference before moving to far.
>Sprint should (and looks to be thinking the same thing)
>have done thi
