Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

2008-07-20 Thread Gino Villarini
Afaik the latests Mk builds are ATheros cpu focused, all the latest mikrotik 
routerboards are  atheros based

gino

-Original Message-
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 1:36 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

Butch,

You can order the Nano's with 16M of Flash, Ubiquiti has already stated that on 
their forums. I think the bigger issue would be the CPU that is in the Nano's 
would not be supported with any current MT builds. They would have to build a 
new OS for that processor.

Travis
Microserv

Butch Evans wrote: 

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Travis Johnson wrote:

  

And although I have great respect for StarOS, the Mikrotik 
community is at least 10x bigger than StarOS... it would make 
more 
sense for Ubiquiti to load Mikrotik on the Nano's... ;)



First, there is not enough flash on the Nanos to hold MT.  IIRC, the 
flash on the nano is 4M (maybe 8?).  I can't recall exactly, but 
it's not enough either way.  That is the only thing that limits the 
ability to run MT on the Nano, as the remaining hardware is pretty 
close to the same thing as the RB133C.

  




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

2008-07-20 Thread Gino Villarini
All are the same platform, the differ only on the form factor and antennas

gino

-Original Message-
From: Jeromie Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 4:19 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

Where? I see LS2/5 and PS2/5 support but nothing for NS2/5. Searching
the forum I found:

Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:38 pm from oswave
We currently have no plans to port oswave to NS2/NS5.

And it goes on to ask why and also someone says if you order 1000 they
will (likely) do it.

I am not able to find it, can you post a link.

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The oswave website says it supports the NS platform

 -Original Message-
 From: Jeromie Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 1:38 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

 Oswave says there is no NS2/5 support and will not be. DD-WRT has
 support. That is a shame since ros/sos seam not to have plans to
 support them. I wonder how much effort/money it would be to get
 Ubiquity to solicit a firmware from someone?


 On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well you all have the option to flash the nanostations with oswave firmware. 
  The oswave has polling...

 gino

 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Larsen - Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 3:21 AM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

 Travis Johnson wrote:
 Matt,

 I agree with almost everything you said... except the polling part.
 Having a robust, efficient polling system is the best thing available
 for outdoor wireless. That is one of the main reasons we are now using
 Mikrotik is because of their Nstreme and polling system. We are
 finding now it's not the same quality as Trango's polling, but it does
 work.

 How else do you keep a single customer from taking down an entire AP
 with a large upload (usually from an infection, virus, worm, etc.)? I
 have tested this over and over and over, and every time I come back to
 the same conclusion... you have to have a polling system to control
 the upload, otherwise the customer with the best signal dominates the
 AP (on the upload side).

 Here is a very simple test... set up an AP with two connected clients
 without polling. Start an upload on one client and then try doing a
 download or even a ping from the 2nd client. My tests show the
 download and/or ping to be very unreliable and very sporadic. Now, if
 you turn polling on and do the same test, everything works fine while
 the upload is running and the 2nd client can't even tell there is an
 upload running.

 Um, bandwidth limiting?   As long as the AP has the upload speed coming
 from the client capped to a rate slightly less than the total capacity
 of the pipe, its not a problem.   I'm doing the test right now, and I
 have rock solid pings, with a little bit of jitter.


 What we really need is the Nanostation-ROS... a Nanostation running
 Mikrotik (even for $50 more per unit)... that would be the killer
 CPE... I would place an order for 500 right now today. :)


 Or Nanostation-SOS - a Nano running StarOS.

 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com
 Travis
 Microserv

 Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
 Hi Travis,

 I'm with you - the Nanostations are a pretty amazing product.   I've
 been deploying Nanostations on 10mhz channels in 2.4 and 5ghz with
 StarOS access points and the performance/interference resistance is
 pretty amazing at ANY price point.   I could say the same thing for the
 newer Tranzeo CPE units as well, but they can't match up with the
 Ubiquity price point just yet.

 It is neat to see a product with many of the Canopy advantages (rich
 features, small footprint, inexpensive to produce, good interference
 resistance) that is compatible with the 802.11a/b/g standards and thus
 able to take advantage of the very innovative Mikrotik and StarOS
 platforms.

 I'm curious to see if someone comes up with a good reflector for the
 Nanostation radios.  That would enable the use of the adaptive antenna
 mode, and since StarOS has the ability to switch connectors on the fly -
 and potentially polarity if hooked up to a dual-pol antenna - you would
 end up with a standards based product that would have nearly every
 feature that the Trangos had that made them special (noise threshold at
 the AP, software switchable polarity, site survey, etc).   No polling,
 but that is one of the most overrated features anyway.

 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com


 Travis Johnson wrote:

 Hi,

 I would agree... I think there is an opportunity as well. There are some
 new products in the market recently (Ubiquiti Nanostation) that could
 shake things up a little. Getting an FCC product with PoE and a Ubiquiti
 quality radio for $79 is pretty amazing (I will be testing some this
 coming week). It really makes you wonder how much money some of these
 companies

Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

2008-07-20 Thread Gino Villarini
Mk can buy nanostations in bulk, 

-Original Message-
From: Matt Ferre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 5:28 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

Looking at the posts on the Mikrotik forum I'd say Mikrotik doesn't
exactly like Ubiquiti. And from business point of view I can clearly
see why.

Who exactly would benefit from porting Mikrotik to NS5? Mikrotik? No,
their Routerboard sales would drop and as we see during last two years
they are more into selling Routerboard + Routeros package than the
software alone. Ubiquiti would be the main beneficiary of that
situation and that's why you're not going to see it happen. Never
ever.




On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Jeromie Reeves wrote:

 Oswave says there is no NS2/5 support and will not be. DD-WRT has
 support. That is a shame since ros/sos seam not to have plans to
 support them. I wonder how much effort/money it would be to get
 Ubiquity to solicit a firmware from someone?

My understanding (this is friend of a friend quality info) is that
MT and Ubiquity DID have discussions about the NS platform.  It is
not something that is going to happen out of the box, however with
a 16M flash that Travis mentioned, perhaps it is something that
could be done.  I mean, the cost would be just $45 for the nLevel4
license and only about $23 or so (I can't recall the available
pricing) for nLevel3 plus the hardware cost.

-- 
*Butch Evans *Professional Network Consultation * *Network Engineering
*MikroTik RouterOS * *573-276-2879 *ImageStream *
*http://www.butchevans.com/ *StarOS and MORE *
*http://blog.butchevans.com/ *Wired or wireless Networks * *Mikrotik
Certified Consultant *Professional Technical Trainer *




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents

2008-07-19 Thread Gino Villarini
Iirc, there where plans for a mm2 and mm9 series...

gino

-Original Message-
From: Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 2:51 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents

Travis,

The Trango 5830 / 900 / 2400 were up/down-coverted 802.11b - not 802.11a systems

The only 802.11a multipoint system that Trango had was MM5, and it is my 
understanding that (1) it was never for 900 MHz and (2) it has been put on hold 
/ discontinued

-Charles

---
WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
Coming to a City Near You
http://www.winog.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 1:08 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents

What about Trango?

Charles Wu wrote:

So, what down converted 802.11a systems are there for 900?





Mini-PCI:

Ubiquiti

Zcomax



Vendor Solutions:

Tranzeo

Alvarion

Vecima/WaveRider

Wu-Wu Special*



*We are doing some exploratory investigation =)



-Charles



- Original Message -

From: Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org

Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:19 PM

Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents







Even thought this thread is a bit old, couldn't help but add my 2 cents

(as there seems to be a resurgence of puff in this space)







DISCLAIMER: I am also a vendor of various WiMAX 802.16d systems - so feel

free to apply your necessary 'BS' filter











Benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz







1. Spectral efficiency ( 4.85 gross bp/hz ) On a six sector



configuration with only 25mhz of spectrum, you can effectively deliver



approx 20mb per sector or 120 mb / per pop, 240 mb when all 50 mhz is



supported. Support for thousands of subscribers is possible off the same



BSU.







This isn't all too exciting, IMO - there are plenty of systems out there

that have similar (if not better) spectral efficiency characteristics as

to what the WiMAX 802.16d standard offers...also, with the uncertainties

of 3650 licensing, which is, from an interference protection perspective,

not that much different that Part-15, higher order modulation schemes

don't do much in the presence of noise







Case in point: Why does everyone keep using Canopy 900 MHz systems when

you can get an 802.11a OFDM-based down-converted system that delivers 3-4x

the throughput?  Well, it's a matter of what's actually going to work in

the crowded 900 MHz band.











2. multiple vendor support ( currently you have Redline, Aperto,



Airspan, Alvarion, all with FCC approved equipment )







The concept of interoperability is one of the most oversold features

of WiMAX which needs to be explained...







Fictitious Scenario:







Say I had deployed Brand A system for my business users, and in order to

enable VoIP services, I enable a variety of the more advanced MAC features

(rTP for my VoIP)...I set up a variety of service flows that are

customized to each user...blah blah blah







Problem is, Brand A system, for whatever reason, didn't support UGS and a

few esoteric service flow / packet filtering features, but at the time,

I'm really not too concerned because (a) my customers don't demand UGS

from me right now and (b) the concept of WiMAX interoperability story

gives me the conclusion that if I really need UGS, I could just buy /

upgrade to Brand X system and retain all of my Brand A CPEs that I've

deployed.







Now, 6 months later, I've deployed 50 CPE in the field, and business is

doing good...so good in fact that 2 customers want to upgrade to a

premium service that requires features not currently supported on Brand

A AP.  Luckily, I have a WiMAX system so I go upgrade Brand A AP with

Brand X.  Common sense would lead me to believe that Brand X would support

all of my CPE's features, plus supporting the enhanced feature of UGS that

I need







Sorry, isn't going to work







As things turn out, the only interoperability testing done between Brand

A CPEs and Brand X APs were done at the Best Effort feature set (basic

Ethernet connectivity)...additionally, Rf interoperability was done at a

3.5 MHz channel size, and I've been running Brand A at 10 MHz to maximize

my throughput (oh, and Brand X only supports 3.5 MHz, 5 MHz  7 MHz

channel sizes)...so to get this interoperability, I lose all of my rTP /

VoIP prioritization for my entire network, or I have to go out and replace

my 20 Brand A CPEs that are running VoIP with Brand X CPEs







Oops







What's the moral of the story?







Ultimately, unless you're willing to run your network at the lowest common

denominator, you're basically buying into a proprietary system.







3. Better RF performance ( even with siso systems )








Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents

2008-07-18 Thread Gino Villarini
They dont have any ofdm 900 product

gino

-Original Message-
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 2:09 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents

What about Trango? 

Charles Wu wrote: 

So, what down converted 802.11a systems are there for 900?



Mini-PCI:
Ubiquiti
Zcomax

Vendor Solutions:
Tranzeo
Alvarion
Vecima/WaveRider
Wu-Wu Special*

*We are doing some exploratory investigation =)

-Charles

- Original Message -
From: Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org 
mailto:wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents


  

Even thought this thread is a bit old, couldn't help but add my 
2 cents
(as there seems to be a resurgence of puff in this space)



DISCLAIMER: I am also a vendor of various WiMAX 802.16d systems 
- so feel
free to apply your necessary 'BS' filter





Benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz



1. Spectral efficiency ( 4.85 gross bp/hz ) On a six sector

configuration with only 25mhz of spectrum, you can effectively 
deliver

approx 20mb per sector or 120 mb / per pop, 240 mb when all 50 
mhz is

supported. Support for thousands of subscribers is possible off 
the same

BSU.



This isn't all too exciting, IMO - there are plenty of systems 
out there
that have similar (if not better) spectral efficiency 
characteristics as
to what the WiMAX 802.16d standard offers...also, with the 
uncertainties
of 3650 licensing, which is, from an interference protection 
perspective,
not that much different that Part-15, higher order modulation 
schemes
don't do much in the presence of noise



Case in point: Why does everyone keep using Canopy 900 MHz 
systems when
you can get an 802.11a OFDM-based down-converted system that 
delivers 3-4x
the throughput?  Well, it's a matter of what's actually going 
to work in
the crowded 900 MHz band.





2. multiple vendor support ( currently you have Redline, Aperto,

Airspan, Alvarion, all with FCC approved equipment )



The concept of interoperability is one of the most oversold 
features
of WiMAX which needs to be explained...



Fictitious Scenario:



Say I had deployed Brand A system for my business users, and in 
order to
enable VoIP services, I enable a variety of the more advanced 
MAC features
(rTP for my VoIP)...I set up a variety of service flows that are
customized to each user...blah blah blah



Problem is, Brand A system, for whatever reason, didn't support 
UGS and a
few esoteric service flow / packet filtering features, but at 
the time,
I'm really not too concerned because (a) my customers don't 
demand UGS
from me right now and (b) the concept of WiMAX 
interoperability story
gives me the conclusion that if I really need UGS, I could just 
buy /
upgrade to Brand X system and retain all of my Brand A CPEs 
that I've
deployed.



Now, 6 months later, I've deployed 50 CPE in the field, and 
business is
doing good...so good in fact that 2 customers want to upgrade 
to a
premium service that requires features not currently 
supported on Brand
A AP.  Luckily, I have a WiMAX system so I go upgrade Brand A 
AP with
Brand X.  Common sense would lead me to believe that Brand X 
would support
all of my CPE's features, plus supporting the enhanced feature 
of UGS that
 

Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents

2008-07-17 Thread Gino Villarini
Wu-WU Special? Or the Mr. That Said Special?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 11:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents

So, what down converted 802.11a systems are there for 900?

Mini-PCI:
Ubiquiti
Zcomax

Vendor Solutions:
Tranzeo
Alvarion
Vecima/WaveRider
Wu-Wu Special*

*We are doing some exploratory investigation =)

-Charles

- Original Message -
From: Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents


 Even thought this thread is a bit old, couldn't help but add my 2
cents
 (as there seems to be a resurgence of puff in this space)



 DISCLAIMER: I am also a vendor of various WiMAX 802.16d systems - so
feel
 free to apply your necessary 'BS' filter





 Benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz



 1. Spectral efficiency ( 4.85 gross bp/hz ) On a six sector

 configuration with only 25mhz of spectrum, you can effectively deliver

 approx 20mb per sector or 120 mb / per pop, 240 mb when all 50 mhz is

 supported. Support for thousands of subscribers is possible off the
same

 BSU.



 This isn't all too exciting, IMO - there are plenty of systems out
there
 that have similar (if not better) spectral efficiency characteristics
as
 to what the WiMAX 802.16d standard offers...also, with the
uncertainties
 of 3650 licensing, which is, from an interference protection
perspective,
 not that much different that Part-15, higher order modulation schemes
 don't do much in the presence of noise



 Case in point: Why does everyone keep using Canopy 900 MHz systems
when
 you can get an 802.11a OFDM-based down-converted system that delivers
3-4x
 the throughput?  Well, it's a matter of what's actually going to work
in
 the crowded 900 MHz band.





 2. multiple vendor support ( currently you have Redline, Aperto,

 Airspan, Alvarion, all with FCC approved equipment )



 The concept of interoperability is one of the most oversold
features
 of WiMAX which needs to be explained...



 Fictitious Scenario:



 Say I had deployed Brand A system for my business users, and in order
to
 enable VoIP services, I enable a variety of the more advanced MAC
features
 (rTP for my VoIP)...I set up a variety of service flows that are
 customized to each user...blah blah blah



 Problem is, Brand A system, for whatever reason, didn't support UGS
and a
 few esoteric service flow / packet filtering features, but at the
time,
 I'm really not too concerned because (a) my customers don't demand UGS
 from me right now and (b) the concept of WiMAX interoperability
story
 gives me the conclusion that if I really need UGS, I could just buy /
 upgrade to Brand X system and retain all of my Brand A CPEs that I've
 deployed.



 Now, 6 months later, I've deployed 50 CPE in the field, and business
is
 doing good...so good in fact that 2 customers want to upgrade to a
 premium service that requires features not currently supported on
Brand
 A AP.  Luckily, I have a WiMAX system so I go upgrade Brand A AP
with
 Brand X.  Common sense would lead me to believe that Brand X would
support
 all of my CPE's features, plus supporting the enhanced feature of UGS
that
 I need



 Sorry, isn't going to work



 As things turn out, the only interoperability testing done between
Brand
 A CPEs and Brand X APs were done at the Best Effort feature set (basic
 Ethernet connectivity)...additionally, Rf interoperability was done at
a
 3.5 MHz channel size, and I've been running Brand A at 10 MHz to
maximize
 my throughput (oh, and Brand X only supports 3.5 MHz, 5 MHz  7 MHz
 channel sizes)...so to get this interoperability, I lose all of my rTP
/
 VoIP prioritization for my entire network, or I have to go out and
replace
 my 20 Brand A CPEs that are running VoIP with Brand X CPEs



 Oops



 What's the moral of the story?



 Ultimately, unless you're willing to run your network at the lowest
common
 denominator, you're basically buying into a proprietary system.



 3. Better RF performance ( even with siso systems )



 Better RF performance as compared to what? And in what vein?



 I can easily slant the argument the other way by bringing up an
example
 where a proprietary system outperforms WiMAX



 Noise Immunity: Are you saying that WiMAX has better noise immunity
that
 Canopy (OFDM vs. FSK...yeah right)

 NLOS: Are you saying that WiMAX can do better NLoS than 900 MHz?

 Urban Reflective NLOS: Are you saying that WiMAX can do better Urban
NLoS
 than a MIMO-based 1024-FFT OFDM system?



 4. NLOS performance ( OFDM+OFDMA = More difficult shots obtain link )



 See above



 5. Better QOS support, and service flows ( UGS, NRTPS, ETC can be  )



 There can be an 

Re: [WISPA] Initial 3650 research

2008-07-05 Thread Gino Villarini
Charled, your blog states that you intend to deploy 802.11y , but currently 
there isnt any gear available.  Ubtn xr3 is 11a gear.

We have sucesfully negotiated with the local earth station using a telecom law 
firm.

gino

-Original Message-
From: Charles N Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 5:12 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Initial 3650 research

I have done a blog post on my initial findings regarding 3650 and
deploying in Southern California. It's quite long and has a number of
external references. Hopefully it is of use to some of you. I will be
turning out two more posts over the next week or so as well as updating
this one with additional information.

If anyone else out there has info on 3650 and exclusion zones, please
let me know!!! :)

Here is the post:
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com/2008/07/80211y-3650-mhz-in-southern-california.html

Apologies if this is considered spam.

-- 
Charles N Wyble (818) 280-7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?

2008-07-04 Thread Gino Villarini
You are lucky we are paying about $.30

gino

-Original Message-
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 1:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List 
wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?

I have been doing solar powered radio sites for 25 years.  I will never do 
one where commercial power is available.  Not sure how folks buying panels 
at $5/watt can think this is a good deal compared with 7 cents per 1000 
watts.
- Original Message - 
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles N Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?


 Charles N Wyble wrote:
 We are looking to deploy several hundred radios as well for a large
 scale private network, and want
 it to be resilient as possible. This includes power and back haul
 connectivity. Solar looks to be a good
 backup power option, and with the price of everything increasing perhaps
 a good primary option?

 Yeah, apparently people have been doing the math on the power required
 and the amount saved, and apparently it's significant.

 Not sure how they can know this without looking at specific equipment,
 but apparently it's worth seriously looking into, in their opinion.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?

2008-07-04 Thread Gino Villarini
Not at this moment.just an example of how different can be the power cost...

I just paid $850 for my home electric bill this month And i am actively 
looking for options


gino

-Original Message-
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 2:28 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?

Do you go solar where there is commercial power?
- Original Message - 
From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?


 You are lucky we are paying about $.30

 gino

 -Original Message-
 From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 1:06 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List 
 wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?

 I have been doing solar powered radio sites for 25 years.  I will never do
 one where commercial power is available.  Not sure how folks buying panels
 at $5/watt can think this is a good deal compared with 7 cents per 1000
 watts.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Charles N Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 10:14 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?


 Charles N Wyble wrote:
 We are looking to deploy several hundred radios as well for a large
 scale private network, and want
 it to be resilient as possible. This includes power and back haul
 connectivity. Solar looks to be a good
 backup power option, and with the price of everything increasing perhaps
 a good primary option?

 Yeah, apparently people have been doing the math on the power required
 and the amount saved, and apparently it's significant.

 Not sure how they can know this without looking at specific equipment,
 but apparently it's worth seriously looking into, in their opinion.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

2008-07-04 Thread Gino Villarini
What was their feedback?

I could only see canopy 400 working on this bandthey could also port their 
wimax solution but thats a different price range

gino

-Original Message-
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 1:57 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

Mot has been asking their users for opinions as to what they should do 
there.  They were very interested in whether or not we thought it should be 
standards based.  I told them that I wanted a closed proprietary system.
- Original Message - 
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP


I am not trying to tell people that they should abandon what they
 have. I am simply trying to make the case for WiMax in 3.65 GHz space.
 I do not think that is in conflict with what you have deployed. Is
 Motorola planning to deploy a  system for 3.65 GHz?  I have not heard
 anything about that.
 Scriv


 On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 Canopy is outdoor.
 I don't want interop as I want to control users to my system.
 The coverage, range, throughput has been totally smoke to date.  I am 
 still
 waiting for 70 Mbps at 70 miles PTMP.
 We don't roam, allow roaming or want to allow roaming.
 We don't operate in areas where ITU is a concern.
 Our systems are very automated

 I just don't see how any purported WiMax system is better in any way for 
 my
 Canopy based WISP.
 - Original Message -
 From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 10:17 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP


 Here is a list of some of what makes WiMax better than most other WISP
 solutions out there:

 -Engineered for outdoor broadband wireless delivery
 -Strict Interoperability Requirement between all vendors
 -Standardized platform which has been accepted globally
 -Support for multiple antenna ie. MIMO, AAS, Diversity, etc. which
 delivers increased operational coverage area above antything else in
 the WISP industry.
 -Roaming and national footprint options across unlicensed and licensed
 networks
 -ITU Recognized standard
 -Mobility options
 -System automation options

 This is a partial list. What is most important to remember is that the
 rest of the world has already built on this standard. I am not
 suggesting anything radical in saying we need to get up to speed with
 the rest of the world on what has been accepted as the standard for
 broadband delivery over wireless in 3.4 thru 3.8 GHz bandspace.
 Scriv


 On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 What is your opinion about the greatness of WiMax based upon?

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:19 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP


I believe that WiMax is great...  greater than equipment we currently
use.
 I just don't use it at this time because of the cost.  I also don't 
 buy
 into
 a lot of the hype people (press, manufacturers, vendors, others) are
 pushing.  I had a project that required 10 meg of synchronous, 
 committed
 bandwidth per customer.  I was told (by more than one group) because 
 of
 the
 WiMax magic, I could put 2 - 3 customers on equipment capable of 23
 megs.
 Sorry, you simply cannot put 10 pounds of shit in a 5 pound box, no
 matter
 the magic.  Other than Mikrotik, only the AN-80i would have been worth
 it.

 I do appreciate the FCC's requirement of equipment getting along with
 dissimilar equipment.  Who knows when we'll have another Canopy or
 Tsunami
 introduced that just doesn't play well with others.


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message -
 From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 11:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP


I do not think we should build our networks for the sole purpose of
 suckering, err, selling to someone else.  I do believe that I want
 anything I build to have value in the event I do sell. That is not
 suckering anyone. Why not build something that holds value or
 appreciates in value? I know a future plan for WISPs to build WiMax
 networks in 3.65 would result in better networks, better valuations
 for WISPs and better economies of scale.

 Leaning on 802.11 further is just not the plan we should be using for
 new bands and new opportunities like we have in 3650. We have a 
 chance
 to build something greater than we have now. WiMax is what the rest 
 of
 the world is already using in the 3.4 thru 3.8 GHz band. Do any of 
 you
 think it is smarter 

Re: [WISPA] unlic wimax on 3.65

2008-06-30 Thread Gino Villarini
Good point

Unlicensed 3.65 does not exist,

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] unlic wimax on 3.65

What is unlicensed 3.65?
I have a license.
- Original Message - 
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 11:57 AM
Subject: [WISPA] unlic wimax on 3.65


 Someone I know is looking for unlicensed wimax on 3.65 GHz.

 I told him I didn't know if that was available (but hadn't looked).

 Does anyone else have any comments or experience on this?





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] ekahau for missing children

2008-06-30 Thread Gino Villarini
That wold require the whole park to be wifi enabled, wouldn't a portable
3g/gps type of thing would be more reliable? 


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ekahau for missing children

Roger,

I'm not an expert but you are basically on the mark. Ekahau or other 
location-based systems should be able to track children if the children 
are wearing active Wi-Fi tags.

jack


Rogelio wrote:
 On a conference call today, someone asked if I knew of a solution that
a 
 large theme park chain might use to locate missing children.

 (Not really knowing the market, I (off the cuff) suggested they look
at 
 Ekahau.  But I told them that wasn't my thing and that I'd have to 
 connect them with someone else who did.)

 If anyone from this list would like for me to connect you with them, I

 can certainly try.





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



   

-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Cisco Press Author - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
Vendor-Neutral Wireless Design-Training-Troubleshooting-Consulting
FCC License # PG-12-25133 Profile http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger
Phone 818-227-4220  Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links

2008-06-20 Thread Gino Villarini
100 mbps UL = Motorola/Orthogon or Exalt

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:41 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links

 Mission critical and unlicensed don't go together.

I don't know about that. I've found it faster to avoid/resolve
interference 
in unlicensed, than I have in Licensed.
In Licensed, you don't just have the right to change, and you DO get 
interference in Licensed, and required to spend time working with others
to 
reach resolution.
Anytime you rely on others, its going to be a slow resolution.  The
beauty 
of unlicensed, is the freedom to take action.

As far as getting 100mbps and Unlicensed togeather, well thats a
different 
arguement, and nothing I'd ever try.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Blake Bowers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links








 Don't take your organs to heaven,
 heaven knows we need them down here!
 Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.

  RickG wrote:
  Any opinions on 100Mbps radios for mission
 critical 100Mbps PTP
 links?
  I need to go 10-15 miles. Licensed or unlicensed
 OK.
 






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links

2008-06-18 Thread Gino Villarini
Licensed or Unlicensed?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of CHUCK PROFITO
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:16 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links

Travis, 
What would you use or be cost effective, to get 50Mbps throughput 27
miles

Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Providing High Speed Broadband 
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links

Dragonwave has been our best radio ever. 18ghz with 2ft dishes shooting 
13 miles for 9 months without missing a single ping. We push about 
50Mbps across it daily.

Trango also has their 18ghz product that is less money than Dragonwave. 
You can purchase a Trango 100Mbps 18ghz set with 2ft dishes for less 
than $15k. Upgrade to 300Mbps full duplex is $3,000 extra (software key,

so can be added later).

Travis
Microserv

RickG wrote:
 Any opinions on 100Mbps radios for mission critical 100Mbps PTP links?
 I need to go 10-15 miles. Licensed or unlicensed OK.

 -RickG






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links

2008-06-18 Thread Gino Villarini
Well not really 45 @ 45 ... but they are good radios

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links

Trango 45 is supposed to do 45 Mbps at 45 miles for less than $2K per 
system.

- Original Message - 
From: CHUCK PROFITO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links


 Travis,
 What would you use or be cost effective, to get 50Mbps throughput 27
miles

 Chuck Profito
 209-988-7388
 CV-ACCESS, INC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Providing High Speed Broadband
 to Rural Central California
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links

 Dragonwave has been our best radio ever. 18ghz with 2ft dishes
shooting
 13 miles for 9 months without missing a single ping. We push about
 50Mbps across it daily.

 Trango also has their 18ghz product that is less money than
Dragonwave.
 You can purchase a Trango 100Mbps 18ghz set with 2ft dishes for less
 than $15k. Upgrade to 300Mbps full duplex is $3,000 extra (software
key,
 so can be added later).

 Travis
 Microserv

 RickG wrote:
 Any opinions on 100Mbps radios for mission critical 100Mbps PTP
links?
 I need to go 10-15 miles. Licensed or unlicensed OK.

 -RickG






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/








 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Rapid Link Launches WiMax Service in Atlanta

2008-06-03 Thread Gino Villarini
I thought you were One ring ...

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Prachar
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 6:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Rapid Link Launches WiMax Service in Atlanta
Importance: High

-  Atlanta business can now enjoy the only wide-area alternative to ATT
-


OMAHA, NE - June 3, 2008 - Rapid Link, Incorporated (OTCBB: RPID), a
leading provider of WiMax and Communication Services, announced today
the official launch of its much anticipated WiMax service offering in
the Atlanta Metropolitan area.

Following the soft launch of this service in February 2008, Rapid Link
has several active customers enjoying the benefits of this cutting edge
technology.  Due to the overwhelming success of the early release
through our Channel Partners, Rapid Link is now offering voice and
internet service via WiMax to the commercial public.

Operating in the licensed-only 3650 MHz spectrum, customers can now
enjoy guaranteed high speed connectivity, voice and internet bundled
service, at the best cost/efficiency ratio in the industry.

Matt Liotta, Chief Technology Officer of Rapid Link states, We are
clearly ahead of the competition and the technology power curve with
this offering.  Customers are increasingly discovering the limitations
of antiquated technologies.  Following the recent release of WiMax
technologies and equipment in the United States, Rapid link is proud to
be a licensed WiMax carrier offering this breakthrough service to our
foundation of customers in the greater Atlanta area.


About Rapid Link

Rapid Link, Incorporated is a Diversified Communication Services
company, supplying bundled internet and voice services to Business and
Residential customers. Rapid Link offers broadband access via its own
facilities to ensure fast and reliable delivery of its content. As a
leading licensed WiMAX carrier, Rapid Link is on the cutting edge of
this exciting new technology. We are one of the only carriers that can
offer an end-to-end solution for our customers without a dependency on
any other company's resources. 

For more information, visit www.rapidlink.com.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995: With the exception of historical information, the
statements set forth above include forward-looking statements that
involve risk and uncertainties. The Company wishes to caution readers
that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Those factors
include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties such as the
failure to satisfy contractually agreed upon closing conditions that may
delay or prevent the closings of subsequent debt financings contemplated
by the applicable agreements; the risk factors noted in the Company's
filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, such
as the trading price of the Company's common stock reaching levels that
would cause funding to occur; the rapidly changing nature of technology,
evolving industry standards and frequent introductions of new products,
services and enhancements by competitors; the competitive nature of the
markets for the Company's products and services; the Company's ability
to gain market acceptance for its products and services; the Company's
ability to fund its operational growth; the Company's ability to attract
and retain skilled personnel; the Company's ability to diversify its
revenue streams and customer concentrations; and the Company's reliance
on third-party suppliers.

Contact:
Investor Relations
Rapid Link, Inc.
Tel.:  402-392-7561





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] AC relay to reboot DC (PoE devices) suggestion?

2008-05-28 Thread Gino Villarini
Well if you already have AC rebooters on Site, you can go with a AC
relay or a DC relay with a wall wart ...

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Langeler
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 1:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AC relay to reboot DC (PoE devices) suggestion?

You have a cost effective recommendation? I guess we already had all 
these AC rebooters deployed and I'd rather not have to replace them all 
and SPEND MORE MONEY if you know what I mean.

-Jon

Gino Villarini wrote:

Why not a DC rebooter? 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Langeler
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 6:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] AC relay to reboot DC (PoE devices) suggestion?

I'm looking for an AC relay to reboot our PoE radios and I'll explain
as

best I know. Basically we have 24/48V DC along with AC at our sites but

our remote reboot controllers only have AC outlets on them. What I'm 
looking for is the ability to reboot our DC devices also with a sort of

relay plugged individually into each rebootable AC port that would 
reboot each DC line individually. Any suggestions?

Thanks

Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.

  






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] AC relay to reboot DC (PoE devices) suggestion?

2008-05-27 Thread Gino Villarini
Why not a DC rebooter? 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Langeler
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 6:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] AC relay to reboot DC (PoE devices) suggestion?

I'm looking for an AC relay to reboot our PoE radios and I'll explain as

best I know. Basically we have 24/48V DC along with AC at our sites but 
our remote reboot controllers only have AC outlets on them. What I'm 
looking for is the ability to reboot our DC devices also with a sort of 
relay plugged individually into each rebootable AC port that would 
reboot each DC line individually. Any suggestions?

Thanks

Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] encolsures

2008-05-23 Thread Gino Villarini
Go to ebay and do a search for nema enclosure, theres an outfit selling
brand new ones 24 x 32 is the biggest I saw

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of chris cooper
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 10:08 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] encolsures

Anybody know of a good source of NEMA 4+ enclosures at least 24x30?

 

Thanks

Chris Cooper

Intelliwave





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango Equipment

2008-05-22 Thread Gino Villarini
What are you standardizing on?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Annas
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:02 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Trango Equipment

Guys,
  We made an internal decision to standardize on our RF equipment.  As
such,
I have some Trango equipment available.  If anyone is interested,
contact me
off list.

  I have about 20 of the FOX SUs in unopened boxes as well as 5.3/5.8
APs,
900 APs, and 5-10 900 SUs

Sincerely,

Don Annas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
336.510.3800 x111 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.0/1459 - Release Date:
5/21/2008
5:34 PM
 






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach

2008-05-19 Thread Gino Villarini
Why is he in jail then? Bad lawyer?

He should get Tony Montana's lawyer ... he's so good, that by tomorrow
morning all the IRS would be working in Alaska

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of CHUCK M
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 2:00 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's
reach

Then The JURY members were uneducated boobs... a little reading and
it
is very evident he should not be in jail.part of the scare tactic
the
IRS uses every yearsad but true  
 If one wanted to read more http://www.originalintent.org/



Chuck Moses



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: May 19, 2008 10:45 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's
reach

Your wrong, Wesley Snipes is going to jail for 3 years because a JURY
felt
he should.

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Victoria Proffer
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 10:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's
reach

  I don't know if you are aware of this but there is no law requiring
you
to
pay income tax, have you ever read any of the U.S. code? Why do you
think
they want to pass a federal sales tax so bad, cause all this is coming
out
on the internet and people are starting to stop paying the income tax.
Just
type income tax on Youtube.

That is why Wesley Snipes is going to jail for 3 years...

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Kurt Fankhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

  Or perhaps you are one of those that doesn't believe the govt has
the
 right
 to impose an imcome tax...

 I don't know if you are aware of this but there is no law requiring
you to
 pay income tax, have you ever read any of the U.S. code? Why do you
think
 they want to pass a federal sales tax so bad, cause all this is coming
out
 on the internet and people are starting to stop paying the income tax.
Just
 type income tax on Youtube.


 Kurt Fankhauser
 WAVELINC
 P.O. Box 126
 Bucyrus, OH 44820
 419-562-6405
 www.wavelinc.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
 Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:53 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's
reach

 While at it, bill the IRS for your time in filling out their data
requests
 which they will use against you.
 Ditto the census bureau, you must be really steamed when they roll
 around...
 Or perhaps you are one of those that doesn't believe the govt has the
right
 to impose an imcome tax...

 I feel godwins law about to be invoked.  Tinfoil hats anyone...







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/








 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/






 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




-- 
Victoria Proffer
CEO
St. Louis Broadband
Visit us @
www.StLBroadband.com
314-974-5600





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

__ NOD32 3110 (20080519) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] 60 miles (90 KM) P2MP with CPE on Vessels, possible?

2008-05-13 Thread Gino Villarini
You need a ptmp 60 miles radius solution  and on a moving vessel to
boot?



Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin Cheng
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 6:22 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] 60 miles (90 KM) P2MP with CPE on Vessels, possible?

Hi,

There has one inquiry for range of 60 miles, with CPEs on 15 vessels
which
are floating units. The base station can be fixed location offshore with
VSAT while offering 360 degree of broadcasting.  Network is planned to
carry
only data packets while accessing the internet.

Can above be done by using 802.11? Any other better solutions?  Though
3G/VSAT are possible with monthly payment.

Thanks,

Kevin Cheng
WiBorne, Inc.
www.wiborne.com






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] point to point recommendation?

2008-05-02 Thread Gino Villarini
Going from wifi to Dragonwave / Bridgewave backhauls is a huge jump,
there are some intermediate solutions that can fit your bill ...

What capacity and range are you needindg?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rogelio
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 1:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] point to point recommendation?

What do others recommend for a backhaul (e.g. DragonWave, Bridgewave,
etc?)
when wi-fi just won't cut it?


-- 
Also on LinkedIn? Shoot me an invite: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] UL 1Gbps Link

2008-04-30 Thread Gino Villarini
List

I have to propose a half mile 100 Mbps upgradable to 1 Gbps Link, I was
thinking on 60 or 70/80 Ghz gear, customer budget is below $20k, 

What are the options?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] UL 1Gbps Link

2008-04-30 Thread Gino Villarini
I think they are proxim now ...

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL 1Gbps Link

Is terrabeam still in business?

- Original Message - 
From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List 
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 8:14 AM
Subject: [WISPA] UL 1Gbps Link


 List

 I have to propose a half mile 100 Mbps upgradable to 1 Gbps Link, I
was
 thinking on 60 or 70/80 Ghz gear, customer budget is below $20k,

 What are the options?

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

2008-04-28 Thread Gino Villarini
Single 15 mhz channel

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zachery Wolfinger
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

I've checked out Moto's product brochure and spec sheet on the PTP500  
and it's not exactly clear.  Are you saying they can do 105Mbps in a  
single 15MHz channel or across multiple 15MHz channels?

Thank you,
Zak Wolfinger
IT Director - Cyberlink
888-293-3693 Ext 4357







On Apr 25, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:

 Ohh, well then take a look at the new motorola PTP500,

 It can go up to 105 Mbps in a 15 mhz channel, pps processing is over  
 10k
 pps
 Multiple units can be synced with gps for spectrum reuse, it would  
 auto
 select the cleanest channel to operate in and many other goodies

 This are the best backhaul radios out there IMHO

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 On
 Behalf Of Zachery Wolfinger
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:05 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

 Actually, for the non-900MHz units, we are talking PTP, not PTMP.
 Using these for backhaul mostly.

 Thank you,
 Zak Wolfinger
 IT Director - Cyberlink
 888-293-3693 Ext 4357







 On Apr 24, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

 If you discover a radio that will do what you are looking for here
 (ptmp
 assumed) please let me know.
 - Original Message -
 From: Zachery Wolfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:00 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions


 Our company has used a single radio vendor exclusively for the  
 last 6
 years. My VP has instructed me to start trials with other vendors.
 Who do you all suggest for:

 Unlicensed
 60+ Mbps
 up to 25 mile links
 5.4 / 5.8GHz (same vendor should also offer 5.3 GHz for shorter
 links)
 same vendor should also offer  a 900MHz solution for neighborhood
 coverage (2-3 mile radius)

 Thank you,
 Zak Wolfinger
 IT Director - Cyberlink
 888-293-3693 Ext 4357












 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] LigoWave proprietary PtP (was Re: Radio Vendor Suggestions)

2008-04-25 Thread Gino Villarini
Matt, have you run this tests in similar 802.11a based systems?
Mikrotik? OSBridge? StarOS?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] LigoWave proprietary PtP (was Re: Radio Vendor
Suggestions)

Our office is in the same city as Deliberant, so we have been able to  
test their new proprietary PtP radios quite extensively. We don't test  
for raw throughput; we focus on consistent payload with low latency,  
low jitter and the ability to handle a lot of PPS. While I don't claim  
to no the limits of their radios, I can tell you that we setup an  
emulated DS1 (CESoPSN) through their radios with a testset running  
quasi. The test completed without errors during a 30min run. The test  
subjected to the radios to 2000pps aggregate with an IP payload size  
of 192k. Latency was as expected given the distance we were testing (1  
mile) and jitter averaged 0.7ms. The performance was in excess of what  
we have seen with 802.11a-based radios, which I believe speaks  
positively to the MAC changes they made. Again, we didn't test to see  
what they were capable of; only that they would meet our minimum  
requirements, which many radios do not.

-Matt

On Apr 24, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Harold Bledsoe wrote:
 The 70Mbps is a 40Mhz channel.  We get around 40Mbps on a 20MHz  
 channel.
 The PTP product is not an 11a mac as that has been rewritten by us to
 improve performance, especially over distance and to allow for better
 2-way traffic handling, among other things.

 70Mbps over distance (and higher) is possible with MIMO technologies  
 in
 a 20MHz channel though.

 -Hal

 -Original Message-
 From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions
 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:45:52 -0400

 I wouldn't count on any 802.11a hitting 70 mbps in a 20 mhz  
 channel 
 maybe on a 40 mhz channel if you do some atheros tricks, if you have  
 the
 cpu power and if you have enough fade margin 

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 On
 Behalf Of Jason Hensley
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:40 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

 Ligowave is real close.  2.4, 5.8 in the same box.  900MHz solution.
 70MBps
 PtP, but not sure distance on that.  5.3 and 5.4 are coming very soon
 from
 what I hear but don't know that for sure.



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:06 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

 If you discover a radio that will do what you are looking for here  
 (ptmp
 assumed) please let me know.
 - Original Message -
 From: Zachery Wolfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:00 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions


 Our company has used a single radio vendor exclusively for the last 6
 years. My VP has instructed me to start trials with other vendors.
 Who do you all suggest for:

 Unlicensed
 60+ Mbps
 up to 25 mile links
 5.4 / 5.8GHz (same vendor should also offer 5.3 GHz for shorter  
 links)

 same vendor should also offer  a 900MHz solution for neighborhood
 coverage (2-3 mile radius)

 Thank you,
 Zak Wolfinger
 IT Director - Cyberlink
 888-293-3693 Ext 4357










--
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

--
 --

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail

Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

2008-04-25 Thread Gino Villarini
Ohh, well then take a look at the new motorola PTP500,

It can go up to 105 Mbps in a 15 mhz channel, pps processing is over 10k
pps
Multiple units can be synced with gps for spectrum reuse, it would auto
select the cleanest channel to operate in and many other goodies

This are the best backhaul radios out there IMHO

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zachery Wolfinger
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

Actually, for the non-900MHz units, we are talking PTP, not PTMP.   
Using these for backhaul mostly.

Thank you,
Zak Wolfinger
IT Director - Cyberlink
888-293-3693 Ext 4357







On Apr 24, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

 If you discover a radio that will do what you are looking for here  
 (ptmp
 assumed) please let me know.
 - Original Message -
 From: Zachery Wolfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:00 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions


 Our company has used a single radio vendor exclusively for the last 6
 years. My VP has instructed me to start trials with other vendors.
 Who do you all suggest for:

 Unlicensed
 60+ Mbps
 up to 25 mile links
 5.4 / 5.8GHz (same vendor should also offer 5.3 GHz for shorter  
 links)
 same vendor should also offer  a 900MHz solution for neighborhood
 coverage (2-3 mile radius)

 Thank you,
 Zak Wolfinger
 IT Director - Cyberlink
 888-293-3693 Ext 4357












 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] LigoWave proprietary PtP (was Re: Radio VendorSuggestions)

2008-04-25 Thread Gino Villarini
Well all of them have modified mac

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 9:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] LigoWave proprietary PtP (was Re: Radio
VendorSuggestions)

Straight 802.11a systems do not pass. A modified MAC seems to be  
required.

-Matt

On Apr 25, 2008, at 5:00 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
 Matt, have you run this tests in similar 802.11a based systems?
 Mikrotik? OSBridge? StarOS?

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 On
 Behalf Of Matt Liotta
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:36 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] LigoWave proprietary PtP (was Re: Radio Vendor
 Suggestions)

 Our office is in the same city as Deliberant, so we have been able to
 test their new proprietary PtP radios quite extensively. We don't test
 for raw throughput; we focus on consistent payload with low latency,
 low jitter and the ability to handle a lot of PPS. While I don't claim
 to no the limits of their radios, I can tell you that we setup an
 emulated DS1 (CESoPSN) through their radios with a testset running
 quasi. The test completed without errors during a 30min run. The test
 subjected to the radios to 2000pps aggregate with an IP payload size
 of 192k. Latency was as expected given the distance we were testing (1
 mile) and jitter averaged 0.7ms. The performance was in excess of what
 we have seen with 802.11a-based radios, which I believe speaks
 positively to the MAC changes they made. Again, we didn't test to see
 what they were capable of; only that they would meet our minimum
 requirements, which many radios do not.

 -Matt

 On Apr 24, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Harold Bledsoe wrote:
 The 70Mbps is a 40Mhz channel.  We get around 40Mbps on a 20MHz
 channel.
 The PTP product is not an 11a mac as that has been rewritten by us to
 improve performance, especially over distance and to allow for better
 2-way traffic handling, among other things.

 70Mbps over distance (and higher) is possible with MIMO technologies
 in
 a 20MHz channel though.

 -Hal

 -Original Message-
 From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions
 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:45:52 -0400

 I wouldn't count on any 802.11a hitting 70 mbps in a 20 mhz
 channel 
 maybe on a 40 mhz channel if you do some atheros tricks, if you have
 the
 cpu power and if you have enough fade margin 

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Jason Hensley
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:40 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

 Ligowave is real close.  2.4, 5.8 in the same box.  900MHz solution.
 70MBps
 PtP, but not sure distance on that.  5.3 and 5.4 are coming very soon
 from
 what I hear but don't know that for sure.



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:06 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

 If you discover a radio that will do what you are looking for here
 (ptmp
 assumed) please let me know.
 - Original Message -
 From: Zachery Wolfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:00 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions


 Our company has used a single radio vendor exclusively for the  
 last 6
 years. My VP has instructed me to start trials with other vendors.
 Who do you all suggest for:

 Unlicensed
 60+ Mbps
 up to 25 mile links
 5.4 / 5.8GHz (same vendor should also offer 5.3 GHz for shorter
 links)

 same vendor should also offer  a 900MHz solution for neighborhood
 coverage (2-3 mile radius)

 Thank you,
 Zak Wolfinger
 IT Director - Cyberlink
 888-293-3693 Ext 4357










 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 --
 --

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

2008-04-24 Thread Gino Villarini
I wouldn't count on any 802.11a hitting 70 mbps in a 20 mhz channel 
maybe on a 40 mhz channel if you do some atheros tricks, if you have the
cpu power and if you have enough fade margin 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Hensley
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:40 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

Ligowave is real close.  2.4, 5.8 in the same box.  900MHz solution.
70MBps
PtP, but not sure distance on that.  5.3 and 5.4 are coming very soon
from
what I hear but don't know that for sure.  

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

If you discover a radio that will do what you are looking for here (ptmp
assumed) please let me know.
- Original Message -
From: Zachery Wolfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:00 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions


 Our company has used a single radio vendor exclusively for the last 6 
 years. My VP has instructed me to start trials with other vendors.
 Who do you all suggest for:

 Unlicensed
 60+ Mbps
 up to 25 mile links
 5.4 / 5.8GHz (same vendor should also offer 5.3 GHz for shorter links)

 same vendor should also offer  a 900MHz solution for neighborhood 
 coverage (2-3 mile radius)

 Thank you,
 Zak Wolfinger
 IT Director - Cyberlink
 888-293-3693 Ext 4357









 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Future

2008-04-23 Thread Gino Villarini
The Canopy SM does this ...

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

And what do you use to control that bandwidth? 

Chuck McCown wrote:
 We sell 10.2 Mbps burst service.  And most of them actually get that
speed.
 If they start streaming or downloading a large file, we throttle them
down. 
 Most are at 768.
 When the stream or download stops, they go back to wide open throttle.

 Customers love it.

 - Original Message - 
 From: D. Ryan Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 2:41 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


   
 Chuck,

 What speeds do you sell to your end customers at 128:1 oversub?

 (I am assuming that you never really go this high!) :)

 ryan

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:33 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 That is pretty much what we do on Motorola Canopy.
 20 MHz channels.
 128:1 (or less) over subscription
 10 Mbps
 First AP and BH would be in the $5K range
 Second AP would be in the $2K range.  (depending on antennas etc).

 We are waiting to see what the OFDM product will do.  Smaller
channels.
 More speed.
 (more money too).

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 1:17 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


 
 Anyone doing a 20 MHz channel?

 Would that be enough capacity to allow for typical oversubscription
on 
 say
   
 a
 10 meg client?

 What does it cost to get the first AP up ($5k, $15k, $50k)?

 What does it cost to get additional APs up ($2k, $10k, $30k)?


 --
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 12:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


   
 Chuck,

 Airspan / Aperto are both shipping 5x Ghz wimax products.

 Throughput is about 26mb peak for the Airspan product on 10mhz
 channels, and 22mb on the Aperto product in 7mhz channels. Also,
there
 are ways to get around the exclusion zones, if you find out who the
 licenseholders are.



 -

 Jeff

 On Apr 21, 2008, at 1:20 PM, CHUCK PROFITO wrote:

 
 Patrick,
 Excellent point on channel sizes!
 So if WiMAX is released in unlicensed frequencies of 900, 2.4? ,
 5.X, 3.6
 (we are in a big exclusion zone.)
 I imagine if you deployed in 2.4 it would smoke the home routers.
 Would our capacity double for the same channel sizes?
 Would it use the same channel sizes?
 Would it help with range and capacity?
 Will WiMax help tree penetration? Can Physics be bent?
 In legacy deployments, would or could it improve our back hauls?


 Chuck Profito
 209-988-7388
 CV-ACCESS, INC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Providing High Speed Broadband
 to Rural Central California
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of CHUCK PROFITO
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:01 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 Patrick,
 If not 70 miles and 30 mbps,
 what are the real numbers on the fixed, for say:
 2 miles los?
 2 miles wooded?
 5 m los?
 5 m nlos?
 10 m los?
 10 m nlos
 ??
 Is this a fair question?

 Chuck Profito
 209-988-7388
 CV-ACCESS, INC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Providing High Speed Broadband
 to Rural Central California
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Patrick Leary
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:14 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 The press has been wrong most of time, causing companies like ours
 great
 headaches. The stupid 70 miles 30 mbps was the most absurd bit
of
 hyperbole that the press picked up and repeated endlessly.
 Meanwhile, Mo
 Shakouri (the Marketing VP of the WiMAX Forum and an Alvarion
exec)
 was
 trying to dispel that at every turn (I sat in on many of his
public
 sessions). Others of us also were trying to correct the
 expectations. I
 did it in numerous analyst and press interviews.

 WiMAX is also doing well overseas, especially in Asia. WiMAX's
 greatest
 near term challenge in the U.S. is Sprint.

 Patrick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 8:57 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 WiMax as hyped by the press is dead.  No?

 - Original Message -
 From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:52 AM
 Subject: Re: 

Re: [WISPA] Future

2008-04-21 Thread Gino Villarini
Is that 2.5 Wimax gear?

 

Gino A. Villarini 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:36 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 

Hi,

A new player just came to my area... BridgeMaxx (a Digital Bridge
company). They are using Alvarion WiMax equipment. We have a test radio
that we play with. We have their up to 3meg premium service and we
barely get 1meg (any time we have tested over the last 3 months).

Here's the real kicker... they will have spent $40 million dollars to
roll out 15 cities (this is direct from their GM to me). She was pretty
proud of herself with that statement. So that's $2.6 million per city...
and I'm talking some cities with 15,000 population (their biggest had
120,000).

Travis
Microserv

Chuck McCown - 2 wrote: 

WiMAX was dead, is dead and will remain dead.  OK, not factually true
but 
emotionally true.  The cell companies will use  WiMax frequencies and 
technologies but they will be a premium service and not well suited to 
compete with us for point to multi point fixed wireless.  It will never
live 
up to the hype.
 
All the cell data technologies will remain premium for folks on the go. 
Cell does not want to squander the bandwidth to go after the value
driven 
customer that love us so much.  Cell is and will not be value leader for

fixed wireless. technologies.
 
700 MHz is just not going to be used for anything other than more cell 
spectrum.  The bands are narrow.  Good for phone and limited amounts of 
data.  Great propagation. Problem with 700 MHz is that the size of the 
antenna will be problematic for really small cell phones.  Less gain
than 
the current 900 and 1800 antennas for the same physical sizes.  Also
there 
will be a few years of implementation due to moving some existing TV 
stations.  And some of them are not moving for some reason.  I don't
know if 
they get a special dispensation or what.
 
All ILECs will continue to build out with fiber to the home.  That will 
erode market share for WISPs in some areas.  This is a slow and capital 
intensive process so no reason to get jumpy on that.  Plus many folks
prefer 
to deal with us vs a large public traded company.  Superior customer
service 
and support will always retain the customer.
 
The cable companies will continue to shoot themselves in the foot and
drop 
the balls.  They are sooo freaked out by the erosion of customer base
from 
DirecTV that they are not managing the IP side of the house as well as
they 
could.  They will continue to get in a tighter and tighter cash
situation 
from satellite TV pressing from one side and the ILEC FTTH (and us) from
the 
other.
 
In the meantime, we add VOIP, computer repair, data backup, web
development, 
OTA HDTV install and maint, etc as cross sell and up sell opportunities.

All of us can offer triple play if we team up with DirecTV or OTA HDTV.
OTA 
HDTV is a wonderful opportunity for the next 18 months for the value 
conscious customer.  Stock UHF TV antennas and converter boxes and help 
folks get their analog TVs converted over.  Less work than a WISP
install 
and you will lock in the customer even more with superior customer
service. 
You can rent them the gear for $5/month and make it a low cost package.
 
In 5 years hopefully your investment will be a cash cow and you will
ride 
this horse until it dies.  Perhaps other technologies will come along
for us 
to deploy but I see our segment strong for the next 5 years.  In 10
years, 
if we have not diversified, we will probably be hurting.
 
Oh, and satellite ISP will never do much.  Pesky physics.
 
- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 6:44 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Future
 
 
  

What do you see as the future of our industry over the next 5
years?
 
ATT is expanding U-Verse (will this be available outside of
town?)
Verizon is expanding FiOS (will this be available outside of
town?)
Cable will be using DOCSIS 3
3G will gain more steam
WiMAX will have larger and larger shares of the market
700 MHz will be in use possibly for data communications by the
big guys
 
 
My banker asked me, so I figured I'd see what other's opinions
are.
 
My thought is that the big guys mentioned above will continue to
avoid the 
niche that we currently serve and we'll be able to provide
better services 
with more spectrum (5.4 GHz, additional 2.5 GHz, 3.6 GHz,
possibly TV 
white spaces) and WiMAX.
 
 
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 

Re: [WISPA] Future

2008-04-21 Thread Gino Villarini
More Testing with the NS5:

Using 5 Mhz channels ...

17 MBps Downlink 10 Mbps Uplinks ...

Wow!  Obviously I have the SuperA options enabled (FastFrame, Bursting
and Compression)... still ... impressive for a $80 radio

All this test are bench test using Mikrotik Bandwidth test tool ...

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 2:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

I am not sure you are comparing apples to apples here. We have  
deployed a number of Redline 3.65 radios. Which UL radio provides more  
payload in a single polarization at an equivalent channel size,  
distance and signal level?

-Matt

On Apr 21, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Brad Belton wrote:
 Exactly.  A couple weeks ago an Avarion rep called to discuss  
 products (cold
 call?) and I asked what payload is expected from the 3650 WiMAX  
 gear.  He
 avoided the question by saying he wasn't at liberty to discuss that
 information yet.

 Redline was more forthright than Alvarion and came right out and  
 admitted
 the WiMAX payloads were a good bit less than what we have available  
 today in
 UL gear.  Essentially the conversation moved completely away from  
 WiMAX and
 back to Redline's UL gear.

 Best,


 Brad




 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 The official WiMax consultant training session I went to, showed sub- 
 canopy
 speeds beyond 7 miles.
 I pointed that out in front of the group and just about got run out  
 of the
 room.
 - Original Message -
 From: CHUCK PROFITO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:01 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


 Patrick,
 If not 70 miles and 30 mbps,
 what are the real numbers on the fixed, for say:
 2 miles los?
 2 miles wooded?
 5 m los?
 5 m nlos?
 10 m los?
 10 m nlos
 ??
 Is this a fair question?

 Chuck Profito
 209-988-7388
 CV-ACCESS, INC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Providing High Speed Broadband
 to Rural Central California
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Patrick Leary
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:14 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 The press has been wrong most of time, causing companies like ours  
 great
 headaches. The stupid 70 miles 30 mbps was the most absurd bit of
 hyperbole that the press picked up and repeated endlessly.  
 Meanwhile, Mo
 Shakouri (the Marketing VP of the WiMAX Forum and an Alvarion exec)  
 was
 trying to dispel that at every turn (I sat in on many of his public
 sessions). Others of us also were trying to correct the  
 expectations. I
 did it in numerous analyst and press interviews.

 WiMAX is also doing well overseas, especially in Asia. WiMAX's  
 greatest
 near term challenge in the U.S. is Sprint.

 Patrick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 8:57 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 WiMax as hyped by the press is dead.  No?

 - Original Message -
 From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:52 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


 I agree with the vast majority of what Chuck says here and only
 partially disagree even on the WiMAX part (though I disagree  
 strongly
 on
 the WiMAX is dead part -- we have sold over $100M to date of it).

 The main takeaway with Chuck's post is that WISPs will have strong
 opportunities for a long time to come, and I agree 110%.

 Patrick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
 Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 9:26 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 WiMAX was dead, is dead and will remain dead.  OK, not factually  
 true
 but
 emotionally true.  The cell companies will use  WiMax frequencies  
 and
 technologies but they will be a premium service and not well  
 suited to
 compete with us for point to multi point fixed wireless.  It will
 never
 live
 up to the hype.

 All the cell data technologies will remain premium for folks on the
 go.
 Cell does not want to squander the bandwidth to go after the value
 driven
 customer that love us so much.  Cell is and will not be value leader
 for

 fixed wireless. technologies.

 700 MHz is just not going to be used for anything other than more  
 cell
 spectrum.  The bands are narrow.  Good for phone and limited amounts
 of
 data.  Great propagation. Problem with 700 MHz is that the size of  
 the
 antenna will be problematic for really small cell phones.  

Re: [WISPA] Future

2008-04-21 Thread Gino Villarini
They don't have a down/up ratio control , but all my test seem like the
subscriber unit allotted more BW for Downlink ... No Range data yet...
the tx power goes from 0 to 24 db ...Not Bad, and you have that external
sma connector for panels , grids and dishes

You have the option to software select:

Vertical, Horizontal , Adaptive or External Antenna...

The adaptive option I assume is to pick the best from all..

The do have some Basic QOS settings (Down / UP MIR) and some 802.x QOS
for VOIP and Video

With ho traffic, pings were in the 1 - 2 ms range, fully loaded, 1500
byte pings went to about 30 ms

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 2:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: Bryan Scott
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

Holy bat guano robin.  I was hoping these things would be a good filler
for 
the smaller areas.
Do they have a down up ratio adjust to make them symmetrical for BH use?

Any range data?
Can they do Canopy ranges?

- Original Message - 
From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


I interrupt this posting by announcing my recent test with the ubiquity
 nano station 5 ...

 Using 20 mhz channels, 24 Mbps downlink , 12 Mbps uplink ...
 simultaneously ... not gad for a piece of $80 Canopy Copycat ...
jejeje

 Ill keep you guys posted on more recent developments

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Patrick Leary
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 2:22 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 Of course it would Chuck. But in the case of Canopy speeds being
higher,
 that is strictly because it uses 4x the channel (20 MHz for the Canopy
 vs. 5 MHz for 2.5 GHz WiMAX).

 By the way, the VL would in turn smoke the Canopy and do it in the
same
 channel size. 

 Patrick Leary
 AVP, Market Development
 Alvarion, Inc.
 o: 650.314.2628
 c: 760.580.0080
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:08 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 The official WiMax consultant training session I went to, showed
 sub-canopy
 speeds beyond 7 miles.
 I pointed that out in front of the group and just about got run out of
 the
 room.
 - Original Message - 
 From: CHUCK PROFITO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:01 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


 Patrick,
 If not 70 miles and 30 mbps,
 what are the real numbers on the fixed, for say:
 2 miles los?
 2 miles wooded?
 5 m los?
 5 m nlos?
 10 m los?
 10 m nlos
 ??
 Is this a fair question?

 Chuck Profito
 209-988-7388
 CV-ACCESS, INC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Providing High Speed Broadband
 to Rural Central California
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Patrick Leary
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:14 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 The press has been wrong most of time, causing companies like ours
 great
 headaches. The stupid 70 miles 30 mbps was the most absurd bit of
 hyperbole that the press picked up and repeated endlessly. Meanwhile,
 Mo
 Shakouri (the Marketing VP of the WiMAX Forum and an Alvarion exec)
 was
 trying to dispel that at every turn (I sat in on many of his public
 sessions). Others of us also were trying to correct the expectations.
 I
 did it in numerous analyst and press interviews.

 WiMAX is also doing well overseas, especially in Asia. WiMAX's
 greatest
 near term challenge in the U.S. is Sprint.

 Patrick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 8:57 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 WiMax as hyped by the press is dead.  No?

 - Original Message - 
 From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:52 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future


I agree with the vast majority of what Chuck says here and only
 partially disagree even on the WiMAX part (though I disagree
strongly
 on
 the WiMAX is dead part -- we have sold over $100M to date of it).

 The main takeaway with Chuck's post is that WISPs will have strong
 opportunities for a long time to come, and I agree 110%.

 Patrick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
 Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 9:26 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future

 WiMAX

Re: [WISPA] when does a startup WISP become a successful WISP?

2008-04-19 Thread Gino Villarini
I would say that ARPU per employee would be a better metric cause in
Chuck case, he has tons of subs with low ARPU, In our case, we have
hundreds of subs with a higher ARPU ( avg $170) ...

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 9:32 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] when does a startup WISP become a successful WISP?

My rule of thumb is you need 600 subscribers per employee.

- Original Message - 
From: Kurt Fankhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 7:17 AM
Subject: [WISPA] when does a startup WISP become a successful WISP?


 Whats the magic client number?



 Kurt Fankhauser
 WAVELINC
 P.O. Box 126
 Bucyrus, OH 44820
 419-562-6405
 www.wavelinc.com












 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

2008-04-14 Thread Gino Villarini
5850? That channel is not legal .. well in the US at least..

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

Sounds like interference on the other channels may be your problem.

Gustavo Santos wrote:
 that exactly the problem i´m having, its just works in one channel, 5860 and
 20mhz,  when i choose 40mhz and 5850 i get at most 10mbps , worse them the
 almost 35mbits at 20mhz. the worst problem i could notice is that the
 alvarion work or dont work, anything diferent from 5860 is 500kbps or doesnt
 even associate with the base .




 2008/4/14, Javier Arigita [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   
 My experience is restricted to ETSI B100 (1W EIRP) and to be honest, I
 agree
 with you, it was quite difficult to stablish a reliable 60-70Mbps link on
 more than 2-3km, in urban environment (LOS but a little bit noisy). In
 average, we have gotten around 40-50Mbps. The 40MHz channel in B100 is
 very
 noise sensitive.

 On 4/14/08, David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Javier Arigita wrote:
   
 As far as I understand, B100 should give you 35Mbps on a 20MHz channel
 
 and
   
 max 70 on a 40MHz one..., so the results are quite adequate.
 
 With the standard allowances for real-world versus workbench. We've
 had trouble pushing more than 40Mbps or so on a 40MHz channel, but as
 even that exceeds our requirements for our B100 links it hasn't been
 much of an issue.

 This isn't specific to those radios or even that brand - virtually every
 piece of networking gear I've ever bought failed to live up to the specs
 in some fashion. :P

 David Smith
 MVN.net




   
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


   
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



   

-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the Cisco Press Book - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
Vendor-Neutral Wireless Training-Design-Troubleshooting-Consulting
FCC License # PG-12-25133
Phone 818-227-4220   Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

2008-04-14 Thread Gino Villarini
Glad you clarified

Have you ever tried the Motorla PTP Series? 400, 500 and 600 ?

The 500 uses a 15 mhz channel for a top speed of 100 Mbps, the PTP 600 can 
achieve 300 Mbps with a 30 Mhz channel 

Give me the coordinates of both sites to give you a idea of the achievable BW 
of your links, (with interference factor)

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gustavo Santos
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

Brazil, and Patrick we returned a 5.4 VL gear (AU, and a pack of 10 SU)
becouse of the same problem, even in 5.4ghz.

2008/4/14, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 5850? That channel is not legal .. well in the US at least..

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Jack Unger
 Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:03 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet
 B100

 Sounds like interference on the other channels may be your problem.

 Gustavo Santos wrote:
  that exactly the problem i´m having, its just works in one channel, 5860
 and
  20mhz,  when i choose 40mhz and 5850 i get at most 10mbps , worse them
 the
  almost 35mbits at 20mhz. the worst problem i could notice is that the
  alvarion work or dont work, anything diferent from 5860 is 500kbps or
 doesnt
  even associate with the base .
 
 
 
 
  2008/4/14, Javier Arigita [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  My experience is restricted to ETSI B100 (1W EIRP) and to be honest, I
  agree
  with you, it was quite difficult to stablish a reliable 60-70Mbps link
 on
  more than 2-3km, in urban environment (LOS but a little bit noisy). In
  average, we have gotten around 40-50Mbps. The 40MHz channel in B100 is
  very
  noise sensitive.
 
  On 4/14/08, David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Javier Arigita wrote:
 
  As far as I understand, B100 should give you 35Mbps on a 20MHz
 channel
 
  and
 
  max 70 on a 40MHz one..., so the results are quite adequate.
 
  With the standard allowances for real-world versus workbench.
 We've
  had trouble pushing more than 40Mbps or so on a 40MHz channel, but as
  even that exceeds our requirements for our B100 links it hasn't been
  much of an issue.
 
  This isn't specific to those radios or even that brand - virtually
 every
  piece of networking gear I've ever bought failed to live up to the
 specs
  in some fashion. :P
 
  David Smith
  MVN.net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 

 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
 Author of the Cisco Press Book - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
 Vendor-Neutral Wireless Training-Design-Troubleshooting-Consulting
 FCC License # PG-12-25133
 Phone 818-227-4220   Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] RB532 replacement...

2008-04-13 Thread Gino Villarini
The 150's are EOL ? whats the replacement?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - Link Techs
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 5:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB532 replacement...

3x is what is out.  The 133 and 133c's are EOL, as are the 532s, 150s 
and for most part the entire 100 series boards.  Figure you will have to

start using 400s, 300, and 600s.

We do have new cases, nice hinged enclousers and build to spec our 
routerboard series. These will fit the 333's without issues.  We are 
just getting ready to put up a dual-pol n-stream link with 600s, think 2

foot on one side and 3 foot dish on the other.   

I'm sure we will post the information on our MT list...

Scott Reed wrote:
 I understand you don't want v3, but I have been moving to RB333s with 
 3.x and have had no issues at all.  They boot faster and support more 
 radios.  RB600 uses same mounting holes and daughter cards.  I have
one 
 600 ready to install, but have none in production, yet.
 I put up a POP with 3 333s on 3RC9 and they are still running on RC12.

 I should get them up to 3.6 or 3.7, but that takes time.  I have a 330

 running 3.3 that is doing great as well.  I have everything from a
RB230 
 running 2.8.x to 532s running all sorts of 2.9 along with the 330s.
 At this point I think you are going to have to bite the bullet and
start 
 moving to 3.x and the newer cards.

 Mark McElvy wrote:
   
 Since RB532s are no longer available, what is everyone using to
replace
 them? It would be nice not to have to replace the box again (using
the
 7x6x2's from wisp-router) and I am not quite ready to run v3 on my
 network. Any suggestions?

  

 Mark McElvy



  






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   
 

   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

2008-04-12 Thread Gino Villarini
Too bad ...

Might want to check out the new Canopy 400 PTMP with 21 Mbps OFDM Radios

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gustavo Santos
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 6:10 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

Hi, someone here have some idea how to solve the problems i~m getting
with the Alvarion VL gear?

I bought some AU and SU 5.4ghz and a B100 5.8ghz 100mbits) ffor  a ~5
miles link, for start replacing my motorola canopy network ( we now
need more troughtput and pps ).


I first deployed the AU with a 120º Sector  and a 4 Su 6mbit version,
the Su ara really easy to align but i got latency and upload traffic
problems, i can get a steady 5mbits downstream but about no upstream
traffic.i already tried change the modulation lavels, atpc, tx power,
all freqs , lower the channel bandwidth. available but no go.

Today i deployed the B100 and i´m having the same issues as the VL
gear. but worse, only a spiky 3 ~4mbits downstream traffic and about
2mbits upstream for a radio capable of almost 70mbits, whats is a
shame. We are in a very crowded area, but the motorola canopy works
perfectly in that area, but we got troughput issues with canopy.

anyone here had problems like that with the Alvarion gear in a
crownded 5ghz area?
in the same area we could manage to work a Airlive Wla5000 (802.11a
radio) from ovislink to work better then the Alvarion.

Thanks in advice.

Gustavo Santos



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

2008-04-12 Thread Gino Villarini
Why you didn't try a PTP400 or PTP600 ?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gustavo Santos
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 7:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

we bought that B100 to replace a working canopy BH 20 ( 15mbps)

2008/4/12, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Too bad ...

 Might want to check out the new Canopy 400 PTMP with 21 Mbps OFDM Radios

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Gustavo Santos
 Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 6:10 PM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

 Hi, someone here have some idea how to solve the problems i~m getting
 with the Alvarion VL gear?

 I bought some AU and SU 5.4ghz and a B100 5.8ghz 100mbits) ffor  a ~5
 miles link, for start replacing my motorola canopy network ( we now
 need more troughtput and pps ).


 I first deployed the AU with a 120º Sector  and a 4 Su 6mbit version,
 the Su ara really easy to align but i got latency and upload traffic
 problems, i can get a steady 5mbits downstream but about no upstream
 traffic.i already tried change the modulation lavels, atpc, tx power,
 all freqs , lower the channel bandwidth. available but no go.

 Today i deployed the B100 and i´m having the same issues as the VL
 gear. but worse, only a spiky 3 ~4mbits downstream traffic and about
 2mbits upstream for a radio capable of almost 70mbits, whats is a
 shame. We are in a very crowded area, but the motorola canopy works
 perfectly in that area, but we got troughput issues with canopy.

 anyone here had problems like that with the Alvarion gear in a
 crownded 5ghz area?
 in the same area we could manage to work a Airlive Wla5000 (802.11a
 radio) from ovislink to work better then the Alvarion.

 Thanks in advice.

 Gustavo Santos




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

2008-04-12 Thread Gino Villarini
I always ask myself, do we really need that much pps? Trading off performance?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gustavo Santos
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 10:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet B100

we got the alvarion by the 4pps advertise :/

2008/4/12, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Why you didn't try a PTP400 or PTP600 ?


 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Gustavo Santos

 Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 7:06 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet
 B100

 we bought that B100 to replace a working canopy BH 20 ( 15mbps)

 2008/4/12, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  Too bad ...
 
  Might want to check out the new Canopy 400 PTMP with 21 Mbps OFDM Radios
 
  Gino A. Villarini
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
  tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Gustavo Santos
  Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 6:10 PM
  To: wireless@wispa.org
  Subject: [WISPA] Problems with Alvarion BreezeAccess VL and Breeznet
 B100
 
  Hi, someone here have some idea how to solve the problems i~m getting
  with the Alvarion VL gear?
 
  I bought some AU and SU 5.4ghz and a B100 5.8ghz 100mbits) ffor  a ~5
  miles link, for start replacing my motorola canopy network ( we now
  need more troughtput and pps ).
 
 
  I first deployed the AU with a 120º Sector  and a 4 Su 6mbit version,
  the Su ara really easy to align but i got latency and upload traffic
  problems, i can get a steady 5mbits downstream but about no upstream
  traffic.i already tried change the modulation lavels, atpc, tx power,
  all freqs , lower the channel bandwidth. available but no go.
 
  Today i deployed the B100 and i´m having the same issues as the VL
  gear. but worse, only a spiky 3 ~4mbits downstream traffic and about
  2mbits upstream for a radio capable of almost 70mbits, whats is a
  shame. We are in a very crowded area, but the motorola canopy works
  perfectly in that area, but we got troughput issues with canopy.
 
  anyone here had problems like that with the Alvarion gear in a
  crownded 5ghz area?
  in the same area we could manage to work a Airlive Wla5000 (802.11a
  radio) from ovislink to work better then the Alvarion.
 
  Thanks in advice.
 
  Gustavo Santos
 
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA

Re: [WISPA] FYI - New how-to-get-a-3650-license whitepaperavailable -- link

2008-04-08 Thread Gino Villarini
That's maybe because you're on the Alvarion blacklist!

Ducking!!! jejee

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Booher
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 4:34 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FYI - New how-to-get-a-3650-license
whitepaperavailable -- link

SEND me patrick, I tried getting it off your webpage... its timing out  
for some reason.

tks,

jeff

On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:

 I wrote a step-by-step guide showing the actual application process.
 100% vendor neutral. You can download it from our Web site via the  
 home
 page. Make sure to select the U.S. Web version from the drop down at  
 the
 top right.

 http://www.alvarion.com/

 Cheers,

 Patrick







 This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
 PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals   
 computer viruses(84).










 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Femtocells

2008-04-04 Thread Gino Villarini
Hmm I see better opportunity going to the Cellco directly and offer them
the service, so that they do a  bundle to the end user... Internet -
Femtocell 

And you make and arrangement with the cellco to deliver the traffic
directly to them instead of going to the internet...Saving them some $$
On Internet Bandwidth and also providing a lower latency link to them!!!


... maybe this is the next step beyond voip...

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 6:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Femtocells

femtocells

This is a great innovation that can help wisps gain market share.

With these femtocells, the cell phone works in the house so the consumer

doesn't need to have an extra land line.
The customer is probably paying 80.00 or so for their dsl - telephone 
line. No land line needed for us wisps, the customer's 80.00 telco 
package is now in play. Maybe they want to trade it in for a faster 
and probably lesser expensive internet connection.

It's a good opportunity for us, or the cable company.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/wireless_show_femtocells;_ylt=ArOpXSwLh8fh4Jp
nL.VHQpsjtBAF

Verizon Wireless is joining Sprint Nextel Corp. in jumping on the latest

craze in the wireless world: little boxes called femtocells that boost 
cell-phone coverage in subscribers' homes.





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Australian WiMAX pioneer trashes technology asmiserablefailure

2008-03-23 Thread Gino Villarini
Well, It still amazes me how well cell 3g is working.

Currently Im on a Cruise Ship sailing out of San Juan towards Aruba, we
are bordering the north coast of Puerto Rico ... about 3 miles out and I
have 3 out of 5 bars in my ATT Hsdpa Card, inside my stateroom ...not
that bad, ATT will eventually migrate to LTE which promises more speed
...

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Webster
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 5:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Australian WiMAX pioneer trashes technology
asmiserablefailure

This does not surprise me. I have never thought that any type of
indoor CPE
business plan would do well for wireless internet. There are just too
many
unknown factors when it comes to placing a low power CPE without an
external
antenna in the hands of customers. They do not understand the
limitations of
wireless. Things like aluminum siding and stucco with wire mesh are just
a
couple of the big problems that you will run in to. Other items like
metallic mirror film on windows and too many interior walls between the
CPE
and tower site are others. From an RF perspective it is always
preferable to
be above all of that (i.e. Rooftop) with the radio/antenna. If most of
the
buildings in the neighborhood are of the same height, building losses
are a
non-issue because you are now above them. The only thing left to worry
about
is the trees. Using outdoor antenna/CPE combinations should also allow
you
higher EIRP since the maximum permissible exposure rules would change
with
the unit being away from the general public.
While you can make the case for customer self installs, you
would need to
have many more base stations so that you would have plenty of signal to
overcome the building  losses. This may work in a densely populated area
where you can justify the numbers (but you also have more competition).
In
rural markets I would suggest to anyone making a business plan, figure
on
doing fixed outdoor CPE installations. With a properly equipped WIMAX
base
station costing around $40,000, a small WISP would be able to conduct
many
truck rolls for that price. The low housing density markets just don't
justify the cost of a properly engineered indoor CPE wireless network
(meaning it would take many more towers to work correctly). There would
never be the return on the invested dollar.
That is just my opinion, I am sure others will disagree with me.
If you
want a good way to think about it,  how many times have you run around a
building with your cell phone in a weak coverage area to keep a good
call
going? WIMAX indoor CPE's will be no different. The bigger problem will
be
that the customer will not want to move their computer in the house just
to
get a better broadband signal. This will easily create an unhappy
consumer,
and then an unhappy investor (and also clueless management). I read some
commissioned market studies (can't tell you where, but they were good
ones)
about the average customer expectation of how and where wireless
internet
should work. The scary thing was that they honestly believed that they
should be able to run around the house ANYWHERE with their laptop and
their
broadband should just work. This was how they perceived wireless
internet
working and they did not believe that they would have to install their
own
wireless AP in the house to achieve this. This basic perception by the
consumer is far different than we all understand these networks to work.
It
sets a business up to get a black eye in the minds of users (which will
also
stress out the folks who sold the idea to investors).
Bottom line to me is, you can't ignore the laws of
physics.no
matter how many times the sales rep tells you it will work...It's
all in
the math.


Thank You,
Brian Webster
www.wirelessmapping.com http://www.wirelessmapping.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 3:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Australian WiMAX pioneer trashes technology as
miserablefailure


http://www.commsday.com/node/228

Australian WiMAX pioneer trashes technology as miserable failure
March 20th, 2008
Australia's first WiMAX operator, Hervey Bay's Buzz Broadband, has
closed its network, with the CEO labeling the technology as a
disaster that failed miserably.

In an astonishing tirade to an international WiMAX conference audience
in Bangkok yesterday afternoon, CEO Garth Freeman slammed the
technology, saying its non-line of sight performance was non-
existent beyond just 2 kilometres from the base station, indoor
performance decayed at just 400m and that latency rates reached as
high as 1000 milliseconds. Poor latency and jitter made it
unacceptable for many Internet applications and specifically VoIP,
which 

Re: [WISPA] Router Wars '08

2008-03-18 Thread Gino Villarini
Got another one for sale?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Router Wars '08


On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:36 PM, David E. Smith wrote:

 Cisco gear is well-supported and pretty darned solid, but is often  
 many
 times as expensive as the next-best alternative, and the benefits  
 don't
 always justify the drastically increased cost.

That is usually the argument, but it does beg the question. If money  
wasn't factor would you prefer Cisco?

Anyway, that is a silly question. Here is a better one. I am currently  
paying around $3k for Cisco 12008s that are fully redundant, can  
handle today's full tables (i.e. greater than 256,000 routes), route  
at line speed, support MPLS, etc. Can you name any solution that for  
the same cost could achieve equivalent results?

-Matt




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors

2008-03-08 Thread Gino Villarini
Using a 5.4 - 5.8 sector on 5.3 wont be much of a problem ...maybe
loosing .5 db in gain?

 

Gino A. Villarini 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 1:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors

 

PacWireless has the 5.4-5.8 horizontal sectors for $200... and they are
working on a 4.9-5.8ghz version, but not available right now. :(

Travis
Microserv

Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: 

Define affordable?
 
I used Radio Waves for my only 5 gig sectors (we're reserving 5 gig for
high 
end customers).  $600 each as I recall.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since
1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
 
 
 
- Original Message - 
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA General List 
wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 4:37 PM
Subject: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors
 
 
  

Hi,
 
Anyone have suggestions for affordable 90 and 120 degree 5.3ghz
sector
(horizontal polarity is preferred) antennas?
 
thanks,
 
Travis
Microserv
 
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 


 
 
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
  



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors

2008-03-08 Thread Gino Villarini
What radios?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 7:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors

Ya, that's what I thought as well... so we deployed about 15 of them on 
tower sites... and then I did a test by switching customers from 5.3ghz 
to 5.8ghz (just changing the channel on the radios, with everything else

the same) and we see a 3-5db difference. :(

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote:
 Using a 5.4 - 5.8 sector on 5.3 wont be much of a problem ...maybe
 loosing .5 db in gain?

  

 Gino A. Villarini 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

 

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 1:25 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors

  

 PacWireless has the 5.4-5.8 horizontal sectors for $200... and they
are
 working on a 4.9-5.8ghz version, but not available right now. :(

 Travis
 Microserv

 Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: 

 Define affordable?
  
 I used Radio Waves for my only 5 gig sectors (we're reserving 5 gig
for
 high 
 end customers).  $600 each as I recall.
 Marlon
 (509) 982-2181
 (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
 42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since
 1999!
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
 www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
  
  
  
 - Original Message - 
 From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA General List 
 wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org 
 Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 4:37 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors
  
  
   

   Hi,

   Anyone have suggestions for affordable 90 and 120 degree 5.3ghz
 sector
   (horizontal polarity is preferred) antennas?

   thanks,

   Travis
   Microserv


   


 
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
   


 

   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   

  
  
  


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
  
   





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors

2008-03-08 Thread Gino Villarini
I could probably be tx loss on the radios too...

 

Gino A. Villarini 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 9:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors

 

MT with SR5 at the AP and WLM54AG-23 at the client.

Tested on two different towers with 5 clients on each. Same results with
both locations.

I have used the PacWireless 5.8ghz 2ft dishes at 5.3ghz and only saw a
2db difference (at max)... so I figured because the sectors were spec'd
down to 5.4ghz that 5.3ghz wouldn't be a problem... but giving up 5db
(only on 1 side of the link too, which is weird) is a lot. :(

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote: 

What radios?
 
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 7:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors
 
Ya, that's what I thought as well... so we deployed about 15 of them on 
tower sites... and then I did a test by switching customers from 5.3ghz 
to 5.8ghz (just changing the channel on the radios, with everything else
 
the same) and we see a 3-5db difference. :(
 
Travis
Microserv
 
Gino Villarini wrote:
  

Using a 5.4 - 5.8 sector on 5.3 wont be much of a problem
...maybe
loosing .5 db in gain?
 
 
 
Gino A. Villarini 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 
 

 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On
  

Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 1:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors
 
 
 
PacWireless has the 5.4-5.8 horizontal sectors for $200... and
they


are
  

working on a 4.9-5.8ghz version, but not available right now. :(
 
Travis
Microserv
 
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: 
 
Define affordable?
 
I used Radio Waves for my only 5 gig sectors (we're reserving 5
gig


for
  

high 
end customers).  $600 each as I recall.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator
since
1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
 
 
 
- Original Message - 
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ; WISPA General List 
wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
mailto:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org  
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 4:37 PM
Subject: [WISPA] 5.3ghz sectors
 
 
  
 
  Hi,
   
  Anyone have suggestions for affordable 90 and 120 degree
5.3ghz
sector
  (horizontal polarity is preferred) antennas?
   
  thanks,
   
  Travis
  Microserv
   
   
  
 



  


  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 



  


   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
   
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
   
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   
  
 
 
 
 
 



  


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
 



  


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Motherboards and cases

2008-03-03 Thread Gino Villarini
www.axiometek.com for high power 1u network appliances

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Motherboards and cases

The Routerboard 1000 does look like a hot new product. I'd like to learn

more about it.

In the past we shyed away from Dell, we preferred Super Micro much more
for 
ease to repair, reliabilty, and open standards.
However, we are now using Dell for ease of procurement, in a one source 
ready to go package.
The Dell 860 series starts at $750 for a PCI Express 1U version that 
supports TWO PCI-e or x  bus slots,
meaning you can put in two Intel 4port Giga cards for a total fo 10
ports, 
at Wirespeed!!
I like the 860s because they are only 21.5 deep.

The Dell 2U are also nice, but unfortunteately they are 29 deep, making
it 
hard to fit them places without cables getting banged.

Think about it, Mikrotik, MPLS, on a Dell 1U, now compare to Cisco MPLS 
enabled switch.

As far as needing high memory and processing Sure 128mb is fine for
a 
basic router.  Even a typical Layer3 switch Cisco 3550s or SMC L3
switches 
only use about 8-32mb for 11,000 or more routes.

But where the higher RAM is needed is when doing large routing tables. 
Nowadays for a BGP edge router, 512-1m is needed jsut for full routing 
tables. As well, with higher CPU cycles, it allows the system to be 
duplixcated for other purposes without slowing down wirespeed through
the 
NICs.  We showed there was a performance benefit of having over 2.4G 
processors, in our applications.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Motherboards and cases


 On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:

I seen a new routerboard out with like a 1ghz processor, somewhere
on the MT site.

 Routerboard 1000.  It is around $1000 list, IIRC.  Includes
 4 x 10/100/1000 ethernet ports and I think a level 6 license.

 -- 
 
 *Butch Evans *Professional Network Consultation *
 *Network Engineering *MikroTik RouterOS*
 *573-276-2879 *ImageStream   *
 *http://www.butchevans.com/ *StarOS and MORE   *
 *Mikrotik Certified Consultant *Wired or Wireless Networks*
 





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45

2008-02-20 Thread Gino Villarini
One of my links is set to 36 Mbps mode and gives 26 Mbps TCP Hdx, I have
tested on bench the 54 MBps mode and it topped at 43 Mbps

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:00 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45

Does anyone know what the actual HDX throughput would be with these
Trango
radios?

Thanks,
Mac


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Cameron Kilton
 Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:51 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
 
 We actually graph our pps usage with one of our Alvarion links.
Granted
 Alvarion can do about 40,000 pps to Trango's 9000pps or so, but our
 primary link which handles dozens of VoIP calls and a sustanained
 30mbit
 throuput has never peaked above 2200 pps.
 
 However, if you got the money to spend, go with the B100, you'll be
 happy. Otherwise, Trango 45 is for you. (can't comment about StarOS,
 never used it)
 
 Cameron
 Midcoast Internet
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Patrick Leary
 Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:42 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
 
 Similar in the way of price or features? B100 has been able to do VLAN
 tagging since day one and it also has QinQ. It also supports much
 higher
 pps and the capacity stays close to constant regardless of the traffic
 type -- that important for a backhaul link, especially in a world
 seeing
 more and more VoIP.
 
 Patrick
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Cliff - Home
 Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:13 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
 
 Patrick... Are you LISTENING too? :)
 
 Can we expect something similar from Alvarion?
 
 - Cliff
 
 
 On 2/19/08 9:39 PM, Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 
  I do hear you Patrick.
 
  Patrick
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
  Behalf Of Patrick Shoemaker
  Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 6:10 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
 
  FYI a sales rep from Trango just informed me that the TrangoLINK-45
 has
  a newly released firmware that supports VLAN tagging on the
 management
  interfaces. It looks like this is what I'll be going with.
 
  Patrick, I'd love to use a B100 for this shot but a full link for
 under
  $2k is hard to pass up. After all, these are backup links that I
 would
  rather not dump a ton of money into.
 
  Patrick
 
 
 
 

---
 -
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

---
 -
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 

***
 *
 
 
 This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
 
 PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
 computer viruses(190).
 

***
 *
 
 
 
 
 
 

***
 *
 
 
 This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
 
 PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
 computer viruses(43).
 

***
 *
 
 
 
 
 
 

***
 *
 
 This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
 PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
 computer viruses(84).

***
 *
 
 
 
 
 

---
 -
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

---
 -
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 

---
 -
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

---
 -
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45

2008-02-20 Thread Gino Villarini
The link is about 6.5 Miles, using Pac Wireless 2' dual pol dishes.  -53
signal on both ends.  26 Mbps TCP

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:30 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45

Gino,

 Thanks for the reply. 

Can you tell me what the link distance and signal level is as well as
what
kind of throughput at that distance and signal level?

Thanks,
Mac




 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Gino Villarini
 Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 12:17 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
 
 One of my links is set to 36 Mbps mode and gives 26 Mbps TCP Hdx, I
 have
 tested on bench the 54 MBps mode and it topped at 43 Mbps
 
 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Mac Dearman
 Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:00 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
 
 Does anyone know what the actual HDX throughput would be with these
 Trango
 radios?
 
 Thanks,
 Mac
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
  Behalf Of Cameron Kilton
  Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:51 AM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
 
  We actually graph our pps usage with one of our Alvarion links.
 Granted
  Alvarion can do about 40,000 pps to Trango's 9000pps or so, but our
  primary link which handles dozens of VoIP calls and a sustanained
  30mbit
  throuput has never peaked above 2200 pps.
 
  However, if you got the money to spend, go with the B100, you'll be
  happy. Otherwise, Trango 45 is for you. (can't comment about StarOS,
  never used it)
 
  Cameron
  Midcoast Internet
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
  Behalf Of Patrick Leary
  Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:42 AM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
 
  Similar in the way of price or features? B100 has been able to do
 VLAN
  tagging since day one and it also has QinQ. It also supports much
  higher
  pps and the capacity stays close to constant regardless of the
 traffic
  type -- that important for a backhaul link, especially in a world
  seeing
  more and more VoIP.
 
  Patrick
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
  Behalf Of Cliff - Home
  Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:13 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
 
  Patrick... Are you LISTENING too? :)
 
  Can we expect something similar from Alvarion?
 
  - Cliff
 
 
  On 2/19/08 9:39 PM, Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
   I do hear you Patrick.
  
   Patrick
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On
   Behalf Of Patrick Shoemaker
   Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 6:10 PM
   To: WISPA General List
   Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
  
   FYI a sales rep from Trango just informed me that the
TrangoLINK-45
  has
   a newly released firmware that supports VLAN tagging on the
  management
   interfaces. It looks like this is what I'll be going with.
  
   Patrick, I'd love to use a B100 for this shot but a full link for
  under
   $2k is hard to pass up. After all, these are backup links that I
  would
   rather not dump a ton of money into.
  
   Patrick
  
 
 
 
 

---
  -
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 

---
  -
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 

***
  *
  
 
  This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
 
  PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
  computer viruses(190).
 
 

***
  *
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

***
  *
  
 
  This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
 
  PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
  computer viruses(43).
 
 

***
  *
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

***
  *
  
  This footnote

Re: [WISPA] Strange managed switch request

2008-02-04 Thread Gino Villarini
Whats your budget?

Linksys has one for about $150, then you can step up to industrial type
of units(Cisco, Moxa, Etherwan, Garret, Sixnet ect)  those will start at
about $500 up ... they usually take 12 - 72 vdc 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of D. Ryan Spott
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 12:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Strange managed switch request

Hey guys, I am looking for an 8-port, 10/100 managed switch for a remote
site.

It needs to be a small form factor switch.

The weird part is that it needs to be 12V DC!

Anyone know of such a beast?

Thanks in advance,

ryan




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!

2008-01-23 Thread Gino Villarini
It is

http://www.shelbywireless.com/files/crossroads3.pdf



Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:19 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!

Wonder if the wireless PCB is available without the box?  I could build
it 
into an antenna.
- Original Message - 
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!


 On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Travis Johnson wrote:

Here is where it will get interesting... in the actual MT software.
How are they going to lock down the software so the power
outputs, channels, etc. are all within FCC guidelines? They are
almost going to have to have a seperate MT version... which to me
seems pretty unlikely. :(

 There is/will be a package installed that will set these limits.  It
 does not require a unique version, per se.  This is what was done
 for at least one upcoming release of some certified systems.

 -- 
 Butch Evans
 Network Engineering and Security Consulting
 573-276-2879
 http://www.butchevans.com/
 My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6
 Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf
 Mikrotik Certified Consultant
 http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!

2008-01-23 Thread Gino Villarini
Rf Connector is Hirose UF.L type , Retail is $120 ... 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!

Anybody know what type of RF connectors are on the board?
What should one expect to pay for large quantities of the bare board?

- Original Message - 
From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!


 It is

 http://www.shelbywireless.com/files/crossroads3.pdf



 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Chuck McCown
 Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:19 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!

 Wonder if the wireless PCB is available without the box?  I could
build
 it
 into an antenna.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:08 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!


 On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Travis Johnson wrote:

Here is where it will get interesting... in the actual MT software.
How are they going to lock down the software so the power
outputs, channels, etc. are all within FCC guidelines? They are
almost going to have to have a seperate MT version... which to me
seems pretty unlikely. :(

 There is/will be a package installed that will set these limits.  It
 does not require a unique version, per se.  This is what was done
 for at least one upcoming release of some certified systems.

 -- 
 Butch Evans
 Network Engineering and Security Consulting
 573-276-2879
 http://www.butchevans.com/
 My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6
 Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf
 Mikrotik Certified Consultant
 http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings (Plat Wireless stuff)

2008-01-17 Thread Gino Villarini
Hey Dave, aren't you here on SLC ?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Sovereen
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings (Plat Wireless stuff)

No, I don't.  My guess would be this year, but I really don't know.

Dave

- Original Message - 
From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings (Plat Wireless stuff)


 Dave, got a eta for 7.0?

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of David Sovereen
 Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 1:39 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings (Plat Wireless stuff)

 Platypus by nature is very extensible and expandable.  We have it
 control
 every aspect of our wireless broadband service, having it talk so
 Mikrotiks,
 Canopy Prizm, and the like, permitting access, controlling bandwidth,
 assigning static IP addresses, etc.

 Much of this capability is there out-of-the-box.  Much, much more
 wireless-specific capability, such as radio/antenna inventory
management
 and
 integrations pre-designed for wireless operators, will be built in to
 Platypus 7.0.

 Dave

 - Original Message - 
 From: Dylan Bouterse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 12:57 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings (Plat Wireless stuff)


 What wireless stuff has been added?

 Dylan

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of George Rogato
 Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings

 Platypus

 I understand that a wisp here at wispa has worked with tucows to add
 wireless stuff to it.

 George




 Ross Cornett wrote:
 Hey guys,

 I am in a pickle here with my client tracking database.  We had a
 propriatary softward made for us and it is not a great scenario for
 us.
 This software stored data in an access database and primarily was
 client
 contact, reminding renewals for mailing bills...etc...

 What are you all using that might be a good transition for me...

 Thanks in advance...

 Ross Cornett
 HofNet Communications, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 - Original Message - 
 From: Ross Cornett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
 wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:37 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Equalizer Anyone?


 I too would say the same.  Initially they did a good job, but soon
 after
 they began to be in effective and variable.  We contacted them and
 got
 very
 little satisfaction.  so, we are now trying mikrotiks at every
tower.
 like
 a 333... details will follow with our success or failure.  We have
 implemented them at 4 or 5 towers and will be puting them at 30
 towers...


 Ross
 - Original Message - 
 From: Jake VanDewater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:33 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Equalizer Anyone?


 We purchased a NetEqualizer last year, and we weren't impressed.  It
 did not
 perform well compared to the Emerging Technologies box we use.  The
 rate
 limits were not effectively enforced.

 -Jake



 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:16:46 -0600
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Net Equalizer Anyone?

 I have been considering the Net Equalizer as a possible platform
for
 bandwidth management. I know that topics like this often lead to a
 myriad of posts about bandwidth management normally. If possible I
 would
 like to hear feedback from people who have actually used this one
 appliance to hear about any advantages or disadvantages to use of
 this
 device for managing bandwidth in WISP networks. I appreciate
hearing
 from any past or present users of the Net Equalizer platform.
 All the best,
 John Scrivner







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 _
 Make distant family not so distant with Windows Vista(r) + Windows
 Live(tm).



http://www.microsoft.com/windows/digitallife/keepintouch.mspx?ocid=TXT_T
 AGLM_CPC_VideoChat_distantfamily_012008

Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings (Plat Wireless stuff)

2008-01-16 Thread Gino Villarini
Dave, got a eta for 7.0?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Sovereen
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 1:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings (Plat Wireless stuff)

Platypus by nature is very extensible and expandable.  We have it
control 
every aspect of our wireless broadband service, having it talk so
Mikrotiks, 
Canopy Prizm, and the like, permitting access, controlling bandwidth, 
assigning static IP addresses, etc.

Much of this capability is there out-of-the-box.  Much, much more 
wireless-specific capability, such as radio/antenna inventory management
and 
integrations pre-designed for wireless operators, will be built in to 
Platypus 7.0.

Dave

- Original Message - 
From: Dylan Bouterse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings (Plat Wireless stuff)


 What wireless stuff has been added?

 Dylan

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of George Rogato
 Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings

 Platypus

 I understand that a wisp here at wispa has worked with tucows to add
 wireless stuff to it.

 George




 Ross Cornett wrote:
 Hey guys,

 I am in a pickle here with my client tracking database.  We had a
 propriatary softward made for us and it is not a great scenario for
 us.
 This software stored data in an access database and primarily was
 client
 contact, reminding renewals for mailing bills...etc...

 What are you all using that might be a good transition for me...

 Thanks in advance...

 Ross Cornett
 HofNet Communications, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 - Original Message - 
 From: Ross Cornett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
 wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:37 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Equalizer Anyone?


 I too would say the same.  Initially they did a good job, but soon
 after
 they began to be in effective and variable.  We contacted them and
got
 very
 little satisfaction.  so, we are now trying mikrotiks at every tower.
 like
 a 333... details will follow with our success or failure.  We have
 implemented them at 4 or 5 towers and will be puting them at 30
 towers...


 Ross
 - Original Message - 
 From: Jake VanDewater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:33 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Equalizer Anyone?


 We purchased a NetEqualizer last year, and we weren't impressed.  It
 did not
 perform well compared to the Emerging Technologies box we use.  The
 rate
 limits were not effectively enforced.

 -Jake



 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:16:46 -0600
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Net Equalizer Anyone?

 I have been considering the Net Equalizer as a possible platform for
 bandwidth management. I know that topics like this often lead to a
 myriad of posts about bandwidth management normally. If possible I
 would
 like to hear feedback from people who have actually used this one
 appliance to hear about any advantages or disadvantages to use of
 this
 device for managing bandwidth in WISP networks. I appreciate hearing
 from any past or present users of the Net Equalizer platform.
 All the best,
 John Scrivner






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 _
 Make distant family not so distant with Windows Vista(r) + Windows
 Live(tm).


http://www.microsoft.com/windows/digitallife/keepintouch.mspx?ocid=TXT_T
 AGLM_CPC_VideoChat_distantfamily_012008





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] Service Needed in San Juan

2008-01-13 Thread Gino Villarini
Hey johhny, I think we might be there  is this in the Encantada
community?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JohnnyO
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 3:03 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Service Needed in San Juan

Gr - Why didn't I think of Mr. Puerto Rico Wi-Fi himself.

JohnnyO

- Original Message - 
From: Forrest W. Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Service Needed in San Juan


 That would be most likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] , or he could point you in
 the right direction.

 -forrest

 JohnnyO wrote:
 Will need service at this location. Please respond offline with
quotes. 
 This is for me personally. I will be renting this home for 180days. I
can 
 do my own install ! ! ! ! and prob have the equipment for it also
 
 quote accordingly :)


 Parque Montebello
 street 1 A-19
 Trujillo Alto Puerto Rico 00976


 Regards,

 JohnnyO
 337.368.7188





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] ATT Coverage in Puerto Rico ????

2008-01-13 Thread Gino Villarini
They are the biggest here ... currently running hsdpa on the data
network.  If you have a national plan, I think you're covered...

What cell project you'll be working on?



Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JohnnyO
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 11:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] ATT Coverage in Puerto Rico 

We're about to head to Puerto Rico for a cellular project. Can anyone
here 
confirm if ATT/Cingular will work there, and if so, any additional
charges ?

Thanks,

JohnnyO 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

2008-01-13 Thread Gino Villarini
Airspan grant:

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/Eas731GrantForm.cfm?mode=COP
YRequestTimeout=500application_id=686827fcc_id=O2J-365T

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 4:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

Mike,

Now that I've read those posts of yours, I better understand your
position.
I was not taking reduced power into consideration.  I just had in my
mind 
the 25watts EIRP often mentioned in FCC precentations over the years.

To the best of my knowledge, the AirSpan product that I am familiar
with, do 
not have that same limitation.
Although I do not have that data off the top of my head, to respond 
accurately.

But regardless... What we have here is not a limitation by WiMax, nor by

3.6G, nor FCC, but a limit posed by the manufacturers and their designs.

Doesn't anyone have any insight on why the FCC rules allow more power
for 
wider channels?

I realize that wider channels create larger internal system noise, which

could be a reason for needing more power for wider channels.
But that is in contradiction to 2.4Ghz rules for Smart Array antennas,
that 
rewarded in highr power for those that had narrower beamwidths, and 
interfere less.
In that spirit, I would think it would have been wise to reward those
who 
strived to use smaller channels, apposed to penalize them for being more

efficient.
There obviously has to be a technical reason apposed to spectrum
ediquete.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service


 See my other post about Redline's comments and their FCC filed
documents.
 It just doesn't have the power.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 8:12 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service


 Wimax APs can go much fartehr than 2-5 miles.
 You are spec'ing the distance limits of their advanced NLOS features.
 In LOS, they can go just as far as any other unlicened gear.

 I think its important to define country.  If you are talking about
Idaho
 with houses 20 miles apart, yes, you'd be correct. 2.4Ghz and less is
the
 better option.
 But where 3.6 Wimax could be exciting is small little towns. where 3
6Mhz
 channels would actually be enough to get decent speed, and able to 
 acheive
 high modulations because its noise free.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 3:24 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service


 Exactly.

 What good is an AP that can only do 15 megs throughput in the city?

 What good is an AP that can only do 2 - 5 miles in the country?


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 2:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service


I guess I am a bit perplexed by this premise. Why would people in
urban
 areas pay for low bandwidth wireless broadband options? What
problem
 does this platform solve under that scenario?
 Scriv


 Mike Hammett wrote:
 I would like to note that Redline echoed my thoughts on 3.65 GHz.
It
 is
 not
 for rural providers and is not for high bandwidth providers.  It's

 only
 practical implementation is a dense urban environment with low
 throughput
 clients.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:18 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX
Service



 There are a number of WiMAX 3.5 GHz solutions that will tune to
3.65
 just fine. I doubt that we would need to force the forum to issue
a
 new
 profile for a frequency band that existing profiles already
cover. As
 far as I am concerned WiMAX in 3.65 GHz is here in all respects
and 
 is
 not just marketing verbiage. Bravo to Matt Liotta on making a
move
 that
 I am sure many others will follow. Way to go Matt.
 Scriv


 Clint Ricker wrote:

 Tom,
 I'd agree.  I'm in no way advocating marketing that is deceptive
in
 terms
 of
 deliverables.

 My 

Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

2008-01-13 Thread Gino Villarini
I thought it was 

Airspan 5 mhz channel: 4.07 w
10 mhz channel 7.24 w


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 11:19 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

Wow- Thats a huge difference.
For those that don't want to pull up the link...

Redline: 25Mhz ch:  1.3w
AirSpan: 20Mhz ch: 4.07 w
AirSpan: 15Mhz ch: 7.24 w

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service


 and the Redline grant:


https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/Eas731GrantForm.cfm?mode=COP
YRequestTimeout=500application_id=549096fcc_id=QC8-AN100UA

 So Redline unit does have FAR less power available then AirSpan.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 2:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service


 Airspan grant:


https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/Eas731GrantForm.cfm?mode=COP
 YRequestTimeout=500application_id=686827fcc_id=O2J-365T

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
 Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 4:24 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

 Mike,

 Now that I've read those posts of yours, I better understand your
 position.
 I was not taking reduced power into consideration.  I just had in my
 mind
 the 25watts EIRP often mentioned in FCC precentations over the years.

 To the best of my knowledge, the AirSpan product that I am familiar
 with, do
 not have that same limitation.
 Although I do not have that data off the top of my head, to respond
 accurately.

 But regardless... What we have here is not a limitation by WiMax, nor
by

 3.6G, nor FCC, but a limit posed by the manufacturers and their
designs.

 Doesn't anyone have any insight on why the FCC rules allow more power
 for
 wider channels?

 I realize that wider channels create larger internal system noise,
which

 could be a reason for needing more power for wider channels.
 But that is in contradiction to 2.4Ghz rules for Smart Array
antennas,
 that
 rewarded in highr power for those that had narrower beamwidths, and
 interfere less.
 In that spirit, I would think it would have been wise to reward those
 who
 strived to use smaller channels, apposed to penalize them for being
more

 efficient.
 There obviously has to be a technical reason apposed to spectrum
 ediquete.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 10:20 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service


 See my other post about Redline's comments and their FCC filed
 documents.
 It just doesn't have the power.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 8:12 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service


 Wimax APs can go much fartehr than 2-5 miles.
 You are spec'ing the distance limits of their advanced NLOS
features.
 In LOS, they can go just as far as any other unlicened gear.

 I think its important to define country.  If you are talking about
 Idaho
 with houses 20 miles apart, yes, you'd be correct. 2.4Ghz and less
is
 the
 better option.
 But where 3.6 Wimax could be exciting is small little towns. where
3
 6Mhz
 channels would actually be enough to get decent speed, and able to
 acheive
 high modulations because its noise free.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 3:24 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service


 Exactly.

 What good is an AP that can only do 15 megs throughput in the
city?

 What good is an AP that can only do 2 - 5 miles in the country?


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - 
 From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 needs more lobbying (was Re: One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service)

2008-01-12 Thread Gino Villarini
IIRC,

3.65 ghz rules allow 1 watt EIRP per each mhz of bandwidth, thus a 7.5
Mhz Radio would be allowed 7.5 Watts of EIRP, 10 Mhz radio would be 10
Watts EIRP ...


Redline cert does not reflect this... don't know why

Airspan certification does get really close to it

Mind me but 10 Watts EIRP if allot (about 40 db)

Vendors should seek maybe 15 or 20 mhz channels 


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 1:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 needs more lobbying (was Re: One Ring Networks To
Rollout New WiMAX Service)

As much as I like seeing One Ring's name over and over I figured I 
switch the subject line to match the tread.

Mike's comments below are accurate with regard to Redline's equipment. 
However, it should be noted that Redline was not able to get their gear 
certified at the full power output allowable for 3.65. It is for this 
reason that Redline does not believe its gear will work in rural 
markets. Remember, 3.65 was originally supposed to be for the rural 
market, which means either Redline went wrong somewhere or the FCC did. 
Additionally, Redline has not sought to get its indoor CPE certified for

3.65 because of the power issue. That means urban operators are not able

to offer self-install options that would greater speed up the rollout 
process.

I believe WISPA should be working with the 3.65 radio vendors and the 
FCC to get things fixed such that there will be a greater opportunity 
for operators to provide services using 3.65.

-Matt

Mike Hammett wrote:
 The guys at Redline said their equipment is power limited due to FCC 
 limitations.
 
 My point of view is based on Redline's statement of what their gear
can do 
 coupled with the documents filed with the FCC for their certification.
 
 The most I could get out of a PtP link was about 7 miles.  With a 90* 
 sector, only about 5 miles.
 
 I agree that all else the same 3.65 is better than 5.x GHz, only it
isn't 
 because the power isn't there.
 
 The throughput isn't there for WiMax compliant equipment due to small 
 channels.  If there were larger channel sizes, yes, it would support
higher 
 throughput applications.  According to Redline, 7.5 MHz only gets
about 15 
 megs of throughput with WiMax.
 
 Redline explicitly said 3.65 GHz isn't for rural applications due to
the 
 power.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Lucaya X-4000 radios

2008-01-04 Thread Gino Villarini
Oooh well yeah ... since it uses 2 radio cards ... you are looking to 40
mhz total for regular operation and 80 mhz total for turbo mode ...

Also I assume you need to use very separate channels in order to avoid
self interference in the dual pol antenna and between the radios inside
the enclosure

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 8:21 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Lucaya X-4000 radios

How does StarOS handle frequency usage for FDX?  Does it require another
channel (and thus another 20 MHz) for FDX operation?


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: Matt Larsen - Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List 
wireless@wispa.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 3:17 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Lucaya X-4000 radios


 Hi all,

 I did some performance testing yesterday with the new X-4000 radio
units 
 from Lucaya and wanted to share the results.   These are the new four 
 radio access point/client/backhaul units from Valemount Networks (the 
 authors of StarOS).   The latest versions of the firmware now support
full 
 duplex operation.   I took two units and configured them for full
duplex 
 and started running ftp downloads and the starutil speedtest utility
to 
 see what the performance looks like.
 General results were that the boards will handle 30meg in both
directions 
 at the same time.   If one end is not pushing at full speed, the other
end 
 will do more traffic, and that split seemed to max out at 50meg in one

 direction and 15-20meg in the other.   I didn't get any speeds faster
than 
 50 meg.   This was using standard 20mhz channels.  40mhz channels
didn't 
 seem to do much better as the CPU was maxed out.  I'm curious to see
what 
 kind of results could be obtained with 2ghz CPU units on both sides
using 
 the 40mhz channels.
 For a $400 unit, I think this is outstanding performance and they are
very 
 versatile.   I have several up as backhaul links (in regular HDX mode)

 pulling 25-30 meg at distances of up to 30 miles.   I even have one
set 
 running on a 62 mile shot that will pull 10-12 meg consistently.
They 
 are also great as 5ghz or 2.4ghz access points.   We have one that has

 three 2.4ghz sectors on it and 120 clients between the three sectors. 
 The board is doing an outstanding job and very clearly outperforms the

 three RB532/SR2 access points that were on the same three sectors
before.

 Here is a link to the Lucaya store:
http://www.station-server.com/store/

 I have also heard that Streakwave will be carrying this product as
well.
 To me, this is one of the most exciting items to hit the WISP business

 since I've been doing wireless.   I thought it made sense to share it
with 
 everyone.

 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com







 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Moto Spectra lite

2007-12-07 Thread Gino Villarini
150's would do 150 mbps hdx in that range

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of chris cooper
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 1:14 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Moto Spectra lite

 

 

Hi-

 

Im looking at the Moto spectra lite units for a link that's just a hair
over 1 mile, clear LOS.  Vendor spec says they do 150 mb.  What actual
throughput have others seen using this product?  I'm looking for a
product that will deliver greater than 70 mb and am considering the
spectra lite and spectra series.

 

Thanks

Chris Cooper

Intelliwave





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Moto Spectra lite

2007-12-07 Thread Gino Villarini
Dragonwave Horizon

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of CHUCK PROFITO
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 4:25 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Moto Spectra lite

RICK,
What would you recommend to transport a 50 meg back haul pipe 23 miles?


Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Providing High Speed Broadband 
to Rural Central California


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 11:18 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Moto Spectra lite


I have a couple of these links running about 142 Meg combined RX and TX.
Just make sure you use the proper antennas for the path to get maximum
bandwidth.  The lower the power settings, the more bandwidth you will
get.

Rick Harnish

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of chris cooper
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 12:14 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Moto Spectra lite

 

 

Hi-

 

Im looking at the Moto spectra lite units for a link that's just a hair
over
1 mile, clear LOS.  Vendor spec says they do 150 mb.  What actual
throughput
have others seen using this product?  I'm looking for a product that
will
deliver greater than 70 mb and am considering the spectra lite and
spectra
series.

 

Thanks

Chris Cooper

Intelliwave






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1177 - Release Date:
12/7/2007
1:11 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1177 - Release Date:
12/7/2007
1:11 PM
 






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] FS: Soekris Router with t-1 Cards

2007-12-05 Thread Gino Villarini

For Sale:

Brand New, 1 month old.  Bought for project that didn't went trough:

4 Soekris net4801-48 Board and Case + Sangoma A101u t-1 Card.

Soekris price is $640.00 ea., I'll let them go for $550 each or 
$2k for all 4


Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

2007-11-13 Thread Gino Villarini
 - Basic Web/SNMP Management card
http://www.apcc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=AP9606

AP9617 - Advanced Web/SNMP Management (email capability etc.)
http://www.apcc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=AP9617

AP9619 - Advanced Web/SNMP Management with Environmental monitoring
http://www.apcc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=AP9619


- Original Message - From: Mark Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


  Gino, how does that differ from the ap9617?

Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax

- Original Message - From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


$125 for the snmp card?

We are buying the ap9606 for $50

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 8:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

UPS - $45 on ebay (buy one without batteries)
SNMP card - $125 on ebay
2 batteries  2 outdoor battery compartments: $150-$175 (more,
depending
  on
battery quality).  I get mine at Bimart.
misc connectors  wire $20

I had one site up for 36 hours with Trango Tlink, small switch, and
Tranzeo
AP.  I thnk that's best-case-scenario.

Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax

- Original Message - From: George Rogato
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


Not sure how much I need really. It's the downtime.
This one pop has a trango, a wrap a metro and a cheap switch. Usually
  when
it looses power it could be 24 hours or more.

With your set up, how much do you pay including the 2 rv batteries and
  how
long have you had for a power outage?

I just ordered one of the cheapo generics for my house to check out.
  But
generic usually leaves that feeling of uncertainty that makes me
  uneasy.

Mark Nash wrote:
  George, are you really needing that much?  3KVA?  Or is it the higher
battery capacity you're wanting?

I buy used APC Smart-UPS SU700NET from ebay, without batteries.  Then
I
buy
a couple RV batteries and hook them up (outside the enclosure, of
course).
I put in a AP9617 SNMP device and it gives me a little remote control
w/e-mail notification.  Doesn't do everything I want (PDU-ability to
power
off each receptacle individually, watchdog).

On a remote site, it'll give anywhere from 12-24 hours depending on
load

whatchya got out there...

Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax

- Original Message - From: George Rogato
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 11:27 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


I need to buy a few ups's for some remote pops.

I was looking at APC and the place I buy stuff from had these:

http://www.pacificgeek.com/product.asp?ID=52353C=216S=-1

Is this worth buying, or should I go with APC at twice the price?


  
http://www.apcc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=SUA3000
  -- 
George Rogato

Welcome to WISPA

www.wispa.org

http://signup.wispa.org/





 This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer viruses(84). 






 
 

This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer 
viruses.







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org

RE: [WISPA] On-Call Compensation

2007-11-13 Thread Gino Villarini
We pay $50 per weekend they are on call

$100 per day if they are deployed to the field

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] On-Call Compensation

We are wanting to have people be on-call in case of emergencies and for 
telephone tech support at night  on weekends.  How do you pay your
people 
for on-call time where they are doing nothing, and how do you then pay
them 
when they work during those time periods?

Are there employment rules on this?

Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

2007-11-13 Thread Gino Villarini
Thanks,

We have examined the pros and cons of going full dc on our pops,

It all comes down to equipment cost vs long time savings on wasted energy.

But for out typical POPs we use an APC UPS with External batteries,

This setup gives us:

Aprox 12 hrs of runtime 
DC voltage selectivity 
Low Voltage disconnect
Surge Suppression on the AC
http snmp remote monitoring
remote rebooting capabilities

all for about $550 ($150 refub UPS, $50 SNMP Card, $ 350 for 2 AGM Cells)

Similar functionality for a DC system is at least 3x the cost

It's a no brainer

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Albert
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 11:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

55VDC at 1.0A

Eric Albert
Application Engineer
Alvarion, Inc.


 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 8:41 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


Eric,

Whats the DC output on the OPS-DC?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Albert
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 8:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

This seems like a good opportunity to lob in a sales pitch of sorts. But I will 
disguise it as an engineering discussion to appease the tech crowd. I will 
preface my comments by saying I do not know the original application for which 
this question was posed. 

Most of the gear (there are exceptions) in our business, in the end run on DC 
power. Our radios are a good example. The chassis based BS-AU can run on -48 
VDC power supplies and supply the necessary DC voltages to the cards and ODUs. 
The process of running a UPS (which in application is a battery powering an 
inverter) only to knock down the 120VAC into DC seems overkill.  The process is 
inefficient, generates heat and can be expensive. This process is commonly 
known as the double-conversion method.

Side bar: some UPS units, not all, don't handle power correction. They will 
kick on during under/over voltage situations but they do little to correct for 
the quality of the power. Over time poor AC power quality will chip away at the 
MTBF of everything connected to it. I have also heard that many of the more 
popular UPS units have trouble with generators, especially the generators that 
have automatic throttles.  If the quality of the generated power is poor it 
will burn up the MOVs that are in place at the input side of the UPS. But I 
digress...

I think the Telcos have had it right for some time. Although how they got there 
is another discussion. But in the end DC power affords you some options. A 
properly engineered DC power plant will take the brunt of bad power and 
isolate it from your gear. The rectifiers take the hit so to speak and the 
batteries don't care. Any power events such as brownouts, surges or blackouts 
don't get telegraphed to the radio equipment. Another point worth noting is the 
availability of modular-based rectifiers and battery chargers. Lots of options. 
(I have even seen hydrogen fuel cell units in place a major POPs. Really cool 
gear.)

One WISP who has employed this design had a long outage that almost drained the 
batteries. They pulled a pickup truck with a full tank of gas up to the site 
and topped off the DC string. Others have taken the approach of using 
wind/solar/hydro/utility. 

Also, if you can build a POP on nothing but DC, think of how much energy you 
will save just by cutting out the wasted heat that an inverter (or UPS) 
creates. If the design calls for a cabinet, chances are you will not back-up 
the air conditioner. Where does all that heat go during a long outage? (DC fans 
anyone?)

Here is the sales pitch. Alvarion manufactures several options in the DC genre. 
We have the aforementioned -48VDC PS for the BS-SH chassis solution. When you 
design a system with one radio family (i.e. VL) redundant power supplies can be 
implemented at the tower. 

And now, for the Pièce de résistance, we have a DC standalone power supply for 
VL. It is the OPS-DC. Its input range is 10.5 to 32 VDC and draws less than 1A 
at 24VDC. Slightly more draw at 12VDC. The temperature range is -31 to +131F. 
Why all the hoopla? A DC battery charger with a good deep cycle battery and the 
OPS-DC could run a VL sector for... well, a really long time. 

This idea will certainly not work for everyone or for every design. But it sure 
is fun to imagine the possibilities. I hope to hear some creative responses. 
Thanks for reading. 

Eric  

 

Eric Albert
Application Engineer
Alvarion, Inc.

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL

RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

2007-11-12 Thread Gino Villarini
We have had great luck buying refurb APC UPS from 

www.upsprotection.com



Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan Langseth
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 3:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


A couple of the differeneces I see: the APC has a 2 year warranty vs 90
days on the generic one,  also it looks like you can add a ethernet
module to the APC for remote monitoring. also the Wattage output is 600W
higher on the APC

Not sure if that is worth twice the price though.

Ryan

On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 11:27 -0800, George Rogato wrote:
 I need to buy a few ups's for some remote pops.
 
 I was looking at APC and the place I buy stuff from had these:
 
 http://www.pacificgeek.com/product.asp?ID=52353C=216S=-1
 
 Is this worth buying, or should I go with APC at twice the price?
 

http://www.apcc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=SUA3000
 
 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

2007-11-12 Thread Gino Villarini
$125 for the snmp card?

We are buying the ap9606 for $50

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 8:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

UPS - $45 on ebay (buy one without batteries)
SNMP card - $125 on ebay
2 batteries  2 outdoor battery compartments: $150-$175 (more, depending
on 
battery quality).  I get mine at Bimart.
misc connectors  wire $20

I had one site up for 36 hours with Trango Tlink, small switch, and
Tranzeo 
AP.  I thnk that's best-case-scenario.

Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax

- Original Message - 
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


 Not sure how much I need really. It's the downtime.
 This one pop has a trango, a wrap a metro and a cheap switch. Usually
when 
 it looses power it could be 24 hours or more.

 With your set up, how much do you pay including the 2 rv batteries and
how 
 long have you had for a power outage?

 I just ordered one of the cheapo generics for my house to check out.
But 
 generic usually leaves that feeling of uncertainty that makes me
uneasy.



 Mark Nash wrote:
 George, are you really needing that much?  3KVA?  Or is it the higher
 battery capacity you're wanting?

 I buy used APC Smart-UPS SU700NET from ebay, without batteries.  Then
I 
 buy
 a couple RV batteries and hook them up (outside the enclosure, of 
 course).
 I put in a AP9617 SNMP device and it gives me a little remote control
 w/e-mail notification.  Doesn't do everything I want (PDU-ability to 
 power
 off each receptacle individually, watchdog).

 On a remote site, it'll give anywhere from 12-24 hours depending on
load 
 
 whatchya got out there...

 Mark Nash
 UnwiredOnline.Net
 350 Holly Street
 Junction City, OR 97448
 http://www.uwol.net
 541-998-
 541-998-5599 fax

 - Original Message - 
 From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 11:27 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


 I need to buy a few ups's for some remote pops.

 I was looking at APC and the place I buy stuff from had these:

 http://www.pacificgeek.com/product.asp?ID=52353C=216S=-1

 Is this worth buying, or should I go with APC at twice the price?


http://www.apcc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=SUA3000


 -- 
 George Rogato

 Welcome to WISPA

 www.wispa.org

 http://signup.wispa.org/




--
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


--
 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/








 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

2007-11-12 Thread Gino Villarini
I don't know

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

Gino, how does that differ from the ap9617?

Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax

- Original Message - 
From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


$125 for the snmp card?

We are buying the ap9606 for $50

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 8:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

UPS - $45 on ebay (buy one without batteries)
SNMP card - $125 on ebay
2 batteries  2 outdoor battery compartments: $150-$175 (more, depending
on
battery quality).  I get mine at Bimart.
misc connectors  wire $20

I had one site up for 36 hours with Trango Tlink, small switch, and
Tranzeo
AP.  I thnk that's best-case-scenario.

Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax

- Original Message - 
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


 Not sure how much I need really. It's the downtime.
 This one pop has a trango, a wrap a metro and a cheap switch. Usually
when
 it looses power it could be 24 hours or more.

 With your set up, how much do you pay including the 2 rv batteries and
how
 long have you had for a power outage?

 I just ordered one of the cheapo generics for my house to check out.
But
 generic usually leaves that feeling of uncertainty that makes me
uneasy.



 Mark Nash wrote:
 George, are you really needing that much?  3KVA?  Or is it the higher
 battery capacity you're wanting?

 I buy used APC Smart-UPS SU700NET from ebay, without batteries.  Then
I
 buy
 a couple RV batteries and hook them up (outside the enclosure, of
 course).
 I put in a AP9617 SNMP device and it gives me a little remote control
 w/e-mail notification.  Doesn't do everything I want (PDU-ability to
 power
 off each receptacle individually, watchdog).

 On a remote site, it'll give anywhere from 12-24 hours depending on
load
 
 whatchya got out there...

 Mark Nash
 UnwiredOnline.Net
 350 Holly Street
 Junction City, OR 97448
 http://www.uwol.net
 541-998-
 541-998-5599 fax

 - Original Message - 
 From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 11:27 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


 I need to buy a few ups's for some remote pops.

 I was looking at APC and the place I buy stuff from had these:

 http://www.pacificgeek.com/product.asp?ID=52353C=216S=-1

 Is this worth buying, or should I go with APC at twice the price?


http://www.apcc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=SUA3000


 -- 
 George Rogato

 Welcome to WISPA

 www.wispa.org

 http://signup.wispa.org/




--
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


--
 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/








 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/








WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org

RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

2007-11-12 Thread Gino Villarini
I have not told you my source :-)

 

Gino A. Villarini 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

 

And now you just created a bidding war on ebay for them... :(

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote: 

$125 for the snmp card?
 
We are buying the ap9606 for $50
 
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 8:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?
 
UPS - $45 on ebay (buy one without batteries)
SNMP card - $125 on ebay
2 batteries  2 outdoor battery compartments: $150-$175 (more, depending
on 
battery quality).  I get mine at Bimart.
misc connectors  wire $20
 
I had one site up for 36 hours with Trango Tlink, small switch, and
Tranzeo 
AP.  I thnk that's best-case-scenario.
 
Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
 
- Original Message - 
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
mailto:wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?
 
 
  

Not sure how much I need really. It's the downtime.
This one pop has a trango, a wrap a metro and a cheap switch.
Usually


when 
  

it looses power it could be 24 hours or more.
 
With your set up, how much do you pay including the 2 rv
batteries and


how 
  

long have you had for a power outage?
 
I just ordered one of the cheapo generics for my house to check
out.


But 
  

generic usually leaves that feeling of uncertainty that makes me


uneasy.
  

 
 
Mark Nash wrote:


George, are you really needing that much?  3KVA?  Or is
it the higher
battery capacity you're wanting?
 
I buy used APC Smart-UPS SU700NET from ebay, without
batteries.  Then
  

I 
  

buy
a couple RV batteries and hook them up (outside the
enclosure, of 
course).
I put in a AP9617 SNMP device and it gives me a little
remote control
w/e-mail notification.  Doesn't do everything I want
(PDU-ability to 
power
off each receptacle individually, watchdog).
 
On a remote site, it'll give anywhere from 12-24 hours
depending on
  

load 
  


whatchya got out there...
 
Mark Nash
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
 
- Original Message - 
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
mailto:wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 11:27 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?
 
 
  

I need to buy a few ups's for some remote pops.
 
I was looking at APC and the place I buy stuff
from had these:
 

http://www.pacificgeek.com/product.asp?ID=52353C=216S=-1
 
Is this worth buying, or should I go with APC at
twice the price?
 
 


http://www.apcc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=SUA3000
  

 
-- 
George Rogato
 
Welcome to WISPA
 
www.wispa.org
 
http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 



--
  

--
  

WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org

RE: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

2007-11-12 Thread Gino Villarini
I just bough 50 for $500 with on site delivery by a girl in bikini :-)

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

Just bought 5 of them on ebay for $50 each, including shipping. ;)

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote:
 I have not told you my source :-)

  

 Gino A. Villarini 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 

 

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Travis Johnson
 Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:07 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?

  

 And now you just created a bidding war on ebay for them... :(

 Travis
 Microserv

 Gino Villarini wrote: 

 $125 for the snmp card?
  
 We are buying the ap9606 for $50
  
 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
  
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Mark Nash
 Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 8:48 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?
  
 UPS - $45 on ebay (buy one without batteries)
 SNMP card - $125 on ebay
 2 batteries  2 outdoor battery compartments: $150-$175 (more,
depending
 on 
 battery quality).  I get mine at Bimart.
 misc connectors  wire $20
  
 I had one site up for 36 hours with Trango Tlink, small switch, and
 Tranzeo 
 AP.  I thnk that's best-case-scenario.
  
 Mark Nash
 UnwiredOnline
 350 Holly Street
 Junction City, OR 97448
 http://www.uwol.net
 541-998-
 541-998-5599 fax
  
 - Original Message - 
 From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 mailto:wireless@wispa.org 
 Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:32 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?
  
  
   

   Not sure how much I need really. It's the downtime.
   This one pop has a trango, a wrap a metro and a cheap switch.
 Usually
   

 when 
   

   it looses power it could be 24 hours or more.

   With your set up, how much do you pay including the 2 rv
 batteries and
   

 how 
   

   long have you had for a power outage?

   I just ordered one of the cheapo generics for my house to check
 out.
   

 But 
   

   generic usually leaves that feeling of uncertainty that makes me
   

 uneasy.
   



   Mark Nash wrote:
   

   George, are you really needing that much?  3KVA?  Or is
 it the higher
   battery capacity you're wanting?

   I buy used APC Smart-UPS SU700NET from ebay, without
 batteries.  Then
 

 I 
   

   buy
   a couple RV batteries and hook them up (outside the
 enclosure, of 
   course).
   I put in a AP9617 SNMP device and it gives me a little
 remote control
   w/e-mail notification.  Doesn't do everything I want
 (PDU-ability to 
   power
   off each receptacle individually, watchdog).

   On a remote site, it'll give anywhere from 12-24 hours
 depending on
 

 load 
   

   
   whatchya got out there...

   Mark Nash
   UnwiredOnline.Net
   350 Holly Street
   Junction City, OR 97448
   http://www.uwol.net
   541-998-
   541-998-5599 fax

   - Original Message - 
   From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 mailto:wireless@wispa.org 
   Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 11:27 AM
   Subject: [WISPA] Which UPS to use?


 

   I need to buy a few ups's for some remote pops.

   I was looking at APC and the place I buy stuff
 from had these:

   
 http://www.pacificgeek.com/product.asp?ID=52353C=216S=-1

   Is this worth buying, or should I go with APC at
 twice the price?


   


http://www.apcc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=SUA3000
   


   -- 
   George Rogato

   Welcome to WISPA

   www.wispa.org

RE: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire scrap WiMax deal

2007-11-09 Thread Gino Villarini
I concur with Steve Stroh take on this:

http://www.bwianews.com/2007/11/good-day-bwia-4.html#more

We will see Sprint buying Clearwire and Craig McCaw as CEO of
Sprint-Nextel-Xohm-Clearwire

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 2:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire scrap WiMax deal

I'm certainly not jumping for joy about ClearWire's poor news and
performance.  I agree with Tom that nearly any wireless failure in the
news
does not bode well for wireless operators.

My point from the beginning was ClearWire is over-valued and therefore
the
only direction it can take is downward.  I believe they are over-valued
for
one primary reason; they are targeting the mobile user market.  This
market
is clearly dominated by the cellular providers and anyone entering that
market is doomed, IMO.

Why would anyone opt for a mobile service that only works in a fraction
of
the area that a competing service offers?  Considering the existing
mobile
service widely available today is performing well and only getting
better,
why would anyone want to enter this market?  Crazy...

Best,


Brad


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Todd Easterling
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 12:19 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire scrap WiMax deal

For the record, everyone in the WISP business (manufacturers and WISPs)
I
talk to about the collapse of the Sprint-Clearwire deal is jumping for
joy
about the news. I am too. WISPs do not need more competition, and a
national WISP like clearwire which added 49,000 new subs in the
quarter
ended September 30, 2007 is clearly competition. Their market coverage
increased from 34 markets last quarter to 48.

Yes, it is unlikely that a satisfied WISP customer would switch to
Clearwire. But what we are talking about is competition for new
customers.
And anything that slows down a national WISP that picked up 49,000 new
subs in one quarter is good for the small business-WISPs and the smaller
manufacturers that supply those WISPs. Also, Clearwire isn't likely, in
my
opinion, to care about buying most small WISPs. What would they be
buying?
The technology wouldn't be compatible, from billing to the wireless
transmission system to the frequency bands. They could just as easily
buy
the names and addresses for homes in an small-WISP area and send
sales/marketing incentives out.

If Clearwire went away tomorrow, small WISPs, WISP distributors and WISP
product manufacturers would be far better off.

Todd




Todd Easterling

VP, Corporate Development  Marketing

Solectek Corporation

www.SOLECTEK.com




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire scrap WiMax deal

I'm not sure it is an issue of Clearwire over-evaluation.
I personally think it was just a publicity stunt to bring in some new
cash 
last quarter, for both companies.

Clearwire and Sprint each own 2.5G spectrum, and its equally worth what
it 
is worth.
The real issue is whether someone is willing to pay what its worth, to
just 
deliver WiMax, and share the profits?
Companies realize that sometimes they are better off just concentrating
on 
what they do best, and take 100% of the profit on the Business model
that 
they have proven to be Solid.
Sprint's mobile division has a clear business model that makes sense,
around

the EVDO 3G/4G mobile data products. Sprint's business broadband
division 
has a clear business model around Fiber Optics. Sprint's Long distance 
division has a clear model for selling bits nation/world wide.
But when it comes to WiMax, do they have a clear model that will benefit

them?
Its all about EGO and public perception, and Tier1 carriers do not like 
someone else getting the Spotlight, its just not good for Investor 
Relations.

Personally, I believe it will help WISPs more, for Clearwire to succeed.
It 
will likely set a record of high evaluation for the industry.
Public perception will be... If Clearwire can't do it, and isn't worth
it, 
how can a WISP be?

I'll make an unpopular statement that I feel is just plain reality, and
the 
reason Telcos are not likely going to be real competition for WISPs or
vice 
versa.
The Wireless business is for scavengers and bottom feeders. Any way you 
slice it, for a WELL FUNDED Mammoth company, Fiber Optic will ALWAYS be
a 
better business proposition for the PROVIDER, whether talking about
business

or residential.  And for Mobility, 3G and 4G already delivers enough 
capacity for MOST applications, that are guaranteed success business
models 

[WISPA] 6 Ghz Questions

2007-10-14 Thread Gino Villarini
Hey List

I don't have much experience with licensed 6 ghz  so I have the
following question based on this scenario:

I have the opportunity to acquire a couple of underused 6ghz microwave
paths.  They are based on Harris DS3 equipment. They are currently
installed on towers that are about 500 to 1500 feet from my towers.  As
you may expect, I wish to move those antennas and paths to my towers in
order to save on tower rent.

Would this affect in any way the FCC license?
What would be the procedure to solicit a move?
Would I need to basically start from scratch license wise?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145



** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] 6 Ghz Questions

2007-10-14 Thread Gino Villarini
Btw:

Anyone know how to fit to 6 ghz links into one antenna? Is there a 6ghz
combiner?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 12:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 6 Ghz Questions

Hi,

I would contact MicroNet (www.micronetcom.com) and see. My guess would 
be because you are moving the locations is that you would have to start 
from scratch. New path analysis, new licenses. Total cost is probably 
$2,500.

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote:
 Hey List

 I don't have much experience with licensed 6 ghz  so I have the
 following question based on this scenario:

 I have the opportunity to acquire a couple of underused 6ghz microwave
 paths.  They are based on Harris DS3 equipment. They are currently
 installed on towers that are about 500 to 1500 feet from my towers.
As
 you may expect, I wish to move those antennas and paths to my towers
in
 order to save on tower rent.

 Would this affect in any way the FCC license?
 What would be the procedure to solicit a move?
 Would I need to basically start from scratch license wise?

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145





 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007
at ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **




 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   



** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] 6 Ghz Questions

2007-10-14 Thread Gino Villarini
Ohh yes, got that I guess I'll have to stick to those locations, Ill
check with Micronet.

 

Do you know of a way to use 1 6ghz antenna with 2 xmts?

 

Gino A. Villarini 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 12:23 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 6 Ghz Questions

 

Hi,

I think even without going to decimal notation on the GPS coordinates,
they are still accurate to within 100 feet.

Also, if the towers they are on now have FCC numbers, then the licenses
would have been tied to those FCC tower numbers as well.

Travis
Microserv

Gino Villarini wrote: 

Well that's what I thought, but due to the limited availability of 6ghz
in the area, I might up end empty handed!.  I thought that since the GPS
cords provided to the FCC in the path description are not that accurate,
I could make a location change within x amount of feet.
 
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 12:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 6 Ghz Questions
 
Hi,
 
I would contact MicroNet (www.micronetcom.com) and see. My guess would 
be because you are moving the locations is that you would have to start 
from scratch. New path analysis, new licenses. Total cost is probably 
$2,500.
 
Travis
Microserv
 
Gino Villarini wrote:
  

Hey List
 
I don't have much experience with licensed 6 ghz  so I have the
following question based on this scenario:
 
I have the opportunity to acquire a couple of underused 6ghz
microwave
paths.  They are based on Harris DS3 equipment. They are
currently
installed on towers that are about 500 to 1500 feet from my
towers.


As
  

you may expect, I wish to move those antennas and paths to my
towers


in
  

order to save on tower rent.
 
Would this affect in any way the FCC license?
What would be the procedure to solicit a move?
Would I need to basically start from scratch license wise?
 
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
 
 




  

** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th
2007


at ISPCON **
  

** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA
www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at


http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **
  

 




  

WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
 




  

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
  




 
** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http

RE: [WISPA] ATT To Buy Wireless Spectrum From Aloha Partners For$2.5 Billion

2007-10-09 Thread Gino Villarini
Sweet!

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joshua Rowe
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ATT To Buy Wireless Spectrum From Aloha Partners
For$2.5 Billion

What a considerable profit considering they paid 43.3 million for it in
2002.

Re: http://mrtmag.com/mag/radio_aloha_plans_test/


Josh Rowe
--
NexGenAccess Inc. http://www.nexgenaccess.com



-- Original Message ---
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:37:33 -0400
Subject: [WISPA] ATT To Buy Wireless Spectrum From Aloha Partners For
$2.5 
Billion

 ATT To Buy Wireless Spectrum From Aloha Partners For $2.5 Billion
 
 October 09, 2007: 07:31 AM EST
 
 DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
 
 ATT Inc.'s (T) board approved the purchase of wireless spectrum 
 licenses from Delware limited partnership Aloha Partners L.P. for 
 about $2.5 billion in cash.
 
 The telecommunications holding company said the spectrum licenses 
 cover 196 million people in the 700 MHz frequency band.
 
 The company said the deal enhances its spectrum position by adding 
 12 MHz of spectrum covering 196 million people in 281 markets. The 
 spectrum covers many major metropolitan areas, including 72 of the 
 top 100 and all of the top 10 markets in the U.S.


---
-
 
 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 
 2007 at ISPCON ** ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA 
   www.ispcon.com ** ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT ** ** FREE 
 Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 ** ** Use 
 Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
 http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **
 


---
-
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


---
-
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--- End of Original Message ---




** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Provider hogging all 2.5 Spectrum?

2007-10-04 Thread Gino Villarini
Hey List,

The local Sprint has bought 1 a local Clearwire-like provider, which
owned some 2.5 licenses and had Leases for others.  Now Sprint is also
in negotiations to buy a local WISP who was Leases more 2.5 licenses
(Educational).  Basically all 2.5 would be owned or leased by Sprint.

Isn't there any FCC regulations that prevents a provider from owning all
spectrum in band? 

I know that limitations exists on Cell bands 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145



** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Provider hogging all 2.5 Spectrum?

2007-10-04 Thread Gino Villarini
Dang! Time for some 3.65 802.16e gear to hit the market!

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 11:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Provider hogging all 2.5 Spectrum?

No such limitations exists in EBS/BRS, likely because no one can own it
all though they can CONTROL it all. They can own some, but 60% is EBS
and they can only control those through lease from the primary EBS
holders. I know even some small guys that control all the spectrum in
their markets.

Patrick Leary
AVP, Market Development
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 7:03 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Provider hogging all 2.5 Spectrum?

Hey List,

The local Sprint has bought 1 a local Clearwire-like provider, which
owned some 2.5 licenses and had Leases for others.  Now Sprint is also
in negotiations to buy a local WISP who was Leases more 2.5 licenses
(Educational).  Basically all 2.5 would be owned or leased by Sprint.

Isn't there any FCC regulations that prevents a provider from owning all
spectrum in band? 

I know that limitations exists on Cell bands 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145




** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by

PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer viruses(190).











This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by

PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer viruses(43).









 This footnote confirms that this email message has been
scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code,
vandals  computer viruses(84).







 
 


This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer viruses.








** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php

RE: [WISPA] Rackmount Mikrotik

2007-10-04 Thread Gino Villarini
Soekris.com

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zack Kneisley
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rackmount Mikrotik

if your looking for high-end outdoor, check out
http://www.cablefree.co.uk/products_radio.htm
72MB...

On 10/3/07, Don Annas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Has anyone found a good solid state rack-mount system for running
 Mikrotik?
 In several areas, we are bottlenecked by the 532 boards and was
looking
 for
 something that would actually handle 100MB of throughput as well as a
good
 amount of queues and VLANs.  Any pointers in the right direction are
 appreciated.  Thanks.





 ___
 Don Annas
 Triad Telecom, Inc.
 336.510.3800 x111
 336.510.3801 FAX
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 HYPERLINK http://www.TriadTelecom.comwww.TriadTelecom.com
 HYPERLINK
 

https://msm.triadtelecom.com/NDDChat/Default.asp?url=http://www.triadtel
eco
 m.com/ndd/dannasCLICK to chat with me now!
 ___

 triadtel-login




 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.39/1045 - Release Date:
 10/2/2007
 6:43 PM



 --
 This message was scanned and is believed to be clean.







 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007
at
 ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
 http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/





 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Provider hogging all 2.5 Spectrum?

2007-10-04 Thread Gino Villarini
Steve, thanks for this great summary.  Too bad we didn't hook up @ Wimax
world last week

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Stroh
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 1:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Provider hogging all 2.5 Spectrum?

Gino:

No, there's no maximum amount of spectrum that one company can own in
2.5 GHz other than the rules for the commercial portions of the band
and the educational parts of the band. Even that partitioning is
pretty fluid when the licensees in the educational portion can lease
their licenses to commercial entities like Sprint.

In fact, it got more concentrated with the merger of SBC and
BellSouth; the latter had some 2.5 GHz spectrum which it was required
to sell off as part of the merger (BellSouth had a lot more 2.3 GHz
spectrum)... and the 2.5 GHz spectrum went to Clearwire. Now Clearwire
and Sprint are horse trading to rationalize their respective
spectrum holdings in the markets that each has chosen to serve. For
example, Sprint is trading its 2.5 GHz spectrum in Seattle to
Clearwire, and Clearwire is trading its spectrum in other urban
markets to Sprint.

Also, there is no longer any limitation on how much cellular spectrum
any one company can own. There was such a limitation at one time, but
that limitation was gradually phased out.

Thanks,

Steve

On 10/4/07, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hey List,

 The local Sprint has bought 1 a local Clearwire-like provider, which
 owned some 2.5 licenses and had Leases for others.  Now Sprint is also
 in negotiations to buy a local WISP who was Leases more 2.5 licenses
 (Educational).  Basically all 2.5 would be owned or leased by Sprint.

 Isn't there any FCC regulations that prevents a provider from owning
all
 spectrum in band?

 I know that limitations exists on Cell bands

 Gino A. Villarini
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-- 
Steve Stroh
Editor / Analyst, Stroh Publications LLC
425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.stevestroh.com



** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Gino Villarini
A Fcc certification search gives no results for Tranzeo in 5.4 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan Langseth
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 8:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

We have a tranzeo PTP link directly south of an Air Force base (the  
link runs east-west),  the East endpoint is right south of the base,  
less than 3 miles.  We put it in the 5.8 range because it dropped  
once.  Here is the DFS info we have:

Channel RADAR EventsTime Since Last Event   Current Status
124 130 days
Available
116 130 days
Available
120 16  7.20 days
Available

Another device on that tower, facing east, shows no DFS events.

ryan

On Oct 2, 2007, at 7:01 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:

 No but I'll tell you that the wireline providers are using the DFS2  
 issue as a major negative against us. I'm getting asked about it,  
 alot from prospects.
 It would be nice to learn very few are effected by it, for building  
 possitive public perception.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - From: Patrick Leary  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 7:26 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?


 Hi folks,

 So how many of you using it have experienced the DFS2 kicking in? I am
 curious because we are not getting many reports where radars are  
 forcing
 the radios to vacate and move to another channel.

 We are getting asked this a lot of late since we released our 5.4 PMP,
 but so far we don't see the radars much. IF you have a story, please
 indicate if you are rural, rural coastal, etc.

 Also how about 5.3 GHz. DFS2 is now mandatory there but I don't  
 think we
 have any case where those found a radar.

 Thanks,

 Patrick Leary
 AVP, Market Development
 Alvarion, Inc.
 o: 650.314.2628
 c: 760.580.0080
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 **

 ** This footnote confirms that this email message has  
 been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious  
 code, vandals  computer viruses(84).  
 **

 **







 **

 **
 This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
 PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals   
 computer viruses.
 **

 **



 --

 --

 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th  
 2007 at ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at http:// 
 www.ispcon.com/register.php **

 --

 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --

 --

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 -- 
 Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date:  
 9/20/2007 12:07 PM


 --

 --

 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th  
 2007 at ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at http:// 
 www.ispcon.com/register.php **

 --

 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --

 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET 

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Gino Villarini
So Brad, what did you use?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 11:18 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

This doesn't come as a surprise.  We deployed a couple VL units and they
were all but shut down due to a less than ideal RF environment.
Countless
hours over days if not weeks with Alvarion's finest in an effort to
remedy
the situation were unsuccessful.

Reflecting back on our particular scenario it was pretty interesting to
see
how poorly they handled peak business hours when interfering RF activity
was
high.  The radios would then speed up as hostile RF became less active
allowing more airtime for the VL to TX  RX.  This was arguably one of
the
more miserable events of our company's entire existence.  sigh

That said it is fair to say, if the RF is clean the VL radios will
scream.  

Best,


Brad

Ps. I'll be bracing for Patrick's attempts to discredit me for opting
out of
Alvarion's $1000 class.  grin




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zachery Wolfinger
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 7:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

Well, since you asked ;-)

We tried to deploy an Alvarion 5.4GHz B100 link in Indianapolis.  DFS2 
kicked in big time.  To the point that the radios shut down all 
frequencies and would not communicate with each other.  Sitting in the 
lab they worked fine.  It's possible that at least one side is hearing 
the radar from the Indy airport, but on all frequencies?

We pulled the link down and put it back in the lab.  Mike Cowan from 
Wireless Connections remoted in and check it out but didn't see any 
issues.  We are getting ready to deploy these back out to the tower 
sites so he can see what they are doing in the field.

Zak Wolfinger
IT Director
CyberLink International
Phone: 888-293-3693 Ext. 4357
Fax: 888-293-3995



Patrick Leary wrote:
 Hi folks,

 So how many of you using it have experienced the DFS2 kicking in? I am
 curious because we are not getting many reports where radars are
forcing
 the radios to vacate and move to another channel. 

 We are getting asked this a lot of late since we released our 5.4 PMP,
 but so far we don't see the radars much. IF you have a story, please
 indicate if you are rural, rural coastal, etc.

 Also how about 5.3 GHz. DFS2 is now mandatory there but I don't think
we
 have any case where those found a radar.

 Thanks,

 Patrick Leary
 AVP, Market Development
 Alvarion, Inc.
 o: 650.314.2628
 c: 760.580.0080
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]







 This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned
by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer
viruses(84).








  
  




 This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
 PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer
viruses.












 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007
at
ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
   




** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

RE: [WISPA] Long Distance StarOS links

2007-10-02 Thread Gino Villarini
Wonder what would Trango Atlas Backhauls would have performed in that
scenario

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 1:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] Long Distance StarOS links

Hi all,

Today we finished replacing our long Trango links with StarOS links, 
WAR-4 boards running version 3 of StarOS - hooked up to 4' Radiowaves 
dishes.  

Here are the results:

42 mile shot
10mhz channel size
-58 signal strength
10-12meg throughput

62 mile shot
10mhz channel size
-60 signal strength
8-10meg throughput

I am fairly happy with the links, and they are pushing about double what

our Trango Tlink-10 radios were able to handle.  I thought they would be

able to deliver a little bit higher speed, but it doesn't look like I'm 
going to be able to get any more out of them.   If only I had sprung for

the dual polarity feedhorns, I would be able to put two radios on each 
side and test the full duplex performance of StarOS on these links.   
I'm guessing that the full duplex shots would be in the 30-40 meg range 
in both directions since they would not have to deal with the mileage 
issues. 

What is really amazing to me is the signal strength.   These are the 
only two links where we use the 4' dishes, and they are the strongest 
backhaul signals that we have on our network, even though they are the 
longest.  I know that the 2x cloaking is part of that, but it still 
blows me away.

Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com


 



** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] tower site monitoring help

2007-09-25 Thread Gino Villarini
Those are nice, no batt voltage sensor tough

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Larry A Weidig
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:01 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] tower site monitoring help

Mac:
We use these at a lot of our tower sites to monitor them for
these same things:
http://www.networktechinc.com/enviro-mini.html
They work well and connect via Ethernet.  They can send out e-mail
notifications when something triggers which should be able to send the
text message you are looking for.
Hope that helps.

Larry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:50 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] tower site monitoring help



I have a tower owner whom we rent space on 6 of his towers that wants to
monitor temperature, the door, battery voltage and the strobes via my
wireless. He states that he has single simple open/closed contacts at
these
sites, but I haven't a clue as to what we need to get him connected. He
also
would like it to notify him via voice mail/text message for an outage. 

Any ideas, thoughts or suggestions?


TIA,
Mac 




** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Larger pole mount for Moto/Orthogon backhauls

2007-09-24 Thread Gino Villarini
IIRC, the The Orthogon Bracket has openings for pipe clamps ...

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Bushard, Jr
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 10:29 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Larger pole mount for Moto/Orthogon backhauls

I'd got the Pipe to Pipe Clamp route.

Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC
320-256-WISP (9477)
320-256-9478 Fax
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 10:21 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Larger pole mount for Moto/Orthogon backhauls

Maybe something like this would work for you.  It's not moved in years 
now...
http://www.odessaoffice.com/wireless/images/misc/P1010755.JPG

Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since
1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 5:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Larger pole mount for Moto/Orthogon backhauls


 List,

 I'm trying to mount a Motorola PTP 400 series backhaul (Orthogon
Gemini) 
 on a pole that is just ever so slightly too large for the mount that
is 
 included in the box.  Is a larger pole mount made for this radio or am
I 
 stuck having to get a set of pipe standoffs and mount a smaller pipe
to 
 the existing one?

 Patrick Shoemaker






 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007
at 
 ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
 http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/





 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 





** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: 

[WISPA] Wimax World , anyone going?

2007-09-22 Thread Gino Villarini
Im going to Chicago next week for Wimax World, anyone else going?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145



** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Multiradio Mesh Equipment

2007-09-17 Thread Gino Villarini
List,

Anyone has experience with multiradio (3-4 radios)mesh units.  Bel Air,
Mesh Dynamics, Strix? Would like to hear your opinions on them

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145



** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Multiradio Mesh Equipment

2007-09-17 Thread Gino Villarini
Yes please, thanks

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 11:03 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Multiradio Mesh Equipment

I am interested as well.  I have contact info on my salesman from Bel
Air
but we haven't purchased anything yet.  I can forward it to you if you
would
like.

Rick Harnish

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Multiradio Mesh Equipment

List,

Anyone has experience with multiradio (3-4 radios)mesh units.  Bel Air,
Mesh Dynamics, Strix? Would like to hear your opinions on them

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145





** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.21/1012 - Release Date:
9/16/2007
6:32 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.21/1012 - Release Date:
9/16/2007
6:32 PM
 




** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Standard Motorola 5.8 GHz Channel Frequencies

2007-09-13 Thread Gino Villarini
From 5735 up to 5840 in 5 mhz steps, 20 mhz channel width

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 3:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Standard Motorola 5.8 GHz Channel Frequencies

Could someone advise me what the Motorola Canopy 5.7 to 5.8 GHz standard

channel center frequencies are?

Also, how configurable are these channel frequencies? Can other 
(non-standard) frequencies be configured?

Thanks very much,

jack

-- 
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
FCC License # PG-12-25133
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
True Vendor-Neutral Wireless Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
FCC Part 15 Certification for Manufacturers and Service Providers
Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220  www.ask-wi.com







** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Thoughts on 900MHz mesh networks

2007-09-12 Thread Gino Villarini
Using dif radios for wifi and backhaul isn't mesh any more? How so?

I was under the impression that mesh was the ability of the equipment
to form a interconnection between the nodes with alternative paths to
the Internet feed 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 7:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Thoughts on 900MHz mesh networks

Hi Allen,

From the conversations I've had with people trying to use, or just
around, 
mesh gear, it doesn't usually work very well once the network starts to
come 
alive.  The old hub and spoke method works best.

Some of the new mesh gear uses different channels for broadcast vs. 
backhaul.  But that's not really mesh anymore, it's hub and spoke
stuffed 
into a single box.

I'm told that if you insist on running mesh, at least make sure that it 
never goes more than 2 or 3 layers deep.

Personally, in your area, I'd run 900 to mini pops.  In the population 
centers I'd run small micro cells of wifi.  Good speeds, cheap installs,

lots of flexibility etc.

It's good to see ya back.  This biz is like a good drug isn't it.  Once
you 
are hooked, you can never get very far away.

grin

Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since
1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Allen Marsalis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 9:16 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Thoughts on 900MHz mesh networks


I was a WISP in the late 90s and early 00s. Some of you may know me.
It's 
good to see many familiar faces still here.  In recent years, I have 
pursued new interests but I keep thinking back on my experiences as a
WISP. 
I had a lot of good times back then.  I'm thinking about creeping back
into 
the WISP business.

 After I sold in 2004, I followed a new trend in wireless in the press 
 called muni wireless promoted by manufacturers such as Strix and
Tropos. 
 This concept has taken some major blows in the press this month:


http://wifinetnews.com/archives/007869.htmlhttp://wifinetnews.com/arch
ives/007869.html
 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20521155/

http://web20.telecomtv.com/pages/?newsid=41788id=e9381817-0593-417a-86
39-c4c53e2a2a10view=newshttp://web20.telecomtv.com/pages/?ne...2a10vi
ew=news
 http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp...ng_sitedefault

http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/as-earthlink-el.htmlhttp://www.all
eyinsider.com/2007/08/...thlink-el.html
 http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/6120

 This hits close to home because the company who bought my WISP
(ShreveNet) 
 boasted being the largest WISP with the largest muni WIFI network in
the 
 nation in Tempe AZ (NeoReach aka Kite aka MobilePro) which sold these 
 properties recently to Gobility.  (Big Yawn)..


http://www.bbwexchange.com/wireless_isp/http://www.bbwexchange.com/wir
eless_isp/

 I'm certainly am not posting this thread to defend or even discuss the

 somewhat failed muni wireless concept.  Some say it was a failure
because 
 of the model rather than technology, caused by giving away free
service to 
 the anchor tenant (the city) and so forth.  Whatever... I couldn't
care 
 less about the past or Earthlink or Google, or MobilePro or huge muni
wifi 
 networks.

 However I am fascinated by the mesh technology in general, especially 
 after witnessing the old Nokia collapsible bridged mesh networks of
the 
 90s.  LOL, a lot has changed since then.  I often wonder how Dave
Peterson 
 and Ultramesh/locustworld turned out.  Once upon a time, he sold
product 
 to a WISP near me in Vivian LA to build the first mesh network in the
US. 
 He ended up with some heavy debt.  Also I knew of a WISP in Leesville
LA 
 using Wave Wireless (Speedcom) mesh gear with pretty good technical 
 results, that is, for a single radio system.  I'm thinking more along
the 
 lines of multiple radio systems.

 I am brainstorming a new WISP model and I am seeking feedback and
advice. 
 The concept goes something like this.  The muni network model touted
in 
 the press had many flaws as I see it.  Coming into an urban market
after 
 DSL and Cable has to be a steep uphill climb. Yet in 2007 there are
still 
 rural areas with no high speed solution in sight, particularly in the 
 wooded Southeast where the old wireless models don't always work.  I 
 posted the following statistics to the wireless boards nearly a decade
ago 
 as the results of my first 2.4GHz network.

 In my area (Shreveport LA) 65 out of 100 business surveys came back 
 positive (35 negative) for LOS. This was made possible by multistory 
 buildings and large parking lots (lack of trees) Yet for residential 
 service, 

RE: [WISPA] Thoughts on 900MHz mesh networks

2007-09-10 Thread Gino Villarini
Wow! Im witnessing the return of a pioneer!

Welcome back

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Allen Marsalis
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 12:17 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Thoughts on 900MHz mesh networks

I was a WISP in the late 90s and early 00s. Some of you may know 
me.  It's good to see many familiar faces still here.  In recent 
years, I have pursued new interests but I keep thinking back on my 
experiences as a WISP.  I had a lot of good times back then.  I'm 
thinking about creeping back into the WISP business.

After I sold in 2004, I followed a new trend in wireless in the press 
called muni wireless promoted by manufacturers such as Strix and 
Tropos.  This concept has taken some major blows in the press this
month:

http://wifinetnews.com/archives/007869.htmlhttp://wifinetnews.com/arch
ives/007869.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20521155/
http://web20.telecomtv.com/pages/?newsid=41788id=e9381817-0593-417a-86
39-c4c53e2a2a10view=newshttp://web20.telecomtv.com/pages/?ne...2a10vi
ew=news 

http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp...ng_sitedefault
http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/as-earthlink-el.htmlhttp://www.all
eyinsider.com/2007/08/...thlink-el.html 

http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/6120

This hits close to home because the company who bought my WISP 
(ShreveNet) boasted being the largest WISP with the largest muni WIFI 
network in the nation in Tempe AZ (NeoReach aka Kite aka MobilePro) 
which sold these properties recently to Gobility.  (Big Yawn)..

http://www.bbwexchange.com/wireless_isp/http://www.bbwexchange.com/wir
eless_isp/

I'm certainly am not posting this thread to defend or even discuss 
the somewhat failed muni wireless concept.  Some say it was a failure 
because of the model rather than technology, caused by giving away 
free service to the anchor tenant (the city) and so 
forth.  Whatever... I couldn't care less about the past or Earthlink 
or Google, or MobilePro or huge muni wifi networks.

However I am fascinated by the mesh technology in general, especially 
after witnessing the old Nokia collapsible bridged mesh networks of 
the 90s.  LOL, a lot has changed since then.  I often wonder how Dave 
Peterson and Ultramesh/locustworld turned out.  Once upon a time, he 
sold product to a WISP near me in Vivian LA to build the first mesh 
network in the US. He ended up with some heavy debt.  Also I knew of 
a WISP in Leesville LA using Wave Wireless (Speedcom) mesh gear with 
pretty good technical results, that is, for a single radio 
system.  I'm thinking more along the lines of multiple radio systems.

I am brainstorming a new WISP model and I am seeking feedback and 
advice.  The concept goes something like this.  The muni network 
model touted in the press had many flaws as I see it.  Coming into an 
urban market after DSL and Cable has to be a steep uphill climb. Yet 
in 2007 there are still rural areas with no high speed solution in 
sight, particularly in the wooded Southeast where the old wireless 
models don't always work.  I posted the following statistics to the 
wireless boards nearly a decade ago as the results of my first 2.4GHz
network.

In my area (Shreveport LA) 65 out of 100 business surveys came back 
positive (35 negative) for LOS. This was made possible by multistory 
buildings and large parking lots (lack of trees) Yet for residential 
service, only 5 came back positive while 95 came back 
negative.  Clearly there is a tree issue in many residential parts of 
the country.  This is the market that has few if any options as many 
keep hoping for DSL and cablemodem. Chainsaw jokes grow old fast around
here.

Traditionally the tools for Foliar NLOS have been (a) the use of low 
frequency spectrum to penetrate through the offending object, and (b) 
route around the offending object by hopping around it, (c) increase 
the power to try and punch through the offending objects.  Add to 
these maybe OFDM to use multipath interference to our advantage but I 
see that as an Urban solution (reflections off buildings) more than a 
foliar solution (reflections off trees)  The 700mw SR9 combined with 
a cheap SBCs and appropriate TCP routing protocols appears to go a 
long way to make new things possible.

Please imagine a muni wireless mesh network that utilizes 900MHz 
cards instead of 5.8 and 2.4 cards.  Instead of nodes being 1000 feet 
apart atop light poles, they are now spread 1 or 2 miles 
apart.  Instead of it taking 15 or 20 nodes to cover one square mile, 
perhaps one node could cover 1 to 4 square miles.  Could this be a 
solution for wooded areas with low to moderate population 
densities?  In other words, do you know anyone who has ever built a 
mesh network using SR9s and SBCs with multiple radios to achieve 
redundancy and ubiquitous coverage for small towns in the 

RE: [WISPA] Thoughts on 900MHz mesh networks

2007-09-10 Thread Gino Villarini
You 900 idea souns interesting, but youll need a 900 muni client and/or
900 pcmcia card for customers

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Allen Marsalis
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 12:17 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Thoughts on 900MHz mesh networks

I was a WISP in the late 90s and early 00s. Some of you may know 
me.  It's good to see many familiar faces still here.  In recent 
years, I have pursued new interests but I keep thinking back on my 
experiences as a WISP.  I had a lot of good times back then.  I'm 
thinking about creeping back into the WISP business.

After I sold in 2004, I followed a new trend in wireless in the press 
called muni wireless promoted by manufacturers such as Strix and 
Tropos.  This concept has taken some major blows in the press this
month:

http://wifinetnews.com/archives/007869.htmlhttp://wifinetnews.com/arch
ives/007869.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20521155/
http://web20.telecomtv.com/pages/?newsid=41788id=e9381817-0593-417a-86
39-c4c53e2a2a10view=newshttp://web20.telecomtv.com/pages/?ne...2a10vi
ew=news 

http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp...ng_sitedefault
http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/as-earthlink-el.htmlhttp://www.all
eyinsider.com/2007/08/...thlink-el.html 

http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/6120

This hits close to home because the company who bought my WISP 
(ShreveNet) boasted being the largest WISP with the largest muni WIFI 
network in the nation in Tempe AZ (NeoReach aka Kite aka MobilePro) 
which sold these properties recently to Gobility.  (Big Yawn)..

http://www.bbwexchange.com/wireless_isp/http://www.bbwexchange.com/wir
eless_isp/

I'm certainly am not posting this thread to defend or even discuss 
the somewhat failed muni wireless concept.  Some say it was a failure 
because of the model rather than technology, caused by giving away 
free service to the anchor tenant (the city) and so 
forth.  Whatever... I couldn't care less about the past or Earthlink 
or Google, or MobilePro or huge muni wifi networks.

However I am fascinated by the mesh technology in general, especially 
after witnessing the old Nokia collapsible bridged mesh networks of 
the 90s.  LOL, a lot has changed since then.  I often wonder how Dave 
Peterson and Ultramesh/locustworld turned out.  Once upon a time, he 
sold product to a WISP near me in Vivian LA to build the first mesh 
network in the US. He ended up with some heavy debt.  Also I knew of 
a WISP in Leesville LA using Wave Wireless (Speedcom) mesh gear with 
pretty good technical results, that is, for a single radio 
system.  I'm thinking more along the lines of multiple radio systems.

I am brainstorming a new WISP model and I am seeking feedback and 
advice.  The concept goes something like this.  The muni network 
model touted in the press had many flaws as I see it.  Coming into an 
urban market after DSL and Cable has to be a steep uphill climb. Yet 
in 2007 there are still rural areas with no high speed solution in 
sight, particularly in the wooded Southeast where the old wireless 
models don't always work.  I posted the following statistics to the 
wireless boards nearly a decade ago as the results of my first 2.4GHz
network.

In my area (Shreveport LA) 65 out of 100 business surveys came back 
positive (35 negative) for LOS. This was made possible by multistory 
buildings and large parking lots (lack of trees) Yet for residential 
service, only 5 came back positive while 95 came back 
negative.  Clearly there is a tree issue in many residential parts of 
the country.  This is the market that has few if any options as many 
keep hoping for DSL and cablemodem. Chainsaw jokes grow old fast around
here.

Traditionally the tools for Foliar NLOS have been (a) the use of low 
frequency spectrum to penetrate through the offending object, and (b) 
route around the offending object by hopping around it, (c) increase 
the power to try and punch through the offending objects.  Add to 
these maybe OFDM to use multipath interference to our advantage but I 
see that as an Urban solution (reflections off buildings) more than a 
foliar solution (reflections off trees)  The 700mw SR9 combined with 
a cheap SBCs and appropriate TCP routing protocols appears to go a 
long way to make new things possible.

Please imagine a muni wireless mesh network that utilizes 900MHz 
cards instead of 5.8 and 2.4 cards.  Instead of nodes being 1000 feet 
apart atop light poles, they are now spread 1 or 2 miles 
apart.  Instead of it taking 15 or 20 nodes to cover one square mile, 
perhaps one node could cover 1 to 4 square miles.  Could this be a 
solution for wooded areas with low to moderate population 
densities?  In other words, do you know anyone who has ever built a 
mesh network using SR9s and SBCs with multiple radios to achieve 
redundancy and 

RE: [WISPA] Thoughts on 900MHz mesh networks

2007-09-10 Thread Gino Villarini
I'll bet they prefer the Motorola Canopy T-shirts!

;-) ... ducking!

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 9:33 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Thoughts on 900MHz mesh networks

LOL. My girls are 6.5 and 4 now. They don't care much what the shirt
says so long as it has something sparkly on it. :)  And I have plenty of
old BreezeCOM shirts still. 


Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Allen Marsalis
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 5:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Thoughts on 900MHz mesh networks

At 06:37 PM 9/10/2007, Patrick Leary wrote:
Allen, great to see you pop up on the list again. You've been missed.


Thanks Patrick.  I trust all is going well with you.  I hear you are 
now vice president.  Great job!  (I mean that both ways. You do a 
great job and have a great job)  :)   Our kids are all growing 
up!   Your daughter must be what about 7 now.  Am I close?  Mine is 9 
and still wears her oversized Mikrotik and Trango 
T-shirts!  :ducking:   LOL, She's still waiting for her Breezecom
t-shirt.. ;)

Allen







** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by

PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer viruses(190).











This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by

PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer viruses(42).









 This footnote confirms that this email message has been
scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code,
vandals  computer viruses(84).







 
 


This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer viruses.








** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org


RE: [WISPA] redline

2007-09-06 Thread Gino Villarini
posibly

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 8:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] redline

I guess that's my question... I have a competitor that is shooting 30 
miles with a Redline 2ft panel pair running 5.4ghz. Even using only 
10mhz of spectrum, that's only a -83 signal. Just wondering if he's 
turned up the power somehow to make that shot.

Travis
Microserv

Mike Hammett wrote:
 I'd imagine the EIRP is still 30.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:52 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] redline


 Hi,

 Does anyone know off the top of their head the maximum power output 
 of the Redline 5.4ghz product? And the receive sensitivity levels?

 Travis
 Microserv


 


 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007

 at ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com
**
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
 http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 


 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 


 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 
 at ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
 http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 


 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Glossary, updated from 6 years ago post

2007-08-29 Thread Gino Villarini
Wow, 6 years ago I was toying with Symbol Spectrum24 FHSS cards and APs, Proxim 
Rangelan2 and RAylink gear 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 9:28 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Glossary, updated from 6 years ago post

Wow, 6.5 years ago...  I don't think I was even looking at becoming a WISP 
then.  ;-)

--Mike



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 3:21 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Glossary, updated from 6 years ago post



So I was looking through some old material when I came across this glossary 
of wireless business related acronyms that WISPs should be familiar with in 
this space. For the new person, it can be daunting to keep track. I sent to 
this list 6 1/2 years ago. I though it merited a re-send, with some 
additions. Deeper concepts are further below.

Hope it is helpful and if I missed any key ones, please add.

Patrick Leary
AVP, Market Development
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Leary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 8:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Glossary

Common abbreviations and/or acronyms...

477: (Form 477) FCC's mandatory broadband reporting form for commercial 
operators
AAA server: authentication authorization accounting server
APD: automatic protocol detection
AES OCB: usually just called AES, advanced encryption standard offset code 
book
AIFS: arbitration inter-frame spacing
AP: access point
ARK: automatic retransmission queing
ARS: automatic rate switching
ASN-GW: access service network gateway
ATPC: automatic transmit power control
AU: access unit (same as above)
BE: best effort
BER: bit error rate
BRS: Broadband Radio Service (commercial side of the 2.5 GHz allocation in 
the US)
BSS: basic service set
BST: base station (referred more often this way in licensed networks)
BWA: broadband wireless access
BWIA: broadband wireless Internet access (Steve Stroh's preferred acronym)
CBR: constant bit rate
CC: convolutional coding
CDL: cell distance learning (refers to an automatic process within RF 
devices)
CDMA: code division multiple access
CG (or UGS): constant grant or unsolicited grant service
CIR: committed information rate
CoS: class of service
CPE: customer premises equipment
C/I: carrier to interference ratio
CSMA/CA: carrier sense multiple access/collision avoidance
EBS: Educational Broadband Spectrum (2.5 GHz allocated to non-profits, may 
be sublet), formerly ITFS (Instructional Fixed Television Service)
DFS: dynamic frequency selection
DFS2 or DFS+: second generation DFS (mandated for all new 5.3 and all 5.4 
GHz)
DIFS: distributed coordination function inter-frame spacing)
DS (or DSSS): direct sequence spread spectrum
EIRP: effective isotropic radiated power (expressed in dB)
EMI: electromagnetic interference
ESSID: extended service set ID
FCC: Federal Communications Commission
FDD: frequency division duplex
FEQ: forward error correction
FFT: fast fourier transform mathematical algorithm
FH (or FHSS): frequency hopping spread spectrum
FIPS: federal information processing standards
GFSK: Gausian frequency shift keying
HIPPA: Healthcare Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
IC: Industry Canada (Canadian peer to FCC)
IDU: indoor unit
IF: intermediate frequency
ISM: Industrial, Scientific, and Medical
LOS: Line of sight
LQI: link quality indicator
MAC: media access control
MAN: metropolitan area network
MIB: management information bit(s)
MIR: maximum information rate
NLOS: Near/non LOS
NMS: network management system
NPU: network processing unit
OAM: operation, administration  maintenance
ODU: outdoor unit
OET: Office of Engineering and Technology (FCC division responsible for 
equipment authorization and rules enforcement)
OFDM: orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
OFDMA: orthogonal frequency division multiple access
OBE or OOBE: out-of-band emissions
PAN: personal area network
Part 15: refers to FCC regulations in Part 15.247 of the Federal Code 
governing certain UL bands
PIU: power interface unit
PoE: power over Ethernet
PtMP or PmP: point-to-multipoint
PtP: Point-to-point
QAM: quadrature amplitude modulation
QinQ: VLAN type that allows customer to have own VLAN inside the operator's 
VLAN
QoS: quality of service
RAN: radio access network
RFI: radio frequency interference
RSSI: receive(r) signal strength index/indication
rtPS: real time polling services
RTS/CTS: request to send, clear to send
Rx: receive
RTCP: real time control protocol
RTP: real time protocol
SCADA: supervisory control and data acquisition
SDR: software defined radio
SIF: short inter-frame spacing
SIP: session initiation protocol
SNR: signal to noise ratio

RE: [WISPA] Glossary, updated from 6 years ago post

2007-08-29 Thread Gino Villarini
Don't tell me you have a Closet full of Manta Ray APs and the Orange USB 
adapters please don't ... jeje

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jory Privett
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 11:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Glossary, updated from 6 years ago post

I still have a closet full of RayLink gear I would like to get rid of.

Jory Privett
WCCS

- Original Message - 
From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 9:50 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Glossary, updated from 6 years ago post


Wow, 6 years ago I was toying with Symbol Spectrum24 FHSS cards and APs, 
Proxim Rangelan2 and RAylink gear 

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 9:28 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Glossary, updated from 6 years ago post

Wow, 6.5 years ago...  I don't think I was even looking at becoming a WISP
then.  ;-)

--Mike



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 3:21 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Glossary, updated from 6 years ago post



So I was looking through some old material when I came across this glossary
of wireless business related acronyms that WISPs should be familiar with in
this space. For the new person, it can be daunting to keep track. I sent to
this list 6 1/2 years ago. I though it merited a re-send, with some
additions. Deeper concepts are further below.

Hope it is helpful and if I missed any key ones, please add.

Patrick Leary
AVP, Market Development
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Leary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 8:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Glossary

Common abbreviations and/or acronyms...

477: (Form 477) FCC's mandatory broadband reporting form for commercial
operators
AAA server: authentication authorization accounting server
APD: automatic protocol detection
AES OCB: usually just called AES, advanced encryption standard offset code
book
AIFS: arbitration inter-frame spacing
AP: access point
ARK: automatic retransmission queing
ARS: automatic rate switching
ASN-GW: access service network gateway
ATPC: automatic transmit power control
AU: access unit (same as above)
BE: best effort
BER: bit error rate
BRS: Broadband Radio Service (commercial side of the 2.5 GHz allocation in
the US)
BSS: basic service set
BST: base station (referred more often this way in licensed networks)
BWA: broadband wireless access
BWIA: broadband wireless Internet access (Steve Stroh's preferred acronym)
CBR: constant bit rate
CC: convolutional coding
CDL: cell distance learning (refers to an automatic process within RF
devices)
CDMA: code division multiple access
CG (or UGS): constant grant or unsolicited grant service
CIR: committed information rate
CoS: class of service
CPE: customer premises equipment
C/I: carrier to interference ratio
CSMA/CA: carrier sense multiple access/collision avoidance
EBS: Educational Broadband Spectrum (2.5 GHz allocated to non-profits, may
be sublet), formerly ITFS (Instructional Fixed Television Service)
DFS: dynamic frequency selection
DFS2 or DFS+: second generation DFS (mandated for all new 5.3 and all 5.4
GHz)
DIFS: distributed coordination function inter-frame spacing)
DS (or DSSS): direct sequence spread spectrum
EIRP: effective isotropic radiated power (expressed in dB)
EMI: electromagnetic interference
ESSID: extended service set ID
FCC: Federal Communications Commission
FDD: frequency division duplex
FEQ: forward error correction
FFT: fast fourier transform mathematical algorithm
FH (or FHSS): frequency hopping spread spectrum
FIPS: federal information processing standards
GFSK: Gausian frequency shift keying
HIPPA: Healthcare Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
IC: Industry Canada (Canadian peer to FCC)
IDU: indoor unit
IF: intermediate frequency
ISM: Industrial, Scientific, and Medical
LOS: Line of sight
LQI: link quality indicator
MAC: media access control
MAN: metropolitan area network
MIB: management information bit(s)
MIR: maximum information rate
NLOS: Near/non LOS
NMS: network management system
NPU: network processing unit
OAM: operation, administration  maintenance
ODU: outdoor unit
OET: Office of Engineering and Technology (FCC division responsible for
equipment authorization and rules enforcement)
OFDM: orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
OFDMA: orthogonal frequency division multiple access
OBE or OOBE: out-of-band emissions
PAN: personal area network
Part 15: refers to FCC

RE: [WISPA] Remote power Reboot.

2007-08-24 Thread Gino Villarini
Those are nighthawk systems.  I have 6 brand new, for sale cheap.
(paging carrier coverage was poor)

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JohnnyO
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:10 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Remote power Reboot.

Aren't there some remote reboot devices that use the paging systems ?
Does 
anyone have links to these ?

JohnnyO
- Original Message - 
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Remote power Reboot.


I was only aware of the DigitalLogger device at that low a cost point
($89 
+ $39 for autoping.)
 If you find the other one, let us know.
 I believe the The Digital-Logger device does have the ability to allow
you 
 to automate scripting into it. Did you check the FAQ on thier website,
I 
 thought I saw a help file on that.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 12:49 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] Remote power Reboot.


 Hi all,

 I am looking for a remote power reboot solution that works with
telnet 
 and/or auto ping for under $100. I know a couple of months ago I
found 
 one googling for about $89, but for the life of me can't find it 
 again(guess I should have bought it then!).

 I only need AC one outlet for this to reboot a cable modem/router. I
can 
 only seem to find Dataprobes stuff, and with a background in
electronics 
 and programming, I have yet to see where the gold is at in this for
$300.

 I found this one http://www.digital-loggers.com/lpc.html but it
doesn't 
 work with telnet according to the email I just received from them. I 
 guess I could just use the auto-ping feature and not have to use
telnet, 
 but the other one I had found did everything I was looking for.

 I have an access server that I can dial into and access my network,
but 
 to reach other gear inside, I have to telnet to them. TIA for any 
 suggestions.

 Scott

 Dial-Up Internet service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as $9.99/mth.
 Check out www.info-ed.com for information.




 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007
at 
 ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com
**
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available til August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
 http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **




 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/






 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007
at 
 ISPCON **
 ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
 ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
 ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available til August 31 **
 ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
 http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **




 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/






 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 




** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at
ISPCON **
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available til August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


** Join us at the 

RE: [WISPA] DC power suggestions

2007-08-15 Thread Gino Villarini
What gear do you need to power on ?

Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:51 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] DC power suggestions


 I have an 80' Rohn 25G tower on top of a 110' concrete grain elevator.
This
elevators power is giving me fits as they are flipping breakers on and
off
as they are in full swing with all the corn coming in right now out of
the
fields. I do have everything on UPS's, but need to move up the ranks for
longer run times to 4 larger marine batteries to accomplish longer run
times
when the breakers are flipped off.

Here is my question: Do they make a device that has multiple DC power
output
voltages (12/18/24/48) that connects directly to a set of batteries with
the
ability to connect multiple devices and if so - how do you keep your
batteries charged? I would like to run my gear directly off the DC power
instead of plugging everything into 120vdc and then have the wall warts
convert to the DC power. I currently have 10 radios on top of the
elevator
and it is a major distribution point for the North and East legs of our
network.

Any and all suggestions are welcomed!!

Thanks folks,
Mac




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >