Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Program/Script for Web Server?
Bo Hamilton wrote: Hello Everyone! Im looking for a Bandwidth Progrom for my Web Server. Can someone on the list help me? Thanks in advance! Bo Hamilton NCOWireless.com What web server are you running? -- --- | Nick White | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Linux distro for the desktop
Butch Evans wrote: I am a FreeBSD guy. Heart and soul. However, I am in the process of evaluating which Linux distro I want to put on my laptop. I would just go with FreeBSD, but I want to try this Linux thing...FreeBSD makes the BEST server platform (no flames, please), but their desktop OS is not the best. Ubuntu is good, but I couldn't get it to work with my Broadcom (ugh) laptop minipci card straight after install. I tried a few, and the only one that worked was Linspire. It's pretty desktop friendly. Debian-based. I recommend either Ubuntu or Linspire. -- --- | Nick White | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] StarOS or Microtik with TRCPQ clients...
We never used the TRCPQ, but we do have several hundred TRCPEs and TRCPE200s. We have 3 Access points with ~50 clients each- a combination of TRCPE, CPE200, and DemarcTech units. This handles well. If I remember correctly, the TRCPE is Atheros based(?) and I would think that it should work ever better than the TRCPE200 (Prism-based; which have sometimes been troublesome when one gets flaky) in combination with an Atheros based StarOS AP. All of our StarOS APs are Atheros based - either CM9, SR2, or WLM54G. Really no problems, and any that we've had we have overcome by tracking down some bad CPEs. We have a total of about 300 2.4Ghz clients, and about a dozen 5.8 clients. -Nick D. Ryan Spott wrote: Can anyone just answer the questions I had without fighting amongst yourselves? (I thought Xmas with the inlaws was bad!) Lonnie... If I were to buy a StarOS type product, would it be compatable with the CPQ series radios from Tranzeo? What sort of client load should I be able to support on a Star-OS based AP? ryan On Dec 28, 2006, at 10:01 PM, Lonnie Nunweiler wrote: Patrick, This is simply the LOWEST blow I have EVER seen you throw. You have always been an Evangelist and I have seen you come and go from several lists, while me and my people have survived legal blind sides and we have outlived several LARGER companies. Yep, pretty low. Plus it did not answer the question. I feel I cannot jump in since I am too close to the product and thus might be seen as self serving. What is your excuse? Lonnie On 12/28/06, Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I mean, besides simply being illegal, such a vendor has no quality controls, they can also just up and walk away from you and quit anytime, they have no accountability, and it throws away your investment from an equity standpoint. Patrick Leary AVP WISP Markets Alvarion, Inc. o: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 Vonage: 650.641.1243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Butch Evans Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 9:00 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] StarOS or Microtik with TRCPQ clients... On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Patrick Leary wrote: Why not stick with Tranzeo or one of the other legal (FCC-certified) brands? Good idea, Patrick, but it doesn't answer the question that was asked. -- Butch Evans Network Engineering and Security Consulting 573-276-2879 http://www.butchevans.com/ Mikrotik Certified Consultant (http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html) -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals computer viruses(190). This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals computer viruses(43). This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals computer viruses. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ --Lonnie Nunweiler Valemount Networks Corporation http://www.star-os.com/ --WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ --WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- --- | Nick White | | Network Administrator | | Tele-NET Internet | | http://www.tele-net.net | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] StarOS or Microtik with TRCPQ clients...
Correction. It's late, I'm tired, and have had too much wine. I meant that the TRCPQ is Atheros based, not TRCPE. This is from a Tranzeo list: The CPE90 is Marvell. The 900, the CPQ, the 6000, the 49, and the 5a are all Atheros based. The CPE200, the 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 were Prism based. The CPE80 was Atmel. -Damian Wallace Also, if you decide to go the StarOS/Mikrotik way, make sure you upgrade all of your Tranzeo gear to the latest firmwares. -Nick N White wrote: We never used the TRCPQ, but we do have several hundred TRCPEs and TRCPE200s. We have 3 Access points with ~50 clients each- a combination of TRCPE, CPE200, and DemarcTech units. This handles well. If I remember correctly, the TRCPE is Atheros based(?) and I would think that it should work ever better than the TRCPE200 (Prism-based; which have sometimes been troublesome when one gets flaky) in combination with an Atheros based StarOS AP. All of our StarOS APs are Atheros based - either CM9, SR2, or WLM54G. Really no problems, and any that we've had we have overcome by tracking down some bad CPEs. We have a total of about 300 2.4Ghz clients, and about a dozen 5.8 clients. -Nick D. Ryan Spott wrote: Can anyone just answer the questions I had without fighting amongst yourselves? (I thought Xmas with the inlaws was bad!) Lonnie... If I were to buy a StarOS type product, would it be compatable with the CPQ series radios from Tranzeo? What sort of client load should I be able to support on a Star-OS based AP? ryan On Dec 28, 2006, at 10:01 PM, Lonnie Nunweiler wrote: Patrick, This is simply the LOWEST blow I have EVER seen you throw. You have always been an Evangelist and I have seen you come and go from several lists, while me and my people have survived legal blind sides and we have outlived several LARGER companies. Yep, pretty low. Plus it did not answer the question. I feel I cannot jump in since I am too close to the product and thus might be seen as self serving. What is your excuse? Lonnie On 12/28/06, Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I mean, besides simply being illegal, such a vendor has no quality controls, they can also just up and walk away from you and quit anytime, they have no accountability, and it throws away your investment from an equity standpoint. Patrick Leary AVP WISP Markets Alvarion, Inc. o: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 Vonage: 650.641.1243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Butch Evans Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 9:00 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] StarOS or Microtik with TRCPQ clients... On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Patrick Leary wrote: Why not stick with Tranzeo or one of the other legal (FCC-certified) brands? Good idea, Patrick, but it doesn't answer the question that was asked. -- Butch Evans Network Engineering and Security Consulting 573-276-2879 http://www.butchevans.com/ Mikrotik Certified Consultant (http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html) -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals computer viruses(190). This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals computer viruses(43). This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals computer viruses. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ --Lonnie Nunweiler Valemount Networks Corporation http://www.star-os.com/ --WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ --WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- --- | Nick White | | Network Administrator | | Tele-NET Internet
Re: [WISPA] OT: sendmail question
I suggest the following. I never liked Sendmail all that much http://www.qmailrocks.org - The Mailing List is VERY active. http://qmail.jms1.net/ - Many patches and great information that goes with above -Nick Chadd Thompson wrote: Won't that still allow the user to receive mail for every domain on the server unless you go in for every user and specifically deny that particular address? Say you wanted bob to only be able to receive mail on yoyo.com and not yingyang.com or jacks.com. I would have to put entries in the virtual user table to exclude/deny the addresses of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] that way the only email that could get through to bob would be [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there any other way to do this? On a side note lately I have been having users get other users email. It is always a spam message and never a legitimate email but still has me boggled on how it is happening. I inspect the header information and it shows that it was came in on the server to the correct addressed user, but it ends up in a different mailbox. Any ideas on that? Thanks, Chadd The only thing I have found is the virtual user table, That is how you do it. Make a virtual user for the main account and then just forward the other email addresses to that account. Jeremy Davis -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- --- | Nick White | | Network Administrator | | Tele-NET Internet | | http://www.tele-net.net | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] OT: sendmail question
lolz. ;-) I guess anything is better than Sendmail. Right? -Nick David E. Smith wrote: On Mon, October 30, 2006 3:41 pm, N White wrote: I suggest the following. I never liked Sendmail all that much You misspelled 'www.postfix.org' :) David Smith MVN.net -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] ? Web Developer Guru's
Since it is a CGI script, I'm assuming it's written in Perl. Adding those two functions should be relatively easy. Let me know if you need anything. I'm a full-time web developer, systems administrator, and network administrator; I know these things from all angles. -Nick Brian Rohrbacher wrote: Hello Web Developer Guru's, I looking for comments or suggestions on my site survey request process. I want to make sure it's as streamlined as it can be. Here is the current process from start to finish. Potential subscriber calls and we talk $. If they are still interested I send them to www.reliableinter.net to click on Free availability check. They submit the form, a cgi script runs, and the raw data is sent to an imap account that my web developer and I have access to. My web developer than open the email from imap in word and runs 2 macros to organize the raw data. One for my copy and one for the customers. My copy adds a bunch of text at the bottom of all the customer info (things like site survey date, install date, mac address, ssid, equipment, new email, rate plan, IP, DNS, and some other good stuff that needs to be on a work order). The other macro organizes the raw data for him to send an email back to the customer see what they submitted along with added text that says, We'll call you, bla bla. After all my work order text is added he emails it (for review) from word back to the imap account and the info all shows up in the body of the email. Now I print the email (1 page) and stick it in a 3 ring binder. This leaves me with one email/printed email that has every field necessary to complete site survey, install, and billing. Making the process smoother... I'd like to know if my process could be changed to what I'll describe below without a major overhaul, or if it needs major work, tell me a little about it. This reason we're doing it like we are is because I know very little about web development/cgi/macro stuff. This is the way my guy knew how to handle it. After the customer hits submit I want 2 things to happen. I want a confirmation email auto sent to them that shows them want they wrote and shows them the text I added. So at some point between hitting submit and getting the email, We'll call you. needs to be injected. I also want an email sent to me with the customers organized data on it. Again, the email is to have text added at the bottom of this email, but my text needs to be the work order type text I explained earlier. Summary. Fill out form. Click submit. Two unique email sent. Their copy with We'll call you text and my copy with Work order text. The last thing. When I receive the email, I want the sender's email to show up so I can hit reply and be talking to them. Currently the sender is my own account and I have to copy and paste the customers email to reply . Can it be done and what would it take? Brian Rohrbacher Reliable Internet, LLC www.reliableinter.net 269 838 8338 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] ? Web Developer Guru's
CGI is Perl. If you'd like to send me a copy of the CGI script, I can take a look and see what I could do. You shouldn't have to use SMTP authentication, instead just have the script input Reply-To: headers in the email it sends to you. Or simply change the From: header to that of the client/customer. I work a lot in PHP and Perl, I know both of these are capable of doing this for you without using SMTP authentication. Send me a message off list if you like. -Nick Brian Rohrbacher wrote: Inline, and thanks. This is more like the response I needed. At least now I can go learn about smtp auth and how it's done, and the other stuff you talked about. Also Scriv requested no Step by step web design commentary on the list. At this point it looks like I'm pointed more in the right direction so I'll go offlist with a couple folks who offered suggestions and help. Once i have all this figured out I can share the code with whoever wants it. But then again this might be so easy no one really needs it. Jason Hensley wrote: Brian, In your backend script (the CGI / Perl script I assume), cgi you could have it send out two separate emails - 1 to the client with the information you want them to see, and the other to you with the information you are wanting. I'm not that familiar with Perl but I'm assuming it could use SMTP Authentication somehow so that the emails sent out could appear to come from the customer. yup sounds good Hard to say much more than it's easy because truthfully, any semi-decent coder should be able to do this pretty easily, whether it be CGI / Perl, ASP, PHP, whatever, and without seeing your code I can make it available offlist if someone wanted to look. and your setup, it's hard to say what would be best to use in this situation. I'm an ASP guy. Others are PHP, others are Perl. They can all accomplish this without the intermediate step of having to open Word to put the data in that you want. Great - Original Message - From: Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:02 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] ? Web Developer Guru's Thanks. I kinda already asked for help. Looking over my original post do you have any more specific suggestions other than it's easy? I have explained what I am currently doing and what I want to do. I can't really ask more because I've included everything I know. Brian N White wrote: Since it is a CGI script, I'm assuming it's written in Perl. Adding those two functions should be relatively easy. Let me know if you need anything. I'm a full-time web developer, systems administrator, and network administrator; I know these things from all angles. -Nick Brian Rohrbacher wrote: Hello Web Developer Guru's, I looking for comments or suggestions on my site survey request process. I want to make sure it's as streamlined as it can be. Here is the current process from start to finish. Potential subscriber calls and we talk $. If they are still interested I send them to www.reliableinter.net to click on Free availability check. They submit the form, a cgi script runs, and the raw data is sent to an imap account that my web developer and I have access to. My web developer than open the email from imap in word and runs 2 macros to organize the raw data. One for my copy and one for the customers. My copy adds a bunch of text at the bottom of all the customer info (things like site survey date, install date, mac address, ssid, equipment, new email, rate plan, IP, DNS, and some other good stuff that needs to be on a work order). The other macro organizes the raw data for him to send an email back to the customer see what they submitted along with added text that says, We'll call you, bla bla. After all my work order text is added he emails it (for review) from word back to the imap account and the info all shows up in the body of the email. Now I print the email (1 page) and stick it in a 3 ring binder. This leaves me with one email/printed email that has every field necessary to complete site survey, install, and billing. Making the process smoother... I'd like to know if my process could be changed to what I'll describe below without a major overhaul, or if it needs major work, tell me a little about it. This reason we're doing it like we are is because I know very little about web development/cgi/macro stuff. This is the way my guy knew how to handle it. After the customer hits submit I want 2 things to happen. I want a confirmation email auto sent to them that shows them want they wrote and shows them the text I added. So at some point between hitting submit and getting the email, We'll call you. needs to be injected. I also want an email sent to me with the customers organized data on it. Again, the email is to have text added at the bottom of this email, but my text needs
Re: [WISPA] Trying to block Stock Spam
I just configured FuzzyOCR (we've been having the same problem this last week with stock spam), and it only took about 150 minutes to install, configure, test. http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin I just used by the INSTALL file in the downloaded tarball. http://users.own-hero.net/~decoder/fuzzyocr/fuzzyocr-2.3b.tar.gz -Nick Carl A Jeptha wrote: Ok spill the beans about the ocr, don't let me get to you to beat it out of you. (OOOPPPS did I say that out loud ) :-[ Please give more info as this is the means of doing spam now. You have a Good Day now, Carl A Jeptha http://www.airnet.ca Office Phone: 905 349-2084 Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm skype cajeptha Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: Just use spamAssassin with an OCR plugin it does wonders :) On 10/17/06, rwf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Marlon- We use ASSP. It works great, but it fails a bit at the stock spam that has been coming out lately. It is almost entirely a graphic with no readable text. I figure that the 300+ it kills from just my business and personal Email accounts is justification for deleting 1-2 graphical ones a day. How does postini filter the graphical spam? Ralph -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:36 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trying to block Stock Spam our postini is doing a pretty good job. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- --- | Nick White | | Network Administrator | | Tele-NET Internet | | http://www.tele-net.net | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Trying to block Stock Spam
Carl A Jeptha wrote: Anybody been able to block the stockmarket spam??? My Merak with Spamassassin is loosing the battle. That seems to be our only weakness. Also using SpamAssassin. -- --- | Nick White | | Network Administrator | | Tele-NET Internet | | http://www.tele-net.net | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Tranzeo CPE alternative
We're using the B-only version with StarOS. They work wonderfully. I think I mentioned it already on another list, but once again, I recommend these. -Nick Chad Halsted wrote: Take a look at these… http://www.demarctech.com/products/reliawave-rwo/rwo-plus-hpg-15a.htm I have ordered a couple to evaluate, but still haven’t had the time to put them up. They are built pretty solid and are a tad bit smaller than the TR-CPE200’s. They were advised to me by another Wisper that uses StarOS, he had good success with them. *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jason Hensley *Sent:* Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:17 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* [WISPA] Tranzeo CPE alternative Trying to evaluate all of my options here, and thought I would see what other CPE are out there that are comparable to Tranzeo CPQ units (802.11b, built-in router, etc). Want to stay within that price range, but DON'T want to build a unit myself. Not that I'm not happy with the CPQ's, but I've had a run of bad ones (to the tune of 1 in almost every 10 pack I get in here) and just not sure what's going on. I just got word of a price increase on the CPE units also (not the CPQ's though). I'd also like to get something a little smaller in physical size than the Tranzeo's. Not that they are bad, but would be nice if they weren't quite such an eyesore. Again, that's not a huge issue though. Anyway, just thought I'd throw this out. I've considered Canopy, but of course, that's an entire network change. Just not sure if I want to do that, and not sure if it would be as financially economical as Tranzeo in the long run. -- --- | Nick White | | Network Administrator | | Tele-NET Internet | | http://www.tele-net.net | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Outage
HaHa! Amazing. We had a similar issue where some possible rats (or could have been squirrels, never found out for sure from them what it was) had gotten in a customer's wall and bit through the cable, just not completely severing the wires. So the link was very flaky, in and out. 75% out. Fixed it with some small PVC pipe through the wall. Nick Brian Rohrbacher wrote: So, I'm working from home today. The internet goes off. Wireless router fine...cannot access cpe. The cpe cable runs down the chimney and I figured it rubbed through on the top. I go up there and it is fine. I go to basement and head for the cable (runs through 8x8 cleanout to chimney) I go to grab the tarp that is wadded up and stuffed in the hole and I hear this awful hissing and growling. I jumped back and about crapped my pants! Long story shortit 2 hrs later and I now have a cap on the chimney and the GREY SQUIRREL ran towards the back woods (lucky bastard, I'm too close to town for the .22) I was using a brick tied to a rope and I was throwing it down the chimney for an hour. He decided to run when I tried to stab him with a piece of pvc I found in the basement. Anyway, beware of them squirrels. Brian -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] A little help with Mikrotik
2 Miles? That's all? The farthest we've gotten is 27 on some old Tranzeo 2.4 gear. It's now been replaced with StarOS, but we're still getting 20 miles, and probably more. What antennas are you using? I'm assuming you've got a really cluttered spectrum? Nick Barry at Mutual Data wrote: Hello Mark, 15 miles!! HAHAHAHA I wish I was so lucky. We are ecstatic if we get 2 miles with 2.4Ghz. We can hardly do 3 miles at times with 900mhz. IIRC, 802.11 timed out at about 11 miles and StarOS had adjusted those settings. Not sure what Mikrotik has done, although nstreme may address that. Barry Wednesday, September 20, 2006, 2:22:32 PM, you wrote: MK I use 11b mode for most of my clients. I have 3 routerboard 112's in long MK distance shots, and I'm sorely disappointed at the performance. Compared MK to Star-OS, the throughput is down about 40%.Two clients just one house MK apart, and about 15 miles from the AP show dramatic performance differences. MK The RSSI is the same for both, btw. One, with compression and other MK atheros features enabled will pass 1200KB of compressible data, around MK 520-540KB of non-compressible data. Right next door, the best I can MK achieve through the RB112 is around 350KB. I see this dramatic deficit in MK ALL my MT installs, in that none of them which are over 15 miles will come MK anywhere near the throughput of the WRAP / Star-OS client. All are CM9 MK radios. MK I've looked through everything I can find, and checked the compression box MK in the appropriate place (using winbox) but the performance is about the MK same as my compex boards's original firmware, which i judged to be MK inadequate. MK Am I missing something? Is this just a setting problem or ??? MK Any help appreciated. MK +++ MK neofast.net - fast internet for North East Oregon and South East Washington MK email me at mark at neofast dot net MK 541-969-8200 MK Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net -- --- | Nick White | | Network Administrator | | Tele-NET Internet | | http://www.tele-net.net | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Wireless AP w/o router
We usually get the Netgear WGR614 - sometimes refurbished. If you disable DHCP it's essentially a Wireless AP bridge like what you're wanting. You can usually pick these up for around $15-20 online, depending on bulk. I think we got some in bulk for about $16 each and their wired counterpart for $11. -- --- | Nick White | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- Scott Reed wrote: I am looking for suggestions for customer AP that is not a router. Need equivalent or lower cost than SOHO router. AP and a 4 port switch would be great. I am looking to use routing on the CPE, thus the customer does not need to purchase a router. But, if they want wireless inside, need an inexpensive way to get it to them. Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net http://www.nwwnet.net/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Field Techs Non-Standard Installations
We charge $85/hour for anything after standard installation. Standard installation includes installing and configuring the CPE and any customer computers that are present at the time of installation, including a installation of a router or switch if necessary. It does not include trenches, masts, custom wiring runs (attic, crawlspace, etc), or troubleshooting client PC problems. Nick KyWiFi LLC wrote: We are starting to see more and more subscribers need custom installations such as a vent pipe mount, aerial drop, trenching, etc. How is everyone paying their sub-contractors when it comes to non-standard installations? For instance, say you pay $75 to a sub-contractor for a standard installation but when they arrive at the job site, the subscriber needs a 10' ditch dug. If the sub-contractor says he will dig the ditch for $25 do you just tack this amount on to the subscriber's installation fee and then pass it along to the sub-contractor or do you add say $10 - $20 to the amount the sub-contractor is going to charge you and then bill the subscriber the inflated amount which would then have a profit margin attached? Or, do you have the sub-contractor bill the subscriber separately for digging the ditch or whatever else they want/need done at their premises? In other words, do you try to make a profit on the additional work performed by the sub-contractor which falls outside a standard installation? Shannon D. Denniston, Co-Founder KyWiFi, LLC - Mt. Sterling, Kentucky Your Hometown Broadband Provider http://www.KyWiFi.com Call Us Today: 859.274.4033 === $29.99 DSL High Speed Internet $14.99 Home Phone Service $19.99 All Digital Satellite TV - No Phone Line Required for DSL - FREE Activation Equipment - Affordable Upfront Pricing - Locally Owned Operated - We Also Service Most Rural Areas === -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Field Techs Non-Standard Installations
Right. Generally we run around the outside of the house/building - try to conceal as much cable as possible. Like you said, we try to make it the cleanest and neatest. Then drill in and install a plate. Always taking customer input and preference of course. A lot similar to a Dish or DirectTV install. Accept we try to be neater about it. :-) Nick Jason Hensley wrote: Can you define custom wire runs? What do you consider a non-custom wire run if you're not going through the attic or whatever? Do you just drill from the outside wall in or what? I'm just curious as we try to take whatever route in with the cabling that makes it look the neatest and try our best to drill as few holes as possible. Sometimes that's through an attic, crawl space, whatever. - Original Message - From: N White [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:53 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Field Techs Non-Standard Installations We charge $85/hour for anything after standard installation. Standard installation includes installing and configuring the CPE and any customer computers that are present at the time of installation, including a installation of a router or switch if necessary. It does not include trenches, masts, custom wiring runs (attic, crawlspace, etc), or troubleshooting client PC problems. Nick KyWiFi LLC wrote: We are starting to see more and more subscribers need custom installations such as a vent pipe mount, aerial drop, trenching, etc. How is everyone paying their sub-contractors when it comes to non-standard installations? For instance, say you pay $75 to a sub-contractor for a standard installation but when they arrive at the job site, the subscriber needs a 10' ditch dug. If the sub-contractor says he will dig the ditch for $25 do you just tack this amount on to the subscriber's installation fee and then pass it along to the sub-contractor or do you add say $10 - $20 to the amount the sub-contractor is going to charge you and then bill the subscriber the inflated amount which would then have a profit margin attached? Or, do you have the sub-contractor bill the subscriber separately for digging the ditch or whatever else they want/need done at their premises? In other words, do you try to make a profit on the additional work performed by the sub-contractor which falls outside a standard installation? Shannon D. Denniston, Co-Founder KyWiFi, LLC - Mt. Sterling, Kentucky Your Hometown Broadband Provider http://www.KyWiFi.com Call Us Today: 859.274.4033 === $29.99 DSL High Speed Internet $14.99 Home Phone Service $19.99 All Digital Satellite TV - No Phone Line Required for DSL - FREE Activation Equipment - Affordable Upfront Pricing - Locally Owned Operated - We Also Service Most Rural Areas === -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- --- | Nick White | | Network Administrator | | Tele-NET Internet | | http://www.tele-net.net | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Ok, what DO you want?
Is this an all-in-one antenna included, or not? Mark Koskenmaki wrote: Ok, so I found a vendor... Someone who is OEM'ing boards and products that are sold by and reccommended by respected members of this list. Salesman makes the following claims: for capabilities... Support for higher power, and a/b/g atheros mini-pci cards - supports 2.4 and 5 ghz bands. POE, either 802.3af or passive Routing Distance optimization. (more than just ack timing adjust) dhcp Adjustable channel widths, presumably compatible with MT, Star-OS, and Ikarus cloaking. Many other features. both MIPS and xscale based boards, not all features apply to all boards. I'd love to make a group purchase (and the supplier would love to sell by the thousands) after I've evaluated a few samples I'm about to get sent in. Is anyone interested?Presumable prices for bulk buys would be right about $100 for board, mini-pci radio of choice and power supply / injector. I really am not attempting to make any money here, I'd just like to get the cheaper CPE. If I flood the name of the vendor, the sales staff may well stop being willing to sell smaller quantities to non-resellers. North East Oregon Fastnet, LLC 509-593-4061 personal correspondence to: mark at neofast dot net sales inquiries to: purchasing at neofast dot net Fast Internet, NO WIRES! - -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 24 dbi Atlas Fox
What kind of distance are you seeing with those 5G Rootennas? And what kind of APs Antennas are you using? Just curious - we're looking at moving all new customers to 5Ghz. -Nick George Rogato wrote: Those MTI's are nice looking product. Nice price too. Have you checked out the pac wireless 5 gig rootennas yet? They are working great for me and they are cheap. George Tom DeReggi wrote: I was thinking Although legal issues involved... (so not indorsing or recommending this idea) An Atlas Fox, mounted inside a MTI 24 dbi Dual Pol antenna w/ stock radio case back, and a custom mod to bypass internal antenna and jumper to the ext antenna connectors, would be less expensive than both a base Fox5800 unit and the 5830SU, and give us 16 more additional DB, which would make it a fantastic combination for a high end business or residential CPE able to survive the noise, upgradable to OFDM, and easy to mount. But most importantly, it would only be one radio CPE type to stock to cover all needs, allowing it to be easier to make quantity orders. In qty 25+, MTI w/ case $245 (maybe a little more with import charges) Atlas Fox $149. Pigtail Jumpers: $15 Total: $409. It would take more time to hack(build), but it would save time by not having to muck with the dish. So why is Trango not doing this yet? Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
