Re: [WISPA] speed test

t 11:26 AM, Jerry Richardson wrote: > You need a router or bandwidth shaper that limits the burst rate > independently of the SM. > > Jerry Richardson > Sent Mobile > > On Sep 13, 2010, at 1:25 AM, "RickG" wrote: > > Bob, How do you do burst at 2x the contracte

Re: [WISPA] speed test

8:10 PM > > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] speed test > > > > turn on bursting?works awesome,they don't wanna tell you the results > because they think they are getting way more than they should. > > > --- On *Sun, 9/12/10, RickG * wrote: > &g

Re: [WISPA] speed test

n on bursting because I get these same types of users > complaining because of a stupid speed test result. > > > > David > > > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *Jason Bailey > *Sent:* Sunday, September 12, 2

Re: [WISPA] speed test

HA! > > > > > > > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *RickG > *Sent:* Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:28 PM > > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] speed test > > > > Ironton i

Re: [WISPA] speed test

:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *Jason Bailey > *Sent:* Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:10 PM > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] speed test > > > > turn on bursting?works awesome,they don't wanna tell you the results > because they think they ar

Re: [WISPA] speed test

in the hell are they defaulting g you to arm pit Ironton? > > > > Been there…….. that place sucks! > > > > > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *RickG > *Sent:* Sunday, September 12, 2010 7:43 PM

Re: [WISPA] speed test

--- On *Sun, 9/12/10, RickG * wrote: > > > From: RickG > Subject: [WISPA] speed test > > To: "WISPA General List" > Date: Sunday, September 12, 2010, 7:29 PM > > > OK for all your speed hungry customers that want to run speed tests to > speedtest.net and

Re: [WISPA] speed test

x27;t it? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:42 PM, RickG wrote: > > My fiver is through TW. They insist I use the Ironton server which, IMO > > a

Re: [WISPA] speed test

eam pipe. > > On Sep 12, 2010 7:29 PM, "RickG" wrote: > > OK for all your speed hungry customers that want to run speed tests to > speedtest.net and dslreports.com - the question is: what do you do? I've > never really had good results with off net speed tests even

Re: [WISPA] Grain leg pipe

Sure, steel tube versus solid cotton :) On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Robert West wrote: > Um But I’ve seen tube be stronger than solid. Physics? > > > > Or maybe.. > > > > > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wi

[WISPA] speed test

I get these people who think they're not getting what they pay for :( -RickG WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ --

Re: [WISPA] NS2Loco ARP table strangeness

;t and is shutting down? > > > > Just guessing at this point. > > > > - Jerry > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *RickG > *Sent:* Saturday, September 11, 2010 2:34 PM > *To:* WISPA General List > *Su

Re: [WISPA] PowerBridge 5M

Chuck, I dont have any Rockets directly plugged into a Mikrotik box. I am considering a bench test though. Will advise if I do. I routinely lock down the port to 100Mbps. -RickG On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: > Rick: > > Since I know you have MikroTik in your ne

Re: [WISPA] NS2Loco ARP table strangeness

gt; Are you saying that after you changed to WDS you started dropping stations? > I would suspect it’s coincidence but I could be wrong. > > > > - Jerry > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *RickG > *Sent:* Sa

Re: [WISPA] Bil-Jax Boom Lift

rly new in good shape. At any rate, I dont get anything for selling it but thought I'd pass this along. Offlist if your interested and I'll gather more info if your serious. -RickG On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Robert West wrote: > Has anyone used or owned a Bil-Jax Towable Boom L

Re: [WISPA] NS2Loco ARP table strangeness

I started turning on WDS mode on some of my UBNT AP's but started getting weird issues such as dropping stations. These are in bridge mode. Does the mode matter? On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote: > Run the AP and SM in WDS mode. > > the radios do some funny things with ARP

Re: [WISPA] Cogent in St. Louis

TW Cable Business Class On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > TW Telecom or TW Cable? > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com > > > On 9/10/2010 9:09 PM, RickG wrote: > > Funny thing happened after I upgrad

Re: [WISPA] PowerBridge 5M

Here is my interface stats: XM.v5.2# ifconfig ath0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:6D:18:1B:97 UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC ALLMULTI MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1704984 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2180287 errors:0 dropped:813 ov

Re: [WISPA] Cogent in St. Louis

Funny thing happened after I upgraded from TW copper to fiber - I get an engineer when I call support now. On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Nick Olsen wrote: > Can't speak for Cogent in St. Louis, But we have it here in Florida and it > works well. The 2 peer setup is a bit weird at first, but i

Re: [WISPA] direct bury pole?

What about a flag pole? http://www.flagpolewarehouse.com/flagpoles/commercial/index.shtml On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Kevin Owen wrote: > Other than a wooden utility pole, does anyone have a source for a direct > bury steel pole, such as those you would see used for street lights, etc?

Re: [WISPA] Grain leg pipe

Well heck, if you want the ultimate in strength, use solid steel round bar then. I've got some tower sections like that but man are they heavy! Bars are for transfer of materials too - when they're serving that is! Saved that one for you Bob =P On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Robert West wrote:

Re: [WISPA] Powerbridge M5 versus Nanobridge M5 ?

Pam? On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: > Does anyone make a radome for the NB? I am thinking I have a unit or > two that could use one due to back tilt or facing the predominate > winter storm path. While I bet nothing would build up for long, it > might be long enough to be

Re: [WISPA] OT: Looking for Layer 3 Switch with BGP?

t; Not much of a point to the RB1000 when a 1U Atom box is cheaper and > can run rings around it in throughput. > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:31 PM, RickG wrote: > > I love mine but only pushin 20Mbps peak. Then again it was only $700. How > > much can you build the Atom u

Re: [WISPA] OT: Looking for Layer 3 Switch with BGP?

I love mine but only pushin 20Mbps peak. Then again it was only $700. How much can you build the Atom unit for? On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Travis Johnson wrote: > The RB1000 is not much of a router when under load. You can build a 1u > ATOM based system for less money that has 4x the hors

Re: [WISPA] PowerBridge 5M

wind. On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > Hehe... So at what point did you figure out that they were trying to > keep folks like you away from their towers ! > > :) > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > > On 9/8/2010 11:10

Re: [WISPA] PowerBridge 5M

I climbed a 400' tower where the cell companies put cables over all 3 faces. I felt like Tarzan the monkey man climbing on vines. Man, that ticked me off! On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Justin Wilson wrote: > I was not happy after climbing a tower where the cell company put > their feedline

Re: [WISPA] Commercial rooftop - Tripod

$17.95 On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Chris Hudson wrote: > That's it. Without logging in, what kind of pricing? > > Chris > > - Original Message - > *From:* RickG > *To:* WISPA General List > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:18 PM > *Subject:

Re: [WISPA] Commercial rooftop - Tripod

http://www.skywalker.com/images/image/SKY32809.jpg On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Chris Hudson wrote: > Aren't there some that have a floating leg. > > Chris > > - Original Message - > From: "Mike Hammett" > To: "WISPA General List" > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 12:49 PM > Sub

Re: [WISPA] PowerBridge 5M

Funny you mention that. I had the same thing. You'd think locking down the port would be better not worse! On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:57 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote: > We saw similar problems with the ports locked at 100/FDX - Set everything > to Auto and speeds were there. > > I posted that on the

Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti

I have nothing bad to say about Mikrotik as my RB1000 firewall runs without complaint. I also have a tower in the forest running an RB433AH with an XR9 radio that I never hear from. LOL, that reminds me of an old saying, only I'll amend it some: If a radio in the forest fails, does anyone hear it?

Re: [WISPA] Netbook/Mini for the field?

It's all depends on what your needs are. Sure, compared to a higher grade CPU, the Atom is slower but it does job. You get used to the keyboard. I agree the screen can be annoying at times but weight overrides that for me. I'd never recommend it as a primary computer, just a field unit.

Re: [WISPA] Netbook/Mini for the field?

I've got an Acer mini for the field. Best tool I ever got. 6 cell, battery literally last me all day if you use proper energy saving settings. It weighs hardly anything and I stick it in a backpack and hike it up a tower all the time. The only thing I wish it had was an anti-glare screen. Those new

Re: [WISPA] RIP vs other routing protocols

IP. I feel it was one of the best things I ever did. Very solid, zero issues. I too have considered a newer protocol but have found no compelling reason to do so. Maybe when we grow up :) -RickG On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote: > We ran into a problem yesterday that

Re: [WISPA] Suggestions for high bandwidth @ 25 miles.

UBNT is great for the price but a bit shy of 100Mbps: Test Results RX: 33.08 Mbps TX: 33.77 Mbps Total: 66.85 Mbps On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Proxim, Ubiquiti M... > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy,

Re: [WISPA] solar power setup

harborfreight.com On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote: > I am looking for a shopping list to build for the following setup: > > I need to create a solar power setup for a remote location > > The location will be running two Ubiqutiy 5ghz radios - not much. > > I would like to h

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirMax Sectors

y stick in place too well and take 3 hands to get them out. Oh, and dont forget the 4 degree electronic downtilt. They look a bit goofy aiming up but in my case, they work better tilted up. -RickG On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Bob Moldashel wrote: > Any feedback on these at 5 G

Re: [WISPA] (DIRECTLY) Connecting two wireless with a RF cable

And dont forget Lantastic! On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote: > arcnet, dude... > > - Original Message - > From: "Leon D. Zetekoff" > To: > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 4:27 PM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] (DIRECTLY) Connecting two wireless with a RF cable > > > > On

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

gt; > On Aug 30, 2010, at 12:08 PM, RickG wrote: > > You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2. > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley wrote: > >> Need something that will go a very short distance (less than 150’) with >> power that’s able to

Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation

You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley wrote: > Need something that will go a very short distance (less than 150’) with > power that’s able to adjust down to where it doesn’t burn up radios. Has to > mount outside, and no, th

Re: [WISPA] Seeking 4.9Ghz Advice

Get your local congressman to put a little pressure on the FCC. It worked for me a few years back. On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > We are in the process here to get a license for the local Sheriff > Department > for 4.9ghz, it is taking way longer than anticipated.

Re: [WISPA] DC Remote reboot?

Oh, so it doesnt have to be direct AC in? On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Michael Baird wrote: > Yes, I've got several of them deployed, very nice. It will run off AC as > well, and is outdoor hardened. > > Only negatives, voltage isn't changeable per port via the web interface, > manual toggl

Re: [WISPA] DC Remote reboot?

It appears that requires direct 100 volts AC input? On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Phil Curnutt wrote: > Inscape LPS-1000 POE Switch, with reboot capabilites. It will run off > 48VDC. Five ports. > > http://www.connectronics.com/inscape/PoE%20Switch.htm > > Phil > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1

Re: [WISPA] DC Remote reboot?

Thats nifty but it does require this: http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=6&products_id=21&zenid=c94a547543bf7e6bd2dd4f846565677f Which is just one

Re: [WISPA] strange firewall connection

Ah, yes, that makes sense. Thanks! On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > The MAC address it would report would be your upstream router. > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutionshttp://www.ics-il.com > > > On 8/23/2010 1:18 AM, RickG wr

Re: [WISPA] strange firewall connection

cript that makes this web-accessible. Anyone that wants to > use it is free to http://whois.141networks.com. However, That is hosted > from my personal residence so be gentle. :D > > //me might move it to the colo here soon though.. > > Nick Olsen > Network Operations > (321)

Re: [WISPA] strange firewall connection

:POC-Name:Network Operations Center > network:POC-Email:supp...@blacklotus.net > network:POC-Phone:(323) 657-5944 > network:Tech-Name:Network Operations Center > network:Tech-Email:supp...@blacklotus.net > network:Tech-Phone:(323) 657-5944 > %ok > > Nick Olsen > Network

Re: [WISPA] Backend systems

At my previous WISP in Florida, I had a billing system - what a pain! At my current WISP, I dont - life is great! I only accept credit cards. Best thing I ever did! On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: > Just a quick point here, because this is a key element for WISP > ope

Re: [WISPA] Ethernet to Fiber Adapters

I had a feeling you were going to say that. Let us know if you find those. On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Scott Reed wrote: > This looks good, but uses 7.5 volt power. I need something that uses the > 24 volt power that is in the box. > > RickG wrote: > > These work

Re: [WISPA] Ethernet to Fiber Adapters

These work well for the price. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833156005&nm_mc=OTC-Froogle&cm_mmc=OTC-Froogle-_-Network+-+Transceivers-_-Trendnet-_-33156005 -RickG On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Scott Reed wrote: > I know there are folks out there using fiber u

Re: [WISPA] shielded termination

With "outdoor" cable :) On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Chris Hudson wrote: > Yeah, I want to watch a video of that. > > Chris > > - Original Message - > *From:* Jason Bailey > *To:* wireless@wispa.org > *Sent:* Saturday, August 21, 2010 12:27 PM > *Subject:* [WISPA] shielded terminat

Re: [WISPA] Tower site thefts

In that case, what do you use for the DVR software? On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: > There are good $75 ethernet cameras. Use a linux PC for the DVR/Face > Rec/Alerts > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Ralph wrote: > > This is right next to one of our sites. > > Glad t

Re: [WISPA] Changign DHCP timeout XP/WIn7

I did that once with a bunch or tranzeos. Works good. of course, having a switch up on a tower isnt practical. I'm sure there must be a registry entry for the dhcp timeout on windoze somewhere? On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:37 PM, John Valenti wrote: > Justin, > I would think you would want to have

Re: [WISPA] Changign DHCP timeout XP/WIn7

I used to use net profile but grew tired of the time it takes for windoze to switch. I can just type it in faster. Another thing to do is just leave the ethernet port unplugged until its configured. Once programmed it wont wait for dhcp. On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Steve Barnes wrote: > Loo

Re: [WISPA] Tower site thefts

rneys at bay we use it" > > > > > > Don't take your organs to heaven, > > heaven knows we need them down here! > > Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "RickG" > >

Re: [WISPA] More BTOP/BIP

Is this free money or loans? On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote: > At 8/20/2010 02:49 PM, you wrote: > >Where does Bip/Btop post these awards? > > > http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/20100818_Broadband_Awards.pdf > > The BIP money mostly went to ILECs, it

Re: [WISPA] Changign DHCP timeout XP/WIn7

Disable the ethernet port until its configured, then re-enable it. On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Justin Wilson wrote: > I just get sick of configuring units, such as mikrotik, and switching > devices and then having to wait until DHCP times out. Pretty annoying when > you have 50 Mikrot

Re: [WISPA] Tower site thefts

They should be hung from the highest..tower! On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Blake Bowers wrote: > http://www.wirelessestimator.com/breaking_news.cfm#Generator > > > Don't take your organs to heaven, > heaven knows we need them down here! > Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today. > > >

Re: [WISPA] Single radio or multiple radios in the same box?

I love UBNT. I've been upgrading backhauls to RocketM's and CPE to BulletM's and/or NanoM's. Customers keep mentioning the network seems faster & faster. The word on the street is we're faster than cable & dsl! The only issue I've had so far is that the legacy radios dont like UBNT AP's. On Wed, A

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance

Michael, Thanks for the tip. I saw you mentioned this previously and fixed a few flaky issues by turning off auto. Thanks again! -RickG On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Michael Baird wrote: > Rick > > I didn't read the entire thread, but generally when you see a low TX

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance

to small. It was the big Rocket5 Dish that finally fixed it. Thanks again! -RickG On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote: > This looks a lot like multipath. > > What size grid are you using? For only 3 miles a small 15 dB or less panel > should be more than enoug

Re: [WISPA] Stimulus money creating jobs in MO

Thank you! On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Let's kill this thread now. > > On Aug 17, 2010 12:44 AM, "RickG" wrote: > > No more than the original post Jack. The title of my link says "Broadband". > This IS broadband is it not?

Re: [WISPA] Stimulus money creating jobs in MO

No more than the original post Jack. The title of my link says "Broadband". This IS broadband is it not? On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Jack Unger wrote: > You're off topic good buddy. > > RickG wrote: > > I'll tell you what "free" gove

Re: [WISPA] Stimulus money creating jobs in MO

I'll tell you what "free" government money does create - corruption: http://www.newnetworks.com/broadbandscandals.htm On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Jim Patient wrote: > Big River to add 70 jobs with $24M stimulus > > http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2010/08/02/daily47.html > >

Re: [WISPA] [Motorola II] Broadband work with Indian Reservation

I can identify! On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote: > At 8/14/2010 02:35 AM, RickG wrote: > > Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on who you were) that same outcome > has not happened for other races in similar situations in mankind's past > history

Re: [WISPA] What to do with outbound bandwidth

Ya, and only allow dsl & cable users to use it :) On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Philip Dorr wrote: > Host a Linux (Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian, ect) Bittorrent seed box? > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Travis Johnson wrote: > > Already do takes 1-2Mbps at peak times. > > > > Travis > > M

Re: [WISPA] [Motorola II] Broadband work with Indian Reservation

No flaming arrows now! On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote: > Wow. Can we kill this thread now before it erupts in flames? > > Jerry Richardson > Sent Mobile > > On Aug 13, 2010, at 7:12 PM, "MDK" wrote: > > > YOu have it all wrong. > > > > Suppose you live in a land where

Re: [WISPA] [Motorola II] Broadband work with Indian Reservation

Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on who you were) that same outcome has not happened for other races in similar situations in mankind's past history. Maybe there wasn't enough lawyers back in the ancient days? So, in the modern era, it's no longer "only the strong survive" but rather, only

Re: [WISPA] Broadband work with Indian Reservation

Dont feed the troll :) On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Jack Unger wrote: > Gosh, I just do not understand how some native American peoples could feel > so "territorial". What's up with that??? > > > Forbes Mercy wrote: > > Travis, > > I totally understand since 2003 I have tried to get on trib

Re: [WISPA] UBNT Grounding

Are you using shielded cable? Also, surge protection on the POE? On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:39 AM, chris cooper wrote: > > > We've had numerous storms here over the past couple of weeks. We have > replaced a box full of Nano and Bullets. This leads me to believe that > our install practices mig

Re: [WISPA] Powerstation2 with very low throughput

I'm assuming you have, but I've never had much luck with "G mode". With that said, I just fixed a similar issue by using a a Bullet2HP (non "M"). -RickG On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Mark Dueck wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I had a bunch of my equipment

Re: [WISPA] RB1100

Aw! Now you made me mark up my Christmas list! On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: > It's the same. All these distributors "NAME" their gear as their own > devices. One distributor will support you without the added fees, and the > other will charge you the fees. It's cheaper a

Re: [WISPA] RB1100

Same results here. On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > Running a RB1000 here for core router over a year without single hiccup. > > > > Kurt Fankhauser > > WAVELINC > > P.O. Box 126 > > Bucyrus, OH 44820 > > 419-562-6405 > > > > > -- > > *From

Re: [WISPA] RB1100

Thats nice. Guess what I'm getting for Christmas! On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: > I use the MikroNOC from Titan…Don’t trust the MT RB/1000 nor the RB/1100. > While I still have RB/1000’s in place for certain applications, BGP and > other core functions for us (and our size)

Re: [WISPA] RB1100

I love my RB1000 On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Gino Villarini wrote: > Replace it with xomething else…. Product is not stable > > > > Gino A. Villarini > > g...@aeronetpr.com > > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > > 787.273.4143 > -- > > *From:* wireless-boun.

Re: [WISPA] Mesh

While I dont like "vendor lock in" for myself, I'm a techie. For a serious business customer, vendor lock in is far less of an issue than getting proper support. On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:03 AM, L. Aaron Kaplan wrote: > > On Aug 10, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Ralph wrote: > > Never asked because we don’

Re: [WISPA] 5 GHz Canopy and 900 MHz

I had a similar issue except it worked in my benefit. I gave them IP connectivity for their SCADA, they waived my tower fee, and all are happy. They never did find the issue with the 900MHz but all is well. On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > I'm guessing the chance is about

Re: [WISPA] 4G carrier for carriers

It looks like yet another attempt at satellite broadband. More big bucks to outer space! Spectrum assets and financing. *LightSquared* already owns valuable high quality spectrum assets, including 59 Mhz of nationwide ubiquitous spectrum in an advantageous frequency position. In addition to the $

Re: [WISPA] Autoreply: Wireless Digest, Vol 32, Issue 21

Everyone gets vacation except me! On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:06 AM, wrote: > > Greetings. I will be on vacation from Aug 10th-17th. If your matter is > urgent: > > For quote requests, send email to quo...@ctg3.com > > Additional support contacts: > Bethany Crowell - (206) 383-8938 - bcrow...@ctg

Re: [WISPA] POE / Ethernet extenders

You could do 400' IF you lock it down at 10Mbps. But then, what would be the point :) On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Mike wrote: > Bob that's a great idea, the second one. I don't recommend a 400' cat5 run > however. > > Mike Gilchrist > Disruptive Technologist > Advanced Wireless Express > P.

Re: [WISPA] I NEED HELP also!!!

I'm not sure I've had any more problems with UBNT than any other equipment when it first comes out. FW bugs are FW bugs. No pain, go gain! I'm am sure my recent issues had nothing to do with UBNT but rather interference. On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > I’m scared of UBN

Re: [WISPA] Mesh

What type of radios does this run on? On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 PM, L. Aaron Kaplan wrote: > > you could of course still use open source: OLSR.org > > Deployed on multiple very large community wireless networks worldwide. > (Freifunk, Funkfeuer, Athens Metropolitan Wireless network (5k nodes),

Re: [WISPA] Mesh

Are there any Munis using Ruckus? On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Butch has done Mikrotik ones, but I would rather go with Ruckus. > > On Aug 3, 2010 3:43 PM, "Brian Webster" > wrote: > > Check with Butch Evans, seems like I remember him building a MESH system > using Micro

Re: [WISPA] M series ubnt products

option 2 Email: supp...@snappydsl.net > > > On 8/9/2010 1:09 PM, RickG wrote: > > I thought something was fishy there! > > http://afsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1577/1548-8675%282001%29021%3C0236%3AMBOIAE%3E2.0.CO%3B2?journalCode=fima > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at

Re: [WISPA] I NEED HELP also!!!

I've had water get in though the antenna once. It was the antennas fault though (poor design). I've had water get in through the Ethernet cover a couple of times. I now add a wrap of tape around the cover where it seals. Seems to help. On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote: > We h

Re: [WISPA] M series ubnt products

mp; Telecom > > > > On 8/9/2010 12:05 PM, RickG wrote: > > Bench test is always good! > > "bunt antenna"??? > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > >> You have not provided much technical detail... >> >> For best effe

Re: [WISPA] I NEED HELP also!!!

I haven't turned on STP. Is there any downfall to doing so? On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Glenn Kelley wrote: > That is about the best way to do it. > Biggest thing is to find which tower its happening on. > > If you have the ability to subnet / segment towers into different ranges - > This h

Re: [WISPA] M series ubnt products

Bench test is always good! "bunt antenna"??? On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > You have not provided much technical detail... > > For best effect I would use rocket M and not bullet...and use the bunt > antennas > > Did you test your setup in the lab? If yes ...then you

Re: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz PtP

-- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services > Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net > *LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training <http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com> - > Author > of "Learn RouterOS" <http://www.routerosbook.com/> * > > > > *From:*

Re: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz PtP

You might have something philosophical there Bob. Do we choose equipment that is like us - lots of trouble and need plenty of attention? LOL! On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Robert West wrote: > But they are awesomely reliable and require no maintenance. Where is the > fun in all of that? > > I

Re: [WISPA] POE / Ethernet extenders

till cheap (TP-Link,TRENDnet,etc). We put our own ends on the > cable to fit whatever modules we buy (used to be SC, but now mainly > ST). We use a Lightcrimp Pluss kit to put the ends on the fiber. > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:34 PM, RickG wrote: > > What type of fiber and media co

Re: [WISPA] POE / Ethernet extenders

What type of fiber and media converters are you using? On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Philip Dorr wrote: > We would use fiber+120VAC > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Jason Hensley > wrote: > > Anyone used one on a tower to go beyond 100meters? I need to get higher > > than that on a tower a

Re: [WISPA] POE / Ethernet extenders

Very carefully! Actually, a huge tower I was on in Florida had 110 at several locations including ours. It was so nice! On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:28 PM, wrote: > How do you run the 110 up the tower? > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -Original Message- > From: Philip Dorr > S

Re: [WISPA] OT- Friday Re: Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance

TGIF!!! On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Jim Patient wrote: > You could prolly use a laugh. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yT48wiRue4&feature=player_embedded > > > On 8/6/2010 11:10 PM, RickG wrote: > > Yes, but I'm not trying to live "that" lif

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance

st) > but I'm spending tonight with 12 Nano's and Loco's resetting them and > uploading the latest firmware before putting them back in service. Here > on my couch watching TV with my notebook and USB to my Ubiquiti's, how > do YOU spend your evenings? :) > > Forbes &

Re: [WISPA] Multiple sectors, one frequency?

Anyone tried the shields out yet? If so, did you notice an improvement? On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:13 AM, MDK wrote: > Fred, a guy on the UBNT site was offering some RF shields for the UBNT > sectors. Those, combined with spacing and screening and grounding, > appeared to bring the RXSL down low

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance

Bob, I feel blessed that you offered. Sorry we didnt get to talk. Thanks! On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Bob Moldashel wrote: > OK Nevermind. Don't call me > > > > RickG wrote: > > I thought of that too but no help. But I just finished installing a > >

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance

radio station engineers and he asked me how > long my antenna cable was. He started giving me a class on harmonics and > how they cross frequencies. I don't remember much of what he said but I Just > got lucky that he was there or I would have still been changing dishes and > rad

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance

; We see these results (albeit different manufacturers equipment) when > clients have viruses or they tank the network when they are not throttled. > I just hope you are not seeing better results because "Mike the Porn King" > shut his laptop off and took it home at the e

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance

Thanks for the offer! On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Bob Moldashel wrote: > OK Nevermind. Don't call me > > > > RickG wrote: > > I thought of that too but no help. But I just finished installing a > > Rocket5 Dish and the problem is now FIXED! It must b

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance

LOL! I'm tired and sent this to the whole list! Anyone else wanna looksee? On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:57 PM, RickG wrote: > Faisal. The RDP ID is kywifi PW=kywifi859 > New Rocket Dish is 10.10.100.20 > ID=admin PW=1qazxsw2 > Let me know your thoughts. > Thanks! > -RickG &g

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >