[WISPA] FCC tower lighting question

2017-05-05 Thread David Williamson
Can someone comment on whether this new ruling is going to pass or not:

 

New FAA Marking Requirements May Impact Rural Towers Under 200 Feet 

 

A recently passed law, the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of
2016 (Act), will affect certain towers that are between fifty (50) and
two hundred (200) feet in height by requiring that many of these towers
in rural areas be marked and lit. The law, passed to protect
agricultural aviators (crop dusters), will make rural towers previously
not subject to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements more
visible with painted markings and other visibility attachments.  The Act
also requires these towers to be documented in an FAA database.  The FAA
must issue regulations by July 15, 2017. As compliance with these rules
may prove costly to wireless carriers, particularly where they are
unnecessary, we are working with the Competitive Carriers Association
(CCA) to create an exemption for communication towers.  Your feedback on
specific towers in your service areas is requested.

 

Summary of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act

 

The term "covered tower" is defined in Section 2110(d) of the Act as a
structure that: is self-standing or supported by guy wires; is 10 feet
or less in diameter; is between 50 - 200 feet AGL; has accessory
facilities on which equipment is mounted; and is located outside an
incorporated city or town, or on undeveloped or agricultural land. The
term does not include a structure that is:  adjacent to a house, barn,
electric utility station, or other building; within the curtilage of a
farmstead; a utility transmission pole; a wind turbine with a rotor
blade radius over 6 feet; or a street lighted maintained by a Federal,
State, local or tribal entity.

 

The Act requires that all covered towers constructed on or after the
date on which the regulations take effect must be marked in a manner
consistent with guidance under the FAA Advisory Circular issued on
December 4, 2015 (AC 70/7460-1L) or other guidance as determined by the
Administrator. Existing covered towers, constructed before the
regulations take effect, will have an additional year to comply with the
new regulations. 

 

AC 70/7460-IL recommends that towers under 200 feet be painted with
alternate bands of aviation orange and white paint. The band width
should be equivalent to 1/7 of the tower height and the paint must be
reapplied if it begins to fade. The Advisory Circular also recommends
that high-visibility sleeves and aviation orange spherical market balls
be installed on any outer guy wires. 

 

The new law also creates an FAA database of all towers covered under
this provision. The database will contain location and height
information of each Covered Tower. The FAA administrator will ensure
that any proprietary information in the database is protected from
disclosure in accordance with the law. 

 

Exemption Proposal and Input Request

 

As mentioned above, we are working with CCA to create an exemption or
carve out for communication towers. Based on meetings with Senate
Commerce Committee staff, CCA is working to include in the exemption any
tower possessing clear, visual cues such as bases, attachments,
antennas, or any equipment critical to service. Other suggestions for
exemption include temporary towers or CoWs, towers that comply with
local zoning ordinances and/or National Historic Preservation Act,
towers with an antenna array over five feet (5') in diameter, guy wired
towers, and towers with antennas that have reflective material. With
regard to the FAA database, an alternative proposal is to make a
database of communication towers available to aviators for reference and
not require those tower owners to mark their towers.  

 

 

Regards,

 

 

David Williamson

Owner

Custom Computers

Winchester Wireless

2979 Valley Avenue

Winchester, VA 22601-2631

 

www.customcomputersva.com <http://www.customcomputersva.com/> 

www.winchesterwireless.com <http://www.winchesterwireless.com/>  

da...@customcomputersva.com <mailto:da...@customcomputersva.com> 

540-722-9688 ext. 223 Office

877-765-3700 Fax

 

 

 

 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] PMP100 Software Revisions

2014-03-19 Thread David Williamson
I would disagree.  We have P8 hardware on our network with 12.1 firmware 
installed on them.


David Williamson

Winchester Wireless

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of CBB - Jay Fuller
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:48 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] PMP100 Software Revisions

 


Yes...p8 hardware does not support  software versions above 7 .3.6

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone

- Reply message -
From: Mark Spring m...@nktelco.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] PMP100 Software Revisions
Date: Mon, Mar 17, 2014 12:37 AM

 

Welcoming all knowledge on the P8 platform. I seem to have a few of these 
floating around the network as Backhaul and SM gear, did they cap those at 
7.3.6? Seems that the SM's are fine to upgrade but the backhaul's will have no 
part in it. I'm really just trying to standardize interfaces that our techs see 
since there were very slight changes in the 8-9.x series, but would gladly take 
any performance/stability increase. Things are well under way, with the 
exception of those few p8's hanging around!

Thanks for all the input so far!




Mark Spring
Systems Analyst

New Knoxville Telephone Company
301 W. South St.
New Knoxville, OH 45871
419.753.5000

This message and the file(s) attached are confidential and proprietary
information of NKTelco for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any 
unauthorized review, distribution, disclosure, copying, use, or 
dissemination, either whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Do not 
transmit these documents, in any form, to any third party without the 
expressed written permission of NKTelco.

 

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote:

If the unit is not in production then you can just jump ahead to the latest 
software version.  However if the radio is deployed in a production environment 
then it's best to follow the path cambium has laid out so that settings stick 
through the upgrade process.

 

2 cents YMMV

 

Sean



On Saturday, March 15, 2014, David Williamson 
dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com wrote:

Do you have to follow that path or can you just skip up and flash to 12.1?  Is 
there a purpose for following that specific path?

 

David Williamson
Winchester Wireless

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Adam Kennedy
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] PMP100 Software Revisions

 

I contacted Cambium support about this recently. The upgrade path the 
technician gave me was this:

7.3.6 - 8.2.7 – 9.0 – 9.4.2 – 9.5 – 10.3.2 – 10.5 – 11.0..1 - 11.2 - 
12.1

 

They also indicated that there were timing changes in 10.x and that causes some 
issues with older firmware. They highly recommend to run the 12.1 firmware 
whenever possible. We are using 12.1 without any issues so far in a couple 
different cells.

 

 http://broadbandnetworks.com/_images/signature.png Adam Kennedy | Network 
Engineer
Watch Communications
PO Box 8 | Rushville, Indiana | 46173
866-586-1518
adamkenn...@omnicity.net
www.broadbandnetworks.com http://www.broadbandnetworks.com/ 

 

From: Mark Spring m...@nktelco.net
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 at 1:54 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] PMP100 Software Revisions

 

I have been using:

8.1.5.1 - 8.2.7 - 9.0 - 9.5 - 10.3.2 - 10.5 - 11.2

there seems to be some debate online about which path to use and this is the 
one I elected to go with, right or wrong. We were stopping at 11.0.1 but I have 
11.2 which I assume is going to provide some benefit. Anyways, I'm just going 
to try to even the playing field in the direction that I have been heading but 
I may have to escalate this project in order to maintain a good level of 
service. 

Open to suggestion as this unfolds, thanks for your input!





___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] PMP100 Software Revisions

2014-03-16 Thread David Williamson
Do you have to follow that path or can you just skip up and flash to
12.1?  Is there a purpose for following that specific path?

 

David Williamson
Winchester Wireless

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Adam Kennedy
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] PMP100 Software Revisions

 

I contacted Cambium support about this recently. The upgrade path the
technician gave me was this:

7.3.6 - 8.2.7 - 9.0 - 9.4.2 - 9.5 - 10.3.2 - 10.5 - 11.0.1 -
11.2 - 12.1

 

They also indicated that there were timing changes in 10.x and that
causes some issues with older firmware. They highly recommend to run the
12.1 firmware whenever possible. We are using 12.1 without any issues so
far in a couple different cells.

 

 http://broadbandnetworks.com/_images/signature.png Adam Kennedy |
Network Engineer
Watch Communications
PO Box 8 | Rushville, Indiana | 46173
866-586-1518
adamkenn...@omnicity.net mailto:adamkenn...@omnicity.net 
www.broadbandnetworks.com http://www.broadbandnetworks.com/ 

 

From: Mark Spring m...@nktelco.net
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 at 1:54 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] PMP100 Software Revisions

 

I have been using:

8.1.5.1 - 8.2.7 - 9.0 - 9.5 - 10.3.2 - 10.5 - 11.2

there seems to be some debate online about which path to use and this is
the one I elected to go with, right or wrong. We were stopping at 11.0.1
but I have 11.2 which I assume is going to provide some benefit.
Anyways, I'm just going to try to even the playing field in the
direction that I have been heading but I may have to escalate this
project in order to maintain a good level of service. 

Open to suggestion as this unfolds, thanks for your input!




Mark Spring
Systems Analyst

New Knoxville Telephone Company
301 W. South St.
New Knoxville, OH 45871
419.753.5000

This message and the file(s) attached are confidential and proprietary
information of NKTelco for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any 
unauthorized review, distribution, disclosure, copying, use, or 
dissemination, either whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Do not 
transmit these documents, in any form, to any third party without the 
expressed written permission of NKTelco.

 

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Tony Iacopi t...@razzolink.com wrote:

The recommended upgrade path is 8.2.4 or 8.2.7 - 9.0 - 9.3 - 9.4 -
9.4.2 -

9.5 or 10.5 - 11.2   you could try direct but we have always followed
this just in case.  

 

 

Thanks


Tony Iacopi

 

From:wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Spring
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:26 AM
To: WISPA General List


Subject: [WISPA] PMP100 Software Revisions

 

Folks,



I am trying to improve the performance of our aging pmp100 platform and
have started upgrading some of the SM's. We noticed one customer having
some side effects after moving them past 9.5 and the AP is still back at
9.5 yet. Can anybody comment on any scenarios where they noticed
software versions that don't play well together? We can upgrade the
AP's, but my main concern was to upgrade some of the 8.2.2, 8.2.7, and
9.0 SM's and get them to newer software. If anybody knows of any major
gotchas on the process, it would save us some grief!

Thanks,



Mark Spring
Systems Analyst

New Knoxville Telephone Company
301 W. South St.
New Knoxville, OH 45871
419.753.5000

This message and the file(s) attached are confidential and proprietary
information of NKTelco for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any 
unauthorized review, distribution, disclosure, copying, use, or 
dissemination, either whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Do not 
transmit these documents, in any form, to any third party without the 
expressed written permission of NKTelco.

 



 http://www.avast.com/ 

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
http://www.avast.com/  protection is active. 

 


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth/Performance Test

2014-03-16 Thread David Williamson
Yeah, I'd like that script, too.

 

David

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Art Stephens
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 5:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth/Performance Test

 

Care to share to script?

 

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote:

There is a very basic one on my web site that sounds like what you
describe...

www.wmwisp.net/speedtest/speedtest.php

--
On 3/6/2014 9:30 AM, Sam wrote:
 Good Morning Folks!

 Years ago, I remember installing a bandwidth tester on one of the
Linux
 boxes I had running at the WISP my wife and I owned. For the life of
me
 I cannot remember the name of it.

 Do any of you have one you like enough to recommend? Basically I'd
like
 for it to sit in the base of a tower so the users consuming bandwidth
 from that tower can measure their speed without touching my upstream
 provider - they can measure how fast and at what capacity my equipment
 is providing them with service from this server at the base of the
tower
 to their equipment at their home or business.

 Hopefully this makes sense

 Thanks,
 Sam

 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



--
West Michigan Wireless ISP
Allegan, Michigan  49010
269-686-8648

A Division of:
Camp Communication Services, INC

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless





 

-- 

Arthur Stephens 
Senior Networking Technician

Ptera Inc.
PO Box 135
24001 E Mission Suite 50
Liberty Lake, WA 99019 
509-927-7837 

ptera.com

facebook.com/PteraInc | twitter.com/Ptera

 

- 
This message may contain confidential and/or propriety information, and
is intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally addressed. 
Any use by others is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or
opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are
not intended to represent those of the company. 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] PMP400 ver 8.4 firmware needed

2013-04-25 Thread David Williamson
Does someone have version 8.4 firmware for PMP400 series radios?

 

Thanks,

 

David Williamson

Owner

Winchester Wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] PMP400 vs. PMP450

2013-04-24 Thread David Williamson
What are the differences between PMP400 and PMP450?  Is it predominately
the additional throughput and the ability to talk to FSK radios as well
as OFDM, or is there more that I am missing?

 

Thanks,


David Williamson
Owner

Winchester Wireless

Winchester, VA

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] AirFiber audio plug

2013-04-23 Thread David Williamson
Can anyone tell me if you can use a canopy audio plug for AirFiber or is
it a proprietary plug for the AF?

 

Thanks,


David Williamson
Owner

Winchester Wireless

Winchester, VA

 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] 3.65 quiet zone letter and contact points

2013-04-22 Thread David Williamson
I need to see if anyone out there has a 3.65 quiet zone template letter
to send to the grandfathered FSS earth stations.  Also, I need contact
information for the following earth stations so I know where to send the
letters to...

 

MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc.

New Skies Networks, Inc.

SES Americom, Inc.

Sprint Communications Company, L.P.

Intelsat LLC

ATT Corp.

 

Any help or guidance would be appreciated.

 

Thanks,


David Williamson

Owner

Winchester Wireless

Winchester, VA

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Friday - Canopy Eqpt repost

2013-02-15 Thread David Williamson
Not to sound dumb, but what is AFMUG?  J

David Williamson
Winchester Wireless

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Doug Clark
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 8:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Friday - Canopy Eqpt repost

 

Why dont you list it over on AFMUG?  I would think that you would get a lot 
more response from the Cambium group. 

 

 

 

 

---Original Message---

 

From: Clay Stewart mailto:cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com 

Date: 2/15/2013 3:58:42 PM

To: wireless@wispa.org

Subject: [WISPA] Friday - Canopy Eqpt repost

 

I am re-listing a set of Canopy Radios for a failed WISP start-up. I finally 
took over their fiber point legally this week. I was held up on the first 
listing having to wait for the acquisition of the companies other assets (fiber 
point). 

 

I have been asked to post and ask for offers. If my client does not get some 
value in his head, he will keep them and use them at another location. The AP 
and couple CPEs were field mounted and tested, rest are in boxes. The company 
did not know about the low tree penetration and licensing requirements for 
3.65Ghz (area is in a Verizon Earth Station).

 

Items with original purchase prices

 

3630APC 3.65 Ghz Connectorized AP   
 3,291.60

3.3-3.8 Ghz 16.5 DBI Gain 90 Degree Sector DUAL 
  384.40

CMM w/Ruggedized Switch, GPS module 
1,984.00

(25) HK1941A Subscriber Modules 3.65 Ghz w/power supplies  7,450.00

(25) Canopy Power Cords 
  140.00

Canopy PMP-320 Stand-alone power supply 
   42.50

 

Total original price for all less shipping: 
 13,292.50

 

 

I am just listing for a client, not charging anything for effort.

 

I would like to sale the whole list as a whole, but will pass along any other 
offers.

 

Shipping should be around $270 for everything.

 

Please serious offers only, did I say I am not making anything on listing and 
boxing these items!

 

But also serious, these are basically new or like-new items, good deal I would 
think.

 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif 

 

-- 


-- 
SCS 
  Clay Stewart 
  CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., 
  DBA Stewart Computer Services   
  434.263.6363 O 
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com  
“We Keep You Up and Running” 
   Wireless Broadband
   Programming
  Network Services



 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 





No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6101 - Release Date: 02/13/13

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Friday - Canopy Eqpt repost

2013-02-15 Thread David Williamson
Got It, and thanks.  We are a 100% canopy WISP, so that will be of great
benefit to us.


David Williamson
Winchester Wireless

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Doug Clark
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 8:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Friday - Canopy Eqpt repost

 

Animal Farm Motorola Users Group

Most everyone on the list uses Motorola which is now Cambium 

 

 

 

 

~Doug

---Original Message---

 

From: Josh Luthman mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com 

Date: 2/15/2013 6:44:46 PM

To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org 

Subject: Re: [WISPA] Friday - Canopy Eqpt repost

 

Big group of people.

Afmug.com

a...@afmug.com

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Feb 15, 2013 8:38 PM, David Williamson
dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com wrote:

Not to sound dumb, but what is AFMUG?  J

David Williamson
Winchester Wireless

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Doug Clark
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 8:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Friday - Canopy Eqpt repost

 

Why dont you list it over on AFMUG?  I would think that you would get a
lot more response from the Cambium group. 

 

 

 

 

---Original Message---

 

From: Clay Stewart mailto:cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com 

Date: 2/15/2013 3:58:42 PM

To: wireless@wispa.org

Subject: [WISPA] Friday - Canopy Eqpt repost

 

I am re-listing a set of Canopy Radios for a failed WISP start-up. I
finally took over their fiber point legally this week. I was held up on
the first listing having to wait for the acquisition of the companies
other assets (fiber point). 

 

I have been asked to post and ask for offers. If my client does not get
some value in his head, he will keep them and use them at another
location. The AP and couple CPEs were field mounted and tested, rest are
in boxes. The company did not know about the low tree penetration and
licensing requirements for 3.65Ghz (area is in a Verizon Earth Station).

 

Items with original purchase prices

 

3630APC 3.65 Ghz Connectorized AP
3,291.60

3.3-3.8 Ghz 16.5 DBI Gain 90 Degree Sector DUAL
384.40

CMM w/Ruggedized Switch, GPS module
1,984.00

(25) HK1941A Subscriber Modules 3.65 Ghz w/power supplies
7,450.00

(25) Canopy Power Cords
140.00

Canopy PMP-320 Stand-alone power supply
42.50

 

Total original price for all less shipping:
13,292.50

 

 

I am just listing for a client, not charging anything for effort.

 

I would like to sale the whole list as a whole, but will pass along any
other offers.

 

Shipping should be around $270 for everything.

 

Please serious offers only, did I say I am not making anything on
listing and boxing these items!

 

But also serious, these are basically new or like-new items, good deal I
would think.

 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif 

 

-- 


-- 
SCS 
  Clay Stewart 
  CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., 
  DBA Stewart Computer Services   
  434.263.6363 O 
  434.942.6510 C
  cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com  
We Keep You Up and Running 
   Wireless Broadband
   Programming
  Network Services



 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 





No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6101 - Release Date:
02/13/13


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 



 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 





No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6101 - Release Date:
02/13/13

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network

2011-11-11 Thread David Williamson
Wow, I would not bridge the radios if I were you.  That is a really dangerous 
network proposition for creating unnecessary ARP and broadcast traffic, and if 
you get someone infected with a virus or malware, it could take down your 
entire network.  We started out 3 ½ years ago doing that, but within about 
40-50 customers we realized it was a potential nightmare and we quickly moved 
to NAT’ing all of our customers at the radio.  Now, the only customers that get 
bridged are ones that pay an extra $10/mo. for a static public IP address.  It 
is much safer that way in my opinion.

 

I would definitely reconsider this topology and what possible heartburn it can 
cause you, especially when it is on a WLAN network and you cannot control what 
all your sub’s are able to do, like you can in a controlled enterprise 
environment.

 

Just my 2 cents.  Take it for what it’s worth…

 

Regards,

 

David Williamson
Owner

Custom Computers  Winchester Wireless

2979 Valley Avenue

Winchester, VA 22601

http://www.customcomputersva.com http://www.customcomputersva.com 

http://www.winchesterwireless.com http://www.winchesterwireless.com 

Work 1: 540.722.9688 x223

Work 2: 540-665-0800 x223

Toll Free Fax: 877-765-3700

da...@customcomputersva.com mailto:da...@customcomputersva.com 

da...@winchesterwireless.com mailto:da...@winchesterwireless.com 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of rwall...@tigernet.us
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 6:32 PM
To: WISPA General List; Scottie Arnett
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network
Importance: High

 

 Yes, I am bridging the radios, and using static addr's for each customer.

 

 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network
From: Scottie Arnett sarn...@info-ed.com
Date: Fri, November 11, 2011 5:54 pm
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org

 

So are you bridging the radios? It still sounds like a networking 
problem instead of the radio. If you are not bridging and using DHCP on the 
radio, try it in bridge mode and see if that changes anything.

 

Scottie Arnett
President
Info-Ed, Inc.
Electronics and More
931-243-2101
sarn...@info-ed.com

- Original Message - 

From: rwall...@tigernet.us 

To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org  

Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 4:21 PM

Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network

 

Thanks Scottie,

 

Actually what is happening is as follows, all users having this 
problem are using MS Vista or MS7.   We use Static IP's, 192.168.0.nnn or 
.10.nnn, .15.nnn, .20.nnn - when the assigned IP, mask, gateway and DSN's are 
entered at the user loc. local area Connection properties dialog and saved a 
yellow triangle w/ a ! appears over the Local Area Connection Icon, lower 
right, in the Quick Launch toolbar.  When the mouse pointer is rested over 
the icon the message Unidentified Network, No Network Access appears.

 

It seems Internet Explorer reads the addressing data as a 
security risk and will not allow access.  Notwithstanding, microsoft's long and 
arduous efforts to provide us with secure communications, I feel they have 
overstepped my customers and my own needs for Microsoft Security where internet 
access is concerned.

 

My question is How Do I over come their enthusiasm with 
security where our internet access is concerned.

 

Ron Wallace

Tigernet Internet

trying to claw our way past Microsoft onto the Inet

 

 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network
From: Scottie Arnett sarn...@info-ed.com
Date: Thu, November 10, 2011 8:52 am
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org

 

Are you doing DHCP with the client radios? If so, I 
remember some having problems if they used the 169.254.x.x private IP 
structure. Changing to another private structure solved the problem.

 

Scottie Arnett
President
Info-Ed, Inc.
Electronics and More
931-243-2101
sarn...@info-ed.com

- Original Message - 

From: rwall...@tigernet.us 

To: WISPA General List 
mailto:wireless@wispa.org  

Sent: Thursday, November

Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network

2011-11-11 Thread David Williamson
Yup, I agree 100%.  That is one of the many reasons we stopped bridging about 
40 sub’s in on our WISP and began NAT’ing at that point…

 

Regards,

 

David Williamson
Owner

Custom Computers  Winchester Wireless

2979 Valley Avenue

Winchester, VA 22601

http://www.customcomputersva.com http://www.customcomputersva.com 

http://www.winchesterwireless.com http://www.winchesterwireless.com 

Work 1: 540.722.9688 x223

Work 2: 540-665-0800 x223

Toll Free Fax: 877-765-3700

da...@customcomputersva.com mailto:da...@customcomputersva.com 

da...@winchesterwireless.com mailto:da...@winchesterwireless.com 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Jason Bailey
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 6:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network

 

If you are bridging radios,whats to stop a client from plugging a router in 
backwards,or any other ip device? Route at the cpe,192.x or 10.x either way you 
should be good. 

--- On Fri, 11/11/11, rwall...@tigernet.us rwall...@tigernet.us wrote:


From: rwall...@tigernet.us rwall...@tigernet.us
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org, Scottie Arnett 
sarn...@info-ed.com
Date: Friday, November 11, 2011, 6:31 PM

 Yes, I am bridging the radios, and using static addr's for each customer.

 

 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network
From: Scottie Arnett sarn...@info-ed.com 
http://us.mc1218.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sarn...@info-ed.com 
Date: Fri, November 11, 2011 5:54 pm
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org 
http://us.mc1218.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wireless@wispa.org 

 

So are you bridging the radios? It still sounds like a networking 
problem instead of the radio. If you are not bridging and using DHCP on the 
radio, try it in bridge mode and see if that changes anything.

 

Scottie Arnett
President
Info-Ed, Inc.
Electronics and More
931-243-2101
sarn...@info-ed.com 
http://us.mc1218.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sarn...@info-ed.com 

- Original Message - 

From: rwall...@tigernet.us 
http://us.mc1218.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=rwall...@tigernet.us  

To: WISPA General List 
http://us.mc1218.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wireless@wispa.org  

Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 4:21 PM

Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network

 

Thanks Scottie,

 

Actually what is happening is as follows, all users having this 
problem are using MS Vista or MS7.   We use Static IP's, 192.168.0.nnn or 
.10.nnn, .15.nnn, .20.nnn - when the assigned IP, mask, gateway and DSN's are 
entered at the user loc. local area Connection properties dialog and saved a 
yellow triangle w/ a ! appears over the Local Area Connection Icon, lower 
right, in the Quick Launch toolbar.  When the mouse pointer is rested over 
the icon the message Unidentified Network, No Network Access appears.

 

It seems Internet Explorer reads the addressing data as a 
security risk and will not allow access.  Notwithstanding, microsoft's long and 
arduous efforts to provide us with secure communications, I feel they have 
overstepped my customers and my own needs for Microsoft Security where internet 
access is concerned.

 

My question is How Do I over come their enthusiasm with 
security where our internet access is concerned.

 

Ron Wallace

Tigernet Internet

trying to claw our way past Microsoft onto the Inet

 

 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network
From: Scottie Arnett sarn...@info-ed.com 
http://us.mc1218.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sarn...@info-ed.com 
Date: Thu, November 10, 2011 8:52 am
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org 
http://us.mc1218.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wireless@wispa.org 

 

Are you doing DHCP with the client radios? If so, I 
remember some having problems if they used the 169.254.x.x private IP 
structure. Changing to another private structure solved the problem.

 

Scottie Arnett
President
Info-Ed, Inc.
Electronics and More
931-243-2101
sarn...@info-ed.com 
http://us.mc1218.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sarn...@info-ed.com 

- Original Message

Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network

2011-11-10 Thread David Williamson
Yes, it is most likely the LAN subnet on the radio that is causing the problem. 
 Microsoft made 169.254.x.x subnets non-routable beginning with Windows Vista 
operating system.  We had this problem about almost two years ago and once we 
finally figured it out, we just changed all of our radio LAN subnets from 
169.254.1.x  to 192.168.10.x subnet and it 100% solved this problem.

 

This problem only exists with firmware 9.5 or higher if memory serves me 
correctly, because I remember we initially rolled back firmware and it solved 
the issue “temporarily”, but the long-term fix was to change all the LAN 
subnets on the NAT’d radios.

 

I hope this helps.

 

Regards,

 

David Williamson
Owner

Custom Computers  Winchester Wireless

2979 Valley Avenue

Winchester, VA 22601

http://www.customcomputersva.com http://www.customcomputersva.com 

http://www.winchesterwireless.com http://www.winchesterwireless.com 

Work 1: 540.722.9688 x223

Work 2: 540-665-0800 x223

Toll Free Fax: 877-765-3700

da...@customcomputersva.com mailto:da...@customcomputersva.com 

da...@winchesterwireless.com mailto:da...@winchesterwireless.com 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Scottie Arnett
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 8:52 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network

 

Are you doing DHCP with the client radios? If so, I remember some having 
problems if they used the 169.254.x.x private IP structure. Changing to another 
private structure solved the problem.

 

Scottie Arnett
President
Info-Ed, Inc.
Electronics and More
931-243-2101
sarn...@info-ed.com

- Original Message - 

From: rwall...@tigernet.us 

To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org  

Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 7:07 AM

Subject: [WISPA] Problem with Access to Canopy network

 

To All,

 

I have a problem with about 15 users not able to access the net.  Their 
PC's network icon, lower right on quick launch toolbar - MS, has a yellow 
triangle w/!.  indicating that their ethernet interface has no access.  Each 
user has MS7.  

 

This is specific to one tower location and three of the four sectors, 2 
Canopy 900's w/180* sectors, 2 Canopy 2.4's w/ 180* sectors.  At first we 
thought it was specific to MS7 Users, that is still the case.  However, not all 
MS7 users.  The setup of all CPE  AP devices is the same.

 

We have reset one 900 to factory default and reconfig'd that device 
with no affect on the ability to access the net.

 

Any suggestions, advice, questions or direction would be greatly 
appreciated.

 

Ron Wallace

Hahnron, Inc. (Tigernet Internet)

rwall...@tigernet.us

Phone:517-547-8410

Cel:517-740-0941

 







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Extra Canopy 900 SMs

2011-04-22 Thread David Williamson
Yes, I would be interested in some.  Hit me offline to discuss further.

 

Regards,

 

David Williamson
Owner

Custom Computers  Winchester Wireless

2979 Valley Avenue

Winchester, VA 22601

http://www.customcomputersva.com

http://www.winchesterwireless.com

Work 1: 540.722.9688 x223

Work 2: 540-665-0800 x223

Toll Free Fax: 877-765-3700

da...@customcomputersva.com

da...@winchesterwireless.com

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Piehn
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 8:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Extra Canopy 900 SMs

 

Just wondering if there is a market and how much for Canopy 900 SMs.

 

We have 100 or so extra due to upgrades to get higher speed

 

 

-
Scott Piehn

 

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] band pass filters

2011-03-14 Thread David Williamson
What Ethernet to USB converter are you using because we have been
looking for a good one?


Thanks,


David Williamson
Winchester Wireless

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 5:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] band pass filters

 

RF Linx DTX amps can be retuned on the fly via usb.

add a Ethernet to usb converter and you can do it remotely.

On 3/14/2011 12:44 PM, Chuck Profito wrote: 

Too bad there is not an electronic version of that w/Ethernet port built
in so you could switch to any channel on the fly. Or maybe a follow me
on the ap side.  The 2.4 is almost unusable in many places.

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marco Coelho
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 7:30 AM
To: scubac...@gmail.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] band pass filters

 

The only thing you've got to remember, is that if in the future you have
a problem, you can't just make a freq change on the AP, you've got to
move hardware as well.

Glad it worked.  I'll keep it in the toolkit.

Marco

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com wrote:

For what it's worth, I had a super noisy Wi-Fi noise environment
(hundreds of clients, dozens of APs, little to no channel
coordination, etc) and got a handle on the situation by putting these
band pass filters

http://www.rflinx.com/products/filters/2400/bpf/

I got several of each, but I ended up using channel 1 mostly.  When I
put that puppy in, I got like 40 dB less noise on the channels I
didn't want, and I also could not even hear other APs when I moved the
radio to channels 2-11 (there is that much isolation in the filter).

Now throughput is much smoother and higher.  Before I put these in,
bandwidth would be slow and come in spurts (as evidenced by various
throughput tools like iperf and online speed tests).

--
Also on LinkedIn?  Feel free to connect if you too are an open
networker: scubac...@gmail.com




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




-- 
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036

 
 
 
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Looking for Bandwidth Manager

2010-10-14 Thread David Williamson
Can you recommend a routing configuration because we currently run some
bridging and I am curious as to what your recommendations would be.  How
do you do the bandwidth shaping if you are routing from local tower
sites directly?

 

Thanks,


David

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 6:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for Bandwidth Manager

 

Hi,

You need to fix your network, not the hardware/software you are running.
I have over 60 Mikrotik backhaul links, with over 1,000 Mikrotik
customer radios (plus thousands more Trango and Canopy) and have NONE of
the issues you describe.

Our main edge router is a Mikrotik box (x86 with Quad core) and it has
thousands of rules and NAT translations, moving 450Mbps x 150Mbps on a
daily basis, and has been up for over 6 months right now (due only to
firmware upgrades).

Having your network bridged is the problem. Take time out and fix that,
or you will continue to have more and more problems...

Travis
Microserv


On 10/14/2010 4:45 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote: 

Really Josh, you want me to rehash this?  To be simple I'm not a true
geek, I barely speak linux and Router OS not at all.  Our network of 700
over 12 towers is bridged, a big no-no but I can't keep radios up long
enough to make us routed along with the growth sprut we've had this year
(we 're averaging 3 installs a day with one installer/field tech).
We've found that if you get over 50 on Mikrotik you start getting
latency issues, four of our towers have over that.  When I was all
Mikrotik (well 90% that 10% Moto) it worked great for about a year and a
half, then the packet storms started, then radios started doing weird
intermittent things like turning off.  Sure we did the obvious, change
passwords, isolate the radios from the rest of the network but it just
started to get worse, probably traffic driven from our ongoing growth
that the greater demand for more bandwidth (we are 90% residential so
Netflix type stuff).

To solve this we started replacing backhauls with Ubiquiti radios.
Ubiquiti allows more traffic so the added pressure really started to
take down the Mikrotik AP's, ports and bridges now drop with
undiagnoisable (new word) regularity.  Then the bandwidth manager
failed, Butch rebuilt it but for some reason the upgrade to 4.11 made
failures happen more often that were like the AP's, dropped ports and
bridges.  We compensated by making a path on the Ethernet side and
in-network side so we could maybe ... (fix the disabled port/bridge)
from either end.  We are spending all of our time building redundant
this and redundant that until we realized one thing, on every outage
Mikrotik's had cascading failures shutting down ports or turning off
radios (disabling)  meanwhile Ubiquiti never went down, ever.  So we
started pulling all Mikrotik backhauls, now we only lose AP's and the
bandwidth manager.  Since the bandwidth manager takes the entire network
down we want replace it.  Now you're up to speed on where we are, I call
Mikrotik my 'backwards momentum' mover, we have to stop our forward
motion on building and installing so we can restore service, it takes
the fun out of this business thats for sure.

Forbes

On 10/14/2010 3:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: 

Hrm why doesn't Mikrotik work?

On Oct 14, 2010 6:15 PM, Forbes Mercy forbes.me...@wabroadband.com
wrote:
 In my mission to rid our network of Mikrotik I need to shop for a new 
 bandwidth manager since mine likes to randomly drop one of the ports
or 
 bridge, and reset the route gateway (twice already this week). I'm 
 looking for a more friendly windows type based unit, any suggestions.
 
 Thanks,
 Forbes
 
 



 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 
 
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 
 
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



Re: [WISPA] speed test

2010-09-12 Thread David Williamson
How do you turn on bursting because I get these same types of users
complaining because of a stupid speed test result.

 

David

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Bailey
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

turn on bursting?works awesome,they don't wanna tell you the results
because they think they are getting way more than they should.

--- On Sun, 9/12/10, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:


From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Subject: [WISPA] speed test
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Sunday, September 12, 2010, 7:29 PM

OK for all your speed hungry customers that want to run speed tests to
speedtest.net http://speedtest.net/  and dslreports.com
http://dslreports.com/  - the question is: what do you do? I've never
really had good results with off net speed tests even when removing the
load and running directly t from my laptop to my fiber connection. But I
get these people who think they're not getting what they pay for :( 

-RickG


-Inline Attachment Follows-





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
http://us.mc525.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wirel...@wispa.org 

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] speed test

2010-09-12 Thread David Williamson
Motorola Canopy

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Bailey
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 10:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

what type of wireless gear are you using?

--- On Sun, 9/12/10, David Williamson
dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com wrote:


From: David Williamson dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Sunday, September 12, 2010, 8:53 PM

How do you turn on bursting because I get these same types of users
complaining because of a stupid speed test result.

 

David

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Bailey
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

turn on bursting?works awesome,they don't wanna tell you the results
because they think they are getting way more than they should.

--- On Sun, 9/12/10, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:


From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Subject: [WISPA] speed test
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Sunday, September 12, 2010, 7:29 PM

OK for all your speed hungry customers that want to run speed tests to
speedtest.net http://speedtest.net/  and dslreports.com
http://dslreports.com/  - the question is: what do you do? I've never
really had good results with off net speed tests even when removing the
load and running directly t from my laptop to my fiber connection. But I
get these people who think they're not getting what they pay for :( 

-RickG


-Inline Attachment Follows-





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
http://us.mc525.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wirel...@wispa.org 

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 


-Inline Attachment Follows-





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
http://us.mc525.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wirel...@wispa.org 

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] speed test

2010-09-12 Thread David Williamson
What are you using to setup bursting on your network?  We are running
Canopy APs and SMs...

 

David

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:06 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

Bursting is cool cause on my system, the web page will *SNAP* right up
and they get this OMFG face when they see it.

But the hit on the network is ZERO!

 

Tip-

 

CHARGE FOR BURSTING!

 

I F'ked that up.

 

Gave it away,

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David Williamson
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

How do you turn on bursting because I get these same types of users
complaining because of a stupid speed test result.

 

David

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Bailey
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

turn on bursting?works awesome,they don't wanna tell you the results
because they think they are getting way more than they should.

--- On Sun, 9/12/10, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:


From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Subject: [WISPA] speed test
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Sunday, September 12, 2010, 7:29 PM

OK for all your speed hungry customers that want to run speed tests to
speedtest.net http://speedtest.net/  and dslreports.com
http://dslreports.com/  - the question is: what do you do? I've never
really had good results with off net speed tests even when removing the
load and running directly t from my laptop to my fiber connection. But I
get these people who think they're not getting what they pay for :( 

-RickG


-Inline Attachment Follows-





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
http://us.mc525.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wirel...@wispa.org 

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] speed test

2010-09-12 Thread David Williamson
I am just looking to learn how to do the bursting as you are running it.
I am quite happy with all Motorola gear, though.  How do I setup this
bursting you are running?

 

Thanks,

 

David

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:33 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

We went to all low $$$ Ubiquiti equipment.  

 

$89 bucks for an AP  and zero day ROI is super cool!

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David Williamson
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

What are you using to setup bursting on your network?  We are running
Canopy APs and SMs...

 

David

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:06 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

Bursting is cool cause on my system, the web page will *SNAP* right up
and they get this OMFG face when they see it.

But the hit on the network is ZERO!

 

Tip-

 

CHARGE FOR BURSTING!

 

I F'ked that up.

 

Gave it away,

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David Williamson
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

How do you turn on bursting because I get these same types of users
complaining because of a stupid speed test result.

 

David

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Bailey
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 8:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test

 

turn on bursting?works awesome,they don't wanna tell you the results
because they think they are getting way more than they should.

--- On Sun, 9/12/10, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:


From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Subject: [WISPA] speed test
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Sunday, September 12, 2010, 7:29 PM

OK for all your speed hungry customers that want to run speed tests to
speedtest.net http://speedtest.net/  and dslreports.com
http://dslreports.com/  - the question is: what do you do? I've never
really had good results with off net speed tests even when removing the
load and running directly t from my laptop to my fiber connection. But I
get these people who think they're not getting what they pay for :( 

-RickG


-Inline Attachment Follows-





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
http://us.mc525.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wirel...@wispa.org 

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Used equipment values

2010-08-25 Thread David Williamson
I may be interested in the PTP400 gear.

David Williamson
da...@winchesterwireless.com


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 8:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Used equipment values

I'll be interested in the radwins, hit me offlist with pricing and freq
details

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 8:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Used equipment values

  I'm not ready to move them yet, but looking to move a Radwin (I 
believe WL-1000), 1.5x Motorola PtP 400 links (plus the one with a blown

Ethernet, if you'd like), Redline AN-50 w\PtMP license, Redline 5.4 
AN-80, Redline AN-100.

Associated antenna wouldn't be a problem to be included.

I'm replacing them all with a common platform so I can more easily stock

spares.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 8/25/2010 7:01 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
 What kind of backhauls?

 Gino A. Villarini
 g...@aeronetpr.com
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 787.273.4143

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 7:48 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Used equipment values

How would I go about ascertaining the value of some pulled
backhauls?

 eBay is about worthless for us.






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Used equipment values

2010-08-25 Thread David Williamson
Are the PTP400's full 60mbps links or what licensing do they have?  I am
assuming they are 5.8ghz links?

David Williamson
da...@winchesterwireless.com


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 8:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Used equipment values

I'll be interested in the radwins, hit me offlist with pricing and freq
details

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 8:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Used equipment values

  I'm not ready to move them yet, but looking to move a Radwin (I 
believe WL-1000), 1.5x Motorola PtP 400 links (plus the one with a blown

Ethernet, if you'd like), Redline AN-50 w\PtMP license, Redline 5.4 
AN-80, Redline AN-100.

Associated antenna wouldn't be a problem to be included.

I'm replacing them all with a common platform so I can more easily stock

spares.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 8/25/2010 7:01 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
 What kind of backhauls?

 Gino A. Villarini
 g...@aeronetpr.com
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 787.273.4143

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 7:48 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Used equipment values

How would I go about ascertaining the value of some pulled
backhauls?

 eBay is about worthless for us.






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/