Re: [WISPA] Wispapalooza - Where is the Gear Beef?
There is just so much that it all blends together. Cadmium had lots of stuff on their roadmap. Lte radios, 3.65 medusa, ac gen 2 epmp, etc. I think most vendors can't afford to wait to a wispa show to launch, so they launch when they're ready. Also, the show has grown to the point where there is so much going on that it's hard to pick out anything in particular. Plus the announcements tend to not be that unexpected. Vendors have newer faster radios. Others have cooler features. But all pretty expected. On Oct 13, 2017 6:39 AM, "Gino A. Villarini"wrote: > It doesn’t seen that Wispapalooza is the new gear coming out party it once > was? No new gear announced? Has the industry lost its shine? > > Nothing new from Mimosa > > UBNT just showing just another 5 ghz backhaul > > Cambium with just another backhaul too? And AC Epmp… nothing spectacular > either > > Where is the new gear in 24 ghz? Multiband backhaul? (5,24,60), more 60 > ghz? SFP ports? > > > > *Gino A. Villarini* > President > Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 > > > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] WISPAPALOOZA
The list Trina provided also includes the Monday evening Cambium reception - or at least it does now. RSVP required apparently. -forrest On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > Those are just training, I think he's after the typical Ubnt Cambium and > Mimosa announcement deals. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Trina Coffey <tr...@wispa.org> wrote: > >> All of the events that I was made aware of are listed here: >> http://www.wispa.org/Events/WISPAPALOOZA/wp16-collocated-training >> >> >> Respectfully, >> >> Trina Coffey >> Director of Operations >> WISPA >> 260-622-5775 direct >> 866-317-2851 ext. 102 (US only) >> 530-227-6696 cell >> www.wispa.org >> >> Come see us at WISPAPALOOZA!! >> >> -Original Message- >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On >> Behalf Of Matt Hoppes >> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:37 PM >> To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org> >> Subject: [WISPA] WISPAPALOOZA >> >> Is there a list of events happening during the show? Like I believe >> Monday >> several vendors have some events going on, or the events happening in the >> evening. Trying to plan my week. >> ___ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> ___ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > > > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] DC UPS (and Solar?) Setup.
In relation to the sitemonitor base unit: It's perfectly fine with running off of the battery voltage directly, and can use a different voltage on each voltage input as long as they share the same common. (I.E. +12V battery and +48V regulated is ok, + and - 48VDC is not). Just make sure you fuse the input at somewhere around 1A. On the solar side: I like the morningstar controllers, they have a new prostar MPPT which might even be better for those sites. Our solar charge controller support is also going to have at least a half-dozen or so additional controllers added to the list here shortly. -forrest On Jul 14, 2016 2:29 PM, "Duncan Scott"wrote: > Hi, > > So historically we've been a mostly AC setup, but I'm trying to figure > out a DC setup for some of our smaller sites, and hopefully a solar > setup as well. I'm new to all of this though so I'm trying to see if > anyone has any written guides or part lists. Basic goal is to power an > airfiber or equivalent and A few Canopy or Ubnt APs. > > Here's what I've been looking at so far: > > 48v DC power supply > Traco TSP-BCMU360 > Packetflux Site monitor 2 base > Packetflux SiteMonitor 6 Channel Switch Closure Input > Neotonix DC switch > > This seems to work okay, the TSP-BCMU360 charges and monitors the > battery and the Packetflux Sitemonitor provides a network connection to > monitor the status. > > Issues so far: > > I'm running the site monitor off the BCMU, but this means that it's > input power is 48v, I want to monitor the voltage of the battery, but > that's just 12v and I don't think I can have different voltages plugged > into the two inputs to the site monitor. Another option would be to have > the site monitor powered off the batteries directly, but that seems bad... > > Is the packetflux stuff the best solution for this, or is there another > web enabling option? Seem pretty good so far, but I'm not even sure what > the other options are. > > The other issue is I have no idea what I should be using for > breaker/fuses for the equipment. A suggested list of DIN mountable stuff > I should have would be super useful if someone has it on hand. Also who > to order this stuff from. > > The other thing I would like to try is some kind of solar setup. Again > it need to be monitored remotely. Power draw would be as low as I could > manage. This is Oregon, so not lots of snow, but there are a lot of > cloudy days. Packetflux makes several items that integrate with Morning > Star controllers. It that a good way to go? Something like a TS-MPPT-30? > > Batteries are another thing. I'm also very curious if Lithium ion > batteries are feasible yet. This would need a different charger but it > would save a TON of space and maybe even be cost effective given the > smaller enclosure size that would be possible. > > Then there is the issue of what solar panels to buy. > > If anyone has any thoughts, comments, links, documents, etc. I'd really > appreciate it. > > Thanks, > Duncan > > > > > > > > > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Solar powered repeater kit
Finding panels under $1/watt are pretty easy, even less in quantity: http://www.wholesalesolar.com/solar-panels.html http://www.civicsolar.com/solar-panels It's getting low enough that I'm actually starting to consider putting in enough panels to zero out my electric bill as I live in a net metering state where I can sell kWH back to the utility at par (up to my annual usage). 1W of panel will generate 1.7kW/year in my climate, or $0.23cents/year of electricity. A 5 year payback is $1.15/watt, not counting all of the incentives. Aka... 30% federal tax rebate, a similar local rebate, and incentives of up to $1.50/watt ($6000maximum) from the local utility. -forrest On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote: Now if I could find those prices in the Mid-West... I mean, the last time I looked it was still around $3-4 a watt. At a $1 per watt, I have some other uses... -- On 4/18/2014 5:41 PM, Marlon Schafer (509.982.2181) wrote: No. But I do have a site. http://www.solarblvd.com/ is where I got my last bit of stuff. 250 watts for my motorhome. At the time, panels and a 40 amp charge controller *with float charging* was around $400. They have pretty high wind load so you'll need a good structure to hold them up. I've also had better luck (so far) with wet cell golf cart 6vdc batteries than with anything else. I get them from the regional Interstate Battery shop, factory blems run less than half the cost of new and have a 90 day warranty. Others have done a lot more of this than I have though. marlon *From:* Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net *Sent:* Tuesday, April 08, 2014 9:16 AM *To:* WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Solar powered repeater kit I'm interested as well. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.comj...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To: *WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.org *Sent: *Tuesday, April 8, 2014 11:00:42 AM *Subject: *[WISPA] Solar powered repeater kit Has anyone deployed a solar powered repeater for a single customer? For example, their house is in the middle of a forest but you can provide service at the end of their lane. This comes up here and there and I'm looking to put together a kit of Nanos, solar panels, battery and give the customer the price. I thought I would ask here before reinventing the wheel. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing listWireless@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- West Michigan Wireless ISP Allegan, Michigan 49010269-686-8648 A Division of: Camp Communication Services, INC ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Solar powered repeater kit
The challenge is still the grid-tie inverter, which at this point may actually be more expensive than the panels themselves. But the whole thing is definitely on my short list of home improvement projects. -forrest On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote: I saw $.57 per watt on that site... $2300 will buy just about 4kW... My state is net meter as well. Forget the the market distorting incentive junk, at that price, they may make direct economic sense. -- On 4/18/2014 11:29 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: Finding panels under $1/watt are pretty easy, even less in quantity: http://www.wholesalesolar.com/solar-panels.html http://www.civicsolar.com/solar-panels It's getting low enough that I'm actually starting to consider putting in enough panels to zero out my electric bill as I live in a net metering state where I can sell kWH back to the utility at par (up to my annual usage). 1W of panel will generate 1.7kW/year in my climate, or $0.23cents/year of electricity. A 5 year payback is $1.15/watt, not counting all of the incentives. Aka... 30% federal tax rebate, a similar local rebate, and incentives of up to $1.50/watt ($6000maximum) from the local utility. -forrest On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote: Now if I could find those prices in the Mid-West... I mean, the last time I looked it was still around $3-4 a watt. At a $1 per watt, I have some other uses... -- On 4/18/2014 5:41 PM, Marlon Schafer (509.982.2181) wrote: No. But I do have a site. http://www.solarblvd.com/ is where I got my last bit of stuff. 250 watts for my motorhome. At the time, panels and a 40 amp charge controller *with float charging* was around $400. They have pretty high wind load so you'll need a good structure to hold them up. I've also had better luck (so far) with wet cell golf cart 6vdc batteries than with anything else. I get them from the regional Interstate Battery shop, factory blems run less than half the cost of new and have a 90 day warranty. Others have done a lot more of this than I have though. marlon *From:* Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net *Sent:* Tuesday, April 08, 2014 9:16 AM *To:* WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Solar powered repeater kit I'm interested as well. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.comj...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To: *WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.org *Sent: *Tuesday, April 8, 2014 11:00:42 AM *Subject: *[WISPA] Solar powered repeater kit Has anyone deployed a solar powered repeater for a single customer? For example, their house is in the middle of a forest but you can provide service at the end of their lane. This comes up here and there and I'm looking to put together a kit of Nanos, solar panels, battery and give the customer the price. I thought I would ask here before reinventing the wheel. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing listWireless@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- West Michigan Wireless ISP Allegan, Michigan 49010269-686-8648 A Division of: Camp Communication Services, INC ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing listWireless@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- West Michigan Wireless ISP Allegan, Michigan 49010269-686-8648 A Division of: Camp Communication Services, INC ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] OT Time Clocks...
That's why my pay period ends on a Friday and payroll isn't until the next Wednesday... I have all weekend and most of Monday to get payroll into QuickBooks for direct deposit. We just use a spreadsheet instead of a timecard. On Mar 31, 2014 6:20 PM, Bob Moldashel lakel...@gbcx.net wrote: If they go straight to the customer then that's an issue. My issue is guys forget to fax the time sheets at the end of the day or they put them in the fax machine upside down. So the bookkeeper either gets no sheets or blank white sheets of paper. This then requires someone to go to the warehouse to retrieve the sheets and a firedrill in the AM to do payroll and get the checks out to the warehouse. -B- On 3/31/2014 8:05 PM, Martha Huizenga wrote: How would you use this if you have techs that go straight to a client from their home? we currently use a mobile app called time tracker. Each employee logs their time. At the end of the pay period they send it to me and I review and enter their time into payroll. This is better, I feel than paper, but is still some work. timothy steele timothy.pct...@gmail.com timothy.pct...@gmail.comwrote: What we had at my last job ( I've seen them at staples ) they work with RFID cards evry time you tap Your card it automatically goes into QB I don't remember the brand but they do sell them at staples -- Sent from Mailbox https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox for iPhone On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Hass, Douglas A. d...@franczek.comwrote: Bob, Particularly if you do not have a supervisor who can sign off on time sheets each week, having a timeclock that can report to a central location is an absolute must. You still should have a supervisor reviewing the times each week and, ideally, having the employees sign off that they agree that the timesheet is correct. I am happy to talk to you about these issues off-list. Shoot me an email or give me a call. House for a timeclock, have you considered using something that would also be QuickBooks integrated? Here's one option among many: http://m.costco.com/Icon-Time-Systems-SB-100-PRO-Employee-Time-Clock.product.11264785.htmlhttp://m.costco.com/Icon-Time-Systems-SB-100-PRO-Employee-Time-Clock.product.11264785.html http://m.costco.com/Icon-Time-Systems-SB-100-PRO-Employee-Time-Clock.product.11264785.html Doug -- Original message -- From: Bob Moldashel Date: 3/31/2014 5:39 PM To: WISPA General List; Subject:[WISPA] OT Time Clocks... OK This is a little off topic as far as wireless goes but I am looking for a time clock to keep track of employee time. Presently we are on the honor system (and I don't have a problem with that...just too much manual labor for the bookkeeper) and they mark down their own time on a sheet. At the end of the pay period someone has to retrieve their time sheets, fax them to the office, and then add up the time, enter into Quickbooks and then print payroll. The crews turn out at a remote site that is not part of the main office. Its time to work smarter not harder. I am looking for a time clock that can be connected to the Internet at the warehouse and all time info will be accessible remotely. Anyone have any suggestions? Tnx -B- Douglas A. Hass Associate 312.786.6502 d...@franczek.com Franczek Radelet P.C. Celebrating 20 Years | 1994-2014 http://www.franczek.com/20thAnniversary/http://www.franczek.com/20thAnniversary/ 300 South Wacker Drive Suite 3400 Chicago, IL 60606 312.986.0300 - Main 312.986.9192 - Fax www.franczek.comhttp://www.franczek.com/ http://www.franczek.com/ Franczek Radelet is committed to sustainability - please consider the environment before printing this email Circular 230 Disclosure: Under requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that, unless specifically stated otherwise, any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter herein. For more information about Franczek Radelet P.C., please visit franczek.com. The information contained in this e-mail message or any attachment may be confidential and/or privileged, and is intended only for the use of the named recipient. If you are not the named recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org
Re: [WISPA] remote employee
One other to really think about how to make the distinction is this: Are you hiring an individual or a business? If you're paying an individual to do work for you, there's a good chance that they're NOT an independent contractor. If you're paying a business then they probably are. And to clarify: I don't mean adding a company name will resolve the issue. If the person you're hiring is setting up a *business* to answer support calls for you and for others, and is actively seeking other clients in addition to you, then that's an independent contractor. They should also provide all their own tools and so on. If the person is setting at home, answering calls only for you, has no intent to go out and add other clients, etc. etc. etc. then they're an employee, and need to be treated as such. Many states have a specific way that you can verify the independent contractor status. In Montana, it's very simple: Each worker has to be covered under a worker's compensation policy, or they have to get an Independent Contractor Exemption from the state. Both of these options have specific requirements. I.E. If you're covered by a work comp policy, then you're someone's employee and they should be paying employee taxes on you.If you're a independent contractor then you have to apply and be approved for the exemption. See http://erd.dli.mt.gov/workers-comp-regulations/montana-contractor/independent-contractor-central-unit/16-erd/montana-contractor/180-what-is-an-independent-contractor-exemption.html. -forrest On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Hass, Douglas A. d...@franczek.com wrote: To clarify, contractors *can* punch a time clock. There's no black and white rule against this. The key is WHY are they punching a time clock? For instance, there might be situations where you require the contractor to track hours so you can bill a customer or keep statistics on service calls or efficiency. That could be o.k. To be clear, though, *very few people qualify as independent contractors*. Speaking from my experience litigating and counseling employers on these cases, it is not uncommon for a worker whose contract has ended to apply for unemployment benefits or for an individual to seek worker's compensation benefits because of an injury incurred while on the contracting job. The state or local workforce agency will not consult you, your accountant or the IRS. Instead, the first question the intake clerk will ask the person is Where do you work? The clerk will look at wage reporting records and see no earning reported and that often leads to an investigation that does not end well. Audits are expensive. Fines are expensive. Back wages and punitive damages are expensive. Paying withholding taxes is cheap! Last year, one of my clients filed for bankruptcy and liquidated because all those contractors they were paying in their construction business started coming out of the woodwork asking for overtime, and unemployment benefits, and other damages. Please don't be a statistic! Doug Douglas A. Hass Associate 312.786.6502 d...@franczek.com Franczek Radelet P.C. * Celebrating 20 Years | * *1994-2014 * 300 South Wacker Drive Suite 3400 Chicago, IL 60606 312.986.0300 - Main 312.986.9192 - Fax www.franczek.com *Franczek Radelet is committed to sustainability - please consider the environment before printing this email * -- *Circular 230 Disclosure: Under requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that, unless specifically stated otherwise, any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter herein. * -- For more information about Franczek Radelet P.C., please visit franczek.com. The information contained in this e-mail message or any attachment may be confidential and/or privileged, and is intended only for the use of the named recipient. If you are not the named recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Justin Wilson *Sent:* Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:10 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] remote employee It's my understanding that contractors can't punch a time clock. Provided you have the legal stuff worked out have him use a ticket system which logs hours. If you don't have one fresh books is web
Re: [WISPA] remote employee
Directly on point for you: http://dlr.sd.gov/ui/publications/independent_vs_employee_fact_sheet.pdf South Dakota Codified Law 61-1-11 states to be considered an independent contractor, a worker must be both free from direction and control and have an independently established business. Since other state and federal agencies may have slightly different definitions of independent contractors, their criteria may not apply to South Dakota Unemployment Insurance. The courts have defined both portions of the South Dakota statute. The first portion of the statute concerns control. Although individuals may have freedom of action in the way work can be performed, control can still be exercised through other means such as written or verbal agreements or a contract. What really matters is who has the legal right to control the outcome of the work. The second portion of the statute concerns whether the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business. The word independently means a trade, occupation, profession, or business must be established independently of, and exist separately from, the services rendered to the alleged employer. The present tense is indicates the individual must be engaged in such independent activity at the time of rendering the service to the alleged employer. The linked .pdf has more information, and I'm sure state government will help you further... -forrest On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:39 AM, heith petersen wi...@mncomm.com wrote: So, we finally got our former local tech set up at his office at his new home 3 hours away. He has tunnel access into our net, access to billing and his VoIP phone tied to our switch to make and receive calls on our local lines, just like he did when he sat 10 feet from me. So next is to fine tune things. We dumped him as a regular employee and moved to contract labor with no benefits, basically bumped him to a level where his pay per hour covered what he received via benefits, like insurance and vacation. Makes it easier for the accountant as she just cuts a check and doesn't have to deduct taxes, however it now becomes his responsibility to claim wages and pay the taxes. What we are working on now is management. My boss wants him to log everything he does and pay from there, but to me that seems to be a lot of work. We have a web based time clock, but I already have issues with techs forgetting to clock in or clock out, I cant imagine it would be better having a guy clock out after every single support call. Our phone system can log time on the phone and where the calls went to, but of course a guy can be busy updating firmware and re-configuring equipment without being on the phone. The guy really only wants to clock 4 hours a day, but I need him available off an on during the day. He is unique and he could sit at home all day. I would almost just pay him 4 hours flat a day to sit and have him there and available, but the bosses want to pay him for only what he works, which I think puts more load on us deciphering logs to see what he actually worked. Anyways kind of a first for us, and maybe a last. Just wondering what others, if any, have done. I don't want to lose the guy because he takes care of a lot of stuff when I am gone and I don't have to train him. thanks heith ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Fw: FW:
This sure looks like a Verizon home fusion broadband cantenna.. I.E. verizon's fixed wireless LTE offering. Hope she enjoys her metered service. -forrest On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:43 PM, heith petersen wi...@mncomm.com wrote: I had a customer cancel our service a few weeks ago in a town an hour away from me. My billing lady got the impression that she was going to use her 4G service. She lives out of town a mile where we are the only WISP or service around, aside from satellite or cell service. Our equipment was laying by her house as she was away for the day when we were there, but stated that the new equipment was mounted in our old spot. So my tech took this picture and it said Cantenna on the bottom of it. Its not like the Cantenna I have seen in the past. I am real positive that I do not have another WISP in the area. Do some WISPS use these devices? The closest business is a John Deere dealership, and I am fairly certain their IT would not allow external usage of their network, and all of the houses in the area use our service. Anyways just curious if any one had any ideas of what they could be using this for. I have had other customers cheat WiFi from their neighbors with different Cantennas, but I would use a UBNT device to re-distribute the service, if that's whats going on thanks heith *From:* 6052801...@mms.att.net *Sent:* Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:32 PM *To:* he...@mncomm.com *Subject:* FW: ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700 frequencies?
I guess the point I was trying to make was that every one of those airgrids have been illegal to operate in 5.4 since day one. If you're unfortunate enough to get the FCC's attention you could be fined dearly for operating out of spec. A bit of history. The 5.4 frequency block used to be military and civilian radar only. As part of the conditions of us gaining access to the band the concept of DFS was created. The specific purpose of DFS was to protect the existing, licensed, and primary users of the band. All operations in 5.4 must use DFS to ensure that radios shut down instead of interfering with the existing, primary users. Without DFS we would have never been permitted in the band. As hardware came out which was capable of transmitting in the band some implemented DFS and was certified and legal to operate in 5.4. And some of it, like the airgrids, could transmit in the 5.4 band but were not legal to operate in those bands in the US. One of the primary users in the 5.4 band is TDWR. This detects micro bursts at airports where they're common. This is a public safety system run by the FAA. A couple of years ago the FAA started having interference caused by various unlicensed operations in this band. Several operators were fined and as fallout the frequencies used by TDWR were carved out of the band and cannot be used anywhere even in areas where TDWR isn't used. In addition the FCC started tightening down on equipment sold in the US and capable of operating in these bands. Which gets us to where we are now. UBNT and others are releasing firmware updates specifically designed to deny illegal operation. This includes removing compliance test mode. In theory legal operations should not be impacted, but operations which should never have been permitted in the first place will no longer be possible. In the bigger picture, illegal operations is a definite strike against our credibility when we either ask for more bands or defend the ones we already have, especially if there needs to be some sort of protection to existing users of the band. On Feb 14, 2014 2:17 PM, Art Stephens asteph...@ptera.com wrote: We have over 600 Airgrids deployed (Which did not get DFS approval but we are using the frequencies listed and DFS on the Rocket Sectors they connect to. I have been chasing jumping bunny rabbits (False Positives from competitors putting up new APs)) - cost to replace $6000 not including labor costs. And money grows on trees. All of our other equipment I have reprogrammed and updated to bring them up to legal. Same with Power Bridges - No DFS - So when the Nano beams came out 5.7-5.8 No DFS that triggered my question about the lower frequencies whether it seemed like they were going to be withdrawn and sold off to the highest bidder. It is all about the money after all. Are we the only ones that deployed so many Airgrids?. On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) li...@packetflux.com wrote: Yes but the lower ones require DFS and lower power and a certified radio. Your original message was complaining about the removal of compliance test mode. The specific purpose of compliance test mode is to permit a radio to operate outside of legal limits. For instance over the legal power limit or on DFS bands without DFS enabled or outside legal channels for that radio. UBNT has stated over and over that their intent was not to prevent any legal operation of their radio. I haven't heard of any instances where not having compliance mode has resulted in a meaningful impact to a legal operator. I hate to defend them but in this case it seems like they may have gotten it nearly correct. Is there a specific frequency and power you're using you think is legal but isn't permitted unless you turn on compliance test mode? On Feb 12, 2014 2:08 PM, Art Stephens asteph...@ptera.com wrote: 5265-5320 5500-5580 5660-5700 5735-5840 Are these not USA channels? If am wrong let me know and I will change them. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:04 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote: Forrest...what is your offlist email ? Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone - Reply message - From: Forrest Christian (List Account) li...@packetflux.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700 frequencies? Date: Sun, Feb 9, 2014 11:53 AM I'm going to agree with others... Running outside legal limits doesn't look good to the FCC, and it sounds like you are definitely running outside the limits since you are whining about the ability to run your radios in a mode which seems to have no use than to exceed the limits. I will also add that if you're running all your radios hotter than they should be that your nose floor problem is most likely self inflicted. My experience over the years is that radios are designed to run at a specific tx power
Re: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700 frequencies?
Yes but the lower ones require DFS and lower power and a certified radio. Your original message was complaining about the removal of compliance test mode. The specific purpose of compliance test mode is to permit a radio to operate outside of legal limits. For instance over the legal power limit or on DFS bands without DFS enabled or outside legal channels for that radio. UBNT has stated over and over that their intent was not to prevent any legal operation of their radio. I haven't heard of any instances where not having compliance mode has resulted in a meaningful impact to a legal operator. I hate to defend them but in this case it seems like they may have gotten it nearly correct. Is there a specific frequency and power you're using you think is legal but isn't permitted unless you turn on compliance test mode? On Feb 12, 2014 2:08 PM, Art Stephens asteph...@ptera.com wrote: 5265-5320 5500-5580 5660-5700 5735-5840 Are these not USA channels? If am wrong let me know and I will change them. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:04 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote: Forrest...what is your offlist email ? Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone - Reply message - From: Forrest Christian (List Account) li...@packetflux.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700 frequencies? Date: Sun, Feb 9, 2014 11:53 AM I'm going to agree with others... Running outside legal limits doesn't look good to the FCC, and it sounds like you are definitely running outside the limits since you are whining about the ability to run your radios in a mode which seems to have no use than to exceed the limits. I will also add that if you're running all your radios hotter than they should be that your nose floor problem is most likely self inflicted. My experience over the years is that radios are designed to run at a specific tx power and if you're exceeding it you get a lot of out of channel bleed over. Even if the radios don't do this you are introducing far more rf than is likely needed causing an overall rising of the noise floor. Please don't interpret everyone's ire incorrectly. We've just all either dealt with an operator like you are now or have been an operator like you are now. And right now we're trying to gain credibility with the FCC which is hard to do when some operators are flagrantly breaking the rules. Which makes us a bit grumpy. I'm sure some of your neighbors out there would love to help you better understand what you are doing to yourself and help you improve your operations which will in turn improve your quality of service. Heck, I'd drive over there for a weekend if my schedule wasn't so packed. In any case please ask for help in appropriate spots and let us help you reap the rewards of a correctly and legally operating network. On Feb 8, 2014 4:49 PM, Art Stephens asteph...@ptera.com wrote: Recent events make me wonder if the FCC is trying to muscle wisps out of these frequencies. Since we are primarily Ubiquiti equipment I can only speak from that platform. First the latest firmware update removes compliance test which for about 40% of our equipment deployed would render them unusable since 5735 - 5840 runs at - 50dBm or higher noise levels in our area, Second is new product released only supports 5735 - 5840. Seems like DFS is such a pain that manufacturers do not want to mess with it. Case in point the new NanoBeam M series only support 5725-5850 for USA. Worldwide version which we are not allowed to buy or deploy supports 5170-5875. Seems the only alternative is to go with licensed P2MP which makes more money for the FCC and drives the cost of wireless internet up for both wisps and consumers. -- Arthur Stephens Senior Networking Technician Ptera Inc. PO Box 135 24001 E Mission Suite 50 Liberty Lake, WA 99019 509-927-7837 ptera.com facebook.com/PteraInc | twitter.com/Ptera - This message may contain confidential and/or propriety information, and is intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally addressed. Any use by others is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company. ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- Arthur Stephens Senior Networking Technician Ptera Inc. PO Box 135 24001 E Mission Suite 50 Liberty Lake, WA 99019 509-927-7837 ptera.com facebook.com/PteraInc | twitter.com/Ptera
Re: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700 frequencies?
I'm going to agree with others... Running outside legal limits doesn't look good to the FCC, and it sounds like you are definitely running outside the limits since you are whining about the ability to run your radios in a mode which seems to have no use than to exceed the limits. I will also add that if you're running all your radios hotter than they should be that your nose floor problem is most likely self inflicted. My experience over the years is that radios are designed to run at a specific tx power and if you're exceeding it you get a lot of out of channel bleed over. Even if the radios don't do this you are introducing far more rf than is likely needed causing an overall rising of the noise floor. Please don't interpret everyone's ire incorrectly. We've just all either dealt with an operator like you are now or have been an operator like you are now. And right now we're trying to gain credibility with the FCC which is hard to do when some operators are flagrantly breaking the rules. Which makes us a bit grumpy. I'm sure some of your neighbors out there would love to help you better understand what you are doing to yourself and help you improve your operations which will in turn improve your quality of service. Heck, I'd drive over there for a weekend if my schedule wasn't so packed. In any case please ask for help in appropriate spots and let us help you reap the rewards of a correctly and legally operating network. On Feb 8, 2014 4:49 PM, Art Stephens asteph...@ptera.com wrote: Recent events make me wonder if the FCC is trying to muscle wisps out of these frequencies. Since we are primarily Ubiquiti equipment I can only speak from that platform. First the latest firmware update removes compliance test which for about 40% of our equipment deployed would render them unusable since 5735 - 5840 runs at - 50dBm or higher noise levels in our area, Second is new product released only supports 5735 - 5840. Seems like DFS is such a pain that manufacturers do not want to mess with it. Case in point the new NanoBeam M series only support 5725-5850 for USA. Worldwide version which we are not allowed to buy or deploy supports 5170-5875. Seems the only alternative is to go with licensed P2MP which makes more money for the FCC and drives the cost of wireless internet up for both wisps and consumers. -- Arthur Stephens Senior Networking Technician Ptera Inc. PO Box 135 24001 E Mission Suite 50 Liberty Lake, WA 99019 509-927-7837 ptera.com facebook.com/PteraInc | twitter.com/Ptera - This message may contain confidential and/or propriety information, and is intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally addressed. Any use by others is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company. ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Voltage regulator
Use a meanwell RSD series power supply. RSD-100B-24 takes from 16.8-31.2VDC in and converts it to a clean 24V out. The 100 means 100W. There are other wattages. (24V/4.8A is 100W, more than enough for 8-10 UBNT radios). B means '24v in'. There are other ranges, not all are available in all wattages. The RSD handles inrush better than the SD versions. There are din rail and wall mount brackets available for this power supply. -forrest On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:27 PM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote: ** I need a means to regulate the voltage coming out of the Solar Controller I need a constant 24 volts for Tranzeo and Ubiquiti radios. I now have between 25 and 29 volts. Any suggestions? NGL If you can read this Thank A Teacher. And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless inline: flag.gif___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Canopy Question
And interestingly, I remember changing channels a LOT back before the switch to Canopy. Not so much since. On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:43 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller par...@cyberbroadband.netwrote: ** no sir, it does not. - Original Message - *From:* Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com *To:* WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org *Sent:* Wednesday, June 05, 2013 10:39 PM *Subject:* [WISPA] Canopy Question Can anyone who's used Canopy on a regular basis answer a question or two for me? Does Canopy probe for interference on a regular basis... and if so, can it be programmed to jump to another frequency on its own? -- ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Portable Alternators?
The other option I've used is to use one of the tripplite online UPS'es which have a *Very wide* input frequency range. Because it's online, it will take the power from the gen, and then clean it up to the right frequency for the load. -forrest On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.comwrote: This is the third time in about two years that we've had some major power outages across our region due to the supplier lines going down. Every time the situation is the same, We roll out our portable generators to a few of our smaller sites that don't have full-time generators -- and every time we have to fight with them to get clean power out of them -- usually just ending up putting equipment directly on the generators and bypassing the UPS systems. I've seen the generators go everywhere from 40Hz to 90Hz. Has anyone come across a nice portable alternator (as opposed to a generator) that can be taken to tower sites as supplementary power? ~ Matt ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] This isn't UBNT support.
Personally, I'd like to see responses on these lists to be 'hey, this is more relevant over on the X list', where the topic IS appropriate for the X list. -forrest On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Elton Wilson el...@alohabroadband.netwrote: Can we also move all Mikrotik and Canopy related posts to their respective lists since I use neither? On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:11 PM, LTI - Dennis Burgess gmsm...@gmail.comwrote: Here here! Move it to the UBNT list! On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Victoria Proffer victo...@stlbroadband.com wrote: Sign me up to that list! =) ** ** Victoria Proffer President/CEO 314-974-5600 St. Louis Broadband, LLC www. StLouisBroadband.com http://www.stlbroadband.com/ ** ** *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Drew Lentz *Sent:* Friday, October 12, 2012 12:20 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Cc:* WISPA List *Subject:* [WISPA] This isn't UBNT support. ** ** At the risk of starting a flame war, I think UBNT needs its own list for WISPA. I love the conversation in here, but it seems that more and more this is turning into UBNT crowd-sourced support. I may be alone on this, but seriously. ** ** /just sayin ** ** -drew Sent from my iPhone On Oct 12, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Olufemi Adalemo adal...@gmail.com wrote: Need help, I'm looking to deploy a UBNT NSM5 powered by a 24v solar supply. Does anyone have experience with this? The data sheet shows that it requires a 24v supply however the POE injector supplied is 15v, do I need a DC to DC converter? ** ** Best regards, - - - *Olufemi Adalemo* M: +234-803-5610040 M: +234-809-8610040 f...@adalemo.com ** ** ** ** ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer** Author of Learn RouterOS- Second Edition http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/mikrotik%20book-2.htm” Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net – *Skype*: linktechs * **-- Create Wireless Coverage’s with *www.towercoverage.com* **–900Mhz – LTE – 3G – 3.65 – TV Whitespace **5-Day Advanced RouterOS Workshop -- July 23rd 2012 – St. Louis, MO, USAhttp://www.wlan1.com/RouterOS_Training_p/5d-stl-training-july2012.htm 5-Day Advanced RouterOS Workshop – Oct 8th 2012 – St. Louis, MO, USAhttp://www.wlan1.com/RouterOS_Training_p/5d-stl-training-oct2012.htm * ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Remote generator monitoring?
Sorry about the semi-promotional email here The PacketFlux Sitemonitor is perfect for this... if you want to go the cheap route, buy the base unit hook up one power supply to the grid before the generator, and one after. The more expensive route (which is what I've done where I have a generac with relay outputs) is to buy the base unit and enough switch in expansion units to monitor all the contacts. That way you not only get on gen warnings, but things like fuel low and gen fail. See http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=6 http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=6zenid=4ee336c3229697810bef03000a30ca60 for a list of the modules. Feel free to ask any questions. -forrest (aka forre...@packetflux.com) On 6/24/2011 10:30 AM, Troy Settle wrote: How does one typically monitor remote locations to know when/if they're running on generator? I'd like to know when a generator exorcises and when it's running due to a power outage. The easiest solution I can think of, is to stick an old routerboard at the site to run from the generator only, then monitor it to know when we're on genny power. This seems a little klunky though. Thanks, -- Troy Settle, Network Administrator The Wired Road Authority 1117 E. Stuart Dr. Galax, VA 24333 (276) 238-0049 (office) (276) 237-3890 (cell) tset...@thewiredroad.net WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Remote generator monitoring?
True, although I will say wiring alarm contacts off of a generator are about as simple as you can get. On 6/24/2011 3:39 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: The PacketFlux Sitemonitor is perfect for this... if you want to go the cheap route, buy the base unit hook up one power supply to the grid before the generator, and one after. I suggest this way. Easier and cheaper. I am also a wimp when it comes to the complicated relays and such, so take that for what it's worth. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Forrest Christian f...@mt.net mailto:f...@mt.net wrote: Sorry about the semi-promotional email here The PacketFlux Sitemonitor is perfect for this... if you want to go the cheap route, buy the base unit hook up one power supply to the grid before the generator, and one after. The more expensive route (which is what I've done where I have a generac with relay outputs) is to buy the base unit and enough switch in expansion units to monitor all the contacts. That way you not only get on gen warnings, but things like fuel low and gen fail. See http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=6 http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=6zenid=4ee336c3229697810bef03000a30ca60 for a list of the modules. Feel free to ask any questions. -forrest (aka forre...@packetflux.com mailto:forre...@packetflux.com) On 6/24/2011 10:30 AM, Troy Settle wrote: How does one typically monitor remote locations to know when/if they’re running on generator? I’d like to know when a generator exorcises and when it’s running due to a power outage. The easiest solution I can think of, is to stick an old routerboard at the site to run from the generator only, then monitor it to know when we’re on genny power. This seems a little klunky though. Thanks, -- Troy Settle, Network Administrator The Wired Road Authority 1117 E. Stuart Dr. Galax, VA 24333 (276) 238-0049 tel:%28276%29%20238-0049 (office) (276) 237-3890 tel:%28276%29%20237-3890 (cell) tset...@thewiredroad.net mailto:tset...@thewiredroad.net WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Remote generator monitoring?
I can probably arrange for pictures But in reality, it's pretty simple to explain: Get one of these: http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=product_infocPath=6products_id=23 http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=product_infocPath=6products_id=23 If you'll note there are 6 inputs, each labeled 'SWx' and 'COM', where the x is replaced with an input number. Basically you connect this module to the base unit, then for each relay contact you want to monitor you connect the SWx to one side of the relay contact, and a COM to the other side. Basically all a relay contact is is a electrically controlled switch closure. The additional I/O will appear on the boolean tab on the sitemonitor manager, and can be monitored via SNMP. In our case, we're also monitoring the alarms on things like the datacenter cooling systems and the fire alarm panel, etc. -forrest On 6/24/2011 4:49 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: I have not done it so I am in the dark. Perhaps a picture or page of documentation on the additional module you used? On Jun 24, 2011 6:46 PM, Forrest Christian f...@mt.net mailto:f...@mt.net wrote: True, although I will say wiring alarm contacts off of a generator are about as simple as you can get. On 6/24/2011 3:39 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: The PacketFlux Sitemonitor is perfect for this... if you want to go the cheap route, buy the base unit hook up one power supply to the grid before the generator, and one after. I suggest this way. Easier and cheaper. I am also a wimp when it comes to the complicated relays and such, so take that for what it's worth. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Forrest Christian f...@mt.net mailto:f...@mt.net mailto:f...@mt.net mailto:f...@mt.net wrote: Sorry about the semi-promotional email here The PacketFlux Sitemonitor is perfect for this... if you want to go the cheap route, buy the base unit hook up one power supply to the grid before the generator, and one after. The more expensive route (which is what I've done where I have a generac with relay outputs) is to buy the base unit and enough switch in expansion units to monitor all the contacts. That way you not only get on gen warnings, but things like fuel low and gen fail. See http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=6 http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=6 http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=6zenid=4ee336c3229697810bef03000a30ca60 http://www.packetflux.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=6zenid=4ee336c3229697810bef03000a30ca60 for a list of the modules. Feel free to ask any questions. -forrest (aka forre...@packetflux.com mailto:forre...@packetflux.com mailto:forre...@packetflux.com mailto:forre...@packetflux.com) On 6/24/2011 10:30 AM, Troy Settle wrote: How does one typically monitor remote locations to know when/if they’re running on generator? I’d like to know when a generator exorcises and when it’s running due to a power outage. The easiest solution I can think of, is to stick an old routerboard at the site to run from the generator only, then monitor it to know when we’re on genny power. This seems a little klunky though. Thanks, -- Troy Settle, Network Administrator The Wired Road Authority 1117 E. Stuart Dr. Galax, VA 24333 (276) 238-0049 tel:%28276%29%20238-0049 (office) (276) 237-3890 tel:%28276%29%20237-3890 (cell) tset...@thewiredroad.net mailto:tset...@thewiredroad.net mailto:tset...@thewiredroad.net mailto:tset...@thewiredroad.net WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Service in Idaho
Speedyquick John Silva 357 E. Watertower St. Meridian, Idaho 83642 United States Telephone Number: 208-344-3837 Tell them Forrest from PacketFlux sent you On 6/22/2011 1:18 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote: 405 Quail Cove Dr. Fruitland ,ID 83619 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Staff Apparel
Cabelas evidentally does this also, although I haven't tried it out yet... http://corporateoutfitter.cabelas.com On 5/18/2011 7:03 PM, RickG wrote: www.queensboro.com http://www.queensboro.com On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com mailto:ch...@shelbybb.com wrote: Cintas works for us. Shirts are inepensive and logo is only $4 per shirt and a $50 setup fee. Shirt prices range from $9-$50. Regards, Chuck On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:03 PM, ralphli...@bsrg.org mailto:ralphli...@bsrg.org wrote: That is what we do, as well From: Cameron Crum [mailto:cc...@wispmon.com mailto:cc...@wispmon.com] To: WISPA General List [mailto:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org] Sent: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:09:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Staff Apparel Or go buy all the shirts and take them to an embroidery place. I got a bunch of the same brand/style in the sizes and colors I needed at Costco and had one of my customers who had an amazing computer controlled embroidery machine put our logo on them. They turned out great! Cameron On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:05 PM, David E. Smith d...@mvn.net mailto:d...@mvn.net wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 13:54, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com mailto:st...@pcswin.com wrote: I have found this to be an issue. All the retail shops want to do a min or 12 like shirts. Basically I have 4 staff that are everywhere from size small to 4X with me doing different names and different colors and different sizes I doubt that I have more than 2 shirts the same. You'll probably have better luck finding a small local outfit to do this, precisely because the big companies usually have large minimum orders. If you do want to do it all online, try customink.com http://customink.com. Can't vouch for their embroidery, but I've ordered hundreds of screen-printed T-shirts through them with no problems. Their Web site they have a minimum embroidery order of just 6 shirts, and you can mix-and-match. David Smith MVN.net WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- -RickG WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/