...@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 2:08 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Network Redesign
We are in the process of redesigning our entire network from our
upstream all the way to the customer.
Currently everything is bridged and on the same physical network.
Obviously we are wanting to change
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com
wrote:
Hi Alan,
We're in the process of doing this too.
We're going to run a bridged backbone (mostly) with routing AP's. Mikrotik
in our case.
For IP space we went to ARIN and got our own (two upstreams on opposite
One way to conserve IP space is to route a subnet to each tower rather
than each AP. Have every AP plugged into a switch at the tower, and then
into a router before it leaves that tower. That way you can use up the
entire subnet before adding another. ;)
Travis
Microserv
Alan Bryant wrote:
Would you leave the AP in bridge mode and let the tower router take
care of the routing?
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
One way to conserve IP space is to route a subnet to each tower rather
than each AP. Have every AP plugged into a switch at the tower,
Yes.
Travis
RickG wrote:
Would you leave the AP in bridge mode and let the tower router take
care of the routing?
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
One way to conserve IP space is to route a subnet to each tower rather
than each AP. Have every AP
We use 10./8 for the network. Then, route single publics out to the
end points (yes, the 10's show up in public trace routes and time out,
shoot me!) PPPoE would take care of that and was the plan to move to.
MT has not implemented pppoe forwarding as
yet, so we have a choice of having many
We are in the process of redesigning our entire network from our
upstream all the way to the customer.
Currently everything is bridged and on the same physical network.
Obviously we are wanting to change this for many reasons. Subnetting
it out on the private side isn't a problem, but the public
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 6/25/2010 2:08 PM, Alan Bryant wrote:
We are in the process of redesigning our entire network from our
upstream all the way to the customer.
Currently everything is bridged and on the same physical network.
I'm not quite understanding.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Bradley D. Thornton
brad...@northtech.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Currently everything is bridged and on the same physical network.
I'm not quite understanding.
That's not the most efficient -
I realize it is not the most
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Alan Bryant
a...@gtekcommunications.com wrote:
As public IP addresses are limited and at times hard to come by, we
are trying to use them as efficiently as possbile, however, we
basically have a /24, 2 /22's, and a /23 allocated to us right now. I
have decided
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 16:08 -0500, Alan Bryant wrote:
We are leaning towards having routeros based routers at every tower
and subnetting all the way to the AP's. We don't have enough public
IP's to allow enough room for much growth. My main question is, what
is the best course of action once
11 matches
Mail list logo
