I apologize, but WT% !?!? What and where is the documentation about this change
to USF, the plan to put WISP's out of business once and for all. Who in their
right mind would be in or start a WISP, when it's crazy enough already ?
May as well fine Gilbert for calling Lebron James names when he
At 7/13/2010 09:17 AM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
I apologize, but WT% !?!? What and where is the documentation about
this change to USF, the plan to put WISP's out of business once and
for all. Who in their right mind would be in or start a WISP, when
it's crazy enough already ?
The problem with
...@hostmedic.com
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 8:39 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
That was my question.
I would love to find a way to get $300K to build a number of towers
around - and then a few thousand per subscriber per
And chicks for free?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of MDK
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:15 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
If you did, how would you
But, then you'd be in dire straights!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:17 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
And chicks
: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
And chicks for free?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of MDK
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:15 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco
On 13 July 2010 11:18, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
But, then you'd be in dire straights!
But you would have one hell of a Telegraph Road to show for it though!
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
That was my question.
I would love to find a way to get $300K to build a number of towers
around - and then a few thousand per subscriber per year to give them VOIP
and Internet...
- but then again I guess we all would
Something however for us to use
, July 12, 2010 8:39 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
That was my question.
I would love to find a way to get $300K to build a number of towers
around - and then a few thousand per subscriber per year to give them
++
--
From: Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 8:39 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
That was my question.
I would love
List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
You beat me to it Mark. In the end, history will show that the free
government money attitude is what was at the root of our country's
downfall. Most WISP's are built on independance. We should fight
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
I dunno what it is about my personality, but I really, REALLY hate
collecting money.I hate asking for it.I hate setting prices.
I always look at it as if I were the customer, and what would things be like
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
I dunno what it is about my personality, but I really, REALLY hate
collecting money.I hate asking for it.I hate setting prices.
I always look at it as if I were the customer, and what would
things be like
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 15:50, MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
I always look at it as if I were the customer, and what would things be
like
if it were ME paying the bill.Maybe that's the wrong attitude, because
honestly, it tends to make me undercharge.Objectively, you have to
++
--
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:52 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
You beat me to it Mark. In the end, history will show that the free
, 2010 8:52 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
You beat me to it Mark. In the end, history will show that the free
government money attitude is what was at the root of our country's
downfall. Most WISP's are built
-8200 509-386-4589
++
--
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:52 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
You beat me
Yeah - Imagine that.$17,763 per line!I wish I had their grant writer on
staff !
Via:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/07/rural-telco-serves-17-people-rakes-in-300k-of-your-money.ars
ATT was insanely profitable in 2009, with $34.4 billion in revenue and $12.5
billion
Your World - Delivered!
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
Yeah - Imagine that. $17,763 per line! I wish I had their grant writer
on staff !
Via:
So how can WISPs get a share of the USF funds that will be redirected
to broadband? Noodle me that...
Glenn Kelley wrote:
Yeah - Imagine that. $17,763 per
line! I wish I had their grant writer on staff !
Via:
That was my question.
I would love to find a way to get $300K to build a number of towers around -
and then a few thousand per subscriber per year to give them VOIP and
Internet...
- but then again I guess we all would
Something however for us to use perhaps as Fodder to show why we should
Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Glenn Kelley
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 11:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rural Telco in Washington Gets $17,763 per line
That was my question.
I would love to find a way to get $300K
At 7/13/2010 12:31 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
That's a double edged sword... You don't pay into USF currently as
WISP's are not classified as such. Then if we are, we'd have a hard
time at it, but we'd be eligible for those funds.
Try again, Chuck.
The pending FCC proposal is a bit worse, where bit
23 matches
Mail list logo
