RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]

2006-08-09 Thread Mac Dearman
I could take offense pretty easy at most of your comments - - so I will just
choose to NOT make any comments at all :)



Regards from deep in rural Louisiana,

Mac Dearman
Maximum Access, LLC
Rayville, La.
www.inetsouth.com
www.mac-tel.us  (VoIP Sales)
www.radioresponse.org (Katrina Relief)
318.728.8600
318.728.9600
318.303.4181
318.303.4182




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Sovereen
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 8:58 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill
toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]

Since when do the people on this list support taxation, waste, and
government subsidies?  Why should the burden of providing high-speed
Internet to people in underserved (typically rural) areas fall on the
shoulders of taxpayers?  I don't want my taxes to pay to expand your network
or for Joe User to get your service.

If people want services, they should live in a city.  If they want to live
in rural areas, they should do so with the understanding that services
(water, sewer, EMS, schools, cable, high-speed Internet, just about anything
and everything) are harder to come by and sometimes more expensive.  No one
makes people live in the country.  People choose to on their own, and they
should take responsibility for the costs and/or lack of services associated
with that decision.

Just my own 2 cents.

Dave

989-837-3790 x 151
989-837-3780 fax

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mercury.net

129 Ashman St, Midland, MI  48640
- Original Message - 
From: Chadd Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:36 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill
toencouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]


 IMO they need to start giving money to the end users to pay for hookup and
 installation. Stop paying to expand WISP's networks and give the money
where
 it is needed, if you want a bigger network pay for it out of your own
 pocket. In IL I doubt you could drive from Chicago to St.Louis and not be
 able to hook up to a WISP.


 Give money to the people who need to put up a 45ft tower to get access.

 Thanks,
 Chadd

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick
  Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:54 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill to
  encouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]
 
 
  Don't forget the 3rd great lie...I'm from the government and I'm
  here to help
  you
 
  :-)
 
 
  Jeff Broadwick
  ImageStream
  800-813-5123 x106

 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/411 - Release Date: 8/7/2006

 -- 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]

2006-08-09 Thread Tom DeReggi

Farmers do not have the abilty to live in the city.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: David Sovereen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill 
toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]




Since when do the people on this list support taxation, waste, and
government subsidies?  Why should the burden of providing high-speed
Internet to people in underserved (typically rural) areas fall on the
shoulders of taxpayers?  I don't want my taxes to pay to expand your 
network

or for Joe User to get your service.

If people want services, they should live in a city.  If they want to live
in rural areas, they should do so with the understanding that services
(water, sewer, EMS, schools, cable, high-speed Internet, just about 
anything
and everything) are harder to come by and sometimes more expensive.  No 
one

makes people live in the country.  People choose to on their own, and they
should take responsibility for the costs and/or lack of services 
associated

with that decision.

Just my own 2 cents.

Dave

989-837-3790 x 151
989-837-3780 fax

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mercury.net

129 Ashman St, Midland, MI  48640
- Original Message - 
From: Chadd Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:36 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill
toencouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]


IMO they need to start giving money to the end users to pay for hookup 
and

installation. Stop paying to expand WISP's networks and give the money

where

it is needed, if you want a bigger network pay for it out of your own
pocket. In IL I doubt you could drive from Chicago to St.Louis and not be
able to hook up to a WISP.


Give money to the people who need to put up a 45ft tower to get access.

Thanks,
Chadd

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick
 Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:54 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill to
 encouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]


 Don't forget the 3rd great lie...I'm from the government and I'm
 here to help
 you

 :-)


 Jeff Broadwick
 ImageStream
 800-813-5123 x106

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/411 - Release Date: 8/7/2006

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.8/414 - Release Date: 8/9/2006




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]

2006-08-09 Thread chris cooper









America wants cheap food. Period. In the past, cattle took better than 30
months to reach slaughter weight on grass. Under current industrialized agricultural
methods cattle can go from birth to the meat case in less than 12 months.
Its very similar for chickens, hogs or any other common form of protein we
consume on a daily basis. All this requires cheap grain, which in turn is
produced with assistance of govt. subsidization. In the past, meat was
often a luxury meal for most Americans. Now we all get to eat it nearly
every day. Most of my neighbors farm. I dont know one of them that would
be taking subsidies just to screw the American taxpayer. Farmers usually
just end up being a small cog in the great wheel of food production. So,
if you dont like the system, dont participate. Buy all your
food from a local producer and pay the actual price of production+profit. Dont
patronize Safeway, or Walmart or Kroger etc.- otherwise you are
implicitly participating in the system. Its a much more
complicated issue than just paying farmers not to produce.



Chris



-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006
11:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin
introduces bill toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]



Yes, I totally DISAGREE
with the government paying people to NOT grow crops. What ever happened to
supply and demand? I thought that was lesson #1 in Economics.

Travis
Microserv

Cliff Leboeuf wrote: 

So David,I guess it is fair for me to assume that you don't agree the the governmentpaying some NOT to grow wheat or NOT to raise pigs so that those that DO cansurvive on a reasonable profit margin and not be flooded by over productioncreating too much product for not enough demand...?:)On 8/9/06 8:57 AM, David Sovereen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

Since when do the people on this list support taxation, waste, andgovernment subsidies? Why should the burden of providing high-speedInternet to people in underserved (typically rural) areas fall on theshoulders of taxpayers? I don't want my taxes to pay to expand your networkor for Joe User to get your service.If people want services, they should live in a city. If they want to livein rural areas, they should do so with the understanding that services(water, sewer, EMS, schools, cable, high-speed Internet, just about anythingand everything) are harder to come by and sometimes more expensive. No onemakes people live in the country. People choose to on their own, and theyshould take responsibility for the costs and/or lack of services associatedwith that decision.Just my own 2 cents.Dave989-837-3790 x 151989-837-3780 fax[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.mercury.net129 Ashman St, Midland, MI 48640- Original Message -From: Chadd Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.orgSent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:36 PMSubject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces billtoencouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas] 

IMO they need to start giving money to the end users to pay for hookup andinstallation. Stop paying to expand WISP's networks and give the money 

where 

it is needed, if you want a bigger network pay for it out of your ownpocket. In IL I doubt you could drive from Chicago to St.Louis and not beable to hook up to a WISP.Give money to the people who need to put up a 45ft tower to get access.Thanks,Chadd 

-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff BroadwickSent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:54 PMTo: 'WISPA General List'Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill toencouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]Don't forget the 3rd great lie...I'm from the government and I'mhere to helpyou:-)Jeff BroadwickImageStream800-813-5123 x106 

--No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/411 - Release Date: 8/7/2006-- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.orgSubscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wirelessArchives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 



 




-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]

2006-08-09 Thread Tom DeReggi
I personally beleive it should be the local cities taking the loans from the 
federal governement, so they can distribute grants to local providers.
Payback justified by increased local taxes (paid by users of the service) as 
they become more productive as economic development grows.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: David Sovereen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill 
toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]




Since when do the people on this list support taxation, waste, and
government subsidies?  Why should the burden of providing high-speed
Internet to people in underserved (typically rural) areas fall on the
shoulders of taxpayers?  I don't want my taxes to pay to expand your 
network

or for Joe User to get your service.

If people want services, they should live in a city.  If they want to live
in rural areas, they should do so with the understanding that services
(water, sewer, EMS, schools, cable, high-speed Internet, just about 
anything
and everything) are harder to come by and sometimes more expensive.  No 
one

makes people live in the country.  People choose to on their own, and they
should take responsibility for the costs and/or lack of services 
associated

with that decision.

Just my own 2 cents.

Dave

989-837-3790 x 151
989-837-3780 fax

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mercury.net

129 Ashman St, Midland, MI  48640
- Original Message - 
From: Chadd Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:36 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill
toencouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]


IMO they need to start giving money to the end users to pay for hookup 
and

installation. Stop paying to expand WISP's networks and give the money

where

it is needed, if you want a bigger network pay for it out of your own
pocket. In IL I doubt you could drive from Chicago to St.Louis and not be
able to hook up to a WISP.


Give money to the people who need to put up a 45ft tower to get access.

Thanks,
Chadd

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick
 Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:54 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill to
 encouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]


 Don't forget the 3rd great lie...I'm from the government and I'm
 here to help
 you

 :-)


 Jeff Broadwick
 ImageStream
 800-813-5123 x106

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/411 - Release Date: 8/7/2006

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.8/414 - Release Date: 8/9/2006




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]

2006-08-09 Thread Travis Johnson




Hi,

I live in a farming community. I drive to many of our towers thru what
was once farmland (wheat, grain, etc.) and it now just weeds... yet the
farmers still collect each year from the government for owning a piece
of ground that they don't farm. 

I want to collect a yearly check from the government for every tower
that I did NOT install because it would drive the price down too low. :)

Travis
Microserv

chris cooper wrote:

  
  
  
  
  America wants cheap
food. Period. In the past, cattle took better than 30
months to reach slaughter weight on grass. Under current
industrialized agricultural
methods cattle can go from birth to the meat case in less than 12
months.
Its very similar for chickens, hogs or any other common form of protein
we
consume on a daily basis. All this requires cheap grain, which in turn
is
produced with assistance of govt. subsidization. In the past, meat was
often a luxury meal for most Americans. Now we all get to eat it
nearly
every day. Most of my neighbors farm. I dont know one of them that
would
be taking subsidies just to screw the American taxpayer. Farmers
usually
just end up being a small cog in the great wheel of food production.
So,
if you dont like the system, dont participate. Buy all your
food from a local producer and pay the actual price of
production+profit. Dont
patronize Safeway, or Walmart or Kroger etc.- otherwise you are
implicitly participating in the system. Its a much more
complicated issue than just paying farmers not to produce.
  
  Chris
  
  -Original
Message-
  From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf
Of Travis Johnson
  Sent: Wednesday,
August 09, 2006
11:37 AM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA]
[Fwd: Durbin
introduces bill toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]
  
  Yes, I
totally DISAGREE
with the government paying people to NOT grow crops. What ever happened
to
supply and demand? I thought that was lesson #1 in Economics.
  
Travis
Microserv
  
Cliff Leboeuf wrote: 
  So David,
  
  I guess it is fair for me to assume that you don't agree the the government
  paying some NOT to grow wheat or NOT to raise pigs so that those that DO can
  survive on a reasonable profit margin and not be flooded by over production
  creating too much product for not enough demand...?
  
  :)
  
  
  On 8/9/06 8:57 AM, "David Sovereen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   
  
Since when do the people on this list support taxation, waste, and
government subsidies? Why should the burden of providing high-speed
Internet to people in underserved (typically rural) areas fall on the
shoulders of taxpayers? I don't want my taxes to pay to expand your network
or for Joe User to get your service.

If people want services, they should live in a city. If they want to live
in rural areas, they should do so with the understanding that services
(water, sewer, EMS, schools, cable, high-speed Internet, just about anything
and everything) are harder to come by and sometimes more expensive. No one
makes people live in the country. People choose to on their own, and they
should take responsibility for the costs and/or lack of services associated
with that decision.

Just my own 2 cents.

Dave

989-837-3790 x 151
989-837-3780 fax

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mercury.net

129 Ashman St, Midland, MI 48640
- Original Message -
From: "Chadd Thompson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:36 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill
toencouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]


 

  IMO they need to start giving money to the end users to pay for hookup and
  installation. Stop paying to expand WISP's networks and give the money
   

where
 

  it is needed, if you want a bigger network pay for it out of your own
  pocket. In IL I doubt you could drive from Chicago to St.Louis and not be
  able to hook up to a WISP.
  
  
  Give money to the people who need to put up a 45ft tower to get access.
  
  Thanks,
  Chadd
  
   
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:54 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill to
encouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]


Don't forget the 3rd great lie..."I'm from the government and I'm
here to help
you"

:-)


Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106
 
  
  --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.394 

RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]

2006-08-09 Thread Jonathan Schmidt
Scriv,
I agree with you now.  It feels right.

But, this country has risen to the occasion, during different parts of its
growth, to make spectacularly prescient moves...the TVA, rural
provisioning of telephony, and the Interstate highways notwithstanding.

It has also made very dumb decisions...too many to list.

We only need to be very diligent to assure ourselves that this move is
or isn't one of the dumb ones.  I don't want to be a neo-Luddite, either.
Luxemburg isn't our only global competition.

. . . j o n a t h a n



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 3:33 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill
toencouragehighspeedinternetaccess in rural areas]


Let me be clear. I would rather the government stay out of broadband
altogether. I honestly mean that. I think it is a shame that our
government gets involved in as many things involving broadband as they
do. The trouble is that they will not stay out of our business. So the
next thing we have to decide is whether we just let them blindly
regulate, tax and screw up the system or if we take an active role in
making the system work for us if it is going to be working for someone.
I hope that makes sense. It is honestly how I feel and is why I am as
active in state and federal level issues as I am.  Think of it this way,
there will be grants for broadband over the next year, would you like it
or would you rather other people get it? Somebody will be getting that
money.

Most of my efforts have to do with providing tax breaks and other
incentives to smaller broadband companies to offer service in harder to
reach areas. I am also part of a few public / private partnering groups
who are trying to improve economic opportunity in our region by using
broadband as a catalyst. Maybe it will work or maybe it will not. The
one thing I can tell you though is that we are not creating new taxes.
We are using existing programs and our own money to try to make the
outlook for broadband and our economy better in our region (Southern
Illinois).
Scriv



David Sovereen wrote:

Since when do the people on this list support taxation, waste, and
government subsidies?  Why should the burden of providing high-speed
Internet to people in underserved (typically rural) areas fall on the
shoulders of taxpayers?  I don't want my taxes to pay to expand your
network
or for Joe User to get your service.

If people want services, they should live in a city.  If they want to live
in rural areas, they should do so with the understanding that services
(water, sewer, EMS, schools, cable, high-speed Internet, just about
anything
and everything) are harder to come by and sometimes more expensive.  No one
makes people live in the country.  People choose to on their own, and they
should take responsibility for the costs and/or lack of services associated
with that decision.

Just my own 2 cents.

Dave

989-837-3790 x 151
989-837-3780 fax

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mercury.net

129 Ashman St, Midland, MI  48640
- Original Message -
From: Chadd Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:36 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill
toencouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]




IMO they need to start giving money to the end users to pay for hookup and
installation. Stop paying to expand WISP's networks and give the money


where


it is needed, if you want a bigger network pay for it out of your own
pocket. In IL I doubt you could drive from Chicago to St.Louis and not be
able to hook up to a WISP.


Give money to the people who need to put up a 45ft tower to get access.

Thanks,
Chadd



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:54 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] [Fwd: Durbin introduces bill to
encouragehighspeedinternet access in rural areas]


Don't forget the 3rd great lie...I'm from the government and I'm
here to help
you

:-)


Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/411 - Release Date: 8/7/2006

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/