Re: [WISPA] Tower standoff or not question

2009-08-03 Thread lakeland
A good reason to mount your antennas on standoffs is so guys like me don't have 
to climb around them.

:-)

-B-
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: "Tom DeReggi" 

Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 23:34:13 
To: ; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower standoff  or not question


My understanding was that an electrical field of about 10" wide from the 
tower leg, was likely to flow down it, if ever hit.
One purpose of offsetting the antenna greater than 1ft out was to solve 
that.  As well as purposes to increase seperation between antennas at same 
horizontal plain, as well as avoid tower leg if an Omni.

Although, we have mounted almost all our antennas to the tower legs just 
fine, with no problems.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "Scott Carullo" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 11:10 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Tower standoff or not question


>
> New commercial tower we will be setting up gear on, about 325ft up on a
> 400ft tower.
>
>>From a lightning perspective does it matter whether you install on the
> tower legs themselves or on say 2-3ft standoffs?
>
> We were asked to reduce weight and just install on the legs (the gear can
> attach no problem).  I'd just like to know if there are any unforeseen
> electrical consequences.  Thanks.
>
> Scott Carullo
> Brevard Wireless
> 321-205-1100 x102
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tower standoff or not question

2009-08-02 Thread RickG
Perhaps a larger problem is having the copper cable run down the leg.
I had a tower with a 10' standoff and the ethernet ports were
routinely fried - with lightning protection. I put a switch on to take
the hits until getting fiber run up the leg whcih cured the issue. At
the same time, I moved the equipment off the stand off and onto the
leg but never had an issue. -RickG

On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
> My understanding was that an electrical field of about 10" wide from the
> tower leg, was likely to flow down it, if ever hit.
> One purpose of offsetting the antenna greater than 1ft out was to solve
> that.  As well as purposes to increase seperation between antennas at same
> horizontal plain, as well as avoid tower leg if an Omni.
>
> Although, we have mounted almost all our antennas to the tower legs just
> fine, with no problems.
>
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Carullo" 
> To: 
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 11:10 PM
> Subject: [WISPA] Tower standoff or not question
>
>
>>
>> New commercial tower we will be setting up gear on, about 325ft up on a
>> 400ft tower.
>>
>>>From a lightning perspective does it matter whether you install on the
>> tower legs themselves or on say 2-3ft standoffs?
>>
>> We were asked to reduce weight and just install on the legs (the gear can
>> attach no problem).  I'd just like to know if there are any unforeseen
>> electrical consequences.  Thanks.
>>
>> Scott Carullo
>> Brevard Wireless
>> 321-205-1100 x102
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tower standoff or not question

2009-08-02 Thread Tom DeReggi
My understanding was that an electrical field of about 10" wide from the 
tower leg, was likely to flow down it, if ever hit.
One purpose of offsetting the antenna greater than 1ft out was to solve 
that.  As well as purposes to increase seperation between antennas at same 
horizontal plain, as well as avoid tower leg if an Omni.

Although, we have mounted almost all our antennas to the tower legs just 
fine, with no problems.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "Scott Carullo" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 11:10 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Tower standoff or not question


>
> New commercial tower we will be setting up gear on, about 325ft up on a
> 400ft tower.
>
>>From a lightning perspective does it matter whether you install on the
> tower legs themselves or on say 2-3ft standoffs?
>
> We were asked to reduce weight and just install on the legs (the gear can
> attach no problem).  I'd just like to know if there are any unforeseen
> electrical consequences.  Thanks.
>
> Scott Carullo
> Brevard Wireless
> 321-205-1100 x102
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tower standoff

2007-05-22 Thread Bob Moldashel

Brings a new meaning to the phrase  "Workin' like a dog"

That could be any WISP owner

:-)





Mac Dearman wrote:

Behalf Of Smith, Rick

 
  

THAT'S why mine was so hard to do.  I didn't
have the dog :)

Thanks for that, Mac, it's pretty close to what we do..





[Mac says:] 



 WHAT DOG? 


That pic was taken by an OIB employee and that is how Harish's employee's
see him - - That is RICK!  :-)

Mac


 

  



--
Bob Moldashel
Lakeland Communications, Inc.
Broadband Deployment Group
1350 Lincoln Avenue
Holbrook, New York 11741 USA
800-479-9195 Toll Free US & Canada
631-585-5558 Fax
516-551-1131 Cell

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

2007-05-22 Thread Mac Dearman

> Behalf Of Smith, Rick
 
> THAT'S why mine was so hard to do.  I didn't
> have the dog :)
> 
> Thanks for that, Mac, it's pretty close to what we do..
> 
> 

[Mac says:] 


 WHAT DOG? 

That pic was taken by an OIB employee and that is how Harish's employee's
see him - - That is RICK!  :-)

Mac


 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

2007-05-22 Thread Smith, Rick
THAT'S why mine was so hard to do.  I didn't
have the dog :)

Thanks for that, Mac, it's pretty close to what we do..


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 6:08 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff


> Behalf Of Rick Harnish
> 
> Here are a few pics of what Mac is trying to describe.
> 
> Rick Harnish
> President
> OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc.
> 260-827-2482
> Founding Member of WISPA
> 

[Mac says:] 

That is exactly what I was trying to say and that is some excellent pics
Harnish - Thanks! The old adage "a picture is worth a thousand words"
absolutely holds true.

Delp - Thanks again for the Katrina Tower climbing/rigging class you
held
here. It has been invaluable to me many times. This is just one example
of
how peers and friends in the industry can trade knowledge and benefit
one
another. Too bad it took a hurricane to get us together :-(

Hey Delp - you ready to lets go fight some more Parrots at 130'? I swear
I
didn't know them suckers were big as Turkeys! They might be good in a
Gumbo!


OFF TO ISPCON NOW!!

 (Larsen - you better be at the airport bar when I get there)

Later,

Mac

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

2007-05-22 Thread Mac Dearman

> Behalf Of Rick Harnish
> 
> Here are a few pics of what Mac is trying to describe.
> 
> Rick Harnish
> President
> OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc.
> 260-827-2482
> Founding Member of WISPA
> 

[Mac says:] 

That is exactly what I was trying to say and that is some excellent pics
Harnish - Thanks! The old adage "a picture is worth a thousand words"
absolutely holds true.

Delp - Thanks again for the Katrina Tower climbing/rigging class you held
here. It has been invaluable to me many times. This is just one example of
how peers and friends in the industry can trade knowledge and benefit one
another. Too bad it took a hurricane to get us together :-(

Hey Delp - you ready to lets go fight some more Parrots at 130'? I swear I
didn't know them suckers were big as Turkeys! They might be good in a Gumbo!


OFF TO ISPCON NOW!!

 (Larsen - you better be at the airport bar when I get there)

Later,

Mac

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

2007-05-21 Thread Mike Delp
I'm glad you remembered the ground crew class at Camp Shagnasty during
Katrina, and also how it worked in Florida after Wilma.  I still have to
remind my tower crews about this simple operation.

Mike

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:48 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff


  Well - - I guess I will respond on list then ;-)


It has been out experience in dealing with these big honking omnioid HPOL
antennas to pre-mount and tie everything down (jumpers, AP's, grounding
...etc) everything you can before pulling it up the tower. It will cause you
to pop a roid or hernia wrestling the HPOL omni onto a 4' standoff up the
tower not to mention just mounting the standoff by itself is a chore at
300".

  The real trick to making it easy to mount a pre-loaded 4' stand off up the
tower is how you tie the standoff on the ground. It will take several
carabineers' and at least two short pieces of web rope (rope) attached to
the hoist line. The "upright" attitude of the standoff and antenna should be
as it will be after install. In other words - when you start the accent of
the standoff - - it ought to go up the tower just like it will be mounted -
- with the omni poking straight up. This way the man on the tower is not
trying to hold it in place - the ground man holds the load while the tower
monkey attaches the standoff.  The other key thing is to have the pulley up
the tower at least 15' (if possible) above where the standoff is going to be
mounted as this makes it a lot easier for the guy up the tower to get the
standoff lined up on the leg of the tower. Bolt the top portion of the
standoff first and then let the weight off the rope and the bottom portion
of the standoff will fall against the tower leg ready for bolts.

 The biggest "gotcha" when pulling up pre-loaded standoffs (with fiberglass
Omni's)is that if you don't have the proper setup then your omni will go
into the tower as you are pulling it up and "snap" goes your new fiberglass
omni! We ALWAYS use a large carabiner attached to the eye that the load is
connected to and then run the "pull end" of the rope through that same
carabiner   - - this allows us back away from the tower and as we back out
away from the tower the gear we are pulling up also is pulled out away from
the tower. It gives the man on the ground complete control of the gear going
up. I have seen times where we would be close to 100' out from the base of a
tower - - - depending on the height of the tower and location on the tower.
This carabineer's sole and ONLY job is to attach the load to the pulling
rope - - do not hook any gear to this carabiner - it is just a loop for the
pulling end rope to go through.

It may take a pic to explain that! :-)



GL,
Mac 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Smith, Rick
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:15 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> 
> I'd like to hear, either way, as well.
> 
> I'm going to be putting up my third 4 foot standoff tomorrow,
> and would like to know if I can make this one easier :)
> 
> R
> 
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Eric Rogers
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:05 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> 
> Mac,
> 
> This is not off-list, but I am interested in your stories.  We do small
> tower work ourselves and I always like to learn from others
> mistakes/lessons.  Is this stuff you can share on-list?  If not, send
> them off-list to me as well.
> 
> Eric Rogers
> Precision Data Solutions, LLC
> (317) 831-3000 x200
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mac Dearman
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:33 AM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> 
> Mark,
> 
>   We found that a minimum of 3' off the leg of tower will get you by,
> but we have gone to 4' as a general rule here.
> 
>   If you have never hung standoffs with big antennas on a tower before
> and would like to know some of the lessons we learned the hard to make
> things easier - ht me off list and will be glad to share with you.
> 
> 
> Mac
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On
> > Behalf Of Mark McElvy
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:16 AM
> > To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> >
> > I am setting up a new tower and I will

RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

2007-05-21 Thread Mac Dearman

  Well - - I guess I will respond on list then ;-)


It has been out experience in dealing with these big honking omnioid HPOL
antennas to pre-mount and tie everything down (jumpers, AP's, grounding
...etc) everything you can before pulling it up the tower. It will cause you
to pop a roid or hernia wrestling the HPOL omni onto a 4' standoff up the
tower not to mention just mounting the standoff by itself is a chore at
300".

  The real trick to making it easy to mount a pre-loaded 4' stand off up the
tower is how you tie the standoff on the ground. It will take several
carabineers' and at least two short pieces of web rope (rope) attached to
the hoist line. The "upright" attitude of the standoff and antenna should be
as it will be after install. In other words - when you start the accent of
the standoff - - it ought to go up the tower just like it will be mounted -
- with the omni poking straight up. This way the man on the tower is not
trying to hold it in place - the ground man holds the load while the tower
monkey attaches the standoff.  The other key thing is to have the pulley up
the tower at least 15' (if possible) above where the standoff is going to be
mounted as this makes it a lot easier for the guy up the tower to get the
standoff lined up on the leg of the tower. Bolt the top portion of the
standoff first and then let the weight off the rope and the bottom portion
of the standoff will fall against the tower leg ready for bolts.

 The biggest "gotcha" when pulling up pre-loaded standoffs (with fiberglass
Omni's)is that if you don't have the proper setup then your omni will go
into the tower as you are pulling it up and "snap" goes your new fiberglass
omni! We ALWAYS use a large carabiner attached to the eye that the load is
connected to and then run the "pull end" of the rope through that same
carabiner   - - this allows us back away from the tower and as we back out
away from the tower the gear we are pulling up also is pulled out away from
the tower. It gives the man on the ground complete control of the gear going
up. I have seen times where we would be close to 100' out from the base of a
tower - - - depending on the height of the tower and location on the tower.
This carabineer's sole and ONLY job is to attach the load to the pulling
rope - - do not hook any gear to this carabiner - it is just a loop for the
pulling end rope to go through.

It may take a pic to explain that! :-)



GL,
Mac 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Smith, Rick
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:15 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> 
> I'd like to hear, either way, as well.
> 
> I'm going to be putting up my third 4 foot standoff tomorrow,
> and would like to know if I can make this one easier :)
> 
> R
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Eric Rogers
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:05 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> 
> Mac,
> 
> This is not off-list, but I am interested in your stories.  We do small
> tower work ourselves and I always like to learn from others
> mistakes/lessons.  Is this stuff you can share on-list?  If not, send
> them off-list to me as well.
> 
> Eric Rogers
> Precision Data Solutions, LLC
> (317) 831-3000 x200
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mac Dearman
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:33 AM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> 
> Mark,
> 
>   We found that a minimum of 3' off the leg of tower will get you by,
> but we have gone to 4' as a general rule here.
> 
>   If you have never hung standoffs with big antennas on a tower before
> and would like to know some of the lessons we learned the hard to make
> things easier - ht me off list and will be glad to share with you.
> 
> 
> Mac
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On
> > Behalf Of Mark McElvy
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:16 AM
> > To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> >
> > I am setting up a new tower and I will mounting at 200ft on a 230ft
> > tower, it is a triangular tower with an approximately 3ft face. I am
> > starting with an omni and I am trying to determine how far off the
> tower
> > a 2.4 HPol omni should be mounted to minimize tower interference.
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark McElvy


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

2007-05-21 Thread Smith, Rick
I'd like to hear, either way, as well.

I'm going to be putting up my third 4 foot standoff tomorrow,
and would like to know if I can make this one easier :)

R 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Rogers
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

Mac,

This is not off-list, but I am interested in your stories.  We do small
tower work ourselves and I always like to learn from others
mistakes/lessons.  Is this stuff you can share on-list?  If not, send
them off-list to me as well.

Eric Rogers
Precision Data Solutions, LLC
(317) 831-3000 x200


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:33 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

Mark,

  We found that a minimum of 3' off the leg of tower will get you by,
but we have gone to 4' as a general rule here. 

  If you have never hung standoffs with big antennas on a tower before
and would like to know some of the lessons we learned the hard to make
things easier - ht me off list and will be glad to share with you.


Mac 



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Mark McElvy
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:16 AM
> To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> 
> I am setting up a new tower and I will mounting at 200ft on a 230ft 
> tower, it is a triangular tower with an approximately 3ft face. I am 
> starting with an omni and I am trying to determine how far off the
tower
> a 2.4 HPol omni should be mounted to minimize tower interference.
> 
> 
> 
> Mark McElvy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tower standoff

2007-05-21 Thread Blair Davis




We do all our own tower work as well and would love to have a chance to
learn from others  Please, if you don't put it on-list, add me to
the cc: line for the off-list tips

Mac Dearman wrote:

  Mark,

  We found that a minimum of 3' off the leg of tower will get you by, but we
have gone to 4' as a general rule here. 

  If you have never hung standoffs with big antennas on a tower before and
would like to know some of the lessons we learned the hard to make things
easier - ht me off list and will be glad to share with you.


Mac 



  
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Mark McElvy
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:16 AM
To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] Tower standoff

I am setting up a new tower and I will mounting at 200ft on a 230ft
tower, it is a triangular tower with an approximately 3ft face. I am
starting with an omni and I am trying to determine how far off the tower
a 2.4 HPol omni should be mounted to minimize tower interference.



Mark McElvy





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  
  
  


-- 
Blair Davis

AOL IM Screen Name --  Theory240

West Michigan Wireless ISP
269-686-8648

A division of:
Camp Communication Services, INC



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

2007-05-21 Thread Eric Rogers
Mac,

This is not off-list, but I am interested in your stories.  We do small
tower work ourselves and I always like to learn from others
mistakes/lessons.  Is this stuff you can share on-list?  If not, send
them off-list to me as well.

Eric Rogers
Precision Data Solutions, LLC
(317) 831-3000 x200


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:33 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

Mark,

  We found that a minimum of 3' off the leg of tower will get you by,
but we
have gone to 4' as a general rule here. 

  If you have never hung standoffs with big antennas on a tower before
and
would like to know some of the lessons we learned the hard to make
things
easier - ht me off list and will be glad to share with you.


Mac 



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Mark McElvy
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:16 AM
> To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> 
> I am setting up a new tower and I will mounting at 200ft on a 230ft
> tower, it is a triangular tower with an approximately 3ft face. I am
> starting with an omni and I am trying to determine how far off the
tower
> a 2.4 HPol omni should be mounted to minimize tower interference.
> 
> 
> 
> Mark McElvy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Tower standoff

2007-05-21 Thread Mac Dearman
Mark,

  We found that a minimum of 3' off the leg of tower will get you by, but we
have gone to 4' as a general rule here. 

  If you have never hung standoffs with big antennas on a tower before and
would like to know some of the lessons we learned the hard to make things
easier - ht me off list and will be glad to share with you.


Mac 



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mark McElvy
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:16 AM
> To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [WISPA] Tower standoff
> 
> I am setting up a new tower and I will mounting at 200ft on a 230ft
> tower, it is a triangular tower with an approximately 3ft face. I am
> starting with an omni and I am trying to determine how far off the tower
> a 2.4 HPol omni should be mounted to minimize tower interference.
> 
> 
> 
> Mark McElvy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/