When I had to get my citizenship I had to pass a language test, so I
remember that it is "eh", eh. 8-)
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajeptha
George Rogato wrote:
eh?
I thought it was "aye"
Lon
Well done Sam, move to the top of the class. Notice when you do it to
someone else(England) it is ok, but do it to your own goverment it is
breaking the law? Weren't Laws made to be broken :-\
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Ho
, May 02, 2007 4:03 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
>
> Its like my old hippie friend told me "the only difference between
> hippie and yuppie is 50 grand a year" That was in 91. Adjust
> accordingly for
ay, May 02, 2007 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
... I wish now that I had paid more attention in History classes
Which of the founding fathers said something to the effect that the
proper response of the citizenry
to an unjust law was to ignore/disobey it?
Joh
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 5:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
>Changing the laws happens MUCH quicker if a mass of people openly
>oppose it. Your country was founded on that very principle.
: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 4:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Justify it anyway you like. Civil disobedience is not a viable
> solution. I don't see a large number of people stepping up to the
>
aye is a form of yes, as in aye capn highliner. eh is a form of
question, to gain agreement, such as "I can do this, eh?"
Lonnie
On 5/2/07, George Rogato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
eh?
I thought it was "aye"
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
> The proper phrase is: yeah but, wait right here, eh?
>
>
May 02, 2007 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
eh?
I thought it was "aye"
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
The proper phrase is: yeah but, wait right here, eh?
Always end with a question, eh?
Lonnie
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsub
in BC most say "hey"
- Original Message -
From: "George Rogato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
eh?
I thought it was "aye"
eh?
I thought it was "aye"
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
The proper phrase is: yeah but, wait right here, eh?
Always end with a question, eh?
Lonnie
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa
You probably should have then. Last I checked treason was just that,
which is what the founding fathers did when they declared their
independance from England over unjust taxation (a law) which they
refused to pay (ignored/disobeyed it).
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
J. Vogel wrote:
Some people ask too much.
Ask not what WISPA can do for you, but ask what you can do for WISPA.
WISPA, being all of us, can always use a helping hand. Anybody that
thinks they can help, should step up to the plate, pay the measly couple
hundred bucks, and offer to do something to help, "ALL
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_disobedience
I recommend Thoreau's treatise on the subject.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Vogel
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 5:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Was lem
e driving a truck!
George
Cliff Leboeuf wrote:
> But they are alike in they both have Harleys... :)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of chris cooper
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 4:03 PM
> To: 'WISP
I suggest you not take the view that breaking any and all laws is a
criminal matter. There are various levels of laws, and most are not
criminal matters. I can break the speed laws and get a fine but no
criminal record, unless of course I harm someone or do it in such a
way that it is clearly cr
ot;WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Sam Tetherow wrote:
Um, that is what the DISOBEDIENCE in civil disobedience means.
I can't tell what you are referring to here. My comment was spe
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of chris cooper
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 4:03 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
Its like my old hippie friend told me "the only difference between
hippie and yuppie is 50 grand a year&qu
... I wish now that I had paid more attention in History classes
Which of the founding fathers said something to the effect that the
proper response of the citizenry
to an unjust law was to ignore/disobey it?
John Vogel
Butch Evans wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
>
>>
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
Changing the laws happens MUCH quicker if a mass of people openly
oppose it. Your country was founded on that very principle.
Yes it does (sometimes). Open opposition to a law and advocating
criminal action are not the same thing.
--
Butch Evans
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Sam Tetherow wrote:
Um, that is what the DISOBEDIENCE in civil disobedience means.
I can't tell what you are referring to here. My comment was
specifically to say that criminal action (breaking the law) is not
the proper course. Is that the part that you disagree with?
But they are alike in they both have Harleys... :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of chris cooper
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 4:03 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
Its l
accordingly for inflation.
c
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lonnie Nunweiler
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 4:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
In the 60's and '70's most
Butch Evans wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Alan Cain wrote:
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Justify it anyway you like. Civil disobedience is not a viable
solution. I don't see a large number of people stepping up to the
plate and defending your position.
Whoa, there now! Civil disobedience is always a
Changing the laws happens MUCH quicker if a mass of people openly
oppose it. Your country was founded on that very principle.
Lonnie
On 5/2/07, Butch Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Alan Cain wrote:
> Dawn DiPietro wrote:
>> Justify it anyway you like. Civil disobedience
02, 2007 4:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
In the 60's and '70's most of us would taken a much firmer stance. We
got old and worried about offending somebody. And then we worried
that somebody would punish us for taking our stan
In the 60's and '70's most of us would taken a much firmer stance. We
got old and worried about offending somebody. And then we worried
that somebody would punish us for taking our stand.
One thing is for sure, the Telcos would not have stood for such a
bum's rush. The FCC and FBI guys would b
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Alan Cain wrote:
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Justify it anyway you like. Civil disobedience is not a viable
solution. I don't see a large number of people stepping up to the
plate and defending your position.
Whoa, there now! Civil disobedience is always a viable solution.
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Mark,
Justify it anyway you like. Civil disobedience is not a viable
solution. I don't see a large number of people stepping up to the
plate and defending your position.
Whoa, there now! Civil disobedience is always a viable solution. This IS
America (at least where I
I think there are between 3000 and 6000 wisps.
I do NOT think CALEA is a bad thing. Pretty hard to abuse it and there's NO
reason for the ability to spy on bad guys to not exist.
Lastly, I just can't take it anymore! Some of you guys loose more sleep
over the little stuff. I'm FAR more wor
Again I ask you, how do you do that?
How do you get hundreds to write in?
You wrote a note that could be massaged and sent to customers. (But then
you would start losing customers almost immediately). So people have a
starting point.
The PR... you suggested that no one could write one... ac
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
Read that document from the FCC again, there's HUGE areas of required
compliance that have NOT EVEN BEEN MENTIONED by anything to come from WISPA
nor anyone else I've seen, and we have 3 weeks to somehow bridge this gulf,
educate everyone, and try some give and take with th
- Original Message -
From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?
> Mark,
>
> Justify it anyway you like. Civil disobedience is not
Mark,
Justify it anyway you like. Civil disobedience is not a viable solution.
I don't see a large number of people stepping up to the plate and
defending your position.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
Wow. I guess the title really is right.
When I participated in the debate
33 matches
Mail list logo
