--
From: rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 12:36 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Antenna gain does matter.
UBNT has only one certified antenna combination - or did back when I
first
filed for the license. Useful only for P2P
- Original Message -
From: Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Who has the final word on this? I've been told by testing laboratories
that do testing for the FCC
March 07, 2009 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Who has the final word on this? I've been told by testing laboratories
that do testing for the FCC that this is not the case... They said if the
radio card (5Ghz when I asked but for this discussion it doesn't matter)
had been appr
.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Who has the final word on this? I've been told
all the questions, yet,
that us creative types can dream up.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Of course, Jack.
Part of what adds up to confusion is that there's always questions that
come
up that don't have particularly clear answers by just reading the rules.
And the rules are very short and to the point. It's easy to read them
(the
ones
List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
EIRP is equivalent in measurements...
John Rock
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
Wireless Connections
166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857
ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell 419-706-7356
fax 419-668-4077
http
Sh
Don't tell the good secrets Mike!
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Your statement confuses me.
Yes, there are EIRP maximums
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
As per the FCC only the anufacturer can make the determination which antenna
is similar in specifications. Otherwise it needs FCC certification as a
system.
That was from the horses mouth about 18 months ago
Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
: Saturday, March 07, 2009 4:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Lower your transmit power, duh. You go a hell of a lot further with a 0 db
radio and 36 db of antenna than 30 db of radio and 6 db of antenna. That do
you think negative db values are for?
-
Mike Hammett
specified.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Not mine, but
http
My system is fully licensed.How did you get your combination of XR3 +
Routerboard 400 series + Mikrotik RouterOS 3.x + whatever antenna certified?
What's the process like, and how much did it cost?Or did you just buy the kit
from someone else who went through the certification process? If
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:05:36 GMT
My system is fully licensed.
How did you get your combination of XR3
+ Routerboard 400 series + Mikrotik RouterOS 3.x + whatever antenna
certified? What's the process like, and how much did it cost?Or did you
just buy the kit from
...@muddyfrogwater.us
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 12:36 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Antenna gain does matter.
UBNT has only one certified antenna combination - or did back when I first
filed for the license. Useful only for P2P, actually.
You have
--
From: Matt Hardy mha...@ligowave.com
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 7:41 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Yes for the 3.65GHz band, antenna gain does matter, because the band is
EIRP restricted. For instance, for the XR3, if you
Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:47:42
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Who has the final word on this? I've been told by testing laboratories
that do testing for the FCC that this is not the case... They said if the
radio card
00:52:36
To: sc...@brevardwireless.com; WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
As per the FCC only the anufacturer can make the determination which antenna is
similar in specifications. Otherwise it needs FCC certification as a system.
That was from the horses mouth
So Reader, are you saying you have a 3.65 GHz license and have
registered your 3.65 GHz access points and end user locations through
the FCC ULS? I did not recall seeing a Star OS 3.65 FCC certified
system. You are required to use FCC certified equipment and to
register every AP and customer
Have they managed to get the FCC to release the full 50 MHz channel
space for this product yet?
Scriv
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Matt Liotta mlio...@r337.com wrote:
We've been using the AN80 3.65 PtP with great success.
-Matt
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
The FCC ULS requires that you enter the FCC ID of the radio that is
being used, along with it's characteristics. That is easily done with
an XR3 card. No where during the registration process does it say the
radio and antenna and everything else has to be certified as a "system".
I can
I did not realize there was as FCC emission designator and grant of
approval assigned to that radio. I would love to read the FCC approval
on that radio. Do you happen to have a link to that? I previously sent
out a step by step guide for everyone to use for registering their AP
and client
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: John Scrivner j...@scrivner.com
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:34 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
So Reader, are you saying you have a 3.65 GHz license and have
months
ago.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner j...@scrivner.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
So Reader, are you saying you have a 3.65 GHz
: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
I did not realize there was as FCC emission designator and grant of
approval assigned to that radio. I would love to read the FCC approval
on that radio. Do you happen to have a link to that? I previously sent
out a step by step guide for everyone to use for registering their AP
tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
Not mine, but
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/licenseLocDetail.jsp?keyLoc
This guy says he is using them but having problems - didn't read into
anything more then 411 board and xr3
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=7t=29063p=145580hilit=xr3#p145580
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't
Redline has a 3.65 ptp with their an80.
Mike Goicoechea
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 9:29 AM
To: Conversations over a new WISP Trade Organization
Subject:
Redline and Ligowave both have gear available.
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:29 AM
To: Conversations over a new
I am.
Works ok. Using Star-OS. I use ok to designate an unenthusiastic, but
affirmative statement that it works.3.65 seems to have unique
propagation qualities that are affected by snow, rain, and fog, moreso than
5 or 2.4.
Or, that's how it seems.
Yes they can. Ligowave also offers a PtP product.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Brian Rohrbacher br...@reliableinter.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 9:29 AM
To: Conversations over a new WISP
30 matches
Mail list logo