I'm sure some on this list would call you quite creative.  ;-)

-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--------------------------------------------------
From: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:01 PM
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

> Of course, Jack.
>
> Part of what adds up to confusion is that there's always questions that 
> come
> up that don't have particularly clear answers by just reading the rules.
>
> And the rules are very short and to the point.  It's easy to read them 
> (the
> ones for 3650) through in a relatively short period of time, and yet still
> have answers.  That's when "interpretation" of the rules comes into play,
> often in a very technological context, and I'd say a lawyer's not going to
> be a lot of help, unless he's technically at engineer level, and I'm not
> sure that all the FCC personell have been even asked all the questions, 
> yet,
> that us creative types can dream up.
>
>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> <insert witty tagline here>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jack Unger" <[email protected]>
> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 1:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
>
>
>> As I see it, there are two sources of information on FCC matters.
>>
>> 1. Those people (onlist) who have the most experience with an issue (be 
>> it
>> 3.65 or any other issue). Experience still adds up to knowledge. Anything
>> less is just guessing. Put your faith in those that you trust who have
>> experience with an issue, whatever the issue is.
>>
>> 2. Your FCC attorney. FCC matters are, at base, a matter of law.
>>
>> jack
>>
>> [email protected] wrote:
>> I dunno who to ask, I think even if you ask the FCC you might get a
>> slightly
>> muddled answer.  I just used exactly what was certified including the
>> enclosure used, and followed the rest of the requirements as best I 
>> could.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> <insert witty tagline here>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Scott Carullo" <[email protected]>
>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
>>
>>
>>  Who has the final word on this?  I've been told by testing laboratories
>> that do testing for the FCC that this is not the case...  They said if 
>> the
>> radio card (5Ghz when I asked but for this discussion it doesn't matter)
>> had been approved with an antenna then you could use the same or less db
>> like antenna and you were good to go - assuming the card manufacturer
>> (like
>> ubiquity) had had appropriate testing completed and filed with FCC.
>>
>> It sure is difficult for any of us to make heads or tales out of what can
>> or can't be done because everyone has a different opinion - even the
>> people
>> at the top of the food chain I guess.
>>
>> Who's right?  And how am I supposed to know?
>>
>> Scott Carullo
>> Brevard Wireless
>> 321-205-1100 x102
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>>    From: "Harold Bledsoe" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 2:21 PM
>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
>>
>> I think the confusion on this comes from the fact that for the P90
>> licensing process, only the transmitter information is collected.
>> Remember that even with Part 90 devices, they still must comply with
>> Part 15 requirements for unintentional radiators.  This is covered with
>> a Declaration of Conformity for the system typically.
>>
>> So the previous example of the XR3 + ARC + RB411 + PoE (sic) is
>> technically only legal if it meets all Part 90 requirements (which it
>> should according to the test report on file at the FCC) as well as Part
>> 15 requirements for unintentional radiators.  In this case, a
>> Declaration of Conformity should be on file at the assembler's location.
>>
>> This is why the label is important.  This kind of system built from
>> modular components should include a label with a manufacturer name/model
>> number, the contains FCC ID: xxxxxx, and the 2 required statements about
>> unintentional interference.  This information tells anyone including the
>> FCC who to contact for intentional emission issues (P-90 in this
>> example) as well as unintentional emission issues (P-15 in this case).
>> If there is no label on there, then it is illegal by default.  Then if
>> there are problems with the intentional radiator, it is the module
>> maker's problem (assuming the integration instructions were followed
>> properly).  Finally if there are problems with the unintentional
>> emissions, it is the system assembler's problem.
>>
>> I know, I know....this is a licensed, Part 90 band.  So why does Part 15
>> even matter?  Simply put, P-90 covers the transmitter, P-15 covers the
>> rest of the crap spewing from the device in the rest of the
>> spectrum.  :-)
>>
>> -Hal
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David E. Smith <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: WISPA General List <[email protected]>
>> To: WISPA General List <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp
>> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:05:36 GMT
>>
>>      My system is fully licensed.
>>        How did you get your combination of "XR3
>> + Routerboard 400 series + Mikrotik RouterOS 3.x + whatever antenna"
>> certified? What's the process like, and how much did it cost?Or did you
>> just buy the kit from someone else who went through the certification
>> process? If so, from whom? I'd be willing to pay a small premium over
>> the price of "all those parts" just to avoid the legal heat.David
>> SmithMVN.net
>>
>>      
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>    WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>>      
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>    WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>      
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>    WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>>      
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>    WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
>> Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
>> Cisco Press Author - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
>> WISPs - Do you know where your customers are?
>> For wireless coverage mapping see http://www.ask-wi.com/mapping
>> FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger>
>> Phone 818-227-4220  Email <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to