y, June 10, 2009 10:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
While I am not certain that it is a Tranzeo issue, I do know that it is
something we are able to cause 100% of the time only on Tranzeo units.
It is possible that it is something in our co
t Service
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Steve Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:37 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
>
PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
We have been seeing a couple issues with old Linksys WRT54Gs passing
private IP addresses down the PPPoE tunnel. It is almost like the NAT
table gets full, or there isn't enough memory to keep it all,
ing.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:19 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Well, this definetly has something t
e-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Steve Smith
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:37 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
>>
>> Wh
Fi Wireless Internet Service
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
While I am not
esday, June 10, 2009 9:19 AM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
>
> Well, this definetly has something to do with having P2P installed on any
> machine behind the CPQ router because I can trigger this 100% of the time by
> lau
List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Well, this definetly has something to do with having P2P installed on any
machine behind the CPQ router because I can trigger this 100% of the time by
launching limewire.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
41
: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
So we now have WISPs with both StarOS and Mtik AP's that are having issues
wit
Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 6:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
I do. I will drop it to you offlist.
D. Ryan Spott wrote:
Do you have any ethreal data you can share?
ryan
Steve Smith wrote:
In our case we are using staros APs
I do. I will drop it to you offlist.
D. Ryan Spott wrote:
Do you have any ethreal data you can share?
ryan
Steve Smith wrote:
In our case we are using staros APs. We like to have the CPE set to
router mode so we don't have to deal with any of the client equipment
on their s
-
From: "D. Ryan Spott"
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:56 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
> Right! At every location is GREAT! but if you have 3 APs at the top of a
> tower, you don't route on each AP, you
Do you have any ethreal data you can share?
ryan
Steve Smith wrote:
> In our case we are using staros APs. We like to have the CPE set to
> router mode so we don't have to deal with any of the client equipment
> on their side of our unit at their place. That way we don't care if
> they chang
In our case we are using staros APs. We like to have the CPE set to
router mode so we don't have to deal with any of the client equipment
on their side of our unit at their place. That way we don't care if
they change out a piece of equipment.
We are having no problem with any Tranzeo equi
; Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "D. Ryan Spott"
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:38 PM
> To: ; "WISPA General List"
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Fir
t"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
> Why you would route AT the AP boggles my mind... Routing Before the AP
> is the way to go.
>
> Why add additional load on an AP when it should be working on sending
> and receiving wireless data.
>
> ryan
>
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
I've got about 50 or 60 CPQ's and SL2's out there, as well as a dozen or
so 6000's, some for up to 4 or 5 years.
I've never had a single problem with any of them failing to pass tra
Why you would route AT the AP boggles my mind... Routing Before the AP
is the way to go.
Why add additional load on an AP when it should be working on sending
and receiving wireless data.
ryan
Rick Kunze wrote:
> I've got about 50 or 60 CPQ's and SL2's out there, as well as a dozen or
> so 60
t;
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Steve Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, June 0
I've got about 50 or 60 CPQ's and SL2's out there, as well as a dozen or
so 6000's, some for up to 4 or 5 years.
I've never had a single problem with any of them failing to pass traffic
as mentioned in the thread. I just upgraded one small town to 4.0.2, a
couple 6000's and a couple dozen CPE'
> 419-562-6405
>> www.wavelinc.com
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:38 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>&g
t;
>
>
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> S
Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Wasn't Tranzeo that diagnosed the disconnect problem?
On 6/9/0
er
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:30 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
>
> H, I've not upgraded many of the CPQ's to 4.0.2. I've not noticed what
> you're talking about. I tend to only upda
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
H, I've not upgraded many of the CPQ'
com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Dropping you an off-list response with much m
Dropping you an off-list response with much more detail. But also
posting here to report that we are seeing a very similar problem. We
are seeing the Tranzeo units fail to sustain downloads after two to five
minutes when they are in router mode performing NAT. Tranzeo is blaming
Mikrotik. H
;Kurt Fankhauser"
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
>I thought I mentioned that all AP's are Mikrotik v3.15. I gave up on the
> Tranzeo AP's a LONG time ago B
Marlon K. Schafer
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:38 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Cc: Brent Thrift
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
>
> Kurt, do yourself a favor and just drop the Tranzeo ap's. The 6000 and 6600
>
> units that I use abso
@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: Brent Thrift
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
Kurt, do yourself a favor and just drop the Tranzeo ap's. The 6000 and 6600
units that I
Kurt, do yourself a favor and just drop the Tranzeo ap's. The 6000 and 6600
units that I use absolutely suck. The 4.0.2 firmware helped quite a bit
with the lock up issues, but now the speeds suck.
I've gotten rid of almost all of them in favor of MT APs. Life is soo
good now!
It wouldn
31 matches
Mail list logo
