Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

They can be mad at me a little > more, tis okay with me. > > Bob- > > > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Matt Jenkins > Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 2:59 PM > To: WISPA General List

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

Matt Jenkins Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 2:59 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement The reason I do not do that is if I get a subpoena for who is using an IP I could not tell them. I do not want the gov't mad at me... - Matt Ugo Bellavance wrote:

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

The reason I do not do that is if I get a subpoena for who is using an IP I could not tell them. I do not want the gov't mad at me... - Matt Ugo Bellavance wrote: > On 2010-01-02 17:45, Matt Jenkins wrote: >> Motorola SM for kbps control with bursting. pmacct central server for >> throughput usa

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

On 2010-01-02 17:45, Matt Jenkins wrote: > Motorola SM for kbps control with bursting. pmacct central server for > throughput usage. DHCP server so all customers always get the same > public IP. One public IP per customer. As this is a small deployment, we don't give IP addresses to users, we NAT

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

Motorola SM for kbps control with bursting. pmacct central server for throughput usage. DHCP server so all customers always get the same public IP. One public IP per customer. Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Hi, > > We are currently looking at a way to make sure the bandwidth is > allocates more

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

6092 >> >> >> -Original Message----- >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On >> Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance >> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:19 PM >> To: wireless@wispa.org >> S

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 13:50 -0500, Michael Baird wrote: > I police via radius attributes to my redback, how are you handling > network access/termination? This is not intended to be a system like that. It is a QOS system only. The access/termination "features" of systems like NetEqualizer/NetEn

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

I police via radius attributes to my redback, how are you handling network access/termination? Regards Michael Baird > On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:19 -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > >> We are currently looking at a way to make sure the bandwidth is >> allocates more fairly amongst our (~300

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:19 -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > We are currently looking at a way to make sure the bandwidth is > allocates more fairly amongst our (~300) users. We have a 60mbps pipe > from our ISP, but some wise ones are dowloading like crazy, and enabling > traffic shaping

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Greg Ihnen Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 10:03 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement I didn't get many google hits for superperfect. I couldn't even find the author&

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:19 PM > To: wireless@wispa.org > Subject: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement > > Hi, > > We are currently looking at a way to make sure the bandwidth is > allocates more fairly amongst our (~30

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:19 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement Hi, We are currently looking at a way to make sure the bandwidth is allocates more fairly amongst our (~300) users. We

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

Uh.. Dell GX150 i think? It has a celeron slow as heck processor. I found it near a dumpster at some point. The license cost me $45. Originally I used it to find the bandwidth hogs, now I control them with it. Wonderful stuff I tell you! ryan On Dec 30, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Ugo Bellavance wro

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

Mikrotik does a much better job of bandwidth management than pfSense though there is a bit more of a learning curve but don't let that scare you. All the talk of the "Mikrotik learning curve" put me off for too long till I finally decided I had to make the leap. Like jumping off the high dive it

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

We do it at the CPE. But depends on what you are using. Bob- -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:19 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

On 2009-12-30 16:38, Ryan Spott wrote: > will get you > started for pennies. Then you can grow from there. Thanks, Our firewall is a Pfsense and I think it can do something similar... What is the hardware required for the above setup? Re

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

will get you started for pennies. Then you can grow from there. ryan On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > On 2009-12-30 16:28, Josh Luthman wrote: >> What kind of equipment do you have? > > A firewall, managed switches,

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

On 2009-12-30 16:28, Josh Luthman wrote: > What kind of equipment do you have? A firewall, managed switches, Ubiquiti and Skypilot antennas. > The best place to limit is the CPE. We don't have CPEs, users simply use their own wireless NICs. We're about to change our access points, though. We a

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

We use an Allot NetEnforcer for bandwidth limiting. We do not do any policy enforcement aka unlimited download/upload at advertised rate. On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Hi, > >        We are currently looking at a way to make sure the bandwidth is > allocates more fairl

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

What kind of equipment do you have? The best place to limit is the CPE. On 12/30/09, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Hi, > > We are currently looking at a way to make sure the bandwidth is > allocates more fairly amongst our (~300) users. We have a 60mbps pipe > from our ISP, but some wise ones a

[WISPA] Bandwidth limitation enforcement

Hi, We are currently looking at a way to make sure the bandwidth is allocates more fairly amongst our (~300) users. We have a 60mbps pipe from our ISP, but some wise ones are dowloading like crazy, and enabling traffic shaping on the firewall is just of little help. What are you guys