Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread jree...@18-30chat.net
get any better than -85. > > Mark > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Travis Johnson > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 3:33 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Link stability > > H

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Blair Davis
a.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of jp Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 3:37 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Link stability I'd change the LMR jumper and/or feedhorn. There's a strong chance there is water in the jumper and changing it might fix it. There's als

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Data Technology
y, October 26, 2009 3:37 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Link stability > > I'd change the LMR jumper and/or feedhorn. There's a strong chance there > > is water in the jumper and changing it might fix it. There's also a > chance that the f

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Jerry Richardson
it's possible the coax, connectors, or antenna got cooked Sent from my iPhone On Oct 26, 2009, at 12:44 PM, "Mark McElvy" wrote: > I have a wireless backhaul link that is not as stable as I would like. > It is a 15.5 mile shot that has been up for 3 years. MT/CM9/32db > dish on > both ends. O

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread ccrum
I would think you should be seeing a better signal than that. I'd replace cards, pigtails, and LMR again. Cameron Mark McElvy wrote: > I have a wireless backhaul link that is not as stable as I would like. > It is a 15.5 mile shot that has been up for 3 years. MT/CM9/32db dish on > both ends. On

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Jerry Richardson
Sent from my iPhone On Oct 26, 2009, at 12:44 PM, "Mark McElvy" wrote: > I have a wireless backhaul link that is not as stable as I would like. > It is a 15.5 mile shot that has been up for 3 years. MT/CM9/32db > dish on > both ends. On a clear day I am only seeing a -83 on each end. All the

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Bret Clark
t; what mfg antenna so its hard to guess. There is always the alignment thing. > > Did you replace the pigtail after the storm damage? > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -Original Message- > From: "Mark McElvy" > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:39:47 > T

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Mark McElvy
Yes, the pigtail was replaced, just not the coax and antenna. It is a PacWireless dish Mark WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread lakeland
ark McElvy" Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:39:47 To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Link stability I have a wireless backhaul link that is not as stable as I would like. It is a 15.5 mile shot that has been up for 3 years. MT/CM9/32db dish on both ends. On a clear day I am only seeing a -83 on ea

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Mark McElvy
They have had radome covers since installed Mark -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of jp Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 3:37 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Link stability I'd change the LMR jumper a

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Mark McElvy
...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 3:33 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Link stability Hi, According to my path calculator, this link should be -55 on each side. Are you sure it was aligned when it was first installed? Travis Microserv Mark McElvy

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread jp
I'd change the LMR jumper and/or feedhorn. There's a strong chance there is water in the jumper and changing it might fix it. There's also a chance that the feedhorn has failed. If you end up changing the feedhorn, consider putting a radome on the dish to protect the feedhorn from weather. It's

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Travis Johnson
Hi, According to my path calculator, this link should be -55 on each side. Are you sure it was aligned when it was first installed? Travis Microserv Mark McElvy wrote: > I have a wireless backhaul link that is not as stable as I would like. > It is a 15.5 mile shot that has been up for 3 years

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Josh Luthman
What about the original LMR400? On 10/26/09, Scott Reed wrote: > I would suspect the CM9s are going deaf as a possibility as well. > > Mark McElvy wrote: >> I have a wireless backhaul link that is not as stable as I would like. >> It is a 15.5 mile shot that has been up for 3 years. MT/CM9/32db d

Re: [WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Scott Reed
I would suspect the CM9s are going deaf as a possibility as well. Mark McElvy wrote: > I have a wireless backhaul link that is not as stable as I would like. > It is a 15.5 mile shot that has been up for 3 years. MT/CM9/32db dish on > both ends. On a clear day I am only seeing a -83 on each end. A

[WISPA] Link stability

2009-10-26 Thread Mark McElvy
I have a wireless backhaul link that is not as stable as I would like. It is a 15.5 mile shot that has been up for 3 years. MT/CM9/32db dish on both ends. On a clear day I am only seeing a -83 on each end. All the radio equip was replaced April 08 due to lighting, still have the original 3ft LMR-40