On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
wrote:
> Tried again and this time airmax off seems to have done the trick. Is there
> any suggested settings in Advanced tab for a 2km link?
Turning auto-ACK off and setting it to 3km is probably a good thing.
Getting different results with
I am referring to the no-ack feature of AirMax. I, too, have Airmax on all
my links.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> I hate to counter..
> All of my links are with Airmax on
I hate to counter..
All of my links are with Airmax on.. including short ones, and they
perform better with Airmax than without.
:)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet& Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, Fl 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Helpdesk: 305 663 5518 option 2 Email: supp...@snappydsl.net
O
You are correct, I have it off. I just checked.
Greg
On Jul 26, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Better not be. It makes the link perform like crap.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011
Better not be. It makes the link perform like crap.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> I've got a short backhaul (.1 mile) PtMP and it definitely works better
> with AirMax on. I
I've got a short backhaul (.1 mile) PtMP and it definitely works better with
AirMax on. I forget if I'm using the no-ack feature.
Greg
On Jul 25, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
> wrote:
>> Ok, so WDS fixed the latency. At 20mhz channe
Mine at max modulation is 51 if that helps.
On Jul 25, 2011 11:48 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> Low 50s is about where you want to be for a link. Now the 40s is a bit
much.
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> On 7/25/2011 11:40 AM, Greg Ihnen wr
Low 50s is about where you want to be for a link. Now the 40s is a bit much.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 7/25/2011 11:40 AM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
Isn't -53 a little too hot?
Are you using WDS? I don't know if AirMax has changed this but I know
on
intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 9:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
On Mon, Jul
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
wrote:
> I tried airmax off but the link is almost unusable. Is there any advanced
> settings I need to change?
The other scenario where Airmax makes better goodput is interference,
either from your tower or from others. Shielding the Rocket m
unauthorized and may be illegal.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 8:41 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Patrick D
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
wrote:
> Ok, so WDS fixed the latency. At 20mhz channel and 100%ccq what should our
> actual throughput be. We are only seeing 20mbps max.
Airmax should be used on P2P only for high-distance (~50km or more)
links. Keep WDS on but turn Airmax of
Did you do multiple/single UDP/TCP streams? Usually you want to do two or
three to get close to full capacity.
On a 10 Mhz channel I am getting 40 mbps with little noise on 3 foot dishes
at 15 miles.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
This is testing with pc on either end of the radio, plugged in 100fdx ethernet
with iperf. Didn't check ota built-in speedtest. No other traffic on radio.
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 25, 2011, at 4:28 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" wrote:
> How are you testing ?
>
> via Radios or via the Mikrotik's behi
Faisal, call me at 2603074000 this ebening
Rick
Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
>How are you testing ?
>
>via Radios or via the Mikrotik's behind the radios ?
>
>What is the Recieve test by itself showing and what is the Transmit test
>by it'self showing.
>
>also double check to make sure that the MT's an
How are you testing ?
via Radios or via the Mikrotik's behind the radios ?
What is the Recieve test by itself showing and what is the Transmit test
by it'self showing.
also double check to make sure that the MT's and the Radios have
ethernet handshake correct.
You may have to ssh into the ra
Ok, so WDS fixed the latency. At 20mhz channel and 100%ccq what should our
actual throughput be. We are only seeing 20mbps max.
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:40 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" wrote:
> Yes, in the UBIQUITY World, if you want a transparent bridge... use WDS
> (so ... wd
Yes, in the UBIQUITY World, if you want a transparent bridge... use
WDS (so ... wds always !).
and YES, turn on AIRMAX...
(Airmax is proprietary to Ubiquity, so two UBNT radios are much happier
with Airmax on, plus with Airmax is not 'compatible' with standards
802.11a/b/g/n so other ra
x, Jr
> *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2011 11:06 AM
> *To:* WISPA General List
>
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
>
> ** **
>
> The reason I ask is because we are using WDS on some M2 PtMP installations
> to relay connections to neighbors that are near oth
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
The reason I ask is because we are using WDS on some M2 PtMP installations to
relay connections to neighbors that are near other customers. A tech from
UBNT told us that WDS is not designed to work with Airmax and it may be causing
some
: Monday, July 25, 2011 12:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: fai...@snappydsl.net
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
Always do WDS for backhauls.
On Jul 25, 2011 1:31 PM, "Patrick D. Nix, Jr"
wrote:
> It is routed, using miktrotik routers. Do I use WDS with airmax? I
don
Always do WDS for backhauls.
On Jul 25, 2011 1:31 PM, "Patrick D. Nix, Jr"
wrote:
> It is routed, using miktrotik routers. Do I use WDS with airmax? I don't
think it is a loop because the other bridges are basically doing the same
thing but not seeing the same problem. They are Trango link 45's
>
It is routed, using miktrotik routers. Do I use WDS with airmax? I don't think
it is a loop because the other bridges are basically doing the same thing but
not seeing the same problem. They are Trango link 45's
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:04 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" wrote:
> Sounds
Sounds like you are creating a loop somewhere...
Is this a routed network ? or a bridge Network.
(Make sure that you have WDS on for fully transparent bridge)
and also make sure you turn off Enable Discovery in the first tab
(picture of airmax logo)... (equivalent CDP in the cisco world).
Als
person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
illegal.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 11:40 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Rocket M5 Dish high latency
Isn't
Isn't -53 a little too hot?
Are you using WDS? I don't know if AirMax has changed this but I know one used
to need to run with WDS on for a purely transparent bridge.
Greg
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
> We are working on deploying a pair of M5 dishes on our network b
We are working on deploying a pair of M5 dishes on our network bridging
point a and point b. When we plug in the network to the dishes, the
ping times climb to 1200+ms on side b of the bridge, and equipment local
to the side b of the bridge, and time out after two or more hops,
essentially bringin
It's PTP, no idea what PPS I'm getting, it's lightly loaded other then
when iperf testing. We will eventually replace the sector, now that
Nanobridges are out.
Regards
Michael Baird
> Is that a 'ptp' link or a 'ptmp' link?
>
> The sector hints at this being the latter. Also, what sort of pps are
Using only 20 mhz, notice the airspeed is 130/117 which is pretty close
to full modulation.
Regards
Michael Baird
>> I've got a 10 mile link with two Ubiquiti 2ft dishes -60 or so on both
>> sides, I can get 77 megs one way and 58 the other, one side has some
>> noise issues hurting throughput. T
That takes me to a question: Does it make a difference if you use two
RocketdishM5 for both ends or another brand (Mikrotik, StarOS, etc) on
one end?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
> Oops, actually that's wrong. I've got a rocket m5/rocketdish 30 on one
> side, and a rocket
Is that a 'ptp' link or a 'ptmp' link?
The sector hints at this being the latter. Also, what sort of pps are
you seeing on this link?
ryan
On Apr 26, 2010, at 1:13 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
> Oops, actually that's wrong. I've got a rocket m5/rocketdish 30 on one
> side, and a rocket m5/rock
We have a 27 Mile engineered link with Rocket 5's using Pac Wireless 3 foot
dual pole dishes.
-71 db signal 62 down and 38 up on normal days, bad weather days get 40 down
and 23 up.
On 40Mhz channels btw.
Ryan
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Matt wrote:
> > I've got a 10 mile link with two Ubi
> I've got a 10 mile link with two Ubiquiti 2ft dishes -60 or so on both
> sides, I can get 77 megs one way and 58 the other, one side has some
> noise issues hurting throughput. This was mcs15 130/117.
What is the channel size?
Matt
-
I have a nano5 almost 2 miles out that can push 130 in tests.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Rocket M5
What kind of realistic
Oops, actually that's wrong. I've got a rocket m5/rocketdish 30 on one
side, and a rocket m5/rocket 120/19 db sector on the other.
Regards
Michael Baird
> I've got a 10 mile link with two Ubiquiti 2ft dishes -60 or so on both
> sides, I can get 77 megs one way and 58 the other, one side has some
I've got a 10 mile link with two Ubiquiti 2ft dishes -60 or so on both
sides, I can get 77 megs one way and 58 the other, one side has some
noise issues hurting throughput. This was mcs15 130/117.
Regards
Michael Baird
> What kind of realistic throughput are people getting out of these?
> 10, 20
What kind of realistic throughput are people getting out of these?
10, 20 and 40meg channels? Where I want to try one I doubt I can
spare 40meg of 5.8. Was thinking of a 3 foot dual polarity dish and
big backhaul.
Matt
---
37 matches
Mail list logo